Effect of silica Nanoparticles on Basil (Ocimum basilicum) Under Salinity Stress

Subject Areas : Journal of Chemical Health Risks

Manizheh  Kalteh ¹ (Department of Soil Science, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran)
Zarrin Taj  Alipour ² (Department of Soil Science, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran)
Shahram  Ashraf ³ (Department of Soil Science, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran)
Maryam  Marashi Aliabadi ⁴ (Department of Soil Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
Alireza  Falah Nosratabadi ⁵ (Department of Soil Biology, Soil and Water Research Institute, Tehran, Iran)

Received: 2014-08-24 Accepted : 2018-10-29 Published : 2018-10-29

Keywords: Silica, pollution, Salinity, basil, Proline chlorophyll,

Abstract :

Application of nanofertilizers is one of the promising methods for increasing resources use efficiency and reducing environmental pollutions. Uncontrolled application of chemical fertilizer and pesticides has caused many problems to human health and domestic animals. Nanofertilizers application could be a suitable way to reduce these problems. Accordingly, in order to assess the silicon nanoparticles effect on some vegetative features of basil under salinity stress, a factorial experiment based on a completely randomized design with three replications was conducted in greenhouse condition. Treatments included different levels of silicon fertilizer (without silicon, normal silicon fertilizer and silicon nanoparticles) and salinity stress (1, 3 and 6 ds/m). Physiological traits (chlorophyll and proline content of leaves) and morphological traits (shoot fresh weight and dry weight) were investigated in this study. Results showed a significant reduction in growth and development indices due to the salinity stress.  Leaf dry and fresh weight reduced by increment in NaCl concentration while significantly (P≤0.01) increased with silicon nanoparticles application. The chlorophyll content reduced in salinity stress, but increased by silicon nanoparticles treatment. Proline content increased under salinity stress which was a response to stress. Moreover, proline increased by silicon nanoparticles which was due to tolerance induction in plant. Silicon nanoparticles application reduced the pollution effects originated from salinity in Basil.

References:

1. Jafari M., 1994.Salinity and Halophytes. Bulletin No. 90, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Tehran, Iran,
2. Baruah S., Dutta J., 2009. Nanotechnology applications in sensing and pollution degradation in agriculture. Environ Chem Lett. 7(3): 191-204.
3. Elawad S.H., Gascho G.J., Street J.J., 1982. Response of sugarcane to silicate source and rate. I: growth and yield. Agron J. 74: 781-783.
4. Liang Y.C., 1999. Effects of silicon on enzyme activity and sodium, potassium and calcium concentration in barely under salt stress. Plant Physiol. 29: 217-224.
5. Ma J.F., 2004. Role of silicon in enhancing the re-sistance of plant to biotic and abiotic stresses. Soil Science. 50: 11-18.
6. Ma J.F., Takahashi E., 2002. Soil, Fertilizer and Plant Silicon Research in Japan, Elsevier: The Netherlands.
7. Wang J., Naser N. 1994. Improved performance of carbon paste ampermeric biosensors through the incorporation of fumed silica. Electroanalysis. 6: 571- 575.
8. Gao X., Zou C.H., Wang L., Zhang F., 2006. Silicon decreases transpiration rate and conductance from stomata of maize plants. J Plant Nutr. 29: 1637- 1647.
9. Rezaei R., Hoseini S.M., Shabanali Fami H., Safa L., 2010. Identification and analysis of barriers in the development of nanotechnology in Iran agriculture sector from the researchers point of view. Sci Technol Policy. 2 (1): 17-26.
10. Fan Z.H., Lu J.G., 2003. Zinc oxide nanostructures: synthesis and properties. Science. 300: 1269-1280.
11. Wurth B., 2007. Emissions of Engineered and Unintentionally Produced Nanoparticles to the Soil. Diploma Thesis, ETH Zurich.
12. Derosa M.R., Monreal C., Schmitzer M., Walsh R., Sultan Y., 2010. Nanotechnology in fertilizers. Nat Nanotechnol. 1: 193-225.
13. Lawrence B.M., 1988. A Further Examination of the Variation of Ocimum basilicum L. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Essential Oil, Fragrances and Flavors, Washington DC, US.
14. Grayer R.J., Kite G.C., Goldstone F.G., Bryan S.E., Paton A., Putiersky E., 1996. Infra specific taxonomy and essential oil chemotypes in sweet basil, Ocimum basilicum. Phytochemistry. 43: 1033-1039.
15. Arnon D.I., 1956. Photosynthesis by isolated chloroplast IV. General concept and comparison of three Photochemical reactions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 20: 499-461.
16. Bates L.S., Waldern R.P., Teave I.D., 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil. 39: 205-207.
17. Munns R., Termat A., 1986. Whole plant response to salinity. Aust J Plant Physiol. 13: 143-160.
18. Munns R., Greenway H., Delane R., Gibbs R., 1982. Ion concentration and carbohydrate status of the elongating leaf tissue of Hordeum vulgare growing at high external NaCl. Plant Toxicol. 33: 574-583.
19. Rawson, H.M., Iong, M.J., Munns, R. 1988. Growth and development in NaCl treated plants. J Plant Physiol. 15, 519-527.
20. Munns R., 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 25, 239-250.
21. Raven J.A., 1983. Transport and function of silicon in plants. Biological Reviews. 58, 179-207.
22. Marschner H., 1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plant. Academic Press, US.