اثر میانجی یادگیری سازمانی بر رابطه بین مهندسی مجدد و عملکرد سازمانی (مورد: کارکنان دانشگاه تهران)

محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورش

جواد پورکریمی ¹ (استادیار مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران)
امین هماینی دمیرچی ² (دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران)
سجاد قارلقی ³ (دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران)
محمدرضا کرمی ⁴ (دانشجوی دکتری اقتصاد و مدیریت مالی آموزش عالی، دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران)

تاریخ دریافت : 1397/04/10 تاریخ پذیرش : 1397/08/28 تاریخ انتشار : 1397/12/01

کلید واژه: یادگیری سازمانی, کارکنان, عملکرد سازمانی, مهندسی مجدد,

چکیده مقاله :

هدف از اجرای این پژوهش بررسی تاثیر مهندسی مجدد بر عملکرد سازمانی با نقش میانجی یادگیری سازمانی بود. روش پژوهش، توصیفی – همبستگی با تاکید بر معادلات ساختاری بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش را کلیه کارکنان دانشگاه تهران (3237 نفر) تشکیل می‌دادند. برای تعیین حجم نمونه از فرمول کوکران استفاده شد و تعداد 343 نفر به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند که گزینش آن‌ها با استفاده از روش طبقه‌ای متناسب صورت گرفت. جمع‌آوری داده‌ها براساس سه پرسشنامه مهندسی مجدد، یادگیری سازمانی و عملکرد سازمانی صورت گرفت که ضریب آلفای کرونباخ آن‌ها به ترتیب 87/0، 92/0 و 88/0 به دست آمد و روایی صوری و محتوایی آن‌ها با استفاده از نظر متخصصان تایید شد. تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها به کمک دو نرم‌افزار SPSS و LISREL صورت پذیرفت. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد: مهندسی مجدد بر یادگیری سازمانی و عملکرد سازمانی تاثیر مثبت و معنی‌داری دارد و یادگیری سازمانی نیز بر عملکرد سازمانی تاثیر مثبت و معنی داری دارد. همچنین نقش میانجی یادگیری سازمانی در رابطه بین مهندسی مجدد و عملکرد سازمانی تایید شد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of Re-engineering on organizational performance with the role of mediator of organizational learning. Research method was descriptive- correlation With an emphasis on structural equations. statistical population of the research consists of all staff of Tehran University (N=3237). Cochran formula was used to determine the sample size And 343 individuals were selected as the sample that Thier selection was done by proportional stratified method. Data collection based on the three questionnaire Re-engineering, organizational learning and organizational performance was performed which their Cronbach's alpha coefficient was Obtain respectively 0.87, 0.92 & 0.887 and face and content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by experts. Data analysis was performed using the SPSS and LISREL. The method results showed that Re-engineering on organizational learning and organizational performance has a positive and significant impact and Organizational learning has a positive and significant impact on organizational performance. As well as the role of mediator of organizational learning was confirmed in the relationship between the Re-engineering and organizational performance.

منابع و مأخذ:

• Ahmad, S., Schroeder, R.G., (2003). The impact of human resource management practices on operational performance. Journal of Operational Management, 21, 19-43.


• Ahmadi, H. (2013). The Relationship between distributed leadership and organizational performance primary school teachers in city Tehran, Master thesis, Tehran University.[in Persian]


• Alipour, F., Idris, K., Ismail, I.A., Anak Uli, J., & Karimi, R. (2011). Learning organization and organizational performance: Mediation role of entrepreneurship. European Journal of Social Sciences, 21(4).


• Andy C. L.; Yeung, K. H. L. & Rachel, W. Y. Y. (2007). Organizational learning, innovativeness, and organizational performance: A qualitative investigation. International Journal of Production Research, 45(11), pp. 2459-2477.


• Arabi, Sayed Mohammad; dehghan, Nabiallah; aghula, Farid (2011). Customs Import Process Reengineering Iran,Magazine Review Commercia, l46: 73-63. .[in Persian]


• Argyris, C. & Schon, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A theory of action perspective. MA: Addison-Wesley.


• Asadi, Hassan; Ghanbarpour nosrati, Amir, ghorbani, Mohammadhossien; dousti, Morteza. (2009). The relationship between learning and organizational performance of Physical Education Organization of Islamic Republic of Iran, Journal of Sport Management, (1): 247-237. .[in Persian]


• Bahreyni, Sayed Sadegh (2006). Analytical review of the implementation of re-engineering processes in higher education. Journal of Andish-e-Sadegh. (23): 106-83. .[in Persian]


• Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and the Theory of Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.


• Boyce, M. E. (2003). Organizational Learning is Essential to Achieving and Sustaining Change in Higher Education. Innovative Higher Education, 28(2), pp. 119-136.


• Chich-Jen, S. (2011). Study on the relations among the customer knowledgemanagement, learning organization, and organizational performance. The Service Industries Journal, 31(5), pp. 791-807.


• Chiva, R., Alegre, J., Lapiedra, R., (2007). Measuring organisational learning capability among the workforce. International Journal of Manpower 28, 224-242.


• Crossan, M.M., Kane, H.W., White, R.E., (1999). An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review 24, 522-537.


• Demers, D. (2009). The relationship between perceptions of learning organization characteristics and firm performance. Unpublished Ph.D., The Pennsylvania State University, United States - Pennsylvania.


• Dixon, N. (1998). The organizational learning cycle: How we can learn collectively. Gower: Brookfield.


• Doyle, W. & Young, J. D. (2007). Workplace learning strategies of managers in small andlarge firms in knowledge-based industries. Proceedings of the University Forum on Human Resource Development, June 27-29, Oxford, UK.


• Eikebrokk, T. R. & Olsen, D. H. (2009). Training, competence, and business performance:Evidence from E-business in European small and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of E-Business Research, 5 (1), pp. 92-116.


• Ellinger, A., et al. (2002). “The relationship between the learning organization concept and firms’ financial performance : An empirical assessment”. Human Resource Development Quarterly, (1), PP:5-21.


• Gadot, Eran Vigoda(2006). Leadership style, organizational politics, and employees’ performance An empirical examination of two competing models, Personnel Review Vol. 36 No. 5, 2007 pp. 661-683  www.emeraldinsight.com/0048-3486.htm.


• ghasemi, Rahim; Saeedi, Farid (2012). Re-engineering of the supply chain: an overview of the most important methods and models recent, Journal of Supply Chain Management, Fourteen years 38: 53-44. .[in Persian]


• GHorbani, Mahmoud; Alishad, Davoud (2006), re-engineering and its position in the organization, Journal of Management, 110-109, 1385: 35-29. [in Persian]


• Ghouchani, Farokh; Zamani, Fayeze. (2011). Re-engineering capabilities to improve their competitive strategies, Journal of  Strategic Management Studies, 6, 1390: 117-103. [in Persian]


• Gitinama, Sahar; Soleymaniha, Mojtaba (2010). Appropriate methodology re-engineering in higher education institutions, the monthly tadbir, 216: 41-36. [in Persian]


• Granberg, O. (1998). Lärande organizationer. Professionella yrkesöverares strategier vid organisatorisk föränring. Stockholm universtitet, Pedagogiska instititutionen: Stockholm.


• Hair J.F.,Jr., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R. E., Tatham R.L.,(2010), Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.) New Jersy: Pearson Education.


• He-Chuan, S. (2010). Conceptual clarifications for organizationallearning, learning organization and a learning organization. Human Resource Development International, 6(2), p. 153-166.


• Homan, HeydarAli (2009). Structural equation modeling using LISREL software, Tehran, Publishers samt. .[in Persian]


• Jensen, P. E. (2005). A contextual theory of learning and the learning organization. Knowledgeand Process Management, 12(1), pp. 53-64.


• Jerez Gomez, P., Céspedes Lorente, J.J., Valle Cabrera, R., (2004). Training practices and organisational learning capability. Journal of European Industrial Training 28, 234-256.


• Kalmuk, G., & Acar, A. Z. (2015). The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning Capability on the Relationship Between Innovation and Firm's Performance: A Conceptual Framework. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210, 164-169.


• Kim, D.H., (1993). The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review 33, 37-50.


• Kline, R. B. (2010), Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3th Ed.). New York: Guilford Press.


• Kock, H. (2007). The team as a learning strategy: Three cases of team-based production in theSwedish manufacturing industry. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(8), pp. 480-96.


• Kocoglu, I., Imamoglu, S. Z., & İnce, H. (2011). The relationship between organizational learning and firm performance: The mediating roles of innovation and TQM. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 9(3), 72-88.


• Kroeger, J.W. (2007). "Firm performance as a function of entrepreneurial organization and strategic planning practices", Doctoral dissertation, Department of Management and Labor Relations, Cleveland state university.


• Kululanga, G. K.; Edum-Fotwe, F. T.; & McCaffer, R. (2010). Measuring construction contractors'organizational learning. Building Research & Information, 29(1), pp. 21-29.


• Mahmoudi, Mehrdad. (2011). organizational learning Human - centered, message sea, 205: 47-44. .[in Persian]


• Marquart, Michael (2006). Creating a learning organization. Translator Reza Zali, city Tehran: University of Tehran, Center for Entrepreneurship. [in Persian]


• Michael Hammer, beyond re-engineering again, Translator Abdoreza, Rezainejad (1999). First Edition, Publishers rasa.[in Persian]


• Minvielle, E & et al. (2008). “Assessing organizational performance in Intensive care units: A French experience”. Journal of Critical Care, 23, PP:236-244.


• Mirkamali, Seyed-mohammad (2010).Educational Leadership & Administration, Tehran Yastoroon publication.[in Persian]


• Mohaghar, Ali; Shafighzadhe, Mohammad (2010). The role of organizational empowerment in the success of the implementation of re-engineering (study: Selected organizations of Iran), Journal of Science and Technology, the first year, (2): 116-97. [in Persian]


• Morales, V.J.; Garcı´, A.; Lopez, F.J.; Martı´n & Llamas-Sa´, R. (2007). Strategic factors and barriers for promoting educational organizational learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, pp. 478-502.


• Mortazavi, Said; Doayi, Habibullah (1995). Organizational development at the University, Journal of Studies improvement and Evolution management, 17 and 18: 102-85. [in Persian]


• Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H., (1995). The Knowledge-creating Company. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.


• Panahifar, Farhad. (2010). Increasing the efficiency of production planning in an ETO system using re-engineering, Journal of Industrial Engineering, Year 20, Number 127: 15-12. .[in Persian]


• Popadiuk, S., Choo, S.W., (2006). Innovation and knowledge creation: how are these concepts related? International Journal of Infor- mation Management 26, 302-312.


• Rahnavard, Farajollah (1999) organizational learning and learning organization. Journal of Public Administration, 43: 22-11.[in Persian]


• Ruth, A. & Sudi, S. (2010). Organizational learning and resistance to change in Estonian companies. Human Resource Development International, 5(3), pp. 313-331.


• Sampe, P. (2012). The influence of organizational learning on performance in Indonesian SMEs, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Southern Cross University


• Sepehri, M (2002). Re-engineering processes organization, the Monthly Tadbir. 122: 53-50.[in Persian].


• ShahiBeyk, Azade; Hashemi, Leila. (2005). Re-engineering human resources through information technology, the monthly Tadbir, 163: 37-34. .[in Persian]


• Sharif-Zadeh, Fatah. (2000). The role re-engineering and information technology to improvement organizational performance, Journal of Studies improvement and Evolution management, 27 and 28: 48-25. .[in Persian]


• Slater, S.F., Narver, J.C., (1994). Market oriented isn’t enough: build a learning organizational. In: Marketing Science Insti- tute Report, N. 94-103. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.


• Srensen, J.B. (2002). “The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, PP:70-91.


• Swee, C. G., Catherine, E., & Tony, K. Q. (2012). The relationship between learning capability and business performance. 18 (3): pp. 275-283.


• Taleghani, Mohammad; malek‌Akhlagh, Esmail (2007). The Role re-engineering in improving organizational processes, Journal of Management, 119 and 120: 27-21. [in Persian]


• Tennant, Charles., Wu, Yi-Chieh., (2005) “The application of business process reengineering in the UK”. The TQM Magazine , pp. 537-545.


• Torkzadeh, Jafar; Sabaghiyan, Zahra. (2006). Organizational development in today's conditions, the nature and scope,  Magazine Outlook Business Commercial, number 19 and 20: 133-112. .[in Persian]


• Tsang, E. W. K. (1997). Organizational learning and the learning organization: A dichotomy between descriptive and prescriptive research. Human Relations, 50(1), pp. 73-89.


• Vaezi, Reza; Abbasi, Zeynab. (2006). Regarding reengineering and learning organization. Journal of Industrial Management Studies, Year 5. 12: 131-152. .[in Persian]


• Wang,hui;keneth s.law;zhen xiong chen(2008). Leader-member exchange, employee performance, and work outcomes: an empirical study in the Chinese context,International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1809–1824.


• Watkins, K; Marsick, V.,( 2003). Dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire (DLOQ). Sanfransisco.


• Yu-jun, Miao., (2010). “How Does the Enterprise Implement Business Process Reengineering Management”. s.l. : IEEE, International Conference on E-Business and E-Government pp. 4100-4102.

• Zahabioun, Shahla; Yousefi, Alireza (2007). The compliance Features organizational of education city Esfahan With Features learning organization From the perspective of teachers in year 1385-85. Knowledge and Research in Educational Sciences. (14).[in Persian].