Textbook Evaluation in Morocco: A study of EFL students’ perceptions and attitudes towards ‘Ticket to English 2’

Subject Areas : Research in English Language Pedagogy

Chaimae Farmati ¹ , Mohamed Yeou ² , Bouchaib Benzehaf ³

1 - Chouaib Doukkali University, Faculty of Letters and Humanities El Jadida, Morocco
2 - Chouaib Doukkali University, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, El Jadida, Morocco
3 - English department, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Chouaib Doukkali University

Received: 2024-04-19 Accepted : 2024-07-02 Published : 2024-08-11

Keywords: EFL students, ELT textbooks, Textbook evaluation,

Abstract :

While textbooks are one of the key factors to successful foreign language development, they are likely to contain some pedagogical issues as they are, after all, human-made products. This, in turn, explains the vast amount of scholarly attention that has been invested in research on EFL textbook evaluation. To contribute to this line of research, the present paper aimed to explore second-year Baccalaureate students’ perspectives on Ticket to English 2, an ELT textbook currently used in Moroccan public high schools. More specifically, it aimed to elicit students’ attitudes and perceptions towards learning English through this locally-designed EFL textbook. The study adopted a quantitative research design. Data were collected using a self-developed questionnaire that was, based on Litz’ (2005) textbook evaluation checklist and, administered to 104 EFL students who were taught using the textbook under study. The findings indicated that most participants are not generally satisfied with their textbook. The majority of students stress that the activities do not develop their listening and speaking skills, the topics do not meet their interests, and the physical appearance is not attractive. In light of these findings, the current study offers a set of recommendations for curriculum designers and textbook writers suggesting ways in which the content of future Moroccan EFL textbooks can be improved.

References:

Ahour, T., Towhidiyan, B., & Saeidi, M. (2014). The evaluation of "English Textbook 2" taught in Iranian high schools from teachers' perspectives. English Language Teaching, 7(3), 150-158. doi:10.5539/elt.v7n3p150.
Ait Bouzid, H. (2016). Race and social class in Moroccan ELT textbooks. EFL Journal, 1(2), 113-127. doi: 10.21462/eflj.v1i2.11
Ait Bouzid, H. (2017). An evaluation of selected Moroccan ELT textbooks: A standards-based approach perspective. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 229-238. doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i1.6879.
Ait Bouzid, H. (2019). Gender issues in select Moroccan ELT textbooks: A review. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 7(2), 209-231. doi: 10.30486/relp.2019.665890.
Ait Bouzid, H., Erguig, R. & Yeou, M. (2016). Towards a reflective textbook evaluation model. EFL Journal, 1(3), 219-233. doi.org/10.21462/eflj.v1i3.21.
Alemi, M., & Sadehvandi, N. (2012). Textbook evaluation: EFL teachers' perspectives on" Pacesetter Series". English language teaching, 5(7), 64-74. doi:10.5539/elt.v5n7p64.
Alshenqeeti, H. (2019). Representation of culture in EFL textbooks and learners’ preference. Pedagogy Journal of English Language Teaching. 7(2), 127-135. doi: 10.32332/pedagogy.v7i2.1647
Badea, M., & Iridon, C. (2015). Students’ evaluation of a Romanian language textbook. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 203, 303-309. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.299.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. London: SAGE Publications.
Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford: Macmillan Education.
Elfatihi, M. (2019). ELT in Morocco: Past, present and future. Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, 3, 6-15.
Ellis, R. (2015). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. B. (2011). Research methods for the behavioral sciences. Cengage Learning.
Hammad, E. A. R. (2014). Palestinian EFL teachers' attitudes towards English textbooks used at the first three grades of elementary school. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 18(1), 1-18.
Hammani, M., Ahssen, S. & Tansaoui, L. (2007). Ticket to English students’ book. Casablanca: D.I.O. El Hadita.
Herliana, L., Djajanegara, S., & Suendarti, M. (2020). Students’ and teachers’ perspectives on EFL textbook for senior high school students. Deiksis, 12(01), 44-55. doi: 10.30998/deiksis.v12i01.5585
Jaafari, M. (2016). Gender roles discrimination in the Moroccan EFL textbook discourse. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, 26(1), 286-301.
Jevitz, L., & Meints, D. W. (1979). Be a better book buyer: Guidelines for textbook evaluation. Journal of Reading, 22(8), 734-738.
Jibreel, I. (2015). Evaluating Blue Skies 6 with reference to Yemeni students. Arab World English Journal, 6(2), 372-384. doi:10.24093/awej/vol6no2.29.
Khodabakhshi, M. (2014). Choose a proper EFL textbook: Evaluation of “Skyline” series. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 959-967. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.505
Knecht, P., & Najvarová, V. (2010). How do students rate textbooks?: A review of research and ongoing challenges for textbook research and textbook production. Journal of Educational Media, Memory, and Society, 2(1), 1-16.
Laabidi, H., & Nfissi, A. (2016). Fundamental criteria for effective textbook evaluation. EFL Journal, 1(2), 141-159. doi: 10.21462/eflj.v1i2.13.
Litz, D. R. (2005). Textbook evaluation and ELT management: A South Korean case study. Asian EFL journal, 48(1), 1-53.
McDonough J., Shaw, C. & Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher’s guide. Wiley: Blackwell.
O’Neill. R. (1982). Why use textbooks? ELT Journal, 104-111.
Ortega, L. (2014). Understanding second language acquisition. Routledge.
Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sheldon, L. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237-246.