DENSITY AND QUALITY OF SPACES IN RELATION TO BUILT-FORMS: The Case of Commercially Active Centers in Addis Ababa (Pedestrian Density and Pedestrian Priority)

Subject Areas : Urban Design

Daniel  Sokido ¹ (Urban Planning, College of Urban Development and Engineering, Ethiopian Civil Service University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia)

Received: 2019-07-22 Accepted : 2019-10-25 Published : 2019-10-01

Keywords: Built-form, pedestrian-priority, Quality-Spaces, Commercially-Active, Pedestrian-Density,

Abstract :

ABSTRACT A vibrant and commercially active center is often the result of interesting, diverse building styles and or built-forms, pedestrian density along with variety of quality public places where people feel comfortable, spending time and shopping items for domestic and commercial functions in cities like Addis Ababa. The scale and design of buildings, pedestrian density, and other physical characteristics will determine the quality of built form and public spaces and how well they create an attractive and pedestrian friendly and welcoming environment in relation to built-up and pedestrian density.On the other hand, not many studies have been undertaken in relation to the concept and theory of “Pedestrian Density and Quality of Spaces”. This research is aimed to analyze and explore the relationship among urban space quality, pedestrian density and built-form of the city in commercially active centers so as to contribute to a better understanding of the correlation among pedestrian density, built-form and quality of urban space. Hence, the study employed multiple data sources through quantitative and qualitative approaches (Triangulation). Finally, the research ended with arriving at answers for research questions through both statistical and non statistical techniques. The research result has highly addressed and concluded that Pedestrian friendly Streets with pedestrian density thresholds in commercially active built-environments are places that people like walking and want to stay in, with real character and sense of place. It concludes with an overview of emerging thinking/implications where further efforts are required in the future

References:

1. 
   

   Al-Masaeid, H. R., Al-Suleiman, T. I., & Nelson, D. C. (1993).
   Pedestrian speed-flow relationship for central business district areas in
   developing countries. Transportation Research Record, 1396, 69-74.

   
   


2. 
   

   Daamen, W., & Hoogendoorn, S. P. (2003). Experimental research
   of pedestrian walking behavior. Transportation Research Record,
   1828(1), 20-30.

   
   


3. 
   

   Gerilla, G. P., Hokao, K., & Takeyama, Y. (1995). Proposed level
   of service standards for walkways in Metro Manila. Journal of the
   Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 1(3), 1041-1060.

   
   


4. 
   

   Hall, E. T. (1990). The Hidden Dimension Anchor Books Editions.
   New York.

   
   


5. 
   

   Hongfei, J. I. A., Lili, Y. A. N. G., & Ming, T. A. N. G. (2009). Pedestrian
   flow characteristics analysis and model parameter calibration in
   comprehensive transport terminal. Journal of Transportation Systems
   Engineering and Information Technology, 9(5), 117-123.

   
   


6. 
   

   Kotkar, K. L., Ras togi, R., & Chandra, S. (2010). Pedestrian flow
   characteristics in mixed flow conditions. Journal of Urban Planning
   and Development, ASCE, 136(3), 23-33.

   
   


7. 
   

   Fruin, J. (1971). Pedestrian Planning and Design, Metropolitan
   Association of Urban Design and Environmental Planners. Inc., New
   York, 20, 6.

   
   


8. 
   

   Krier, R., & Rowe, C. (1979). Urban space. London: Academy
   Editions.

   
   


9. 
   

   Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research
   interviewing. Sage.

   
   


10. 
    

    Lam, W. H., Lee, J. Y., Chan, K. S., & Goh, P. K. (2003). A generalized
    function for modeling bi-directional flow effects on indoor walkways
    in Hong Kong. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,
    37(9), 789-810.

    
    


11. 
    

    Navin, F. P., & Wheeler, R. J. (1969). Pedestrian flow characteristics.
    Traffic Engineering, Inst Traffic Engr, 39.

    
    


12. 
    

    Older, S. J. (1968). Movement of pedestrians on footways in shopping
    streets. Traffic engineering & control, 10(4).

    
    


13. 
    

    Polus, A., Schofer, J. L., & Ushpiz, A. (1983). Pedestrian flow and
    level of service. Journal of transportation engineering, 109(1), 46-56.

    
    


14. 
    

    Sarkar, A.K. & K.S.V.S. Janardhan (1997) “A study on pedestrian
    flow characteristics,” In CD-ROM with Proceedings, Transportation
    Research Board, Washington.

    
    


15. 
    

    Seyfried, A., Passon, O., Steffen, B., Boltes, M., Rupprecht, T., &
    Klingsch, W. (2009). New insights into pedestrian flow through
    bottlenecks. Transportation Science, 43(3), 395-406.

    
    


16. 
    

    Spreiregen, P. D. (1965). The architecture of towns and cities.
    McGraw-Hill.

    
    


17. 
    

    Tanaboriboon, Y., Hwa, S. S., & Chor, C. H. (1986). Pedestrian
    characteristics study in Singapore. Journal of transportation
    engineering, 112(3), 229-235.

    
    


18. 
    

    Virkler, M. R., & Elayadath, S. (1994). Pedestrian speed-flow-density
    relationships (No. HS-042 012).

    
    


19. 
    

    Habitat, U. N. (2006). State of the World’s Cities 2006/7. New York:
    United Nations.

    
    


20. 
    

    Lozano-Perez, T. (1990). Spatial planning: A configuration space
    approach. In Autonomous robot vehicles (pp. 259-271). Springer, New
    York, NY.

    
    


21. 
    

    Pushkarev, B., Zupan, J. M., Pushkarev, B., & Zupan, J. M. (1975).
    Capacity of walkways. Transportation research record, 538, 1-15.