تجارب معلمان دورة ابتدایی از آزادسازی برنامه درسی: یک رویکرد پدیدارشناختی
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسی
رضا معصومی نژاد
1
,
اسکندر فتحی آذر
2
,
یوسف ادیب
3
,
فیروز محمودی
4
1 - دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی برنامه‌ریزی درسی دانشگاه تبریز، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، تبریز، ایران.
2 - استاد، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، تبریز، ایران.
3 - استاد، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، تبریز، ایران.
4 - دانشیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، تبریز، ایران.
کلید واژه: تجارب معلمان, آزادسازی برنامه درسی, پدیدارشناسی, دورة ابتدایی,
چکیده مقاله :
پژوهش حاضر در جستجوی کشف تجارب آموزشی مشترک معلمان دورة ابتدایی از وضعیت موجود آزادسازی برنامه درسی بوده است. هدف پژوهش نشان دادن تمهیدات و اقداماتی بود که در راستای آزادسازی برنامه درسی صورت گرفته است. روش پژوهش از نوع تحقیقات کیفی و به شیوة پدیدارشناسی تفسیری بوده و جامعة آماری پژوهش، همة آموزگاران مدارس دورة ابتدایی شهرستان‌های خوی و چایپاره را در سال تحصیلی 96-95 شامل شده است که به‌صورت نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. در این راستا مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختاریافته‌ای با 23 نفر از آموزگاران صورت گرفت. داده‌های به‌دست‌آمده با استفاده از روش پدیدارشناسی اسمیت (1995) مورد تجزیه‌وتحلیل قرارگرفت. یافته‌های این تحقیق دارای 4 مضمون اصلی شامل موانع و محدودیت‌ها، نقش معلمی، نوآوری‌ها و مشارکت ذینفعان بود که هرکدام دارای چندین مضمون فرعی بودند که جمعاً در 20 مؤلفه فرعی قرار گرفتند و عبارت‌اند از: تمرکززدایی متمرکز، دیدگاه حاکم بر برنامه درسی ملی، آموزش ضمن خدمت، ماهیت دورة ابتدایی، پذیرش اجتماعی، هویت حرفه‌ای، فرهنگ معلمی، معلم به‌عنوان محقق، گروه‌های معلمان، جایگاه معلمی، تولید محتوای الکترونیکی، برنامه درسی تلفیقی، طرح‌های آموزشی، نظریه سازنده‌گرایی، دبیرخانه‌های استانی، همایش‌ها، راهبران برنامه درسی، سرگروه‌های معلمان، شورای معلمان، انجمن اولیا و مربیان.
The present research seeks to explore the common learning experiences of elementary school teachers from the current status of the curriculum decentralization. The purpose of the study was to demonstrate the measures and actions taken to curriculum decentralization.The methodology of this research is qualitative research in the form of interpretive phenomenology and The statistical population of the study included all the teachers of elementary schools in Khoy and Chayparaat cities in the academic year of 1395-96 which were selected through targeted sampling. In this regard, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 educators.The data were analyzed using Smith's phenomenological method (1995). The findings of this research consisted of four main themes including barriers and constraints, teacher's roles, innovations and stakeholder engagement, each of which had several sub themes, which included a total of 20 sub-components, including: Centralized decentralization, the view of the ruling national curriculum, in-service training, The nature of the elementary school, social acceptance, professional identity, teacher culture, teacher as researcher, teacher groups, teacher position, electronic content generation, Integration Curriculum, Educational plans, constructivist theory, provincial secretariats, conferences, Curriculum guiders, head teachers, teachers' councils, parents and educators associations.
Adib Haj bagheri, M., Parvizi, S., & Salsali, M. (2010). Qualitative research methods. Tehran: Bashari Publications. [Persian]
Ali, U., Hart, E., Baars, V., Kaur, R., Bailey, A., &Sesay, K. (2010). Liberation, Equality, and Diversity in the Curriculum.NUS.
Alsubaie, M. A. (2016). Curriculum Development: Teacher Involvement in Curriculum Development. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol[7], No 9,pp 106-107.
Chenari, M. (2007). Comparison of Husserl, Heidegger and Gadamerwith methodological benchmark. Philosophical-Theological Research,Vol[9], No2, pp 113-138. [Persian]
Department of Education. (2015). The Curriculum and Learning Management(CLM) Systems Framework of Deped Region IVA. Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Region IV-A Cauibarzon.
Desmond, S.,& Elfert, M. (2008). Parental interaction with schooling is one of the most important factors for learners’ successful educational development. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute of Lifelong Learning.
Farooq, M. S. (2016). Causes of Primary School Students' Dropout in PunjabPrimary School Teachers' Perspective. Journal of Elementary Education, Vol[26], No1, pp 57-79.
Fastier, M. (2016). Curriculum change, challenges and teacher responsibility. New Zealand Geographer,Vol[72], pp51-56.
Fathi Vajargah, K.,Khorasani, A., &Roody, M. (2012).Causes of Attending Homeschooling in Parents 'Perspectives for Home-educated Children: A Qualitative Study of Parents' Experiences. Research in Curriculum Planning,Vol[2],No8, pp1-14. [Persian]
Harrigan, J.,Yonk, R., & Mason, N. (2016). Curricular Contagion: A Case Study in Curriculum Development, Distribution, and Adoption.2nd International Conference on Higher Education Advances.253-260.
HosseiniKah, A. (2014). Curriculum decision levels.Curriculum Encyclopedia.Curriculum Studies Association, pp6-1. [Persian]
Jimes,C., Weiss, S., & Keep, R. (2013). Addressing The Local in Localization: a Case Study of Open Textbook Adoption by Three South African Teachers. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,Vol[17], No2, pp73-86.
Kenea, A. (2014). The Practice of Curriculum Contextualization in Selected Primary Schools in Rural Ethiopia.Journal of Education and Practice, Vol[5], No10, pp49-56.
Koskei, K. K. (2015). Assessment of Stakeholders’ Influence on Curriculum Development Process in Secondary Schools in Kericho County. Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, Vol[20], No3,pp 79-87.
Kufi, E. F. (2013). The Role of Different Stakeholders in Ethiopia in the Improvement of Educational Quality. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, Vol[2], No1, pp11-24.
Laverty, S. M. (2003). Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol[2], No3, pp1-29.
Lavonen, J. (2017). Governance decentralisation in education: Finnish innovation in education. Journal of Distance Education, Vol[53], No1, pp1-22.
Mahrozadeh, T.,& Jalilinia, F. (2016).Explaining the Phenomenology Approach in Curriculum. Journal of Modern Educational Thoughts, Vol[12], No4, pp7-30. [Persian]
Maleki, H.,& Aghamohammadi, J. (2015). The centralization and decentralization in the process of educational development planning: Challenges and barriers.Monthly of Social, Economic, Scientific and Cultural of Work and Society, No180, 60-66. [Persian]
Mansoori Gargar, R.,Salehi, A., & Abbasi, E. (2016). Curriculum characteristics of in the era of globalizing and internationalizing of curriculum. Research in Curriculum Planning, Vol[13], No23,pp 1-13. [Persian]
Meena, W. E. (2009). Curriculum Innovation in Teacher Education: Exploring Conceptions among Tanzanian Teacher Educators.Abo Akademi University Press.
Mokua, B. (2010). An Evaluation Of The Curriculum Development Role Of Teachers As key Agents In Curriculum Change. University Diploma in Education, Advanced Diploma in Education, B. ED. Hons. In Traffic Safety.
Oloruntegbe, K. O. (2011). Teachers’ Involvement, Commitment and Innovativeness in Curriculum Development and Implementation. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS),Vol[2], No6,pp 443-449.
Ozturk, I. H. (2012).Teacher’s Role and Autonomy in Instructional Planning: The Case of Secondary School History Teachers with regard to the Preparation and Implementation of Annual Instructional Plans. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, Vol[12], No1, pp295-299.
Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Qi, T. (2011). Between Centralization and Decentralization: Changed Curriculum Governance in Chinese Education after 1986. University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleTrace: Tennessee Research and CreativeExchange
Reid, W. A., & Null, J. W. (2006).The Pursuit of Curriculum: Schooling and the Public Interest. Greenwich, CT: IAP-Information Age Publishing.
Research and Education Planning Organization. (2013). The document on the fundamental transformation of the education of the Islamic Republic of Iran.Ministry of Education of the Islamic Republic of Iran. [Persian]
Sherbondy, K. (2012). Restructuring Equality: Assessing the Effects of Centralized and decentralized Education Systems on Student Perfprmance Cross- Nationally. University Honors in Political Science.
Sukirno, D.S., &Sununta, S. (2011). Does participative decision making affect lecturer performance in higher education? International Journal of Educational Management, Vol[25], No5, pp494-508.
Thompson, D., Bell, T., Andreae, P., & Robins, A. (2013). The Role of Teachers in Implementing Curriculum Changes. Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. Denver, Colorado, USA.
Unesco. (2015). Education For All 2000-2015:achievements and challenges.United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.Second edition.
Vitrukh, M. (2014). Exploratory study of the professional identity of higher education teachers in Ukraine.MPhil, Psychology and Education, University of Cambridge.
Yaro, I.,Arshad, R., &Salleh, D. (2016). Education Stakeholder’s Constraints in Policy Decisions for Effective Policy Implementation in Nigeria. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, Vol[14], No1, pp1-12.
Yousefzadeh Chosari, M. R. (2015). Reid's classification of curriculum theories.Curriculum Encyclopedia. Curriculum Studies Association, pp1-6. [Persian]
Ziba, S. A. (2011). The Decentralization and Centralization of Curriculum in the Primary Education of Burkina Faso.Master's Theses.Paper 502.Loyola University Chicago.http:// ecommons.luc. edu/ luc_theses/502.
_||_