A Comparative Study of the Effects of Equal and Expanding Spacing Schedules on L2 Receptive and Productive Vocabulary Retrieval
محورهای موضوعی : Research in English Language Pedagogy
Roya Khoii
1
(Department of Foreign Languages, Islamic Azad University, Tehran North Branch, Iran)
Kobra Fallah Abed
2
(Department of Foreign Languages, Islamic Azad University, Tehran North Branch, Iran)
کلید واژه: Receptive Vocabulary, Spacing Effect, Productive Vocabulary, EFL learners, Equal Spacing, Vocabulary Retrieval, Expanding Spacing,
چکیده مقاله :
Spaced repetition seems to play a significant role in the learning and retention of words in foreign language settings. This experimental study investigated the impact of expanding and equal spacing conditions on receptive and productive English vocabulary retrieval. The participants consisted of 63 pre-intermediate EFL learners in three intact classes randomly assigned to one control and two experimental groups. A Vocabulary Knowledge Scale (VKS) was used to select 20 unknown word pairs (each word and its synonym) for teaching purposes and check the effects of the treatments at the end of the study. The word pairs were later divided into two 10-item A and B sets because of the counterbalanced design of the study. The first experimental group studied set A under an equally spaced condition (2-2-2) and set B under an expanding spaced condition (0-1-5) with the same absolute spacing value. The second experimental group studied them in the reverse order, thus counterbalancing the effect of encounter order. The control group studied the target items under the no-spacing or massed condition (0-0-0). The statistical analyses of the three groups’ posttest scores indicated that all the three groups had improved their receptive and productive vocabulary retrieval. However, an equally spaced schedule had led to a significantly higher mean score only on the receptive items of the posttest and, therefore, better vocabulary retrieval. Therefore, it is suggested that EFL teachers consider spacing in general and the equal spacing condition in particular as important elements in facilitating both receptive and productive vocabulary learning.
Baddeley, A. D. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A.D. (2017). Modularity, working memory, and language acquisition. Second Language Research, 33, 299–311.
Barcroft, J. (2007). Effects of opportunities for word retrieval during second language vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 57, 35 – 56.
Bui, G., Ahmadian, M.J., & Hunter, A. M. (2019). Spacing effects on repeated L2 task performance. System, 81, 1-13.
Candry, S., Decloedt, J., & Eyckmans, J. (2020). Comparing the merits of word writing and retrieval practice for L2 vocabulary learning. System, 89, DOI.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102206
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Snow, M. A. (2014). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (4th ed.). National Geographic Learning.
Cepeda, N., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J., & Pashler, H. (2008). Spacing effects in learning: A temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Association for Psychological Science, 19(11), 1095-1101.
Crossley, S. A., Skalicky, S., Kyle, K., & Monteiro, K. (2019). Absolute frequency effects in second language lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(4), 721-744. 1-24. DOI:10.1017/S0272263118000268.
Cull, W. L. (2000). Untangling the benefits of multiple study opportunities and repeated testing for cued recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 215–235.
Elgort, I. (2011). Deliberate learning and vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Language Learning, 61(2), 367–413.
Fall, T., & Davies, P. (2012). Solutions:Pre-Intermediate (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Gains, R., & Redman, S. (2008). Oxford word skills: Intermediate. Oxford University Press.
Juffs, A. (2019). Lexical development in the writing of English language program students. In R. M. DeKeyser, & G.P. Botana (Eds.), Reconciling methodological demands with pedagogical applicability (pp. 179–200). John Benjamins.
Kang, H.K., Lindesy, R.V, Mozer, M.C., & Pashler, H. (2014). Retrieval practice over the long term: Should spacing be expanding or equal-interval? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1544-1550.
Karpicke, D.J., & Roediger, L.H. (2007). Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33(4), 704-419.
Karpicke, D.J., & Roediger, L.H. (2010). Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials? Memory & Cognition, 38(1), 116-124.
Kapricke , J. D., & Bauernschmidt , A. ( 2011 ). Spaced retrieval: Absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1250 – 1257.
Landauer, T. K., & Bjork, R. A. (1978). Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning. In M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 625–632). Academic Press.
Lenko-Szymanska, A. (2019). Defining and assessing lexical proficiency. Routledge.
Naismith, B., & Juffs, A. (2021). Finding the sweet spot: Learner’s productive knowledge of mid-frequency lexical items. Language Teaching Research, OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211020412.
Nakata, T. ( 2011 ). Computer-assisted second language vocabulary learning in a paired-associate paradigm: A critical investigation of flashcard software. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, 17 – 38.
Nakata, T. (2015). Effects of expanding and equal spacing on second language vocabulary learning: Does gradually increasing spacing increase vocabulary learning? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(4), 677-711. DOI:10.1017/S0272263114000825.
Nakata, T., & Webb, S. (2015). Does studying vocabulary in similar sets increase learning? The effects of part and whole learning on second language vocabulary acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 38(3), 523-552. DOI:10.1017/S0272263115000236.randal
Nakata, T. (2016). Does repeated practice make perfect? The effects of within-session repeated retrieval on second language vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 39(4), 653-679.
Nakata, T., & Elgort, I. (2020). Effects of spacing on contextual vocabulary learning: Spacing facilitates the acquisition of explicit, but not tacit, vocabulary knowledge. Second Language Research, 37(2), 233-260.
Namaziandost, E., Mohammed Sawalmeh, M. H., & Izadpanah Soltanabadi, M. (2020). The effects of spaced versus massed distribution instruction on EFL learners’ vocabulary recall and retention, Cogent Education, 7(1), DOI:10.1080/2331186X.2020.1792261
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
Nation, I. S. P. (2014). How much input do you need to learn the most frequent 9,000 words? Reading in a Foreign Language, 26(2), 1–16.
Nation, P. (2020). The different aspects of vocabulary knowledge. In S. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 15-29). Routledge.
O'brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Collenine, J., & Freed, B. (2006). Phonological memory and lexical, narrative, and grammatical skills in second language oral production by adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 377-402.
Ramanujan, K., & Weekes, B. S. (2020). Predictors of lexical retrieval in Hindi–English bilingual speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(2), 265-273.
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2010). Intricacies of spaced retrieval: A resolution. In A. S. Benjamin (Ed.), Successful remembering and successful forgetting: A festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork (pp. 23- 47). Psychology Press.
Rogers, J. (2017). The spacing effect and its relevance to second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 38, 906–911.
Rogers, J., & Cheung, A. (2018). Input spacing and the learning of L2 vocabulary in a classroom context. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1177/1362168818805251.
Rogers, J. (2021). Input spacing in second language classroom settings: Replications Bird (2010) and Serrano (2011), Language Teaching, 54, 424-433.
Rohrer, D. (2015). Student instruction should be distributed over long time periods. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 635–643.
Ruiz, S., Rebuschat, P., & Meurers, D. (2019). The effects of working memory and declarative memory on instructed second language vocabulary learning: Insights from intelligent CALL. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1177/1362168819872859.
Schmitt, N. (2000).Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge university press.
Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, 64, 913–951.
Schuetze, U. (2015). Spacing techniques in second language vocabulary acquisition: Short-term gains vs. long-term memory. Language Teaching Research, 19(1), 28–42.
Schuetze, U., & Weimer-Stuckmann, G. (2011). Retention in SLA processing. CALICO Journal, 28, 460–472.
Serrano, R. (2011). The time factor in EFL classroom practice. Language Learning, 61(1), 117–145.
Serrano, R., & Huang, H. Y. (2018). Learning vocabulary through assisted repeated reading: How much time should there be between repetitions of the same text? TESOL Quarterly, 52, 971–94.
Smith, S. M. (2017). Working with working memory and language. Language Teaching Research, 33(3), 291-297.
Sobel, H.S., Cepeda, N.J., & Kapler, I.V. (2011). Spacing effects in real-world classroom vocabulary learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 763–767.
Storm, B., Bjork, R. & Storm, J. (2010). Optimizing retrieval as a learning event: When and why expanding retrieval practice enhances long-term retention. Memory & Cognition, 38(2), 244-253. DOI:10.3758/MC.38.2.244.
Suzuki, Y., Nakata, T., & DeKeyser, R. (2019). The desirable difficulty framework as a theoretical foundation for optimizing and researching second language practice. Modern Language Journal, 103, 713–720.
Thalheimer, W. (2006). Spacing learning events over time: What the research says. http://www.work-learning.com/catalog/
Webb, S. (2007). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 46–65.
Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T. S. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth vs. breadth. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 13-39.
Zhu, Y. (2015). Revisiting word exposure frequency and incidental vocabulary acquisition. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(5), 968-973.
