The Effectiveness of Concordancing on Vocabulary Learning: EFL Intermediate-level Learners in focus
محورهای موضوعی : English Language Teaching (ELT)
Ali Bahremand
1
,
Mahnam Saeid
2
,
Neda Fatehi Rad
3
1 - Department of English Language, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran
2 - Department of English Language, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran
3 - Department of English Language, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran
کلید واژه: Corpus Linguistics, Concordancing, Vocabulary Teaching, CALL, Data-Driven Learning,
چکیده مقاله :
Corpus linguistics has developed a new avenue of research in the field of language teaching. One important aspect of corpora is concordancing. Drawing on the concept of concordance, this study aimed to explore whether concordancing can effectively improve the vocabulary learning and retention of Persian EFL learners. To this end, 50 homogenous learners were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. Vocabulary pre-test and post-test, and interviews were employed to collect the data. The results of this mixed method study revealed a statistically significant difference between the control and experimental groups on post-test scores; furthermore, the experimental group’s retention of these items was weaker in the delayed post-test. Finally, the results of interviews showed that this approach increased learners' enjoyment and interest in learning, led to a greater appreciation of particular uses of words in various contexts, enhanced learners' command of the target language's linguistic rules and patterns, facilitated the development of autonomy, and improved learners' language awareness.
Corpus linguistics has developed a new avenue of research in the field of language teaching. One important aspect of corpora is concordancing. Drawing on the concept of concordance, this study aimed to explore whether concordancing can effectively improve the vocabulary learning and retention of Persian EFL learners. To this end, 50 homogenous learners were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. Vocabulary pre-test and post-test, and interviews were employed to collect the data. The results of this mixed method study revealed a statistically significant difference between the control and experimental groups on post-test scores; furthermore, the experimental group’s retention of these items was weaker in the delayed post-test. Finally, the results of interviews showed that this approach increased learners' enjoyment and interest in learning, led to a greater appreciation of particular uses of words in various contexts, enhanced learners' command of the target language's linguistic rules and patterns, facilitated the development of autonomy, and improved learners' language awareness.
Alqahtani, M. (2015). The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International journal of teaching and education, 3(3), 21-34. DOI: 10.20472/TE.2015.3.3.002
Alsahafi, M. (2022). Corpora and Concordancing in Second Language Vocabulary Learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(12), 2651-2657.
Ballance, O. J. (2017). Pedagogical models of concordance use: correlations between concordance user preferences, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3-4), 259-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1307228
Bitchener, J. ISP Nation, Learning Vocabulary in Another Language:(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, UK. 2001. pp. xiv, 477).
Chan, H. & Liou, F. (2005). Effects of web-based concordancing instruction on EFL students' learning of verb-noun collocations, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 231-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220500185769
Cobb, T. (1997). Is there any measurable learning from hands-on concordancing?. System, 25(3), 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00024-9
Enayati, F., & Gilakjani, A. P. (2020). The Impact of Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) on Improving Intermediate EFL Learners' Vocabulary Learning. International Journal of Language Education, 4(1), 96-112.
Ghalebi, R., Sadighi, F., & Bagheri, M. S. (2020). Vocabulary learning strategies: A comparative study of EFL learners. Cogent Psychology, 7(1), 1824306.
Gilmore, A. (2008). Using online corpora to develop students' writing skills. ELT Journal, 63(4), 363-372. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn056
Gilquin, G., & Granger, S. (2010). How can data-driven learning be used in language teaching. The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics, 359370, 359-370.
Golabi, N. (2022). The Effect of Concordancing based Teaching on the Student's Vocabulary Retention. Journal of Research in Techno-based Language Education, 2(1), 25-32.
Hadley, G. (2002). An introduction to data-driven learning. RELC Journal, 33(2), 99–
124. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820203300205
Jalilifar, A., Mehrabi, K., & Mousavinia, S. R. (2014). The effect of concordance enriched instruction on the vocabulary learning and retention of Iranian EFL learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98(5), 742-746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.476
Johns, T., & King, P. (Eds.). (1991). Classroom concordancing. Centre for English Language Studies, the University of Birmingham.
Kaur, J., & Hegelheimer, V. (2005). ESL students' use of concordance in the transfer of academic word knowledge: An exploratory study. Computer assisted language learning, 18(4), 287-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220500280412
Ko, M. H. (2017). Learner perspectives regarding device type in technology-assisted language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 844-863. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1367310
Laufer, B. (2017). From word parts to full texts: Searching for effective methods of vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 21(1), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816683118
Liu, D., & Jiang, P. (2009). Using a corpus‐based lexicogrammatical approach to grammar instruction in EFL and ESL contexts. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 61-78.
Marzá, N. E. (2014). A practical corpus-based approach to teaching English for tourism. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(1), 129-136.
Muftah, M. (2023). Data-driven learning (DDL) activities: do they truly promote EFL students’ writing skills development?. Education and Information Technologies, 1-27.
Mukherjee, J. (2006). Corpus linguistics and language pedagogy: The state of the art–and beyond. Corpus technology and language pedagogy: New resources, new tools, new methods, 5-24.
Nation, I. S. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language (Vol. 10). Cambridge: Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009093873
Nation, I. S. (2008). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891643
Nation, I. S. (2008). Teaching vocabulary: Strategies and techniques. (No Title).
O'keeffe, A., McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2007). From corpus to classroom: Language use and language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Rets, I. (2017). Vocabulary retention and concordance-based learning in L3 acquisition. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 313-324. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.461029
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.). (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge university press.
Sagarra, N., & Alba, M. (2006). The key is in the keyword: L2 vocabulary learning methods with beginning learners of Spanish. The modern language journal, 90(2), 228-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00394.x
Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12, 329-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880808992
Stapleton, P., & Radia, P. (2009). Tech-era L2 writing: Towards a new kind of process. ELT journal, 64(2), 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp038
Stevens, V. (1995). Concordancing with language learners: why? when? what. Caell Journal, 6(2), 2-10.
Sun, Y. C. (2007). Learner perceptions of a concordancing tool for academic writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(4), 323-343.
Sun, Y. C., & Wang, L. Y. (2003). Concordancers in the EFL classroom: Cognitive approaches
and collocation difficulty. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16, 83 – 94. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220701745791
Susanto, A. (2017). The teaching of vocabulary: A perspective. Jurnal Kata: Penelitian Tentang Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, 1(2), 182-191.
Thurston, J., & Candlin, C. N. (1998). Concordancing and the teaching of the vocabulary of academic English. English for specific purposes, 17(3), 267-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00013-6
Vyatkina, N., & Boulton, A. (2017). Corpora in language teaching and learning. Language learning and technology, 21(3), 66-89.
Widdowson, H. 1990. Aspects of Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Widdowson, H. G. (1990). Aspects of language teaching. New York: Oxford.
Yeh, Y., Liou, H. C., & Li, Y. H. (2007). Online synonym materials and concordancing for EFL college writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(2), 131-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220701331451
Yelland, N., & Masters, J. (2007). Rethinking scaffolding in the information age. Computers & Education, 48(3), 362–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.010
Yılmaz, E., & Soruç, A. (2015). The use of concordance for teaching vocabulary: A data-driven learning approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2626-2630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.400
Yoon, C. (2011). Concordancing in L2 writing class: An overview of research and issues. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(3), 130-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.003
Yoon, H., & Hirvela, A. (2004). ESL student attitudes toward corpus use in L2 writing. Journal of second language writing, 13(4), 257-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.06.002
