الگوی دانشگاه نسل چهارم در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات
محورهای موضوعی :
آموزش و پرورش
سهراب جهانگیری فرد
1
(دانش آموخته دکتری تخصصی مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد گرمسار، گرمسار، ایران)
حمید شفیع زاده
2
(دانشیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد گرمسار، گرمسار، ایران.)
نادر سلیمانی
3
(دانشیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد گرمسار، گرمسار، ایران.)
تاریخ دریافت : 1399/07/29
تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/01/26
تاریخ انتشار : 1401/10/01
کلید واژه:
دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی,
دانشگاه نسل چهارم,
مطالعه موردی,
واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران,
چکیده مقاله :
مقدمه و هدف: برای رشد در محیط متغیر امروزی، سازمانها باید با تغییرات مقابله و از فرصتها بهره برداری کنند ظهور اقتصاد دانش بنیان به همراه مقوله جهانی شدن و ادغام آن با بحرانهای مالی و زیست محیطی، چالشهای بی سابقهای را در طراحی مجدد ماموریتهای یک دانشگاه ایجاد کرده و از طرفی سرعت و پویایی تولید دانش با تغییر سریع انتظارات جامعه نیز مزید بر این علت شده است و باتوجه به این که دانشگاه نسل چهارم پرچم‌دار توسعه اقتصادی محلی و منطقهای ذکر شده لذا هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر، طراحی الگوی دانشگاه نسل چهارم و ارتقای آن در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران بود.
روش شناسی پژوهش: پژوهش حاضر از نوع مطالعه موردی به صورت کیفی با هدف توسعهای ـ کاربردی در زمینه طراحی الگویی جهت ارتقای دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم تحقیقات تهران به دانشگاه نسل چهارم بود.
یافته ها: یافته ها نشان داد که از مهم‌ترین شرایط علّی می‌توان به تغییرات زمانه و الزام به نوآوری اشاره و از عوامل زمینه‌ای مهم می‌توان به محدودیت‌های ساختاری و عملیاتی و از عوامل مداخله‌گر به عوامل محیطی و ساختاری و از راهبردهای اصلی و اثرگذار به راهبردهای آموزش نوین و درنهایت از اهم پیامدهای تبدیل واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران به دانشگاه نسل چهارم می‌توان به پیامدهای اجتماعی و فرهنگی اشاره کرد.
بحث و نتیجه گیری: نتایج نشان از فاصله تا وضع مطلوب داشته و با توجه به شرایط روزِ واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران، باید طبق راهبردهای به‌دست‌آمده، برنامه‌ای جامع بر اساس شرایط روزِ زیست‌بوم و جهان، تدوین‌شده تا حرکت به سوی دانشگاه نسل چهارم تسهیل گردد. شاید بتوان گفت از مهم‌ترین اقدامات لازم، توجه به عقب‌افتادگی و بلوغ نسلی، التزام به برنامه توسط مدیران و ایجاد روابط پایدار و سودآور در جهت مقابله با عوامل مداخله‌گر و کنترل عوامل زمینه‌ای باشد.
چکیده انگلیسی:
Introduction: The main purpose of this study was to design a fourth generation university model and promote it in Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch of Tehran.
research methodology: This research was conducted with an applied purpose and with a qualitative-case approach. The research community included professors, experts and top managers of the Islamic Azad University (related to the Science and Research Unit) Among them, 9 people were selected as the focus group and 15 people as academic experts by purposive theoretical sampling method to achieve theoretical saturation. Data were collected using direct survey and semi-structured in-depth interviews. Data analysis method was content analysis using Strauss and Corbin coding method in three levels: open, axial and selective, which was analyzed in Max Q2020 software. Then the concepts were related in the form of causal conditions, central phenomena, strategies, contextual conditions, intervenors and consequences of classification in the form of a model. The focus group was also used for validation (validity and reliability).
Findings: The results showed that the science and research Unit of Tehran needs special measures due to the gap between its current and desired situation in some indicators of the fourth generation university.
Conclusion: Tehran Science and Research Unit can, based on the presented model and taking into account the changes of time and the requirement for innovation, alignment with the world, attention to society's issues, connection with the industry, expansion of knowledge-based companies, commitment to the developed program, to The fourth generation university should be promoted.
منابع و مأخذ:
1. Aberdeen, T. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 14(1), 69-71. doi:https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v14i1.73
2. Agasisti, T., Barra, C., & Zotti, R. (2019). Research, knowledge transfer, and innovation: The effect of Italian universities’ efficiency on local economic development 2006− 2012. Journal of Regional Science, 59(5), 819-849. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12427
3. Aggarwal Sharma, A., Rao, V. R., & Popli, S. (2013). Measuring consumer-based brand equity for Indian business schools. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 23(2), 175-203. doi:10.1080/08841241.2013.866609
4. Arteta, B. M., & Giachetti, R. E. (2004). A measure of agility as the complexity of the enterprise system. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 20(6), 495-503. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2004.05.008
5. bakhshi, B., khorsan, M., dana, H. h., & tavakoli, S. d. (2014). The consequences study of new communication technologies on the Learning Process. Media studies, 9(25), 139-150.
6. Cai, Y., & Liu, C. (2020). The role of university as institutional entrepreneur in regional innovation system: Towards an analytical framework. In Examining the Role of Entrepreneurial Universities in Regional Development (pp. 133-155): IGI Global.
7. Cao, Y., Zhao, L., & Chen, R. (2009). Institutional structure and incentives of technology transfer: Some new evidence from Chinese universities. Journal of technology management in China.
8. Carayannis, E. G., & Rakhmatullin, R. (2014). The quadruple/quintuple innovation helixes and smart specialisation strategies for sustainable and inclusive growth in Europe and beyond. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(2), 212-239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0185-8
9. Chan, Y. E., & Farrington, C. J. T. (2018). Community-based research: Engaging universities in technology-related knowledge exchanges. Information and Organization, 28(3), 129-139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.08.001
10. Chesbrough, H. W. (2019). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting From Technology (M. S. Kamran Bagheri, Trans. M. Ghanbarian Ed. Vol. 5). tehran: rasa.
11. Devlin, M., & Samarawickrema, G. (2010). The criteria of effective teaching in a changing higher education context. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 111-124. doi:10.1080/07294360903244398
12. Duc, N. H. (2020). The Third Generation University in the Context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 36(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1159/vnuer.4374
13. Etuk, G. K. (2015). Innovations in Nigerian Universities: Perspectives of an Insider from a" Fourth Generation" University. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(3), 218-232.
14. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. 42(3), 293-337. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177%2F05390184030423002
15. Eurostat. (2014). GDP per capita in the EU in 2011: seven capital regions among the ten most.
16. Fazel, A., Kamalian, A., & Rowshan, A. (2017). Identification of Effective Dimensions and Components on Academic Human Resources Empowerment, Emphasizing the Third and Fourth Generation of Universities With Fuzzy Delphi Approach: Presenting a Conceptual Model Bimonthly of Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, 10(6), 455-468.
17. Foroghi, D., Haghighi Parapari, M., & Rasaiian, A. (2012). Feasibility of the Implementation of Activity-Based Costing (ABC) in Operational Budgeting of Government Agencies (A Case Study of Government Agencies of Isfahan Province). Journal of Health Accounting, 1(1), 47-62. doi:10.30476/jha.2012.16586
18. Frodeman, R., Klein, J. T., & Pacheco, R. C. D. S. (2017). The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity: Oxford University Press.
19. Fu, H., Kleinberg, R. D., Lavi, R., & Smorodinsky, R. (2017). Job security, stability, and production efficiency. Theoretical Economics, 12(1), 1-24. doi:https://doi.org/10.3982/TE2016
20. Gaffar, A. M., Magzoub, M. E. M. A., & Mahmoud, I. (2020). Do community-based Medical Schools Produce More Community-based Research? A Review of Four Medical Schools in Sudan and Saudi Arabia. Health Professions Education, 6(1), 19-30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2019.02.001
21. Giuri, P., Munari, F., Scandura, A., & Toschi, L. (2019). The strategic orientation of universities in knowledge transfer activities. Technological Forecasting Social Change, 138, 261-278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.030
22. Goudarzvand chegini, M. (2018). The fourth generation university labor; and action approach (case studies: Cambridge, Stanford, and Harvard universities. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 20(78), 1-16. doi:10.22047/ijee.2018.128487.1541
23. Gregory, D., Meusburger, P., & Suarsana, L. (2015). Power, knowledge, and space: A geographical introduction. In Geographies of knowledge and power (pp. 1-18): Springer.
24. Hashemnia, S., Emadzadeh, M., Samadi, S., & Saketi, P. (2009). Effective Factors on Earmarked Revenues of Researches in Iranian Universities of Technology. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 15(2), 1-21.
25. Hayter, C. S., Lubynsky, R., & Maroulis, S. (2017). Who is the academic entrepreneur? The role of graduate students in the development of university spinoffs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(6), 1237-1254. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9470-y
26. Judson, K. M., & Taylor, S. (2014). Moving from marketization to marketing of higher education: The co-creation of value in higher education. Higher education studies, 4(1), 51-67.
27. kamali, y. (2014). Study the role of administrative decentralization on administrative integrity. Quarterly Journal of The Macro and Strategic Policies, 2(Vol 2- No5), 111-132.
28. Laptevа, A. V., & Efimov, V. S. (2016). New generation of universities. University 4.0. Journal of Siberian Federal University, 9(11), 2681-2695.
29. Leff, G. (1992). 1994:“The trivium and the Three Philosophies”; North, J.,“The quadrivium”. A History of the University in Europe I: Universities in the Middle Ages, 306-358.
30. Lowe, R., & Yasuhara, Y. (2016). The origins of higher learning: knowledge networks and the early development of universities: Taylor & Francis.
31. Lukovics, M., & Zuti, B. (2017a). New functions of universities in century XXI towards “Fourth Generation” universities. academia. edu, 9. doi:https://ssrn.com/abstract=3022727
32. Lukovics, M., & Zuti, B. (2017b). Successful universities towards the improvement of regional competitiveness:‘fourth generation’universities. Available at SSRN 3022717. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3022717
33. Manning, P. (2020). Disciplines and Their Evolution. In Methods for Human History (pp. 83-90): Springer.
34. Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education in East Asia and Singapore: rise of the Confucian Model. Higher Education, 61(5), 587-611. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9384-9
35. Mariani, G., Carlesi, A., & Scarfò, A. A. (2018). Academic spinoffs as a value driver for intellectual capital: the case of the University of Pisa. Journal of Intellectual Capital. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-03-2017-0050
36. Mehdi, R., & Shafi'i, M. (2018). Role-building and capacity building of fourth generation universities for local and regional development. Journal of Industry and University, 10(35), 1-22.
37. Michael, B., & Popov, M. (2016). How Does Government Size and Structure Respond Empirically to Changes in its Organisational Environment? Public Organization Review, 16(2), 269-283. doi:10.1007/s11115-015-0306-2
38. Mostafaei, S. M. R., Malekian, F., Kaviani, E., & Karamafrooz, M. J. (2019). Desingning the Entrepreneurial University Model based on Grounded theory (case study: units of Islamic Azad University of West Iran(Journal of Management and Planning In Educational System, 12(2), 41-74. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.29252/mpes.12.2.41
39. Mousavi, S. H., Salehi Omran, I., Mousavi, S. M., & ferasatkhah, m. (2020). Identifying the Barriers to Entrepreneurial University Ecosystem Development. Journal of Research on Management of Teaching in Marine Sciences, 6(4), 35-51.
40. Naderi, A. (2017). Meta-analysis of Iranian students' political participation: a study of the effectiveness of explanatory factors. Sociological Studies (Former Social Science Letter), 24(1), 259-290. doi:10.22059/JSR.2017.63556
41. Neale, P., Thapa, S., & Boyce, C. (2006). Preparing a case study: A guide for designing and conducting a case study for evaluation input: Pathfinder international Watertown, MA.
42. Nekavand, M., Jafari, P., & Arasteh, H. (2018). The role of teaching-learning environment on student engagement in medical science students. MEDICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL, 28(1), 58-65. doi:10.29252/iau.28.1.58
43. O’Connor, R. (2012). Using grounded theory coding mechanisms to analyze case study and focus group data in the context of software process research. In Research methodologies, innovations and philosophies in software systems engineering and information systems (pp. 256-270): IGI Global.
44. Oztel, H. (2019). Fourth Generation University: Co-creating a Sustainable Future. In W. Leal Filho, A. M. Azul, L. Brandli, P. G. Özuyar, & T. Wall (Eds.), Quality Education (pp. 1-13). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
45. Papadimitriou, A. (2020). Beyond rhetoric: Reinventing the public mission of higher education. In: Springer.
46. Patton, M. Q. (2011). Essentials of utilization-focused evaluation: Sage.
47. Pawłowski, K. (2009). The ‘Fourth Generation University’ as a Creator of the Local and Regional Development. Higher Education in Europe, 34(1), 51-64. doi:10.1080/03797720902747017
48. Penn-Edwards, S., & Donnison, S. (2014). A fourth generation approach to transition in the first year in higher education: First year in higher education community of practice (FYHECoP). International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 5(1), 31-41. doi:https://doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v5i1.190
49. Perez-Esparrells, C., & Orduna-Malea, E. (2018). Do the technical universities exhibit distinct behaviour in global university rankings? A Times Higher Education (THE) case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 48, 97-108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.04.007
50. Pietsch, T. (2015). Empire of scholars: Universities, networks and the British academic world 1850–1939: Manchester University Press.
51. Pourezzat, A. a., & ghasemi, f. (2018). Impression of excellence-directed and knowledge-based libraries Along the development of new generations of university. Journal of Academic librarianship and Information Research, 51(4), 13-38. doi:10.22059/jlib.2017.61316
52. Rubens, A., Spigarelli, F., Cavicchi, A., & Rinaldi, C. (2017). Universities’ third mission and the entrepreneurial university and the challenges they bring to higher education institutions. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People
53. Places in the Global Economy.
54. sadeghi, m., niazazari, k., & Yazdi, M. T. (2019). Examining the dimensions of the virtual approach to the development of fourth generation universities. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 9(36), 41-25.
55. Samadi-Miarkolaei, H., & Samadi-Miarkolaei, H. (2019). Towards the Wise University: the Third Academic Revolution %J Science and Technology Policy Letters. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Letters, 09(2), 43-66.
56. Secundo, G., & Elia, G. (2014). A performance measurement system for academic entrepreneurship: a case study. Measuring Business Excellence. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-11-2013-0061
57. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research: sage.
58. Symaco, L. P., & Tee, M. Y. (2019). Social responsibility and engagement in higher education: Case of the ASEAN. International Journal of Educational Development, 66, 184-192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.10.001
59. Torkzadeh, J., & Fereidooni, F. (2018). Predicting the Prevalence of Organizational-Political Behaviors Based on Different Types of Organizational Climates. Journal of Applied Sociology, 29(3), 117-138. doi:10.22108/jas.2018.98642.0
60. Urdari, C., Farcas, T. V., & Tiron-Tudor, A. (2017). Assessing the legitimacy of HEIs’ contributions to society. Sustainability Accounting, Management Policy Journal. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2015-0108
61. Välimaa, J., & Nokkala, T. (2014). The dimensions of social dynamics in comparative studies on higher education. Higher Education, 67(4), 423-437. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9684-y
62. Vijaya Anuradha, R., Lokanadha Reddy, G., Shailaja, M., & Vijaya Vardhini, S. (2020). Job Satisfaction and Personal & Professional Efficiency of University Teachers. The International journal of analytical and experimental modal analysis.
63. Whyte, W. H. (2015). Redbrick: A social and architectural history of Britain's civic universities: Oxford University Press, USA.
64. Xiao, J., & Wilkins, S. (2015). The effects of lecturer commitment on student perceptions of teaching quality and student satisfaction in Chinese higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(1), 98-110. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2014.992092
65. Yaghoubi, N., Dehghani, M., & Omidvar, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial University Agility Model with Knowledge Management Approach. Management Researches, 12(43), 185-204. doi:10.22111/jmr.2019.4749
66. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th ed.): sage.
67. Zakizadeh, E., Naeini, M. T., & Ahmadi, S. M. S. (1398). Explain the principles of transparency and freedom of information as components of good governance in the light of the legal system governing government contracts. Quarterly Journal of Private and Criminal Law Research, 39(1), 81-102.
68. Zuti, B., & Lukovics, M. (2015). ”Fourth Generation” Universities and Regional Development. ERSA international workshop, 14-31.
_||_
