Technical Knowledge and Information Gaps among Smallholder Farmers in the Production of Sugarcane in Kakamega County, Kenya

Subject Areas : Agricultural Extension

Gilbert Odilla Abura ¹ , Raphael Mwiti Gikunda ² , Godffrey NyongesaNato ³

1 - Department of Education, Chuka University, P.O Box 109 – 60400, Chuka
2 - Department of Education, Chuka University, P.O Box 109 – 60400, Chuka
3 - Technical University of Mombasa, P.O Box 90420 – 80100, Mombasa

Received: 2015-12-24 Accepted : 2015-12-24 Published : 2013-12-01

Keywords: Smallholder farmers, Knowledge &Information Gaps, Sugarcane Production, information dissemination,

Abstract :

The purpose of the study was to identify and document technical knowledge and information gaps that can inform development of appropriate training programs for cane farmers. The study employed a survey research design; involving 105 small scale farmers in selected from eight Sub-counties of Kakamega County. Data was analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficient was used to test for significance of relationships between access to information regarding cane production and the productivity of the crop. The results show that there was a strong positive correlation (r =0.722) between the firm size and the acreage under cane crop. The technical knowledge and information gaps varied on the basis of growth stages of the cane crop; 60% of the small scale farmers did not prepare land at the right time, 48% of the farmers did not know how to propagate cane, 34% did not know the cane planting spacing, 48% cultivated uncertified materials due to lack of capital and poor access to the suitable materials as the reasons. Majority of the farmers (92%) confirmed that they knew how to gap, although a few (8%) didn’t, 48% did not remove tillers from their crop, the number of times that the crop was weeded ranged from once (2%) to 8 times (2%), and 64% of the farmers applied organic manure while 87% applied inorganic fertilizers. The results show that majority of the smallholder farmers were unable to apply the recommended crop management practices due to lack of capital and lack knowledge and skills. For instance 38% of the respondents were unable to practice crop rotation due to lack of practical skills. Access to agricultural information regarding cane crop agronomy was rated as low by most of the respondents (58%).There was a positive correlation between access to knowledge and productivity of cane crop with a coefficient of 0.283. The productivity of sugarcane crop in Kakamega County was low and this was contributed by among other factors; lack of capital and inadequate knowledge and skills regarding the crop’s agronomy. The study recommends that strategies should be designed to disseminate practices that require technical knowledge and skills.

References:

1) Amadalo, B., Jama, B., Noordin, Q., Nyasimi, M., Place, F., Franzel, S. & Beniest, J. (2003). Improved fallows for western Kenya: An extension guideline. Nairobi, Kenya: World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF).

2) Azhar, M., Ishfaq, M., IQBAL, J and Shafi N. M. (2007). Agronomic Performance and Juice Quality of Autumn Planted Sugarcane (Saccharumofficinarum L.) as affected by flat, ditch and pit planting under different spatial arrangements. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology 9(1): 167-169.

3) CBS. (2011). Economic Survey. Nairobi, Kenya: Government Press.

4) FAO. (1978). Reports of the agro-ecological zones project: World Soil Resources Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations Report 48 Vols.1-4: 5-20.

5) Jaetzold, R & Schimdt, H., (1982). Farm Management Handbook of Kenya: Natural Conditions and Farm Management Information. Nairobi, Kenya Ministry of Agriculture, Kenya, and German Agency for Technical Cooperation (GTZ).

6) KARI. (1994). Strategic Plan for Cereals (1993-2013). Nairobi, Kenya Agriculture Research Institute.

7) Kenya Sugar Board. (2009). Kenya Sugar Board Strategic Plan 2009. Retrieved from http://www.kenyasugar.co.ke

8) Kenya Sugar Board. (2010). The Kenya Sugar Industry Value Chain Analysis: Analysis of the Production and Marketing Costs for Sugarcane andSugar Related Products. Provided by the KSB through: http://www.kenyasugar.co.ke/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&layout=item&i61&Itei=184&lang=en

9) Kenya Sugar Industry (KSI). (2009). Kenya Sugar Industry Strategic Plan 2010 - 2014. Retrieved from http://www.kenyasugar.co.ke.

10)KESREF ( 2009). Kenya Sugar Research Foundation Strategic Plan 2009 - 2014. Nairobi, KESREF.

11)Mumias Sugar Company (MSC). (2008). Annual Report and Financial Statements for year ended 30 June 2008.Mumias, Mumias Sugar company.

12)Lynam, J & Hassan, R. M. (1998). A new approach to securing sustained growth in Kenya's maize sector. In: R.M H, editor. Maize technology development and transfer: A GIS publication for research planning in Kenya. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.

13) Odenya, J. O., Wawire, N. W & Okwach, G. O. (2007). The Sugar Industry in Kenya with Special

Reference to Smallholder Farmers. A paper presented to the East African Sugar Development Project Inception Meeting at Impala Hotel, Arusha on 4th – 5 th June 2007.

14) Ojiem, J. O. (2006). Exploring Socio-Ecological Niches for Legumes in Western Kenya Smallholder Farming Systems [Ph.D thesis].Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen University. 35-116 p.

15) Olweny, C & Jamoza, J. (2008). Effect of Plant Density on Seed cane Yield of Tissue Cultured Cane Plantlets. South African Journal of Science (2008) 81: 355 – 357.

16) Robson, C. (1993). Real World Research. A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers.Oxford: Blackwell.

17) Verma, R. S. (2004). Sugarcane Projection Technology in India.International Book Distributing Co. Lucknow. India.

18) Wawire, N. W., Kahora, F., Wachira P. M & Kipruto, K. B. (2006).Technology Adoption Study in Kenya Sugar Industry. KESREF Technical Bulletin No.1 P: 51-77.