Comprehension of factual, nonfactual, and counterfactual conditionals by Iranian EFL learners
Subject Areas : Journal of Teaching English Language Studies
Fatemeh Moeini
1
(Islamic Azad University, Takestan Branch)
Keywords: subjunctive mood, conditional reasoning, indicative mood, factuals, nonfactuals, counterfa,
Abstract :
A considerable amount of studies have been established on conditional reasoning supporting mental model theory of propositional reasoning. Mental model theory proposed by Johnson- larid and Byrne is an explanation of someone's thought process about how something occurs in the real world. Conditional reasoning as a kind of reasoning is the way to speak about possibilities or probabilities. The aim of present study was to investigate comprehension of English factual, nonfactual, and counterfactual structures by Iranian EFL learners advocating mental model theory of propositional reasoning. To this end 68 learners studying EFL in 4 language centers participated in the study. A consistency judgment test adopted from Byrne & Tasso (2002) was administered to determine comprehension of 3 English conditional types in indicative vs. subjunctive mood, and past or present tense aspect i.e. Factual, nonfactual, and counterfactual structures. The data were analyzed through a repeated measure one-way ANOVA. The result showed that when participants encountered factual conditional having a general knowledge that it is real, possible and very likely to fulfill, build a mental model of its premises and are more likely to perceive that indicative conditional is consistent with the truth of antecedent and consequent(TA-TC). Also when encountering a nonfactual or counterfactual conditional in subjunctive mood having a general knowledge that it is very unlikely or impossible to fulfill, participants build a mental model of its premises, and are more likely to perceive that subjunctive conditional is consistent with the falsity of antecedent and consequent(FA-FC).
Bonatti, L. (1994). Propositional reasoning by model. Psychological Review, 101,725-733.
Breckenrigde, W. (2000). On the truth conditions of indicative and counterfactual Conditionals. Psychological Review, 96,1-10.
Byrne, R. M. J. (1997). Cognitive processes in counterfactual thinking about what might have been. The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, 37, 105-154
Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Mental models and counterfactual thoughts about what might have been. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 426- 431.
Byrne, R. M. J. (2007). Précis of the rational imagination: How people create alternatives to reality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 439- 480.
Byrne, R. M. J. (2009). "If" and the problems of conditional reasoning. Trends in cognitive sciences, 13, 282-287.
Byrne, R. M. J. & Egan, S. M. (2004). Counterfactual and prefactual conditionals. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 58, 113- 120.
Byrne, R. M. J. & McEleny, A. (2000). Counterfactual thinking about actions and failure to act. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, & cognition, 26, 1318- 1331.
Byrne, R. M. J., Segura, S., Culhane, R., Tasso, A., & Berrocal, P. (2000). The temporality effect in counterfactual thinking about what might have been. Memory and cognition, 28, 264- 281.
Byrne, R. M. J., & Tasso, A. (1999). Deductive reasoning with factual, possible, and counterfactual conditionals. Memory and cognition, 27, 726- 740.
Celce- Murica, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1991). The grammar book: An ESl/ EFl teachers course (2nd edition). Newyork: Heinle & Heinle.
De Vega, M., & Urritia, M. (2011). Counterfactual sentences activate embodied meaning: an action- sentence compatibility effect study. Journal of cognitive psychology, 23, 962- 973.
Evans, J. St. B. T. (2003). In two minds: dual- process accounts of reasoning. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7, 454- 459.
Evans, J. St. B. T., Newstead, S. E., & Byrne, R. M.J. (1993). Human reasoning. The psychology of deduction. Hove, England: Erlbaum.
Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental spaces: aspects of meaning construction in natural language. New York: Cambridge university press.
Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mapping in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
Fillenbaum, S. (1974). Information amplified: memory for counterfactual conditionals. Journal of experimental psychology, 102, 44-49.
Fillenbaum, S. (1978).
Folega, S. (2012). Why English grammar is important.http://www.howtolearnenglish.co.uk.
Frosch, C. A., & Byrne, R. M.J. (2005). Paraphrases of counterfactual and casual conditionals. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/228709609.
Gavanski, I., & Wells, G. L. (1989). Counterfactual processing of normal and exceptional events. Journal of experimental social psychology, 25, 314- 325.
Goodman, N. (1983). Fact, fiction, & forecast. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: Harvard university press.
Hajek, A. (2002). Counterfactual reasoning (philosophical aspects)- quantitative. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2872-2874.
Johnson- Larid, P. N. (1994). Mental models and probabilistic thinking. Cognition, 50, 189-209.
Johnson- Larid, P. N. (1995). Mental model: mental models, deductive reasoning, and the brain. The cognitive neurosciences, 65, 999-1008
Johnson- Larid, P. N. (1999). Deductive reasoning. Annu. Rev. Psychol, 50, 109-135.
Johnson- Larid, P. N. (2001). Mental models and deduction. Trends in cognitive sciences, 5, 434-442.
Johnson- Larid, P. N. & Byrne,R. M. J. (2002). Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference. Psychological Review, 109, 646-678.
Johnson- Larid, P. N., Byrne,R. M. J., & Schaeken, W. (1992). Propositional reasoning by model. Psychological Review, 99, 418- 439.
Johnson- Larid, P. N., Byrne,R. M. J., & Schaeken,W. (1994). Why models rather than rules give a better account of propositional reasoning: a reply to Bonatti and to O'Brien, Braine, and Yang. Psychological Review, 101, 734-739.
Schechter, J. (2013). Deductive reasoning. Forthcoming in the encyclopedia of the mind.
Stalnaker, R. (1968). A theory of conditionals. In N. Recher (Ed), Studies in logical theory. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
Thompson, V. A. (1994). Interpretational factors in conditional reasoning. Memory & cognition, 22, 742- 758.
Thompson, V. A., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Reasoning counterfactually: making inferences about things that didn’t happen. Journal ofexperimentalpsychology, 28, 1154- 1170.
Urrutia, M., de Vega, M. & Basitiaansen, M. (2012). Understanding counterfactuals in discourse modulates ERP and oscillatory gamma rhythms in the EEG. Brain research, 1455, 40-55.
Wong, E. M. (2010). It could have been better: the effects of counterfactual communication on impression formation. European journal of social psychology, 40, 1251- 1260.
Wason, P. C. (1966). Reasoning. In Foss, B. M. New horizons in psychology 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin.