پیش¬بینی ملاک¬های همسرگزینی براساس رضامندی زوجیت و محبوبیت متقابل والدین
محورهای موضوعی : روانشناسی زوجینفرزانه پوررضی 1 , زهرا نقش 2 * , قربان همتی علمدارلو 3 , محمدرضا بردیده 4
1 - دانشجوی دکتری سنجش و اندازه گیری، دانشگاه تهران، پردیس بین المللی کیش. F.Purazi@gmail.com
2 - دانشیار گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. (نویسنده مسئول): Z.Naghsh@ut.ac.ir ، تلفن: 09124396156
3 - استاد گروه روانشناسی و آموزش کودکان استثنایی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران. ghemati@shirazu.ac.ir
4 - استادیار گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد فیروزآباد، فیروزآباد، ایران. mbardideh@yahoo.com
کلید واژه: رضامندی زوجیت, محبوبیت متقابل والدین, ملاک¬های همسرگزینی,
چکیده مقاله :
چکیده مقدمه: یکی از متغیرهایی که قبل از آغاز زندگی زناشویی مورد توجه بوده و با عملکردی بعدی زوج ها رابطه دارد، ملاک-های همسرگزینی است. هدف پژوهش حاضر پیش¬بینی ملاک¬های همسرگزینی جوانان در آستانه ازدواج براساس رضامندی زوجیت و محبوبیت متقابل والدین بود. روش پژوهش: روش پژوهش توصیفی-همبستگی و جامعه آماری کلیه دانشجویان 18 تا 30 ساله در آستانهِ ازدواج دانشگاه-های شهر شیراز و والدین آنها بودند که به روش نمونه¬گیری خوشه¬ای چندمرحله¬ای تعداد 300 نفر از آنها انتخاب و توسط مقیاس¬ رضامندی زوجیت افروز؛ مقیاس محبوبیت والدین اسدی و افروز؛ و پرسشنامه اولویت¬بخشی ملاک¬های همسرگزینی رفاهی (1387) مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفتند. داده¬های پژوهش با استفاده از نرم افزار SPSS و به روش همبستگی پیرسون و رگرسیون گام¬به¬گام تجزیه و تحلیل گردید. یافته¬ها: یافته¬ها نشان داد بین تمام مؤلفه¬های رضامندی زوجیت و محبوبیت والدین با ملاک¬های همسرگزینی محتوایی و فرایندی رابطه مثبت معنادار (05/0>p) وجود دارد. همچنین یافته¬های حاصل از تحلیل رگرسیون نشان داد سه مؤلفه امورمالی و فعالیت¬های اقتصادی، روش فرزندپروری، و محبوبیت مادر بهترین پیش¬بینی¬کننده ملاک محتوایی و مؤلفه¬های محبوبیت مادر، احساس و رفتار معنوی، و رفتارهای ارتباطی و اجتماعی بهترین پیش¬بینی¬کننده ملاک همسرگزینی فرایندی بودند. نتیجه¬گیری: نتایج نشان داد عملکرد خانواده به ویژه رضامندی زوجیت و محبوبیت متقابل والدین نقش ویژه در ملاک¬های همسرگزینی جوانان دارند.
© 2020 The Author(s). This work is published by family and health as an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Introduction: One of the variables that is considered before the start of married life and is related to the subsequent performance of couples is the criteria for choosing a spouse. The aim of the present study was to predict the criteria for choosing a spouse of young people on the verge of marriage based on marital satisfaction and mutual popularity of parents. Research method: The research method was descriptive-correlation and the statistical population was all students aged 18 to 30 on the verge of marriage at universities in Shiraz and their parents. 300 of them were selected by multi-stage cluster sampling method and were evaluated by the Afrouz Marital Satisfaction Scale; Asadi and Afrouz Parental Popularity Scale; and the Welfare Criteria for Choosing a Spouse Questionnaire (2008). The research data were analyzed using SPSS software and Pearson correlation and stepwise regression methods. Findings: The findings showed that there was a significant positive relationship (p<0.05) between all components of marital satisfaction and parental popularity with content and process criteria for mate selection. Also, the findings from regression analysis showed that the three components of financial affairs and economic activities, parenting method, and mother's popularity were the best predictors of content criteria, and the components of mother's popularity, spiritual feelings and behavior, and communication and social behaviors were the best predictors of process criteria for mate selection. Conclusion: The results showed that family functioning, especially marital satisfaction and mutual popularity of parents, play a special role in the criteria for mate selection of young people.
1. Afrooz G. Family psychology of top spouses. Tehran: Association of Parents and Teachers, 2020 (In Persian)
2. Azimi Khoei A, Zahrakar K, Ahmadi Kh. Comparison of the effectiveness of premarital awareness training and interpersonal choice (PICK) and relationship improvement and improvement program (PREP) on attitudes towards marriage in couples on the verge of marriage. Family and Health. 2021; 11(2): 45-61. (In Persian)
3. Mohammadi A, Sahaq H. Presenting a grounded theory of the formation process of attitude towards temporary marriage: a qualitative study. New strategies in psychology and educational sciences. 2020; 2(1): 71-89. (In Persian)
4. Grover S, Helliwell J.F. How’s life at home? New evidence on marriage and the set point for happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2019; 20(2): 373-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9941-3
5. Zakari H, Mokhtari S. The role of demographic factors (gender, age, birth order and education level) on criteria for choosing a spouse in Shiraz students. Family and health. 2024; 14(1): 101-114. (In Persian) https://www.sid.ir/paper/1154857/en
6. Zhang LR, Chen WW. The mediating role of parental influence on the relationship between adult children’s filial piety beliefs and mate preferences. Evolutionary Psychology. 2020; 18(4): 1-12 DOI: 10.1177/1474704920969110
7. Amuasi GK, Alhassan E. Spousal Selection for Marriage by Tertiary Students in Wa Municipality of Ghana: Internal Factors in Perspective. European Journal of Development Studies. 2022; 2(2): 31-41. DOI: 10.24018/ejdevelop.2022.2.2.74
8. Yazdani F, Shafiabadi A, Heydari H. Predicting marital stability based on the criteria of choosing a spouse, communication skills and family resilience. Islamic Studies in Health. 2020; 4(1): 69-78. (In Persian) https://sid.ir/paper/966642/en
9. Olcay Imamoğlu E, Ads M, Weisfeld CC. What is the impact of choosing one’s spouse on marital satisfaction of wives and husbands? The case of arranged and self-choice Turkish marriages. Journal of Family Issues. 2019; 40(10): 1270-1298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X19835874
10. Makhliyo T. Psychological approach to choosing a spouse for young people who are about to start a family. Periodica Journal of Modern Philosophy. Social Sciences and Humanities. 2023; 15: 8-11, https://periodica.org/index.php/journal/article/view/411/353
11. Bovet J, Raiber E, Ren W, Wang C, Seabright P. Parent–offspring conflict over mate choice: An experimental study in China. British Journal of Psychology. 2018; 109(4): 674-693. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12319. Epub 2018 Jun 26. PMID: 29943825.
12. Rostami A, Ebrahimi MA. Prediction of marital satisfaction based on primary maladaptive schemas, social support and couple attachment styles in married women. Family and Health. 2023; 13(1): 107-94. DOI: 10.52547/psychowoman.2.1.23, (In Persian)
13. Asadi R, Afrooz G, Arjamandania A. Evaluation of marital satisfaction in ten domains of common life of parents of normal and abnormal children. Psychological Science. 2022; 21(114): 1077-1063. (In Persian) doi: 10.52547/JPS.21.114.1063
14. Halford K. Short-term couple therapy (couples' game to help themselves). 2001. Mostafa Tabrizi, Mojdeh Kardani and Forough Jafari, Tehran: Farravan Publication; 2022. (In Persian)
15. Lee S, Lee MJ. Religious homogamy and marital satisfaction in South Korea: Exploring variations across religious groups. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 2023; 62(3): 672-693. DOI: 10.1111/fare.12521
16. Raj A. Beyond the statistic: Exploring the process of early marriage decision-making using qualitative findings from Ethiopia and India. BMC Women's Health. 2018; 18(1): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0631-z
17. Lui M, Lau GK, Tam VC, Chiu HM, Li SS, Sin KF. Parents’ impact on children’s school performance: Marital satisfaction, parental involvement, and mental health. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2020; 29: 1548-1560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01655-7
18. Shi Y, Whisman MA. Marital satisfaction as a potential moderator of the association between stress and depression. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2023; 327: 155-158, doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.01.093. Epub 2023 Jan 31. PMID: 36731542.
19. De Coninck D, Van Doren S, Matthijs K. Attitudes of Young Adults Toward Marriage and Divorce, 2002–2018. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2021; 1(62): 66- 82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2020.1833292
20. Abbas E, Ferdoos A. Uncovering the Preferences of Highly Qualified Women during Spouse Selection from District Skardu–Gilgit Baltistan Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2022; 10(2): 613-625. https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2022.1002.0225
21. Asgari Z. Prediction of spouse selection criteria based on primary incompatible schemas and the health of the main family with the mediation of coping styles, Master's Thesis, Family Counseling, Qazvin Payam-Noor University, 2021 (In Persian)
22. Babai Fard, A, Heydarian A, Sharifi, A. A study of individual and social criteria of choosing a spouse among students. Roish Scientific Journal of Psychology. 2018; 7(5): 199-220. URL: http://frooyesh.ir/article-1-361-en.html (In Persian)
23. Heydari R, Sudani M, Rajabi G, Khojaste Mehr R. Investigating the experience of choosing a spouse in the children of divorce: a qualitative research. Consulting Research. 2023; 22(87): 86-113. (In Persian)
24. Yousefi F, Rostami Ch, Moradi M, Ardalan A, Rezaiyan K. Investigating the relationship between spouse selection criteria and marital satisfaction among the clients of Kamiyaran Marriage Counseling Center. Zanko Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020; 21(70): 41-32. URL: http://zanko.muk.ac.ir/article-1-487-en.html (In Persian)
25. Salimi H, Alipour G, Tarvardizadeh SH, Nikkhah-Bahrami MR. Prediction of irrational beliefs in choosing a spouse based on mental well-being, personality organization and attachment styles among male and female students. Islamic Research Journal of Women and Family. 2018; 6(10): 73-97. (In Persian)
26. Akpa E, Kolo JN, Florence N, Dada KM. The factors that influence mate selection among youth in ABU SAMURA CAMPUS ZARIA. Lapai international journal administration. 2023; 6(2): 122-128.
27. Chen MT, Lin GX, Lu C, Chang YP. Good partners, good parents: Parent relationship satisfaction predicts parenting efficacy for young children. Applied Research in Quality of Life. 2022; 17(4): 2405-2422, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-022-10043-1
28. Mahdavi A, Gholamali Lavasani M, Naqsh Z. Multilevel analysis of the relationship between parents' popularity, the formation of early maladaptive schemas and perfectionism of gifted teenagers. Psychological Science. 2022; 21(112): 727-741. URL: http://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-1377-en.html (In Persian)
29. Mamqani J, Afrooz GH, Ghbari Bonab b, Ghasemzadeh S. The relationship between creativity and spiritual vitality, parental popularity, parenting styles and cognitive characteristics in gifted students. New Psychological Research. 2019; 14(56): 244-270. (In Persian)
30. Sani GMD, Quaranta M. Chips off the old blocks? The political participation patterns of parents and children in Italy. Social science research. 2015; 50: 264- 276. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.12.002. Epub 2014 Dec 13. PMID: 25592935.
31. Wolchik S, Christopher C, Tein JY, Rhodes CA, Sandler IN. Long-term effects of a parenting preventive intervention on young adults’ attitudes toward divorce and marriage. Journal of divorce and remarriage. 2019; 3(60): 284-400. doi: 10.1080/10502556.2018.1528530. Epub 2018 Oct 17. PMID: 31217674; PMCID: PMC6583916.
32. Nosrati F, Bidaki MR, Ghbari Bonab b, Sharifi A. Comparison of attachment styles, parental popularity and behavioral-emotional disorder in children of veterans with and without visual impairment. Empowering Exceptional Children. 2018; 9(4): 55-67. DOI: 10.22034/CECIRANJ.2018.91193 (In Persian)
33. Atakilit M. Betrothal Practices in the Customary Marriage among the Rural Awi-Agew People: The Case of Guangua Woreda. Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Anthropology, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia; 2020
34. Refahi Zh, Sanai-Zhaker B, Shafi Abadi A, Sharifi HP. A comparative study of the criteria for choosing a spouse in Shiraz women and men in two situations when they got married and now, Counseling News and Research. 2010; 9(33): 7-31. https://sid.ir/paper/69975/en (In Persian)
35. Sabernjad R, Bagheri F, Pourhossein R. Examining the paradigmatic pattern of spouse selection and satisfaction in satisfied couples in Tehran. Review of Grounded Theory. Psychology and Cognitive Psychiatry, 2023; 10(6): 45-61. URL: http://frooyesh.ir/article-1-4437-en.html (In Persian)
36. Qarlipour Z, Rahbar Sh, Omid Oskoi AR, Ghasemi N, Rahbar A. Prioritization of wife selection criteria from the point of view of female students of Qom University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Qom University of Medical Sciences. 2022; 16(12): 968-979. (In Persian)
37. Akbari B, Farahbakhsh K, Naimi E. Factors affecting the formation of criteria for choosing a spouse in educated youth of Elam city; A contextual theory. Cultural-Education of Women and Family. 2022; 17(60): 83-107. https://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3125-en.pdf (In Persian)
38. Taqavi R, Ahmadi A, Mirfardi A, Rajabi M. The impact of developmental idealism beliefs on the marriage styles of young people: case study, 18-35 year olds of Yasouj city. Interdisciplinary Studies in Human Sciences. 2022; 14(4): 7-34. https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2022.4791.4700 (In Persian)
39. Abedini Mazreh S, Afrooz Gh, Baghdasarinas A, Tajalli P. The relationship between marital satisfaction and parents' popularity with children's academic achievement. Medicine Faculty Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. 2018; 61(1): 154-163. URL: http://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-2256-en.html (In Persian)
40. Al-Alawi ARS, Al Gharaibeh F. Criteria of Spouse Selection among Omani Youth and their impact on Marital Concordance: A field study. AL-ADAB Journal. 2022; 1(142): 441-480
41. Chirwa M, Banda L, Thankian K. Lived Experiences of Married Postgraduate Students at University of Zambia Regarding Marriage Mate Selection. Archives of Current Research International. 2022; 22(5): 1-11. DOI: 10.9734/ACRI/2022/v22i530287
42. Eaves LJ, Hatemi PK. Do we choose our spouse based on our in‐laws? Resolving the effects of family background and spousal choice for educational attainment, religious practice, and political preference. Social Science Quarterly. 2011; 92(5): 1253-1278, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00817.x
43. Yaffe Y. Systematic review of the differences between mothers and fathers in parenting styles and practices. Current psychology. 2023; 42(19): 16011-16024. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-020-01014-6
44. Szkody E, Steele EH, McKinney C. Effects of parenting styles on psychological problems by self-esteem and gender differences. Journal of Family Issues. 2021; 42(9): 1931-1954, https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X20958445
45. Roshani Sh. The role of parents' marital interactions and their education in the field of marriage in predicting children's attitude towards marriage. Islamic Research Institute of Women and Family. 2021; 9(25): 175-198. (In Persian). https://www.sid.ir/paper/1031735/en
46. Priyadharshini S, Gopalan RT. Marital Adjustment, Love, Personal Intimacy, personality, dyadic coping and spirituality on marital stability. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports. 2020; 7(4): 1-16. DOI: 10.9734/ajarr/2019/v7i430186