Designing a Model for Translation of Technical Terminology

Subject Areas : Research in English Language Pedagogy

Shadi Forutanian ¹

1 - Department of Foreign Languages, Sepahan University

Received: 2011-12-17 Accepted : 2012-02-01 Published : 2012-02-01

Keywords: Model Designing, English-Persian Translation, Translation of Terminologies, Technical terminology,

Abstract :

Technical terminology has a significant role in translation of technical or scientific texts. Unfortunately, most of research in this area has not perceived the urgent need for a model to analyze or shown how translate technical or scientific terminology. In this paper, the researcher attempts to designs a workable model for translation of technical or scientific terminology. The major aim of this model is to provide a real equivalence for both one word terms and above words terms. The design of such a model benefits from different theories about equivalence and approaches that are used for finding real equivalence which translation studies especially technical translation are still lacking.

References:

Abigail, M. (2005).Translation equivalence for health/medical terminology in
         Xitsonga.Retrieved April 23, 2011, from http://upetd.up.ac.za /available/
        etd-02152006-152056/.../00dissertation.pdf.
Bay, H. (2005).A study on the translation of economic terminology. Retrieved
       October 11, 2011, from http:// data.ulis.vnu.edu.vn/jspui/handle/123456789/
       560
Baker, M. (1992).In other words:A course book on translation.London and New
        York; Routledge.
Bell, R.T. (1991). Translation and translating: theory and practice. New York:
        Long man Inc.
Catford, J.C. (1965). A linguistic theory of translation. Oxford: OUP.
Cohen, L. (2007). Research method in education. London and New York:
        Routledge.
Edem, B. (2000).Terminology and language planning. North America: John
       Benjamins.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar.  London:
       Edward Amold.
Hann, M. (1992).The key to technical translation. Amsterdam, & Philadelphia,
        John Benjamins.
Hatim, B & Mason, I. (1990).Discourse and the Translator.London/Newyork.
         Longman.
Munday, J. (2001). Introducing translation studies, theories and applications.
         London and New York: Routledge, p. 36.
Newmark, P. (1991). About translation.Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation. London and New York: Prentice
         Hall International (UK) Ltd.
Nida, E. A. and Taber, C. R. (1982).The theory and practice of translation, Leiden:
         E.J. Brill.
Nida, E. A. (1964). Towards a science of translating, Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Olohan, M. (2004).Introducing corpora in translation study. London and New
         York: Routledge.
Pearson, J. (2000).Terms in context. North America: John Benjamins.
Pym, A. (2007). Natural and directional equivalence in theories of translation.
         Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Snell-Hornby, M. (1988). Translation studies: An integrated approach. Amsterdam
        and Philadelphia: J. Benjamin’s Publishing House.
Temmerman, R. (2000).Towards new ways of terminology description: The
       sociocognitive approach. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Thanh, P. (2010).Strategies to deal with non-equivalence at word level in translation.
        Retrieved October 11, 2011, from http:// web.hanu.vn/deck/file.php/1/
        Non-equivalent-Binh.pdf
Wills, W. (1982).Thescience of translation: problems and methods. Tubingen:
        GunterNarrVerlag.