Negotiating Power: Analysis of Communication Strategies in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Debates and Their Impact on Voter Perception
محورهای موضوعی :
1 - Department of English languages, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
کلید واژه: Negotiation Strategies, Presidential Debates, Political Communication, Voter Perception,
چکیده مقاله :
This research examines the negotiation strategies employed by the Democratic and Republican nominees during the 2024 U.S. presidential debates, exploring how these strategies align with the candidates’ communicative goals and how they are perceived by American voters. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study analyzes debate transcripts alongside citizen feedback to assess the effectiveness of these strategies in influencing voter perceptions. The findings reveal significant differences in the rhetorical techniques used by the candidates, with Democratic nominees favoring positive politeness strategies aimed at fostering inclusivity, while Republican nominees utilized more direct, assertive tactics. Despite these differences, the study finds no significant correlation between voters' evaluations of candidates’ communication strategies and their voting preferences. This suggests that partisanship plays a more substantial role in shaping electoral outcomes than voters' perceptions of debate performance. The paper situates these findings within the context of recent political communication literature, contributing to the ongoing discussion of the role of communication strategies in a polarized political climate.
This research examines the negotiation strategies employed by the Democratic and Republican nominees during the 2024 U.S. presidential debates, exploring how these strategies align with the candidates’ communicative goals and how they are perceived by American voters. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study analyzes debate transcripts alongside citizen feedback to assess the effectiveness of these strategies in influencing voter perceptions. The findings reveal significant differences in the rhetorical techniques used by the candidates, with Democratic nominees favoring positive politeness strategies aimed at fostering inclusivity, while Republican nominees utilized more direct, assertive tactics. Despite these differences, the study finds no significant correlation between voters' evaluations of candidates’ communication strategies and their voting preferences. This suggests that partisanship plays a more substantial role in shaping electoral outcomes than voters' perceptions of debate performance. The paper situates these findings within the context of recent political communication literature, contributing to the ongoing discussion of the role of communication strategies in a polarized political climate.
Acheoah, A. (2014). Pragma-crafting theory: Customizing communication for specific goals. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 1-15.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Polite-ness: Some universals in language us-age. Cambridge University Press.
Clayman, S. E., & Heritage, J. (2002). The news interview: Journalistic practices and the construction of meaning. Cambridge University Press.
Cutrone, P., & Pino, A. (2021). Rhetorical de-vices in political discourse: An analysis of presidential debates*. Political Com-munication, 38(4), 523-543.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2023). Language and power in political discourse. Discourse & Society, 34(1), 5-20.
Fraser, B., & Bruce, D. (2011). Speech acts and politeness strategies in political dis-course. Journal of Language and Poli-tics, 10(2), 215-234.
Gonzalez-Ramos, J. (2023). Partisanship and voter evaluation: The role of candidate performance in electoral outcomes. Elec-toral Studies, 78, 102-114.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax nd semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41-58). Academic Press.Hughes, R. (2015). The impact of debates on voter behavior: An analysis of audience perceptions. Journal of Political Com-munication, 32(3), 309-327.
Hughes, R., Smith, J., & Lee, K. (2019). Voter perceptions and candidate performance: A longitudinal study of electoral debates. American Politics Research, 47(6), 1020-1045.
Johnson, M., & Lee, T. (2022). Evaluating ne-gotiation strategies in political debates: Citizen perceptions and preferences. Communication Research Reports, 39(1), 45-56.
Kornielaieva, O. (2023). Political speech as a tool for influence in polarized societies. Journal of Political Discourse Analysis, 12(2), 89-105.
McKinney, M., & Warner, B. R. (2013). The role of presidential debates in shaping voter preferences: A historical perspec-tive. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 43(4), 745-762.
Saidamirovna, G. I. (2022). Language and po-litical communication: The dynamics of electoral discourse. International Jour-nal of Political Science Research, 10(1), 22-35.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Smith, R., Johnson, L., & Brown, T. (2023). Communication strategies in the polar-ized political landscape: A study of the 2024 U.S. presidential debates. Political Psychology Review, 45(2), 134-150.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipu-lation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359-383.
Watts, R. J. (2023). Politeness theory revisited: New perspectives on interpersonal rela-tions in political discourse. Journal of Language Studies, 15(1),67-82.
