فهرست مقالات Expert Evaluation

• دسترسی آزاد مقاله
  • صفحه چکیده
  • متن کامل
  
  1 - Evaluation and Prioritization of Indicators That Improve the Quality of Life in Residential Neighborhoods
  Khosro Movahed Hadi Nikounam Nezami
  10.30495/ijaud.2021.60285.1530
  Providing the conditions of residential neighborhoods to enhance residents' quality of life has always been an issue of great for urban experts and policymakers of various fields. According to the extensive research in this field, addressing quality of life indicates it چکیده کامل

  Providing the conditions of residential neighborhoods to enhance residents' quality of life has always been an issue of great for urban experts and policymakers of various fields. According to the extensive research in this field, addressing quality of life indicates its importance in residential neighborhoods. The present manuscript evaluates and prioritizes the indicators that improve the quality of life based on the review and analysis of experts (in architecture, landscape architecture, urban design, and planning). The s‌trategy of this s‌tudy is the correlation with a descriptive-analytical approach to evaluate and prioritize the indicators of quality of life, four of which have been identified for review by experts, namely Ins‌titutional; Economic; Social and Environmental satisfaction. A total of 22 experts answered the ques‌tions, and the findings were analyzed using the DANP technique. The findings indicate that the components of "ins‌titutional satisfaction" and "social satisfaction" have the mos‌t significant impact on enhancing residents' quality of life, respectively, from the perspective of experts. In addition, based on the weight of the obtained components, "policy-making and decision-making of organizations and ins‌titutions" in the neighborhood and "access to health facilities and services" were ranked as the firs‌t and las‌t practical components, respectively. Therefore, s‌trategies can be developed based on the prioritization of experts, such as s‌trengthening social and infras‌tructural services and facilities (ins‌titutional); Residents' decision-making and participation in neighborhood management (social); provision of participatory housing (economic), and development of open and green space (environmental). پرونده مقاله
• دسترسی آزاد مقاله
  • صفحه چکیده
  • متن کامل
  
  2 - Social Sustainability Components & Improving the Physical Quality of Contemporary Residential Complexes
  Hamed Moztarzadeh Hadi Nikounam Nezami
  10.22094/soij.2022.1962776.1503
  The paradigm of social sustainability in contemporary literature has always been widely proposed to solve the problems and inefficiencies of the physical environment in various scales of the urban space. Hence, addressing the concept of social sustainability on a micro- چکیده کامل

  The paradigm of social sustainability in contemporary literature has always been widely proposed to solve the problems and inefficiencies of the physical environment in various scales of the urban space. Hence, addressing the concept of social sustainability on a micro-scale, such as residential complexes that have been less discussed, can improve the socio-physical quality of these areas. In this research, because social sustainability indicators have complex dimensions; evaluation and prioritization of the components and indicators that are affecting social sustainability in Shiraz’s residential complexes have been done from the viewpoints of professionals in the field of architecture and urban planning. The strategy of the current study is correlational and quantitative in terms of methodology; the collected data of 33 selected professionals whose research and professional area is focused on residential complexes was examined and evaluated using a multi-criteria decision-making process (DANP technique). The findings of this study showed that the physical component serves as a grounding criterion that affects the component of social sustainability. The following indicators, according to experts, are effective in improving the physical quality of residential complexes: the indicators A) social interactions, B) security and safety, and C) place attachment and sense of place have higher rankings, whereas the indicator E) housing density has the lowest. Finally, policies and strategies for planning and designing residential complexes in both social and physical dimensions are suggested for decision-makers and planners to adopt based on the findings and results. پرونده مقاله