Minimum Stiffness and Optimal Position of an Intermediate Elastic Support to Maximize the Fundamental Frequency of a Vibrating Timoshenko Beam using Finite Element Method and Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm

Subject Areas : Mechanical Engineering

Hossein  Ebrahimi ¹ (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran)
Farshad  Kakavand ² (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran)
Hasan  Seidi ³ (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran)

Received: 2021-12-28 Accepted : 2022-04-23 Published : 2023-06-01

Keywords: intermediate support, Timoshenko beam, Multi-objective genetic algorithm (GA), optimal position and minimum stiffness,

Abstract :

This paper explores the optimal position and minimum stiffness of two intermediate supports to maximize the fundamental natural frequency of a vibrating cantilever Timoshenko beam with tip mass using Finite Element Method (FEM) and a multi-objective genetic algorithm (GA). After validating the results by comparison to previous works, the effects of the mass ratio and the position and stiffness of intermediate elastic support on the fundamental frequency are investigated. The numerical results demonstrated that as mass ratio increases, the optimal position moves toward the tip mass, and minimum stiffness increases. In many practical applications, it is not possible to place intermediate support in the optimal position; therefore, the minimum stiffness does not exist. In order to overcome this issue, a tolerance zone is considered, and design curves are proposed. The simultaneous optimization of the first and second natural frequencies of the beam with two intermediate supports was carried out using the genetic algorithm (GA) and the multi-objective GA. It was found that the optimization of the first and second natural frequencies did not require the two supports to have the same and high stiffness. The stiffness and optimal positions of the two supports differ at different mass ratios. Moreover, to optimize the first natural frequency, the second support should be stiffer, while the optimization of the second natural frequency requires the higher stiffness of the first support.

References:

• Courant, R., Hilbert, D., Methods of Mathematical Physics, Interscience Publishers, New York, 1953.


• Akesson, B., Olhoff, N., Minimum Stiffness of Optimally Located Supports for Maximum Value of Beam Eigen Frequencies, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 120, No. 3, 1988, pp. 457–463.


• Wang, D., Friswell, M., and Lei, Y., Maximizing the Natural Frequency of a Beam with an Intermediate Elastic Support, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 291, No. 3, 2006, pp. 1229–1238, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.06.028.


• Wang, C., Minimum Stiffness of an Internal Elastic Support to Maximize the Fundamental Frequency of a Vibrating Beam, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 259, No. 1, 2003, pp. 229–232, https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2002.5100.


• Olhoff, N., Akesson, B., Minimum Stiffness of Optimally Located Supports for Maximum Value of Column Buckling Loads, Structural Optimization, Vol. 3, No.3, 1991, pp.163-175, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01743073.


• Rao, C. K., Frequency Analysis of Clamped-Clamped Uniform Beams with Intermediate Elastic Support, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 133, No. 3, 1989, pp. 502–509, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(89)90615-9.


• Won, K. M., Park, Y. S., Optimal Support Positions for a Structure to Maximize its Fundamental Natural Frequency, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 213, 1998, pp. 801–812, https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1997.1493.


• Albarracı́n, C. M., Zannier, L., and Grossi, R., Some Observations in the Dynamics of Beams with Intermediate Supports, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 271, No. 1-2, 2004, pp. 475–480, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00631-X.


• Zhu, J., Zhang, W., Maximization of Structural Natural Frequency with Optimal Support Layout, Struct Multidiscip Optim, Vol. 31, No. 6, 2006, pp.462–469, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00158-005-0593-2.


• Wang, D., Optimal Design of Structural Support Positions for Minimizing Maximal Bending Moment, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2006, pp. 95–102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2006.07.004.


• Wang, D., Friswell, M. I., and Lei, Y., Maximizing the Natural Frequency of a Beam with an Intermediate Elastic Support, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 291, 2006, pp. 1229–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.06.028.


• Friswell, M. I., Wang, D., The Minimum Support Stiffness Required to Raise the Fundamental Natural Frequency of Plate Structures, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 301, 2007, pp. 665–77, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2006.10.016.


• Wang, D., Friswell, M. I., Support Position Optimization with Minimum Stiffness for Plate Structures Including Support Mass, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 499, 2021, 116003, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2021.116003.


• Kong, J., Vibration of Isotropic and Composite Plates Using Computed Shape Function and its Application to Elastic Support Optimization, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 326, No. 3-5, 2009, pp. 671–686, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2009.05.022.


• Wang, D., Yang, Z., and Yu, Z., Minimum Stiffness Location of Point Support for Control of Fundamental Natural Frequency of Rectangular Plate by Rayleigh-Ritz Method, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 329, No. 14, 2010, pp. 2792-2808, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2010.01.034.


• Aydin, E., Minimum Dynamic Response of Cantilever Beams Supported by Optimal Elastic Springs, Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 51, No. 3, 2014, pp. 377–402, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.51.3.377.


• Aydin, E., Dutkiewicz, M., Oztürk, B., and Sonmez, M., Optimization of Elastic Spring Supports for Cantilever Beams, Struct Multidiscip Optim, Vol. 62, 2020, pp. 55–81, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02469-3.


• Roncevic, G. S., Roncevic, B., Skoblar, A., and Zigulic, R., Closed form Solutions for Frequency Equation and Mode Shapes of Elastically Supported Euler-Bernoulli Beams, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 457, 2019, pp. 118-138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2019.04.036.


• Abdullatif, M., Mukherjee, R., Effect of Intermediate Support on Critical Stability of a Cantilever with Non-conservative Loading, Some New Results, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 485, 2020, 115564, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115564.


• Kukla, S., Free Vibrations of Axially Loaded Beams with Concentrated Masses and Intermediate Elastic Supports, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 172, No. 4, 1994, pp. 449–458, https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1994.1163.


• Lin, H. P., Chang, S., Free Vibration Analysis of Multi-Span Beams with Intermediate Flexible Constraints, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 281, No. 2, 2005, pp. 155–169, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.01.010.


• Lin, H. Y., Tsai, Y. C., Free Vibration Analysis of a Uniform Multi-Span Beam Carrying Multiple Spring–Mass Systems, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 302, No. 3, 2007, pp. 442–456, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2006.06.080.


• Lin, H. Y., Dynamic Analysis of a Multi-Span Uniform Beam Carrying a Number of Various Concentrated Elements, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 309, No. 1, 2008, pp. 262–275, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2007.07.015.


• Kim, T., Lee, U., Dynamic Analysis of a Multi-Span Beam Subjected to a Moving Force Using the Frequency Domain Spectral Element Method, Computers and Structures, Vol. 192, 2017, pp. 181–195, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.07.028.


• Laura, P., Pombo, J., and Susemihl, E., A Note on the Vibrations of a Clamped-Free Beam with a Mass at the Free End, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 37, No. 2, 1974, pp. 161-168, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(74)80325-1.


• Bruch, J., Mitchell, T., Vibrations of a Mass-Loaded Clamped-Free Timoshenko Beam, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 114, No. 2, 1987, pp. 341-345, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(87)80158-X.


• Goel, R., Vibrations of a Beam Carrying a Concentrated Mass, Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 40, No. 3, 1973, pp. 821-832, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3423102.


• Salarieh, H., Ghorashi, M., Free Vibration of Timoshenko Beam with Finite Mass Rigid Tip Load and Flexural–Torsional Coupling, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 48, No. 7, 2006, pp. 763-779, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2006.01.008.


• Murgoze, M., On the Eigenfrequencies of a Cantilever Beam with Attached Tip Mass and a Spring-Mass System, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 190, No. 2, 1996, pp. 146-162, https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1996.0053.


• Magrab, E. B., Natural Frequencies and Mode Shapes of Timoshenko Beams with Attachments, Journal of Vibration and Control, Vol. 13, No. 7, 2007, pp. 905-934, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546307078828.


• Zohoor, H., Kakavand, F., Vibration of Euler–Bernoulli Beams in Large Overall Motion on Flying Support Using Finite Element Method, Scientia Iranica, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2012, pp. 1105–1116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2012.06.019.


• Hong, J., Dodson, J., Laflamme, S., and Downey, A., Transverse Vibration of Clamped-Pinned-Free Beam with Mass at Free End, Applied Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 15, 2019, 9, 2996, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9152996.


• Huu-Tai, T., Thuc, P. V., Bending and Free Vibration of Functionally Graded Beams Using Various Higher-Order Shear Deformation Beam Theories, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 62, 2012, pp. 57–66, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.05.014.