بررسی ارتباط بین شاخص سطح برگ و میزان ترسیب کربن در خاک تودههای جنگلی خالص و آمیخته دستکاشت بلندمازو (مطالعه موردی: جنگلهای جلگهای چمستان)
محورهای موضوعی : جنگلداری
1 - عضو هیات علمی دانشکده آب و خاک ، دانشگاه زابل ، زابل ، ایران
کلید واژه: شاخص سطح برگ, ترسیب کربن, بلند مازو, جنگلکاری, ترکیب آمیختگی,
چکیده مقاله :
چکیده این تحقیق به منظور بررسی وجود رابطه میان شاخص سطح برگ با مقدار ترسیب کربن در خاک در ایستگاه تحقیقات جنگل و مرتع چمستان در قالب یک طرح کاملاً تصادفی صورت گرفته است که در آن گونه بلند مازو به صورت خالص و آمیخته با هر یک از گونههای آزاد، پلت، داغداغان و ممرز در سال 1373 جنگلکاری شده است. برای نمونهبرداری برگها شش درخت از هر گونه در هر تیمار انتخاب گردید. میزان شاخص سطح برگ به روش مستقیم وزنی محاسبه شد. میزان اثربخشی هر یک از تودههای جنگلی بر میزان ترسیب کربن خاک در دو عمق 20-0 سانتی متر و 60-21 سانتی متر مورد مطالعه قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که توده آمیخته بلندمازو و افرا با 96/5 و توده آمیخته بلندمازو و آزاد با 63/3 به ترتیب بیشترین و کمترین شاخص سطح برگ را داشتهاند. درختان بلوط در حالت آمیخته با افرا کمترین شاخص سطح برگ را دارا میباشند. در عمق اول خاک میزان ترسیب کربن در خاک در توده خالص بلوط به مقدار 8/92 تن در هکتار برآورد گردید و توده آمیخته بلوط ممرز بیشترین (16/120 تن در هکتار) و تیمار شاهد بدون جنگلکاری شده کمترین (0/75 تن در هکتار) ترسیب کربن در خاک را به خود اختصاص دادهاند. در عمق 40 سانتی متری دوم این میزان از 56/96 تا 86/145 تن در هکتار متغیر بوده و تودههای مختلف اختلاف معنیداری از این نظر نداشتهاند. ضریب پیرسون همبستگی معنیداری میان شاخص سطح برگ با میزان ترسیب کربن در خاک را تا به این سن از جنگلکاریها نشان نداده است.
This study done aimed to investigating of the relationship between LAI and soil carbon sequestration in Chamestan Forest and Rangeland Research Station in a completely randomized design, which Oak (Quercus castaneifolia) has been planted in pure and mixed with any of the species including Siberian Elm (Zelkova carpinifolia), Maple (Acer velutinum), Hackberry (Celtis australis) and Hornbeam (Carpinus betulus) in 1995. For sampling of leave, six trees were selected from each species in each treatment. The leaf area index was determined by gravimetric method. The effectiveness of each forest stand on carbon sequestration was studied in two soil depths of 0-20 cm and 21-60 cm. The results showed that the highest and lowest amount of LAI was calculated for Oak-Maple mixed stand (5.96) and Oak-Elm mixed stand (3.63) respectively. Oak trees have the lowest LAI in Oak-Maple plantation. Soil carbon sequestration in pure stand of Oak was estimated 92.8 ton/hectare in the first depth and mixed stand of Oak-Hornbeam has the highest (120.16 t/ha) and bare land treatment has the lowest (75.0 t/ha) soil carbon sequestration amount. This parameter at second soil depth of 40 cm varies at the rate of 96.56 to 145.86 t/ha and different stands were not significantly different in this respect. The Pearson correlation hasn’t shown coefficient between LAI and soil carbon sequestration to this age of plantations.
References
1-Adl, H.R., 2007. Estimation of leaf biomass and leaf area index of two major species in Yasuj forests. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research 15(4): 417-426.
2- Afas, N., A. Pellis, & U. Niinemets, 2005. Growth and production of a short rotation coppice culture of poplar. II. Clonal and year-to-year differences in leaf and petiole characteristic and stand leaf area index. Journal of Biomass and Bioenergy 28: 536-547.
3-Ali Arab, A., S.M. Hosseini, & S.Gh. Jalali, 2006. Effects of Maple, Robinia, Populus and Cupressus species on soil physicochemical properties in East Haraz afforestation. Soil and Water Sciences, 19 (1): 97-106.
4- Allison, L.E., 1975. Organic carbon. In: Black, C.A. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. American Soceity of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 1367-1378.
5-Amighy, S.J., H.M. Asgari, V. Berdy Sheikh, & F. Honardoost, 2012. Impact of Agroforestry systems on carbon sequestration in soils (Golestan, Aqqala). First National Conference on Desert, Tehran University.Iran.
6- Arias, D., 2007. Calibration of LAI- 2000 to estimate leaf area index and assessment of its relationship with stand productivity in six native and introduced tree species in Costa Rica. Forest Ecology and Management 247: 185-193.
7- Augusto, L., J. Ranger, D. Binkley, & A. Rothe, 2002. Impact of several common tree species of European temperate forests on soil fertility. Annales Forest Science 59: 233-253.
8-Babaei, Kafaki, S., A. Khademi, & A. Matajy, 2009. Relationship between leaf area index and phisiographical and edaphical condition in a Quercus macranthera stand (Case study: Andebil's forest, Khalkhal). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research 17 (2): 280-289.
9- Batjes, N.H., 1998. Mitigation of atmospheric CO2 concentrations by increased carbon sequestration in the soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 27: 230–5.
10- Blake, G.R., & K.H. Hartge, 1986. Bulk density. In: Klute, A. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Soil Science Society of America Journal 9 (1): 363-376.
11- Boley, J.D., P. Allan, A.P. Drew, E. Richard, & R.E. Andrus, 2009. Effects of active pasture, teak (Tectona grandis) and mixed native plantations on soil chemistry in Costa Rica. Forest Ecology and Management 257 (11), 2254-2261.
12- Canadell, J.G., 2008. Raupach MR. Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science 320: 1456–7.
13- Charles, T., & J.R. Garten, 2002. Soil carbon storage beneath recently established tree plantations in Tennessee and South Carolina, USA. Biomass and Bioenergy 23(2): 93–102.
14- Chiti, T., A. Certini, A. Puglisi, A. Sanesi, C. Capperucci, & C. Forte, 2007. Effects of associating a N-fixer species to monotypic oak plantations on the quantity and quality of organic matter in minesoils. Geoderma 138, 162-169.
15- Davi, H., F. Baret, R. Huc, & E. Dufrêne, 2008. Effect of thinning on LAI variance in heterogeneous forests. Forest Ecology and Management 256 (5): 890-899.
16- Dixon, R.K., S. Brown, R.A. Houghton, A.M. Solomon, & M.C. Trexler, 1994. Carbon pools and fluxes of global forest ecosystems. Science 263: 185-190.
17- Fang, S., J. Xue, & L. Tang, 2007. Biomass production and carbon sequestration potential in poplar plantations with different management patterns. Journal of Environtal Management 85: 672–679.
18- Farley, K.A., & E.F. Kelly, 2004. Effects of afforestation of a Paramo grassland on soil nutrient status. Forest Ecology and Management 195, 281-290.
19- Geng, Y.B., Y.S. Dong, & W.Q. Meng, 2000. Progresses of terrestrial carbon cycle studies. Advance in Earth Science 19: 297- 306.
20- Gower, S.T. & J.M. Norman, 1991. Rapid Estimation of Leaf Area Index In Conifer and Broad-leaf Plantation. Ecology 72(5): 1896-1900.
21- Gower, S.T., J.G. Vogel, J.M. Normal, C.J. Kucharic, S.J. Steele, & T.K. Stow, 1997. Carbon distribution and aboveground net primary prodution in aspen, jack pine, and black spruce stands in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 102(24): 29029-41.
22- Gucinski, H., E. Vance, & W.A. Reiners, 1995. Potential affect of global climate change in: Smith, W. K., Hinckley,T.M.(Eds), Ecophysiology of Coniferous Forests. Academic Prees, NewYork, Chapter 10.pp. 309 – 331.
23- Hagen-Thorn, A., I. Callesen, K. Armolaitis, & B., Nihlgard, 2004. The impact of six European tree species on the chemistry of mineral topsoil in forest plantations on former agricultural land. Forest Ecology and Management 195, 373-384.
24- Honda, Y., H. Yamamoto, & K. Kajiwara, 2000 . Biomass Information in Central Asia. Center for. Environmental Remote Sensing, Chiba University 263: 1-33.
25- Huang, L., J. Liu, Q. Shao, & X. Xu, 2012. Carbon sequestration by forestation across China: Past, present, and future. Renew. Sustainable Energy Reviews 16: 1291– 1299.
26- Huang, M., J.J. Ji, K.R. Li, Y.F. Liu, & F.T. Yang, 2007. The ecosystem carbon accumulation after conversion of grasslands to pine plantations in subtropical red soil of South China. Tellus B. 59: 439–48.
27-Javadi Tabalvandan, MRr., Gh. Zehtabyan, H. Ahmadi, Sh. Ayoubi, M. Jaafari, & M. Alizadeh, 2011. The role of different land useon the soil carbon sequestration (case study: Nomeh Rood watershed, Noor, Iran). Journal of natural ecosystems of Iran, 1 (2): 156-166.
28-Khademi, A., B. Kord, & S. Poor Abbasi, 2011. Estimation of Robinia LAI and its correlation with physiographical conditions and soil and growth characteristics (Case study: Bame Malayer plantation, Iran). Journal of science and technologies of natural resources 6 (1): 41-52.
29- Korkance, S. Y., 2014. Effects of afforestation on soil organic carbon and other soil properties. Catena 123: 62-69.
30- Lackner, K.S., 2003. A guide to CO2 sequestration. Science 300, 1677–1678.
31- Ma, H., J. Song, J. Wang, Z. Xiao, & Z. Fu, 2014. Improvement of spatially continuous forest LAI retrieval by integration of discrete airborne LiDAR and remote sensing multi-angle optical data. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 189-190 (1): 60-70.
32-Mahmoudi Taleghani, E., Gh. Zahedi Amiri, E. Adeli, & Kh. Sagheb-Talebi. 2007. Assessment of carbon sequestration in soil layers of managed forest. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research 15(3): 241-252.
33- Majasalmi, T., M. Rautiainen, P. Stenberg, & P. Lukeš, 2013. An assessment of ground reference methods for estimating LAI of boreal forests. Forest Ecology and Management 292 (15): 10-18.
34- Merino, A., A. Ferandez-Lopez, F. Solla-Gullon, & J.M. Edeso, 2004. Soil changes and tree growth in intensively managed Pinus radiate in northern Spain. Forest Ecology and Management 196: 393-404.
35-Moghadam, M., 2006. terricolous plants ecology. Tehran University Press, 512 pages.
36- Mortenson, M., & G.E. Schuman, 2002. carbon sequestration in rangeland interseed with yellow flowering Alfalfa (Medicago sativa, Facata spp), USDA symposium on natural resource managment to offest greenhouse gas emisson in Uni of Wyoming.
37- Murthy, I.K., M. Gupta, S. Tomar, M. Munsi, R. Tiwari, G.T. Hegde, & N.H. Ravindranath, 2013. Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems in India. Earth Science and Climate Change 4(1): 131-137.
38-Naghipour Borj,.A., A. Aghakhani, Gh. Dianati, & D. Kartoolinejad, 2005. Carbon sequestration in Caspian forests, a way for mitigating of climate change. Proceedings of the first international conference on climate change and dendrochronology in the Caspian ecosystem, Sari, Iran.
39-Nobakht, A., M. Pourmajidian, S.M. Hojjati, & A. Fallah, 2011. A comparison of soil carbon sequestration in hardwood and softwood monocultures (Case study: Dehmian forest management plan, Mazindaran). Iranian Journal of Forest 3(1): 13-23.
40-Panahi, P., M. Pourhashemi, & M. Hassani Nejad, 2012. Estimation of tree species’ Leaf ecological indicators in the Caspian segment National Botanic Garden. Second national conference on environmental planning and management, Tehran University, Iran.
41- Paul, K.I., P.J. Polglase, J.G. Nyakuengama, & P.K. Khanna, 2002. Change in soil carbon following afforestation. Forest Ecology and Management 168(1–3): 241–57.
42-Pourhashemi, M., S. Eskandari, M. Dehghani, T. Najafi, A. Asadi, & |P. Panahi, 2012. Biomass and leaf area index of Caucasian Hackberry (Celtis caucasica Willd.) in Taileh urban forest, Sanandaj, Iran. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research 19 (4): 609-620.
43- Qi, Y., Z. Liu, & G. Jin, 2014. Impact of understorey on overstorey leaf area index estimation from optical remote sensing in five forest types in northeastern China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 198-199: 72-80.
44- Richter, D.D., D. Markewitz, S.E. Trumbore, & C.G. Wells, 1999. Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest. Nature 400: 56–8.
45-Roosta, T. & M. Hodjati, 2011. Soil forest management in relation to carbon sequestration. Fourth Conference of Environment, Tehran, Iran.
46-Rouhi Moghaddam, E., 2007. Growth and Nutrition dynamic of pure and mixed Oak Plantations. Ph.D. thesis of Forestry, Department of Forestry, Tarbiat Modarres University, Iran, 235 pages.
47- Specht, A., 2003. West PW. Estimation of biomass and sequestered carbon on farm forest plantations in northern New South Wales, Australian Biomass and Bioenergy 25(4): 363–79.
48- Sun, R., J.M. Chen, Y. Zhou, & Y. Liu, 2004. Spatial distribution of net primary productivity and evapotranspiration in Changbaishan natural reserve. China, using Land sat ETM+ data. Canadian Journal of Remote sensing 30: 731-742.
49- Tang, H., M. Brolly, F. Zhao, A.H. Strahler, C.L. Schaaf, S. Ganguly, G. Zhang, & R. Dubayah, 2014. Deriving and validating Leaf Area Index (LAI) at multiple spatial scales through lidar remote sensing: A case study in Sierra National Forest, CA. Remote Sensing of Environment 143 (5): 131-141.
50- Thuille A., & E. Schulze, 2006. Carbon dynamics in successional and afforested spruce stands in Thuringia and the Alps. Global Change Biology 12(2): 325–342.
51- Turner, J., & M. Lambert, 2000. Change in organic carbon in forest plantation soils in eastern Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 133(3): 231–47.
52-Varamesh, S., S.M. Hosseini, & N. Abdi, 2011. The effect of afforestation of hardwood species on soil carbon sequestration in Cheetgar Forest Par. Soil and Water Sciences, 25 (3): 187-196.
53- Vesterdal, L., 2002. change in soil organic caabon following afforestation of former avable land. Forest Ecology and Management 169: 137 – 147.
54- Walkley, A., & I. Black, 1934. An exmination of the Degtjaref method for determining Soil otganic matter and proposed modification of the choromic acid titration method. Soil Science Society America Journal 37: 29 – 38.
55- Wang, S.Q., J.Y. Liu, G.R. Yu, Y.D. Pan, Q.M. Chen, & K.R. Li, 2004. Effects of land use change on the storage of soil organic carbon: a case study of the Qianyanzhou forest experimental station in China. Climatic Change 67: 247–55.
56- Woomer, D.L., A. Tourc, & M. Sall, 2004. Cabon Stocks in Senegal Sahel Transition zone. Journal of Arid Environment 134 – 147.
57- Yan, H., M. Cao, J. lieu, & B. Tao, 2007. Ptential and sustinablility for carbon ssequsestion with improre soil mangment in agricultural soils. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 121: 352 – 335.
58- Zeng, X., W. Zhang, J. Cao, X. Liu, H. Shen, & X. Zhao, 2014. Changes in soil organic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and bulk density after afforestation of the “Beijing–Tianjin Sandstorm Source Control” program in China. Catena. 118: 186-194.
59- Zinn, Y.L., D.V.S. Resck, & J.E. Silva, 2002. Soil organic carbon as affected by afforestation with Eucalyptus and Pinus in the Cerrado region of Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management 166(1–3): 285–94.