تحلیل نظام آمایش مناطق روستایی استان گیلان
محورهای موضوعی : آمایش سرزمین
الهه محقق دوست
1
,
شهره تاج
2
*
,
مجید ولی شریعت پناهی
3
,
علیرضا استعلاجی
4
1 - دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی رشته جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات ،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 - استادیار، گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی، تهران، ایران. * (مسوول مکاتبات)
3 - دانشیار گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد یادگار امام(ره) شهر ری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
4 - استاد
کلید واژه: تحلیل, نظام آمایش, مناطق روستایی, استان گیلان.,
چکیده مقاله :
زمینه و هدف: هدف از انجام این پژوهش، بررسی و تحلیل نظام آمایش مناطق روستایی استان گیلان می‌باشد.
روش بررسی: این تحقیق به لحاظ هدف، کاربردی و از نظر ماهیت و روش بررسی، از نوع تحقیقات توصیفی- تحلیلی می‌باشد.
یافته‌ها: تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها و اطلاعات در دو سطح آمار توصیفی و آمار استنباطی و بوسیله نرم افزار SPSS ورژن 22 انجام شده است. در بخش توصيفي، ویژگی پاسخگویان و در بخش استنباطي با استفاده از آزمون آماری تی‌تک نمونه‌ای، فرضیه‌های تحقیق بررسي شده‌اند. در بخش یافته‌های توصیفی، متغیر اهداف نظام آمایش استان گیلان با 37 گویه و اهداف سازمانی نظام آمایش با 14 گویه مورد سنجش قرار گرفته شده است. نمرات به‌دست آمده نشانگر این است که: حداقل نمره پاسخگویان در بین اهداف نظام آمایش برابر با 3 و مربوط به اهداف سیاسی و حداکثر آن 20 و مربوط به اهداف محیطی بوده است. در بخش یافته‌های استنباطی، سطح معناداری Sig به‌دست آمده از آزمون کولموگروف - اسمیرنوف برای متغیرهای مورد نظر بزرگتر از 05/0 است و به عبارتی دیگر آزمون معنی دار نمی‌باشد.
بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج و یافته‌های حاصل از این پژوهش نشان داد که با اطمینان 95/0 و سطح خطای کمتر از 05/0 از دیدگاه کارشناسان، اهداف (محیطی، اجتماعی، اقتصادی، کالبدی و سیاسی) و اهداف سازمانی (مشارکت‌های مردمی) طرح آمایش استان گیلان می‌تواند محقق گردد. اما اهداف زیست محیطی طرح آمایش تحقق نیافته است. در این بین، اهداف اقتصادی و اجتماعی طرح آمایش به ترتیب با میانگین‌های 80/3 و 56/3 در بین اهداف مختلف طرح آمایش استان گیلان، از نظر پاسخگویان بیشرین میزان تحقق را به خود اختصاص داده‌اند.
Background and Objective: The aim of this study is to analysis of preparation system in rural areas of Gilan Province.
Material and Methodology: The research is functional in terms of its objective and in terms of review method; is based on descriptive- analytical and in terms of data collection; is Library and field (questionnaire).
Findings: The analysis of data and information at two levels of descriptive statistics and inferential statistics was done by SPSS version 22 software. In the descriptive part, the characteristics of the respondents and in the inferential part using the sample t-tech statistical test, the research hypotheses have been investigated. In the descriptive findings part, the variables of goals of Guilan province's preparation system have been measured with 37 items and organizational goals of preparation system with 14 items. The obtained scores indicate that: the minimum score of the respondents among the objectives of the preparation system was equal to 3 and related to political goals and the maximum score was 20 and related to environmental goals. In the inferential findings part, the significance level of Sig obtained from the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for the desired variables is greater than 0.05, and in other words, the test is not significant.
Discussion and Conclusion: Data analysis was performed on two levels of description and inferential statistics and by SPSS software. The results show that: With a confidence level of 0.95% and Error level less than 0.05, From Experts' views; has been realized Targets (Environmental, social, economic, physical, Political and people's participation) preparation system of Guilan Province, but has not been realized Targets (environment) preparation system of Guilan Province.
1. Shakur, Ali and Shams al-Dini, Ali. Evaluating physical and spatial effects of the implementation of Hadi projects in Fathabad village, Marvdasht city. Housing and Village Environment Quarterly. 2015; Volume 34, Number 152: 101-114. (In Persian)
2. Saeedi, Abbas. Basics of rural geography. First Edition. Tehran; side publications; 1381. (In Persian)
3. Heldak, M., 2010. Functional standardization of Rural Area of Dolnoslakie vivodeship, Bullent of Geography socio – Economic series, NO.13, pp 127-137.
4. Taleshi, Mostafa and Amir Fakhrian, Mostafa. The application of quantitative models of spatial analysis of population in the study of rural settlements (case study: Razavi Khorasan Province). Rural Research Quarterly. 2013; Year 1, Number 4: 105-128. (In Persian)
5. Shams Aldini, Ali and Rahimi, Alireza. Leveling of rural settlements in Mamsani city using space organizing techniques. Journal of regional planning. 2012; Volume 4, Number 14: 87-102. (In Persian)
6. Kuklinski, A.,1979, social Issues in Regional policy and Reigional planning, Netherlands Economic In statute.
7. Baboganj and Mira. Regional expansion; New methods, translated by Abbas Mokhbar, first edition, Tehran; Informant Publications; 1989. (In Persian)
8. Rahmani, Mohammad Taghi and Ashrafi, Yusuf. Public spaces of the city and its role in the formation of civil society from the point of view of urban planning. Geography Quarterly. 2002; Number fifteen. (In Persian)
9. Teimouri, Samaneh and Shakur, Ali and Gandomkar. Stratification of rural settlements based on human capacity from the point of view of land use, a case study: the central part of Shiraz city. Regional Planning Quarterly. 2016; 6th year, 21st serial number: 102-93. (In Persian)
10. Mahdavi, Masoud. An introduction to the rural geography of Iran. Third edition. Tehran; side publications; 2002. (In Persian)
11. Mahdavi, Masoud and Azmi, Aeezh. Space planning and rural development. Geographical Quarterly of the land. 2019; Sixth period, second issue, twenty-second series: 25-42. (In Persian)
12. Sarafi, Mozafar and Nejati, Naser. The new approach of regionalism in order to improve Iran's spatial development management system. Researches of human geography. 2014; 46th period, 4th issue; 874-857. (In Persian)
13. Khanifar, Hossein. An introduction to the concept of land preparation and its applications in Iran. Scientific-research journal of Aamish Sarzemen. 2010; Second period, second issue: 5-25. (In Persian)
14. Makhdoom, Majid. Foundation of Amish Sarmeen, Tehran; Tehran University Publications; 1999. (In Persian)
15. Eftekhari, Abdolreza., Khalifeh, Ebrahim., Poortaheri, Mahdi and Rahmani Fazli, Abdolreza. Analysis of the spatial planning management model of rural areas in Iran under study: Hadi plans of rural areas of Tehran province. Space planning and design magazine. 2016; Volume 20, Number 3: 61-104. (In Persian)
16. Guilan province preparation document. Management and planning organization of Gilan province. Project manager: Mozafar Sarafi and Gholamreza Kazemian, executive director of the project: Hasan Mohammadian Mossamam; 2018. (In Persian)
17. Tavakoli, Morteza and Ebrahimi, Aram and Hamidi Tehrani, Samira. Analysis of the zoning pattern of land use in Iran since the post-constitutional period until now. Space planning and design magazine. 2018; The twenty-second period, the first issue. (In Persian)
18. Akbari, Yunus and Imani Jajermi, Hossein and Rostamalizadeh, Valiullah. Analysis and investigation of obstacles to land development in Iran. Science and technology policy. 2013; Sixth period, third issue. (In Persian)
19. Darvishi, Hedayatollah and Biranvandzadeh, Maryam and Nader Dehghani Alvar, Seyed Ali and Ahmadi, Sajjad (2014), Prioritization of rural tourism development strategies from the perspective of land use, case study: Gaigan village (Aligodarz city), Rural development strategies publication, first period , second issue, pp. 69-84. (In Persian)
20. Yu, T., zhang, J,x., sun, L,J. (2009), Research on Rural spatial Distribution in chaina Based on urban –Rural Integrated planning Management, Fourth Internation conference on computer sciences and convergence Information Technology seoul, korea, pp 269-299.
21. Statistical yearbook of Gilan province. First chapter: land and climate, management and planning organization of Gilan province, vice president of statistics and information of management and planning organization; 2018. (In Persian)