Iranian EFL Learners’ Understanding of Ubiquitous Learning: Examining Factors Affecting L2 Learner’s Classroom Achievement Using Structural Equation Modeling
DOR: 20.1001.1.23223898.2021.9.36.6.2
محورهای موضوعی : Research Paper
Maral Azizi 1 , Ehsan Rassaei 2 , Mohammadsadegh Bagheri 3
1 - English Language Department, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
2 - English Language Department, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
3 - English Language Department, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
کلید واژه: Ubiquitous learning, classroom achievement, L2 learners,
چکیده مقاله :
Ubiquitous learning can be described as a daily learning environment supported by mobile, computers, and wireless networks to provide learning anytime and anywhere. As the concept of Ubiquitous learning is little known in Iran, this study considers a sample of Iranian EFL learners to identify the effects of different aspects of Ubiquitous learning including omnipresence, context customization, interactivity, perceived self-efficacy, and m-learning motivation that influence L2 learner’s classroom achievement. The participants included 150 high school students in Shiraz. A questionnaire adapted from Jung (2014) was the main data collection instrument used in the present study. Moreover, classroom achievement scores of the students taken from their final exam results were also analyzed. Structural equation modeling results showed that among aspects of Ubiquitous learning, omnipresence, context customization, perceived self-efficacy, and m-learning motivation affected classroom achievement but interactivity did not influence classroom achievement. The results also revealed the positive effect of integration of technology on student learning. EFL learners with a clear understanding of innovation in education are better positioned to move their efficiency and effectiveness from the traditional English learning environment to one that fully integrates learning into learners’ daily routines. The study concludes that developments in technology need to be transmitted into the pedagogical areas and carefully considered in the forms of curriculum and contents for language teaching.
l
Alavinia, P., & Qoitassi, K. (2013). On the Viability of Vocabulary Learning Enhancement through the Implementation of MALL: The Case of Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(2), 412–426.
Aljohani, N. R., & Davis, H. C. (2012). “Learning Analytics in Mobile and Ubiquitous Learning Environments.” Paper presented at the 11th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning: mLearn, Helsinki, Finland, 16-18.
Alsaleem, B. I. A. (2014). The effect of “Whatsapp” electronic dialogue journaling on improving writing Vocabulary Word Choice and Voice of EFL Undergraduate Saudi Students. Arab World English Journal, 4(3), 213–225.
Bandura A., & Locke EA. (2003). Negative self- efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 87–99.
Begum, R. (2011). Prospect for cell phones as instructional tools in the EFL classroom: A case study of Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 105–115.
Burbules, N. C. (2014). Los significados de “aprendizaje ubicuo”. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22.1880.
Callan, S. (1994). Can the use of hand-held personal computers assist transition students to produce written work of excellent quality? Wentworth County Board of Education, Ontario, Canada.
Cavus, N., & Ibrahim, D. (2008). MOLT: A mobile learning tool that makes learning new technical English language words enjoyable. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 2(4), 38–42.
Chang, C. Y., & Sheu, J. P. (2002). “Design and implementation of Ad Hoc classroom and eSchoolbag systems for ubiquitous learning.” In M. Milrad, U. Hoope, and Kinshuk (Eds.), Proceedings of IEEE international workshop on wireless and mobile technologies in education (pp.8–14).Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Publications.
Chen, C. M., & Chung, C.J. (2008). Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle, Computers & Education, 51(2), 624–645.
Chen, Y.S., Kao, T.C., Sheu, J.P. & Chiang, C.Y. (2002). A Mobile Scaffolding-Aid-Based Bird Watching Learning System, Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE'02), 15-22.
Chiu, P.S., Kuo, Y., Huang, Y. & Chen. T. (2008). A Meaningful Learning based u-Learning Evaluation Model, Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 77- 81.
Cook, D.J., & Das, S.K. (2012). Pervasive computing at scale: Transforming the state of the art. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 8(1), 22 – 35.
Corlett, D., Sharples, M., Chan, T., & Bull, S. (2004). A mobile learning organizer for university students. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education. JungLi, Taiwan: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 35-42.
Crowe, A. R. (2007). “Learning to teach with mobile technology: A teacher educator's journey.” In M. van't Hooft and K. Swan (Eds.), Ubiquitous computing in education Mahwah (pp. 127-144). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Curtis, M., Luchini, K., Bobrowsky, W., Quintana, C. & Soloway, E. (2002). Handheld Use in K-12: A Descriptive Account, Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE'02), pp. 23-30.
Dede, C. (2011). ”Emerging technologies, ubiquitous learning, and educational transformation.” Paper presented at the 6th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL2011 Palermo, Italy, September 20-23.
Dholakia, N., Dholakia, R., Lehrer, M., & Kshetri, N. (2004). Patterns, opportunities, and challenges in the emerging global m-commerce landscape. In N. Shi (Ed.), Wireless communications and mobile commerce (pp. 121) Singapore & Hershey PA: Idea Group.
Eady, M. J., & Lockyer, L. (2013). Tools for learning: technology and teaching strategies: Learning to teach in the primary school. Queensland University of Technology, Australia. pp. 71-89.https://scholars.uow.edu.au/display/publication76376
Figge, S. (2004). Situation-dependent service: A challenger for mobile network operators. Journal of Business Research, 57(11), 1416-1422.
Holme, O., & Sharples, M. (2002). Implementing a student learning organizer on the pocket PC platform. Proceedings of MLEARN 2002: European Workshop on Mobile and Contextual Learning, Birmingham, UK, pp. 41-44.
Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63– 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002.
Huang, Y. M., Huang, T.C., & Hsieh, M. Y. (2008). Using Annotation Services in a Ubiquitous Jigsaw Cooperative Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 3-15.
Huang, Y. M., Lin, Y. T., Cheng, S. C. (2010). Effectiveness of a Mobile Plant Learning System in a Science Curriculum in Taiwanese Elementary Education, Computers & Education, 54, 47- 58.
Hwang, G.-J., Tsai, C.-C., & Yang, S. J. H. (2008). Criteria, strategies and research issues of context-aware ubiquitous learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 81–91.
Hwang, W-Y., & Chen, H. (2013). Users’ familiar situational contexts facilitate the practice of EFL in elementary schools with mobile devices. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), 101–125.
Jeong, H.Y., & Hong, B.H. (2013). “A practical use of learning system using user preference in ubiquitous computing environment,” Multimedia Tools and Application, 64, 491-504.
Jung, H.J. (2014). Ubiquitous Learning: Determinants Impacting Learners’ Satisfaction and Performance with Smartphones. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 97–119. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2014/jung.pdf.
Kannan, P. K., Chang, A. M., & Whinston, A. B. (2001). Wireless commerce: Marketing issues and possibilities. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference Systems Science, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos.
Kiernan, P. J., & Aizawa, K. (2004). Cell phones in task based learning: Are cell phones useful language learning tools? ReCALL, 16(1), 71-84.
Kim, S. H. (2008). Moderating effects of job relevance and experience on mobile wireless technology acceptance: Adoption of a smartphone by individuals. Information & Management, 45(6), 387-393.
Kim, H-S. (2010). Three teachers’ initial efforts to use Twitter for teaching English in public schools. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), 129–154.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler. J. (2005). Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers. London: Routledge.
Lam, Y., & Lawrence, G. (2002). Teacher-student role redefinition during a computer-based second language project: Are computers catalysts for empowering change? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(3), 295-315. https://doi.org/10.1076/call.15.3.295.8185
Levy, M., & Kennedy, C. (2005). Learning Italian via mobile SMS. In A. Kukulska-Hulme & J. Traxler (Eds.), Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers. London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 76-83.
Li, M., Ogata, H., Hou, B., Hashimoto, S., Uosaki, N., Liu, Y. & Yano, Y. (2010) ‘Development of adaptive vocabulary learning via mobile phone, e-mail’, 6th IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technologies in Education (WMUTE), pp. 34–41.
Liaw, SH. SH., & Huang, H. M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60(1), 14-24.
Liu, G. Z., & Hwang, G. J. (2009). “A key step to understanding paradigm shifts in e- learning,” British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 1–9.
Liu, T., Tan, T., & Chu, Y. (2010). QR code and augmented reality-supported mobile English learning system. In X. Jiang, M-Y. Ma, & C-W. Chen (Eds.), Workshop of Mobile Multimedia Processing 2008, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 59(60), 37–52.oney, C., Jessup, L., & Valacich, J. (2004). Emerging business models for mobile brokerage services. Communications of the ACM, 47(6), 71–77.
McConatha, D., & Praul, M. (2008). Mobile learning in higher education: An empirical assessment of a new educational tool. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(3), 15–21.
Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30-38. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.30.
Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2008). Handhelds: Getting mobile. District Administration, 44(8), 20 – 24.
Ogata, H., & Yano, Y. (2008). Supporting a decision making for task assignments in language learning outside classroom with handhelds, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computers in Education, Taipei, pp.713–720.
Pezzulo, G., van der Meer, M. A., Lansink, C. S., & Pennartz, C. M. (2014). Internally generated sequences in learning and executing goal-directed behavior. Trends in cognitive sciences, 18(12), 647-657.
Pourhossein Gilakjani, A. (2017). A review of the literature on the integration of technology into the learning and teaching of English language skills. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(5), 95-106. doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n5p95
Rahimi Y. (2009). A study on computer anxiety of high school and the relationship between use of computer and ownership of personal computers. Proceedings of the electronics of conference. University of Science and Technology, Tehran, 18-19.
Redman, D. (2016). Motivation of Adult, Auditioned Community Choirs: Implications toward Lifelong Learning. Ph.D., University of South Florida.
Riordan, B., & Traxler, J. (2003). Supporting computing students at risk using blended technologies. Proceedings of 4th Annual Conference. Galway, Ireland: LTSN Centre for Information and Computer Science, 174-175.
Rogers, Y., Connelly, K., Hazlewood, W., & Tedesco, L. (2009). “Enhancing learning: A study of how mobile devices can facilitate sense making.” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14, 111–124.
Schacter, J. (1999). The impact of education technology on student achievement. What the most current research has to say. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED430537) .
Schwarzer, R., & Warner, L. M. (2013). Perceived self-efficacy and its relationship to resilience. In S. Prince- Embury & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The Springer series on human exceptionality: Resilience in children, adolescents, and adults: Translating research into practice, pp. 139-150. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4939-3_10.
Sharples, M., Chan, T., Rudman, P., & Bull, S. (2003). Evaluation of a mobile learning organizer and concept mapping tools. Proceedings of MLEARN 2003: Learning with Mobile Devices, pp. 139-144. London, UK: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
Shin, D. H., Shin, Y. J., Choo, H., & Beom, K. (2011). Smartphones as smart pedagogical tools: Implications for smartphones as u-learning devices. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2207- 2214.
Sivin-Kachala & Bialo, E. (2000). Research Report on the Effectiveness of Technology in Schools. (7th ed.) Washington.DC: Software and lnformation lndustry Association
Solanki, D., & Shyamlee1, M. P. (2012). Use of technology in English language teaching and learning: An analysis. 2012International Conference on Language, Medias and Culture IPEDR vol. 33(2012)©(2012)IACSIT Press,Singapore. 150-156.
Stajkovic A., & Luthans F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240–261.
Stickler, U., & Hampel, R (2010). CyberDeutsch: Language production and user preferences in a Moodle Virtual Learning Environment. CALICO Journal, 28(1), 49-73. http://dx.do i.org/10.11139/cj.28.1.49-73
Stockwell, G. (2007). Vocabulary on the move: investigating an intelligent mobile phone-based vocabulary tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(4), 365–383.
Susilo, A. (2014). Exploring Facebook and Whatsapp As Supporting Social Network Applications For English Learning In Higher Education.
Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 217-228.
Traxler, J., & Riordan, B. (2003). Evaluating the effectiveness of retention strategies using SMS, WAP and WWW student support. Proceedings of 4th Annual Conference, pp. 54-55. Galway, Ireland: LTSN Centre for Information and Computer Science.
Underwood, J., Luckin, R., & Winters, N. (2010) ‘m-iLexicon harnessing resources for personal and collaborative language inquiry’, Communications in Computer and Information Science, 126, 87–98.
Wang, H. (2006). A pragmatic framework for promoting interactivity in e-Learning. In T. Reeves & S. Yamashita (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2006, pp. 158–163. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
Weiser, M. (1991). The computer of the 21st century. Scientific American, 265(3), 66- 75.
Zare M., & Sarikhani R. (2016). “From E-learning to Ubiquitous Learning; Theoretical Principles”. Features of Medical Education Journal, 6(3), 12-15.
Zhang, B., Looi, C. K., Seow, P., Chia, G., Wong, L. H., Chen, W., et al. (2011). Deconstructing and reconstructing: transforming primary science learning via a mobilized curriculum. Computers & Education, 55, 1504e1523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.016
