• Home
  • Determinants of Agricultural Students’ Academic Performance at the University Level: Case of Bangladesh

Share To

Article Url


Manuscript ID : IJASRT-2201-1227 (R1) Visit : 259 Page: 213 - 222

20.1001.1.22517588.2021.11.4.3.1

Article Type: Original Research

Determinants of Agricultural Students’ Academic Performance at the University Level: Case of Bangladesh

Subject Areas : Agricultural Education

Md. Wakilur Rahman 1 , Kazi Shek Farid 2 , Nishith Zahan Tanny 3

1 - Department of Rural Sociology Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
2 - Department of Rural Sociology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
3 - Department of Rural Sociology Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh

Received: 2021-11-01 Accepted : 2021-12-20 Published : 2021-12-30

Keywords: factors, Academic Performance, Bangladesh, tertiary education,

Abstract :

This study identifies the determinants of students’ academic performance at the tertiary level of agricultural education in Bangladesh. Primary data were collected through interview survey with a pre-tested interview schedule over a period of three months from randomly selected 437 students of four agricultural universities of Bangladesh. Regression analysis was performed to identify the factors affecting students’ academic performance. Students are seemed to perform better provided they had a good result in the first semester at the university as the coefficient value of this variable is found statistically significant at one percent level. Their academic achievements are largely influenced by their motivation along with their active participation in different extra-curricular activities. Teaching and research facilities provided by the institutions influence academic achievement of the students positively as well. The study further reveals that pre-university results, family income, connectivity with family members, parents' occupation, and residence positively influence academic results. In contrast, the uncongenial environment of the residential hall and non-cooperation from supporting staffs make students apathetic in achieving better academic results, which is evident in the data with the statistically significant relationship at a one percent level having a negative effect on academic results. The findings emphasize on creation of enabling environment for the fresher, enhancement of need-based teaching and research facilities, and provision of extra-curricular activities to foster the academic performance of the students.

References:


  1. Ahmmed, M. M. and Salim, Z.R. (2018). Determinants of academic performance of undergraduate students in private universities in Bangladesh: A case study. Global Journal of Human-Social Science 18 (11). Retrieved from https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/2622
    2.
  2. AL-Muslimawi, I.A.J. and Hamid, A.A. (2019). External and internal factors affecting students’ academic performance. The Social Sciences 14 (4), 155-168. DOI: 3923/sscience.2019.155.168.
    3.
  3. Alam, R. and Islam, R. (2021). Determinants of academic performance of the students of public universities in Bangladesh. Athens Journal of Education, 8, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.X-Y-Z
    4.
  4. Ali, S., Haider, Z., Munir, F., Khan, H. and Ahmed, A. (2013). Factors contributing to the students' academic performance: A case study of Islamia University sub-campus. American Journal of Educational Research 1(8), 283-289. DOI: 10.12691/education-1-8-3.
    5.
  5. Bailey, T.H. and Phillips, L.J. (2016). The influence of motivation and adaptation on students’ subjective well-being, meaning in life and academicperformance. Higher Education Research and Development 35 (2), 201-216. DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2015.1087474.
    6.
  6. Berkowitz, R., Moore, H., Astor, R.A. and Rami, B.R. (2017). A research synthesis of the associations between socioeconomic background, inequality, school climate, and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research 87(2), 425–469. DOI: 3102/0034654316669821.
    7.
  7. Bunce, L., Baird, A. and Jones, S.E. (2016). The student-as-consumer approach in higher education and its effects on academic performance. Studies in Higher Education 41 (12), 1-21. DOI: 1080/03075079.2015.1127908.
    8.
  8. Byrne, M. and Flood, B. (2008). Examining the relationships among background variables and academic performance of first year accounting students at an Irish University. Journal of Accounting Education 26 (4), 202–212. DOI: 1016/j.jaccedu.2009.02.001.
    9.
  9. Davis, P., Milne, B. Parker, K. Hider, P. Lay-Yee, R. Cumming, J.(2013). Efficiency, effectiveness, equity (E3). Evaluating hospital performance in three dimensions. Health Policy 112 (1–2), 19–27. DOI: 1016/j.healthpol.2013.02.008.
    10.
  10. Davy, A., Kincaid, J.F., Smith, K.J. and Trawick, M.A. (2007). An examination of the role of attitudinal characteristics and motivation on the cheating behavior of business students. Ethics and Behavior 17(3), 281–302. DOI: 10.1080/10508420701519304.
    11.
  11. Dronkers, J. and P. Robert (2004) The Effectiveness of Public, Private Government-dependent and Private Independent Schools: A Cross-national Analysis, European University Institute, Florence, Italy, iue.it.
    12.
  12. Englander, F., Terregrossa, R.A. and Wang, Z. (2011). Internet use among college students: tool or toy? Educational Review 62 (1), 85-96. DOI: 1080/00131910903519793.
    13.
  13. Eum, , and Rice, K.G. (2011). Test anxiety, perfectionism, goal orientation, and academic performance. Anxiety, Stress and Coping 24, 167–78. DOI: 10.1080/10615806.2010.488723.
    14.
  14. Fenollar, P., Roma´n, S. and Pedro, J. Cuestas P.J. (2007). University students’ academic performance: An integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology 77, 873–891. DOI: 1348/000709907X189118.
    15.
  15. Fraser, W. and Killen, R. (2005). The perceptions of students and lecturers of some factors influencing academic performance at two South African Universities. Perspectives in Education 23(1), 25-40. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2263/4887.
    16.
  16. Hansen, A.L. (2005). Hispanic Student Achievement: Research Brief. Education Partnerships Inc. 15 November. URL: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED537925.
    17.
  17. Harb, N. and El-Shaarwi, A. (2006). Factors affecting students’ performance. Journal of Business Education 82(5), 282-290. URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/13621.
    18.
  18. Hardre, L. and Reeve, J. (2003). A motivational model of rural students’ intentions to persist in, versus drop out of, high school. Journal of Educational Psychology 95(2), 347–356. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.347.
    19.
  19. Huws, N., Reddy, P. and Talcott, J. (2006). Predicting university success in psychology: Are subject-specific skills important? Psychology Learning and Teaching 5 (2), 133-140. DOI: 2304/plat.2005.5.2.133.
    20.
  20. Islam, M. K., Islam, Y. M. and Hoque, M. S. (2014). Poor academic achievement of university students: problems and solutions. ULAB Journal of Science and Engineering 5(1), 18-25. URL: http://journals.ulab.edu.bd/jse/vol5_2014/paper03.pdf.
    21.
  21. Islam, N., Hossen, M.A., and Saha, P. (2021). An analysis of the factors affecting academic performance of undergraduate students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science 5 (9).
    22.
  22. Islam, A., and Tasnim, S. (2021). An Analysis of Factors Influencing Academic Performance of Undergraduate Students: A Case Study of Rabindra University, Bangladesh (RUB). Shanlax International Journal of Education 9(3), 127-135. DOI:https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9i3.3732
    23.
  23. Lotsi, A. (2019). Statistical analysis of factors affecting grade point average of level 100 students: A case study of University of Ghana Legon Campus. Journal of Mathematics Education 4(2), 87-96.
    24.
  24. McKenzie, K. and Schweitzer, R. (2001). Who Succeeds at University? Factors predicting academicperformance in first year Australian university students. Higher Education Research and Development 20(1), 21-33. DOI: 1080/07924360120043621.
    25.
  25. McKenzie, K., Gow, K. and Schweitzer, R. (2004). Exploring first‐year academic achievement through structural equation modeling. Higher Education Research and Development 23 (1), 95-112. DOI: 1080/0729436032000168513.
    26.
  26. Mlambo, V. (2011). An analysis of some factors affecting student academic performance in an introductory biochemistry course at the University of the West Indies. Caribbean Teaching Scholar 1 (2), 79–92. URL:https://journals.sta.uwi.edu/ojs/index.php/cts/article/view/10.
    27.
  27. Pisarik, T. (2009). Motivational orientation and burnout among undergraduate college students. College Student Journal 43(4), 1238–1252. URL: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ872339.
    28.
  28. Radhika, K. (2018). Factors Influencing the Students’ Academic Performance in Secondary Schools in India. Open Journal of Social Sciences 7(11).
    29.
  29. Rego, A. and Sousa, L. (2006). Performance in higher education: towards an understanding. Educational Research 41 (1), 91-107. DOI: 1080/0013188990410108.
    30.
  30. Richardson, M., Abraham, C. and Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 138(2), 353-387.DOI: 1037/a0026838.
    31.
  31. Ryan, M., and Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55(1), 68–78. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11392867.
    32.
  32. Shahiduzzaman, M., Ali, M. K., and Islam, M. R. (2017). Factors influencing the academic performance of undergraduate students of private universities in Bangladesh: Modeling approach. Human Evolution, 32(1-2), 43-55.
    33.
  33. Sarrico, C.S. (2010). On performance in higher education: Towards performance governance. Tertiary Education and Management 16(2), 145-158. DOI: 10.1080/13583881003775401.
    34.
  34. Sirin, S. K. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: a meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research 75 (3), 417-453. DOI: 3102/00346543075003417.
    35.
  35. Sothan, S. (2018). The determinants of academic performance: Evidence from a Cambodian University. Studies in Higher Education 44(1), 1-16.
    36.
  36. Tsinidou, M., Gerogiannis and Fitsilis, P. (2010). Evaluation of the factors that determine quality in higher education: An empirical study, Quality Assurance in Education 18(3), 227-244. DOI: 10.1108/09684881011058669.
    37.
  37. Wirthwein, , Sparfeldt, J. R., Pinquart, M.,Wegerer, J. and Steinmayr, R. (2013). Achievement goals and academic achievement: A closer look at moderating factors. Educational Research Review 10, 66–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.07.001.
    38.

Related articles

The rights to this website are owned by the Raimag Press Management System.
Copyright © 2021-2024

Home| Login| About Us| Contact Us|
[فارسی] [العربية] [fa] [ar]