The Impacts of Vocabulary Instruction via Synchronous and Asynchronous Social Networks on Iranian EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension
محورهای موضوعی : Research in English Language Pedagogy
Servat Shirkhani
1
(English Department, Khorram Abad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khorram Abad, Iran)
Samaneh Shiran
2
(English Department, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
کلید واژه: vocabulary instruction, EFL learners, reading comprehension, Asynchronous social networks, Synchronous social networks,
چکیده مقاله :
The significant role of technology in improving second language skills and components has been recently addressed extensively. In the same vein, this quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design study aimed to compare the effects of synchronous and asynchronous social networks in teaching vocabulary to improve English as a foreign language (EFL) learners' reading comprehension. For this purpose, 61 EFL learners were chosen using the convenience sampling method and were randomly assigned to two experimental groups. Before the treatment, a researcher-made reading comprehension test was run as the pretest. Then WhatsApp was employed as the synchronous network for teaching vocabulary for the first group and Instagram as the asynchronous network for the second. The first group had to be online at a specific time, but the second group was given two days to see the posts. The strategies for teaching vocabulary were the same in both groups. After the treatment, another reading comprehension test was administered as the posttest. The statistical analysis indicated significant effects for both networks and a significant difference between the two experimental groups, showing that the asynchronous social network was significantly more effective in enhancing learners' reading comprehension than the synchronous one. The results imply that teachers can benefit from synchronous and asynchronous social networks as good platforms for teaching new words and improving learners' reading comprehension.
Alibakhshi, G., & Mohammadi, M. J. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous multimedia and Iranian EFL learners' learning of collocations. Applied Research on the English Language, 5(2), 237-254.
Bailey, D., Almusharraf, N., & Hatcher, R. (2021). Finding satisfaction: Intrinsic motivation for synchronous and asynchronous communication in the online language learning context. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2563-2583.
Battro, A. M., & Fischer, K. W. (2012). Mind, brain, and education in the digital era. Mind, Brain, and Education, 6(1), 49-50.
Biemiller, A. (2005). Size and sequence in vocabulary development: implications for choosing words for primary grade vocabulary instruction. In E. H. Hiebert & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 223–242). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Côté, S., & Gaffney, C. (2021). The effect of synchronous computer-mediated communication on beginner L2 learners' foreign language anxiety and participation. The Language Learning Journal, 49(1), 105-116.
Crosson, A. C., McKeown, M. G., Lei, P., Zhao, H., Li, X., Patrick, K., & Shen, Y. (2021). Morphological analysis skill and academic vocabulary knowledge are malleable through intervention and may contribute to reading comprehension for multilingual adolescents. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(1), 154-174.
Davis, M. H., Ponnamperuma, G. G., & Ker, J. S. (2009). Student perceptions of a portfolio assessment process. Medical Education, 43(1), 89-98.
Golkar, M., & Yamini, M. (2007). Vocabulary, proficiency, and reading comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 7(3), 88-112.
Grabe, W. P., & Stoller, F. L. (2013). Teaching and researching: Reading. Routledge.
Kaivanpanah, S., & Zandi, H. (2009). The role of the depth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension in EFL contexts. Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(4), 698-706.
Karaaslan, H., Kilic, N., Guven-Yalcin, G., & Gullu, A. (2018). Students' reflections on vocabulary learning through synchronous and asynchronous games and activities. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 53-70.
Khodaparast, F., & Ghafournia, N. (2015). The effect of asynchronous/synchronous approaches on English vocabulary achievement: A study of Iranian EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 8(4), 117-127.
Kim, D., & Gilman, D. A. (2008). Effects of text, audio, and graphic aids in multimedia instruction for vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 114-126.
Kohnke, L. (2020). Exploring learner perception, experience, and motivation of using a mobile app in L2 vocabulary acquisition. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 10(1), 15-26.
Lotfi, A. R., & Pozveh, S. M. H. H. (2019). The Effect of Synchronous and Asynchronous Language Learning: A Study of Iranian EFL Intermediate Students' Vocabulary Learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(12), 1585-1594.
Macaro, E. (2005). Teaching and learning a second language: A guide to recent research and its applications. Continuum.
Mehrpour, S., Razmjoo, S. A., & Kian, P. (2011). The relationship between depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension among Iranian EFL learners. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 53(222), 97-127.
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Beyond phonological skills: Broader language skills contribute to the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27(4), 342-356.
Rassaei, E. (2020). Effects of mobile‐mediated dynamic and nondynamic glosses on L2 vocabulary learning: A sociocultural perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 284-303.
Raudszus, H., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2021). Patterns and predictors of reading comprehension growth in first and second language readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(2), 400-417.
Sadeghi, K., & Ahmadi, N. (2012). The effect of gloss type and mode on Iranian EFL learners' reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 5(12), 100-110.
Salah, S. M. (2008). The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension of authentic Arabic texts. Brigham Young University.
Sedita, J. (2005). Effective vocabulary instruction. Insights on Learning Disabilities, 2(1), 33-45.
Shintani, N. (2016). The effects of computer-mediated synchronous and asynchronous direct corrective feedback on writing: a case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 517-538.
Shiotsu, T., & Weir, C. J. (2007). The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary breadth in the prediction of reading comprehension test performance. Language Testing, 24(1), 99-128.
Stahl, S. A. (1986). Three principles of effective vocabulary instruction. Journal of Reading, 29(7), 662-668.
Tozcu, A., & Coady, J. (2004). Successful learning of frequent vocabulary through CALL also benefits reading comprehension and speed. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(5), 473-495.
Wawire, B. A., & Zuilkowski, S. S. (2021). The role of vocabulary and decoding language skills in reading comprehension: a cross-linguistic perspective. International Multilingual Research Journal, 15(1), 23-42.
Zapata, G., & Sagarra, N. (2007). CALL on hold: The delayed benefits of an online workbook on L2 vocabulary learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(2), 153-171.
Zarei, A., & Saddeghi, M. (2011). The effects of synchronous and asynchronous interlingual and intralingual transcript presentation on L2 vocabulary comprehension and production. Teaching the English Language, 5(1), 101-123.
Zeinali Nejad, M., Golshan, M., & Naeimi, A. (2021). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) on learners' pronunciation achievement. Cogent Psychology, 8(1), 1872908.
Zhang, S., & Zhang, X. (2020). The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and L2 reading/listening comprehension: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 1362168820913998.
