Presentation of the principles of design parameters and regulations of urban facades and body, emphasizing cultural components (Case study: Kamyab Street, Kerman)
محورهای موضوعی : Space Ontology International Journal
Sajad Hosseini
1
,
Sahar Alinejad Majidi
2
,
Hossein Moradinasab
3
1 - Department of Architecture, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semana, Iran
2 - Department of Architecture, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran
3 - Department of Architecture, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semana, Iran
کلید واژه: facade regulations, urban body, cultural components, Kamyab Street, economic factors,
چکیده مقاله :
With the resurgence of interest in public spaces and urban life quality, building facades have become increasingly important. Urban facades, created by various views facing public spaces, can be either homogeneous or heterogeneous. Heterogeneity occurs when each building expresses its own purposes and identity, while ignoring the design of neighboring facades can lead to a monotonous and uniform urban facade. Since street facades form the first impression of a city and remain in the memory of individuals, it is crucial to design facades that reflect the culture of the society and provide a common language for creators. Culture is considered the most influential element in shaping the environment and public perception. This study focuses on Kamyab Street in Kerman as a case study to explore these dynamics. The Analytical Network Process (ANP) method, along with MATLAB coding, is employed for data analysis to identify the key factors influencing urban facade design. The findings reveal that the cultural components index (A3) holds the highest priority in the model for design principles and regulations of urban facades and structures, based on the specified criteria. This indicates that investing in cultural components can yield the greatest benefits for the region, enhancing its aesthetic appeal and cultural resonance according to the defined indices. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the need for a holistic approach to urban facade design, considering both individual building purposes and the collective urban aesthetic. By prioritizing cultural elements, urban planners and architects can create more vibrant, memorable, and cohesive urban environments that resonate with both residents and visitors, thereby improving the overall quality of urban life.
With the resurgence of interest in public spaces and urban life quality, building facades have become increasingly important. Urban facades, created by various views facing public spaces, can be either homogeneous or heterogeneous. Heterogeneity occurs when each building expresses its own purposes and identity, while ignoring the design of neighboring facades can lead to a monotonous and uniform urban facade. Since street facades form the first impression of a city and remain in the memory of individuals, it is crucial to design facades that reflect the culture of the society and provide a common language for creators. Culture is considered the most influential element in shaping the environment and public perception. This study focuses on Kamyab Street in Kerman as a case study to explore these dynamics. The Analytical Network Process (ANP) method, along with MATLAB coding, is employed for data analysis to identify the key factors influencing urban facade design. The findings reveal that the cultural components index (A3) holds the highest priority in the model for design principles and regulations of urban facades and structures, based on the specified criteria. This indicates that investing in cultural components can yield the greatest benefits for the region, enhancing its aesthetic appeal and cultural resonance according to the defined indices. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the need for a holistic approach to urban facade design, considering both individual building purposes and the collective urban aesthetic. By prioritizing cultural elements, urban planners and architects can create more vibrant, memorable, and cohesive urban environments that resonate with both residents and visitors, thereby improving the overall quality of urban life.
Alikaei, S. (2024). Urban resilience as a content-oriented approach to urban design process. Space Ontology International Journal.
ALP, S. Ç., & Bilgin, E. A. (2019). Understanding impacts of cultural tourism on sustainability of rural architecture in three villages of Bursa. Journal of multidisciplinary academic tourism, 4(2), 87-107.
Andarodi, E. (2020). Analyzing the infrastructures of cultural tourism in heritage sites with an emphasis on architectural design elements. Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient, 8(27), 53-66.
Cucuzzella, C., Rahimi, N., & Soulikias, A. (2022). The evolution of the architectural façade since 1950: A contemporary categorization. Architecture, 3(1), 1-32.
Farahnaki, M. (2019). Land use planning for urban river margins based on the green city approach (Case study: Abshooran River of Kermanshah). Space Ontology International Journal. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.23456450.2019.8.1.2.7
Fakuhi, N. (2014). One hundred and one questions of culture. Tehran, Tisa Publications, 8-26.
Fathi, M. S., & Heidari, F. (2018). The role of façades in the formation of physical identity in the Iranian cities. Int. J. Hum. Capital Urban Manage, 3(1), 69-80.
Faryadi, S. (2019). A storytelling planning process to transform environmental values into sustainable cities and sustainable behaviours. Space Ontology International Journal.
Ghahramanpour, A., Keshmiri, H., & Karimi, B. (2020). Expressing effective criteria on the physical identity of the urban street walls (Case Study: Hafez Street, Shiraz). International Journal of Applied Arts Studies (IJAPAS), 5(1), 7-18.
Hassanein, H. (2021). Trends of contemporary art in innovative interior architecture design of cultural spaces. Cities' Identity Through Architecture and Arts, 25-57.
Hosseini, S. M., Mohammadi, M., Rosemann, A., Schröder, T., & Lichtenberg, J. (2019). A morphological approach for kinetic façade design process to improve visual and thermal comfort. Building and Environment, 153, 186-204.
Hu, M., & Chen, R. (2018). A framework for understanding sense of place in an urban design context. Urban Science, 2(2), 34.
Khanmohammadi, M., & Zolfaghari, A. (2023). Analysis and identification of underlying factors of development creative industries through the creation of a cultural quarter. Journal of Archaeology and Archaeometry, 2(1), 11-26.
Kim, J. (2017). Comparing the influences of the D/H ratio, size, and facade design of an enclosed square on its perceptual qualities as a sustainable urban space in South Korea. Sustainability, 9(4), 675.
Lei, H., & Zhou, Y. (2022). Conducting heritage tourism-led urban renewal in Chinese historical and cultural urban spaces: A case study of Datong. Land, 11(12), 2122.
Liu, F., Kang, J., Wu, Y., Yang, D., & Meng, Q. (2022). What do we visually focus on in a world heritage site? A case study in the historic centre of Prague. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1).
Lucchi, E. (2022). Integration between photovoltaic systems and cultural heritage: A socio-technical comparison of international policies, design criteria, applications, and innovation developments. Energy Policy, 171, 113303.
Maio, R., Ferreira, T. M., & Vicente, R. (2018). A critical discussion on the earthquake risk mitigation of urban cultural heritage assets. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 27, 239-247.
Mansouri, R., Habib, F., & Shahcheraghi, A. (2023). Logical analysis of Iran's historical buildings in order to read the effective components in the architecture of collective-ritual spaces based on the wisdom of art and architecture. Journal of Archaeology and Archaeometry.
Mokhberi, M. (2018). An investigation on the influence of landscape of buildings on citizens' perceptual characteristics. QUID: Investigación, Ciencia y Tecnología, (2), 53-63.
Paknezhad, N., & Latifi, G. (2018). Explanation and evaluation of the impact of environmental factors on the formation of behavioral patterns in urban spaces. Bagh-e Nazar, 15(69), 51-66.
Pendar, H., & Zhaleh, S. R. (2023). Performance assessment of façade committees (Over 2014-2021) and development of future-study scenarios using AIDA technique. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 20(119), 77-100.
Pourjavadasl, B. (2022). An investigation into the feasibility of façade design guidelines for newly constructed residential facades (Case study: Bagh-Shomal District along the historic-cultural area of Tabriz Metropolis). Urban Design Discourse - A Review of Contemporary Literatures and Theories, 28-46.
Razzaghi-Asl, S., Ariaei, A. R., & Ghahfarokhici, S. B. (2017). An investigation into the comparative impact assessment of urban facades on psychological attributes of residents in new and old housing areas; the case of Jolfa street in Isfahan. Architecture, Civil Engineering, Environment, 10(3), 57-70.
Sadeghi, A. R., & Jangjoo, S. (2022). Women's preferences and urban space: Relationship between built environment and women's presence in urban public spaces in Iran. Cities, 126.
Xu, Z., & Zheng, X. (2021). Roadmap of moving urban colour toward cultural sustainability in China. Color Research & Application, 46(1), 222-239.
Yaran, A., & Bahru, H. (2016). The influence of Islamic culture and ethics on housing and the spatial structure of houses (Case example: Qajar era houses in Ardabil city). Islamic Architecture Research Quarterly, 15th issue, 5th year, 92.
Zekavat, M., & Momenian, A. (2019). Study of the relationship between mental security and urban views. Specialty Journal of Architecture and Construction, 5(1), 1-11.
