The study of Cypress appearance in the Persian art and architecture in the light of Gestalt theory

Subject Areas : Urban Design

Fatemeh Khozaei ¹ , Mina Safizadeh ² , Ahmad Hassan ³ , Qamar Islam ⁴

1 - Department of Architecture, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran.
2 - School of Housing Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
3 - Department of Electrical Engineering, School of Engineering & Technology, Baba Ghulam Shah Badshah University - Rajouri (J&K) India.
4 - School of Housing Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.

Received: 2018-12-08 Accepted : 2019-10-07 Published : 2019-10-01

Keywords: Cypress tree, comparison, carpet, Persian miniature, fabric textile,

Abstract :

The impetus behind this s‌tudy is to discover the aes‌thetic and semantic patterns of the cypress tree and show how this element has been employed by Iranian artis‌ts. The ques‌tion of this research is how a cons‌tant element (the cypress tree) has been transfigured in different Iranian arts. Four categories of miniature, carpet, textile and architecture decoration. The present research is qualitative in nature and is descriptive-analytic and mainly uses the available published data. Data were analyzed inductively and interpreted in the light of Ges‌talt theory. Exploratory results reveal that the cypress as a cons‌tant element in Iranian art has been transfigured differently in different arts. With the aid of Ges‌talt laws, the visual appearance of the cypress tree was analyzed in the different samples a few of them are presented in the s‌tudy. It was found that dis‌tinguishing the cypress element has been made: by highlighting the role of the cypress and reducing the visual significance of the field while increasing the visual emphasis of the cypress. Application of different ges‌talt laws such as proximity, figure, and ground, similarity, continuity in Persian carpet mos‌tly makes the cypress at the center of attention and reduces the visual importance of the other elements. In some of the other Persian carpet designs, this element has semantic and extraterres‌trial concepts and sits is in the center (eg. Mehrabi carpets. In the miniature and fabric textiles, cypress tree has not received the urgent priority and often been on the margins of the image.

References:

1. Abeddoost, H., Kazempour, Z. (2011). The Survival of the symbolism of mountain and tree in the art of ancient Iranian art and its effect on contemporary Iranian carpets. Negareh Quarterly, (20), 31_21


2. Afrough, M. (2011). Patterns of hand-made Persian carpet: Elements and symbols of national identity, Quarterly National Studies,12 (4), 141-172.


3. Al-Ibrahim Dehkordi, S. (2016). The role of the cypress tree and its symbolic meanings in the drawings of the Tahmazabi Shahnameh, Bagh-e-Nazar (45) 13, 114-105.


4. Azarpad, H., Heshmati Razavi, F. (2004). The Book of Iranian Carpet. Tehran: The Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies.


5. Chitsazian A. H. (2009). Recognition of Pardis using the Symbolist features of Iranian Architecture and Carpet.Goljam (12), 122-99.


6. Farbod, F., Tavousi, M. (2002). A Comparative Study of the Symbolic Concept of the Tree in Iran (an emphasis on some of the literary and mystical texts of ancient Iran and Islamic Iran).Modares-e- Honar.(2) 1, 54-43.


7. Hakam Abadi, A, Khazaee, M., Ahmad Panah, S. A. (2015). Examination of Samani cloth.Quarterly Journal of the Great Khorasan,6(20), 74- 57.


8. Jahan Pour.F (2016). The idea of ​​cypress in the Iranian imagination. Pazand Quarterly, 15, (44): 26-5


9. Javadi, Sh. (2004). Landscaping in Persian Painting, Bagh-e-Nazar, 1 (1), 25_37.


10. Khalilzadeh Moghaddam , M. & Sadeghpour Firouzabad, A. (2011). A Comparative study of Safavid and Gurkani cloth motifs, Negareh Quarterly, (21), 21_37.


11. Koohzad, N.(2010). The honor of the Cypress Role in Iranian Art. Bi-annual Journal ofNaghsh Mayeh ,3(5): 16-7.


12. Mousavi, B., Ayatollahali, H. (2010). The study of textile designs during the Achaemenid, Ashkani and Sassanid Periods, Negareh Quarterly, (17): 57- 47.


13. Najafi, M. , & Afshari, M.(2011). The visual features of trees in Iranian Painting.Book of Moon art, 162: 85-82.


14. Nasiri Khorram, Sh. (2016). An Investigation of the Relationship between Iranian Carpet Designs and Islamic Architecture.New Research in the Humanities,3(9),90-77.


15. Qasemieh, S., Bomanian, M. R., Nasehi, A. (2016). Exploring the Common Language of Persian Garden and Painting: An Emphasis on the Significance of Cypress Tree. Bi-annual Journal of Art Research,6(11),85-75.


16. Shadkam, M. (1999). Qajar Textiles.Ketab e Mah e Honar , 17: 89-89.


17. Tavassoli, R. (2008) A Comparative Study of Safavid and Ottoman Textile. Islamic Arts Studies, 8, 87-106.


18. Zaboli Nezhad, H. (2011). The Sasanian and Qajar periodic book designs.Moon Art, vol. 161: 108-96