تاثیر رهبری تحول‌آفرین بر عملکرد شغلی اعضای هیات علمی با میانجی‌گری درگیری شغلی

محورهای موضوعی : خطمشی‌گذاری عمومی در مدیریت

عبدالعلی جلالی ¹ , احمدعلی روح‌الهی ²

1 - عضو هیات علمی، گروه آموزشی مراقبت پرواز، دانشکده پرواز، دانشگاه هوایی شهید ستاری، تهران، ایران
2 - عضو هیات علمی، گروه آموزشی مراقبت پرواز، دانشکده پرواز، دانشگاه هوایی شهید ستاری، تهران، ایران.

تاریخ دریافت : 1394/11/29 تاریخ پذیرش : 1394/12/03 تاریخ انتشار : 1394/12/26

کلید واژه: درگیری شغلی, رهبری تحولی, عملکرد شغلی, اعضای هیات علمی,

چکیده مقاله :

هدف پژوهش حاضر ارائة راهکارهای کاربردی به‌منظور بهبود عملکرد شغلی اعضای هیات علمی، بر اساس رهبری تحول‌آفرین و عملکرد شغلی است. این پژوهش از لحاظ هدف کاربردی و از نظر روش، توصیفی همبستگی است. در این پژوهش ابتدا مدل نظری و فرضیه‌های پژوهش توسعه داده شد. سپس به کمک مدل معادلات ساختاری و آزمون رگرسیون فرضیه‌های پژوهش بررسی شدند. جامعة آماری تحقیق، اعضای هیات علمی یکی از مراکز دانشگاهی نظامی است. بدین منظور نمونه‌ای برابر با 210 نفر بر اساس جدول مورگان و به روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی به دست آمد. داده‌ها از طریق پرسشنامه جمع‌آوری شد. برای اندازه گیری سطح درگیری شغلی از پرسش‌نامه درگیری شغلی کانونگو (1982) با 10 گویه، عملکرد شغلی از پرسش‌نامه پاترسون (1970) با 15 گویه و رهبری تحولی از پرسش‌نامه باس و الولیو (2006) با 20 گویه استفاده گردید. پایایی ابزارهای تحقیق از طریق الفای کرونباخ مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. روایی ابزارها از طریق روایی محتوا و سازه‌ای مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. نتایج به دست آمده از پژوهش نشان داد که رهبری تحول‌آفرین بر عملکرد شغلی اعضای هیات علمی تأثیر مثبت داشته و نقش میانجی‌گری درگیری شغلی در تأثیر رهبری تحول‌آفرین بر عملکرد شغلی اعضای هیات علمی به تأیید رسید. از سوی دیگر، تحلیل رگرسیون نشان داد که مولفه‌ی حمایت‌های رشد دهنده، بیشترین تاثیر بر عملکرد شغلی دارد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The main objective of present study is to provide applicable measures for betterment the job performance of faculty members, based on transformational leadership and job performance. With respect of objectives, this study is the applied research and with respect of methodology, is a correlation-descriptive one. In this paper, Firstly, the theoretical model and research hypotheses have been developed, and then by using structural equation modeling (SME), research hypotheses were examined. The statistical population of this study consisted of all faculty members of a military university which 210 person of them have been selected randomly via Morgan table. Research data were collected via questionnaires. For measuring job involvement Kanungo (1982) with 10 items, job performance form Paterson (1970) with 15 items and finally transformational leadership measured by Bass and Avoilo (2006)   questionnaire have been used. Reliability of research tools have been investigated by Cronbach’s alpha. Validity of them have been test by content and--.  Research finding indicated that all hypotheses were verified then: transformational leadership has positive effect on faculty member’s job performance and the role of job involvement as a moderator between transformational leadership and job performance was verified. In the other word, regression analysis shows that grower supporting component of transformational leadership has maximum effect on job performance.

منابع و مأخذ:

• Abzaree, M.; Ranjbari, B.; Fathi, S.; Ghorbani, H. (2009). Effect of internal marketing on marketing and job performance in hotel industry, mamagemnet overwiev, 31, 57-42.


• Babin, B.J. & Boles, J.S. (1996). The effects of perceived co-worker involvement and supervisor support on service


• Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration, technological studies, 2 (2), 285-309


• Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press


• Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006), Transformational Leadership, Mahwah, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates


• Bighteli, E., Karimzadeh, S. (2005). Investigation of factor effecting on psychological health of nurses of Seman, Semnan human science journal, 8 (2), 25-21.


• Borman, W. C., and Motowidlo, J. S. (1993), "Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include elements of Contextual Performance", In N. Schmitt and C., Borman (Eds). Personnel Selection in Organizations, 9, 71-98


• Bowen, F. E., Rostami, M., & Steel, P. (2010). Timing is everything: A meta-analysis of the relationships between organizational performance and innovation Journal of Business Research, 63 (11), pp. 1179–1185


• Brown, B. B., 1996, Employees' Organizational Commitment and Their Perception of Supervisors' Relations–Oriented and Task–Oriented Leadership Behaviors, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia polytechnic Institute and state university, Virginia


• Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., and Slaughter, J. E. (2011) Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64 (1):89-136


• Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika


• Daren E, H. (2005). The relationship between transformational leadership and organizational performance in the largest public companies in Canada, MSc thesis


• Davari, A., Rezazadeh, A., (2013). SEM with Smart PLS, jihad university publication.


• DeCarufel, A., & Schaan, J-L. (1990). the impact of compressed work weeks on police job involvement. Canadian Police College, 14, 81–97


• Felstead, A., & Gallie, D. (2004). For better or worse? Nonstandard jobs and high involvement work systems. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15 (7), 1293-1316


• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measuring error. Journal of High Technology Management Reasearch. 39-50


• Hafer, J.C., & Martin, T.N. (2006).Job Involvement or Affective Commitment: A Sensitivity Analysis Study of Apathetic Employee Mobility. Institute of Behavioral and Applied Management. September 1.University of Nebraska at omaha


• Hensler, J., Ringle, C., & Sinkovics, R. (2009). The use of patial least square based multi group analysis: in. advance in international marketing 20.Nunnaly, J., & Bernsten, I. (1994). Psychometric theory. New york: Mc Graw Hill


• Herndon CB (2007). An Analysis of the Relationship between Servant Leadership, School Culture and Student Achievement. A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the degree Doctor of Philosophy; University of Missoury


• Hirschfeld, Robert, R. (2006). Achievement orientation and psychological Involvement in job tasks: The interactive effects of work alienation and intrinsic job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol 32, Issue 8, 1663-1681


• Hollenbeck, J. R., Connolly, T., & Rabinowitz, S. (1982). Job involvement 1977- 1981. Beyond the exploratory stage. Working Paper, Michigan State University, Ann Arbor: MI


• Hulland, j (1999). Use of partial least squres in stratgic management research: a review of four recent studies. stratgic management journal. 195-20


• Jung, D. I.,Chow, C. & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings, The Leadership Quarterly, NO.14, PP. 525–544


• Kanungo, R.N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 341-349


• Kark, J. (2005). The Transformational Leader. Who is (s)he? A Feminist Perspective”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 17, No. 2


• Karsoun, T. L., 1995, Relation between Employees' Religiosity and Job Involvement, Psychological Report, No. 93, pp. 867-75.


• Lodahl, T. M., &Kejner, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal Applied syclogical, 49, 24-33


• Macey, W. H. and Schneider, B. (2008) The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1 (1): 3-30


• Moynihan, D. P., Pandey, S. K., and Wright, B. E. (2009) Pulling the Levers: Leadership, Public Service Motivation and Mission Valence. Paper presented at the International Public Service Motivation Research Conference, June 7-9


• Nemanich, L. A., & Keller, R. T. (2007). Transformational leadership in an acquisition: A field study of employees.The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 49–68


• Osborn, R.N. & Marion, R. (2009), “Contextual leadership, transformational leadership and the performance of international innovation seeking alliances. Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp: 191-206


• Paullay, I. M., Alliger, G. M., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1994). Construct validation of two instruments designed to measure job involvement and work centrality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 224-228


• Peterson, S. J., Walumbwa, F. O., Byron, K., & Myrowitz, J. (2009).CEO positive psychological traits, transformational leadership, and firm performance in high technology start-up and established firms. Journal of Management, 35, 348-368


• Piccolo, R. F., & Colquitt, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 327–340


• Poper, M., Mayseless, O. and Castelnovo, O. (2000), “Transformational Leadership and Attachment”, Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 2


• Purvanova, R. K., Bono, J. E., and Dzieweczynski, J. (2006) Transformational leadership, job characteristics, and organizational citizenship performance. Human Performance, 19 (1): 1-22


• Rabinowitz, S., & Hall, D. T. (1977). Organizational research on job involvement. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 265-288


• Rich, B. L., LePine, J. A., and Crawford, E. R. (2010) Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53 (3): 617-635


• Sanjaghi, M.; Farrahi, B., Hosseini, S. (2011). Effect of transformational leadership on organizational culture and organizational commitment in a military organization, defense strategics journal, 9 (32), 136-111


• Sashkin, M., & Sashkin, M. (2003). Leadership that matters. San Francisco: berrettkoehler publishers Inc


• Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A.B. (2002). The measurement of Engagement and burnout: A confirmative analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3,71-92


• Waldman, D. A., Ramirez, G. G., House, R. J., & Puraman, P. (2001). Does leadership matter? CEO leader attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 134–143


• Wang, X., Liao, J., Xia, D., and Chang, T. (2010) The impact of organizational justice on work performance. International Journal of Manpower, 31 (6): 660-677


• Wenxia, Zh., & Bo, Li. (2008). Study on the relationship between organizational career management and job involvement. Frontiers of Business Research in China. Vol 2, No 1, 116-136. DOI10.1007/s11782-008-0007-6  Werner, J. M. (2000) Implications of OCB and contextual performance for human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 10 (1): 245-261


• Zhu, W., Avolio, B. J., and Walumbwa, F. O. (2009) Moderating role of follower characteristics with transformational leadership and follower work engagement. Group & Organization Management, 34 (5): 590-619