Fermatean Fuzzy Type Statistical Concepts with Medical Decision-Making Application
Subject Areas : Fuzzy Optimization and Modeling Journal
1 - Department of Bİostatistics and Medical Informatics, Cerrahapasa Medicine Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa
Keywords: Variance, Correlation Coefficient, Pearson correlation coefficient, Covariance, Fermatean fuzzy set,
Abstract :
When a correlation between datasets is presented, it is clear from this statement that it quantifies how strongly these datasets are connected. Meanwhile, this coefficient is a well-known metric for assessing the link between two sets. The Fermatean fuzzy set is a significant extension of the extant intuitionistic and Pythagorean fuzzy sets, with the benefit of more comprehensively characterizing ambiguous data. In other words, Fermatean fuzzy sets are powerful and useful tools for representing imprecise information. The purpose of this work is to generate novel correlation coefficients using Fermatean fuzzy sets. These coefficients specify the degree and kind of correlation (positive or negative) between two Fermatean fuzzy sets. The new coefficient values will similarly be in the [-1,1] range. During formulation, pairs of membership and non-membership degrees were viewed as a vector representation containing the two elements. Furthermore, the novel approach was compared to existing methods. A medical diagnosis application and pattern recognition as a data mining application were used to exemplify the effectiveness of the proposed method.
1. Akram, M., Ali, G., Alcantud, J. C. R., & Riaz, A. (2022). Group decision-making with Fermatean fuzzy soft expert knowledge. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55(7), 5349-5389.
2. Akram, M., Amjad, U., Alcantud, J. C. R., & Santos-García, G. (2022). Complex fermatean fuzzy N-soft sets: a new hybrid model with applications. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 1-34.
3. Akram, M., Shahzadi, G., & Ahmadini, A. A. H. (2020). Decision-making framework for an effective sanitizer to reduce COVID-19 under Fermatean fuzzy environment. Journal of Mathematics, 2020, 1-19.
4. Arora, R., & Garg, H. (2018). A robust correlation coefficient measure of dual hesitant fuzzy soft sets and their application in decision making. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 72, 80-92.
5. Atanassov, K. (2016). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. International Journal Bioautomation, 20, 1.
6. Bustince, H., & Burillo, P. (1995). Correlation of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy sets and systems, 74(2), 237-244.
7. Chen, S. M., & Chang, C. H. (2015). A novel similarity measure between Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on transformation techniques with applications to pattern recognition. Information Sciences, 291, 96-114.
8. Chen, Y., Peng, X., Guan, G., & Jiang, H. (2014). Approaches to multiple attribute decision making based on the correlation coefficient with dual hesitant fuzzy information. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 26(5), 2547-2556.
9. Chiang, D. A., & Lin, N. P. (1999). Correlation of fuzzy sets. Fuzzy sets and systems, 102(2), 221-226..
10. Ejegwa, P. A. (2020). Distance and similarity measures for Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Granular Computing, 5(2), 225-238.
11. Ejegwa, P. A., & Jana, C. (2021). Some new weighted correlation coefficients between Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications. Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications, 39-64.
12. Augustine, E. P. (2021). Novel correlation coefficient for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application to multi-criteria decision-making problems. International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications (IJFSA), 10(2), 39-58.
13. Farhadinia, B. (2014). Correlation for dual hesitant fuzzy sets and dual interval‐valued hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 29(2), 184-205.
14. Garg, H. (2016). A novel correlation coefficients between Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its applications to decision-making processes. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31(12), 1234-1252.
15. Garg, H. (2016). A new generalized Pythagorean fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations and its application to decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31(9), 886-920.
16. Garg, H. (2018). Novel correlation coefficients under the intuitionistic multiplicative environment and their applications to decision-making process. Journal of industrial & management optimization, 14(4), 1501.
17. Garg, H., & Kumar, K. (2018). A novel correlation coefficient of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on the connection number of set pair analysis and its application. Scientia Iranica, 25(4), 2373-2388.
18. Garg, H., & Rani, D. (2019). A robust correlation coefficient measure of complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications in decision-making. Applied intelligence, 49, 496-512.
19. Garg, H., Shahzadi, G., & Akram, M. (2020). Decision-making analysis based on Fermatean fuzzy Yager aggregation operators with application in COVID-19 testing facility. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, 1-16.
20. Garg, H., & Kaur, G. (2022). Algorithm for solving the decision-making problems based on correlation coefficients under cubic intuitionistic fuzzy information: a case study in watershed hydrological system. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 1-20.
21. Gupta, R., & Kumar, S. (2022). Intuitionistic fuzzy scale-invariant entropy with correlation coefficients-based VIKOR approach for multi-criteria decision-making. Granular Computing, 7(1), 77-93.
22. Kamaci, H. (2020). Simplified neutrosophic multiplicative refined sets and their correlation coefficients with application in medical pattern recognition, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 41, 270-285.
23. Kirişci, M. (2021). Ω-soft sets and medical decision-making application. International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 98(4), 690-704.
24. Kirişci, M. (2023). New cosine similarity and distance measures for Fermatean fuzzy sets and TOPSIS approach. Knowledge and Information Systems, 65(2), 855-868.
25. Kirişci, M. (2022). Data Analysis for Lung Cancer: Fermatean Hesitant Fuzzy Sets Approach. In Applied Mathematics, Modeling and Computer Simulation (pp. 701-710). IOS Press.
26. Kirişci, M., Demir, I., & Şimşek, N. (2022). Fermatean fuzzy ELECTRE multi-criteria group decision-making and most suitable biomedical material selection. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 127, 102278.
27. Kirisci, M. (2022). Correlation coefficients of fermatean fuzzy sets with a medical application. Journal of Mathematical Sciences and Modelling, 5(1), 16-23.
28. Kirişci, M., & Şimşek, N. (2022). Decision making method related to Pythagorean Fuzzy Soft Sets with infectious diseases application. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 34(8), 5968-5978.
29. Liu, S. T., & Kao, C. (2002). Fuzzy measures for correlation coefficient of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 128(2), 267-275.
30. Peng, X., & Selvachandran, G. (2019). Pythagorean fuzzy set: state of the art and future directions. Artificial Intelligence Review, 52, 1873-1927.
31. Peng, X., Yuan, H., & Yang, Y. (2017). Pythagorean fuzzy information measures and their applications. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 32(10), 991-1029.
32. Senapati, T., & Yager, R. R. (2020). Fermatean fuzzy sets. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11, 663-674.
33. Senapati, T., & Yager, R. R. (2019). Some new operations over Fermatean fuzzy numbers and application of Fermatean fuzzy WPM in multiple criteria decision making. Informatica, 30(2), 391-412.
34. Senapati, T., & Yager, R. R. (2019). Fermatean fuzzy weighted averaging/geometric operators and its application in multi-criteria decision-making methods. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 85, 112-121.
35. Ashraf, S., Naeem, M., Khan, A., Rehman, N., & Pandit, M. K. (2023). Novel Information Measures for Fermatean Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications to Pattern Recognition and Medical Diagnosis. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2023.
36. Singh, S., & Ganie, A. H. (2020). On some correlation coefficients in Pythagorean fuzzy environment with applications. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 35(4), 682-717.
37. Smarandache, F. (2003). A unifying field in logics: Neutrosophic logic. Neutrosophy, neutrosophic set, neutrosophic probability and statistics, Phoenix, Xiquan.
38. Xuan Thao, N. (2018). A new correlation coefficient of the intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application. Journal of intelligent & fuzzy systems, 35(2), 1959-1968.
39. Wei, G. W., Wang, H. J., & Lin, R. (2011). Application of correlation coefficient to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making with incomplete weight information. Knowledge and Information Systems, 26, 337-349.
40. Wei, G., Wei, Y. (2018) . Similarity measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets based on the cosine function and their applications. International Journal of Intelligent Systems. 33(3), 634-652.
41. Yager, R. R. (2013). Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on fuzzy systems, 22(4), 958-965.
42. Zadeh, L. A. (1978). Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy sets and systems, 1(1), 3-28.
43. Zhang, X. (2016). A novel approach based on similarity measure for Pythagorean fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31(6), 593-611.
44. Zulqarnain, R. M., Xin, X. L., Saqlain, M., & Khan, W. A. (2021). TOPSIS method based on the correlation coefficient of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets and aggregation operators with their application in decision-making. Journal of Mathematics, 2021, 1-16.