Evaluation of the Flexible Elements Components in Housing Design to Determine their Priority according to Delphi Design Method

Subject Areas : Architecture

Hamid Asadi ¹ , Seyyed Majid Hashemi Toghroljerdi ² , Mitra Ghafourian ³ , Hamed Abedini ⁴

1 - Department of Architecture, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran.
2 - Department of Architecture, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran.
3 - School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
4 - Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Khatam University, Tehran, Iran.

Received: 2021-10-05 Accepted : 2022-01-25 Published : 2023-01-01

Keywords: flexibility, Fuzzy Delphi, compatibility, Housing, Expansion and Division,

Abstract :

In a different context, the user's needs in a housing apartment are constantly changing; it is required that the provided house, by having flexibility, can always be responsive to the user's needs in various situations, which would be a challenge for specialized areas of housing, including design. To perform a flexible housing design, the architects face many different design solutions and variables, leading to confusion in this field. So, the objective of this study is to identify these variables and achieve an effective solution by considering their priority of them. The variables of this study were proposed in three scales of macro, medium, and micro according to the previous valid research studies in the field of flexible housing. Then, the variables have been evaluated using the specialist's idea through the Fuzzy Delphi method (FDM). The Friedman test has been used to analyze the data obtained from the questionnaires and achieve a valid ranking, which performs the ranking by calculating the mean rank for each variable. According to the results of data analysis, the characteristics of "spatial expansion and division," which means the possibility of space to be expanded (the expansion) or divided (the contraction), as the medium scale of housing design, has the greatest impact on the housing flexibility. On the macro scale, the "structure" component, and the micro-scale, the "use of flexible elements" provide the highest effectiveness in this regard. Moreover, as the medium scale, the modular design of space falls in the second place of influence compared to all other variables. Increasing the properties of spatial expansion and spatial division can be an effective design strategy for achieving flexibility in apartment housing. Also, modular space designing and flexible elements have been introduced as two solutions in the next priorities. All are considered small and medium scales and can be prioritized in designing flexible apartment housing.

References:

Abdulpader, O. Q., Sabah, O., & Abdullah, H. S. (2014). Impact of Flexibility Principle on the Efficiency of Interior Design. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 5(3), 195-212. 
Aghaei, S., Ghafourian, M., & Akhund, N. (2021). Evaluating the spatial expansibility and division in the flexibility of the interior space of apartment housing and adjacent residential units under study: Region 2 of Tehran. Soffeh, 31 (92), 33-51.
Bashkite, V., & Zahharov, R. (2011). Modularization impact to product end of life cycle. International Symposium, Topical Problems in the Field of Electrical and Power Engineering, Pärnu, Estonia, 213-217.
Beisi, J. (1995). Adaptable housing or adaptable people. Architecture & Behaviour (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology), (11), 139-162.
Bentley, I. (1985). Responsive Environments: A Manual for Designers. Architectural Press.
Blakstad, SH. (2001). A Strategic Approach to Adaptability in Office Buildings. Ph.D. Thesis, NTNU. 
Brady, S. R. (2015). Utilizing and adapting the Delphi method for use in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5), 1-6. 
Cellucci, C., & Di Sivo, M. (2015). The Flexible Housing: Criteria and Strategies for Implementation of the Flexibility. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9, 845-852. 
De Paris, S., & Lopes, C.N.L. (2018). Housing flexibility problem: review of recent limitations and solutions. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 7(1), 80-91. 
Debicka, E. & Friedman, A. (2009). Flexible Design of Public Housing. Iqaluit, Nunavut, Canada, open house international, 34(4), 26-35. 
Eghbali, S., & Hesari, P. (2013). Modular and prefabricated approach in flexible housing. Housing and Rural Environment, 32 (143), 53-68. 
Einifar, A. (2003). A model for flexibility analysis in traditional Iranian housing. Fine Arts, 13, 64-77.
Elkady, A., Fikry, M. A., & Elsayad, Z. T. (2018). Developing an optimized strategy achieving design flexibility in small-area units: Case study of Egyptian economic housing. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 57(4), 4287-4297. 
Friedman, A., & Krawitz, D. (1998). The next home: Affordability through flexibility and choice. Housing and Society, 25(1-2), 103-116. 
Ghafourian, M. (2012). A Correlation Model on Flexible Building Design with User Satisfaction in Residential Unit Plan. Ph.D. thesis, UTM.
Ghafourian, M., & Aghaei, S. (2016). Recognizing and prioritizing flexibility criteria in designing Iranian apartment housing. Soffeh, 26 (74), 41-64.
Groak, S. (2002). The idea of building: thought and action in the design and production of buildings. Taylor & Francis.
Habraken, J. N. (2008). Design for flexibility. Building Research & Information, 36(3), 290-296. 
Habraken, J.N. (2003). Open Building as a condition for industrial construction, in 20th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics. Construction, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, 37-42. 
Higuchi, Y., & Gotou, T. (2005). Demonstrative experiment for next-generation structural housing. The 2005 World Sustainable Building Conference, Tokyo, 2833-2840.
Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, M., Shiga, T., Tomizawa, G., Tatsuta, R., & Mieno, H. (1993). The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy sets and systems, 55(3), 241-253. 
 Ismail. Z., & Rahim. A. (2011). Adaptability and Modularity in Housing: a Case Study of Raines Court and Next21. Kulliyyah of Architecture & Environmental Design, International Islamic University Malaysia. 
Lynch, K. (1972). What time is this place?. MIT press.
Malakouti, M., Faizi, M., Hosseini, S. B., & Norouzian-Maleki, S. (2019). Evaluation of flexibility components for improving housing quality using fuzzy TOPSIS method, Journal of Building Engineering, 22, 154-160. 
Pereira, D. Afonso, A., & Mederios, F. M. (2015). Overview of Friedman's test and post-hoc analysis, Communications. Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 44(10), 2636-2653. 
Schneider, T., & J. Till. (2005). Flexible housing: opportunities and limits. ARQ: Architectural Research Quarterly, 9(2), 156-166. 
Seyyeddin, S., & Aqli Moghaddam, K. (2015). The effect of high-rise construction on environmental flexibility and sustainability. Armanshahr Architecture and Urban Planning, 8(15), 235-243. 
Shi, D., & Daniels, R. L. (2003). A survey of manufacturing flexibility: Implications for e-business flexibility. IBM Systems Journal, 42(3), 414-427. 
Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Thaniyabadi, A., Ghaffari, A., Farhadi, M. (2017). The role of communication space in achieving flexible residential units, Soffeh, 76, 17-36. 
Till, J., & T. Schneider. (2005). Flexible housing: the means to the end. ARQ: architectural research quarterly, 9(4), 287-296. 
Upton, D. M. (1995). What really makes factories flexible?. Harvard business review, 73(4), 74-84.
Živković, M., & A. Keković. (2014). the motives for application of the flexible elements in the housing interior. Facta Universitatis, Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering, 12(1), 41-51.