ارائه مدل اثربخش ارزیابی خط‌مشی‌های سلامت نظام اداری با توجه به اسناد بالادستی: مطالعه در وزارت امور اقتصادی و دارایی
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت دولتی
محمد رحمانی
1
,
نوید فاتحی راد
2
,
شیوا مداحیان
3
,
مژگان درخشان
4
1 - دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت، واحد کرمان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمان، ایران.
2 - استادیار، گروه مدیریت، واحد کرمان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمان، ایران.
3 - استادیار، گروه مدیریت، واحد کرمان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمان، ایران.
4 - استادیار، گروه مدیریت، واحد کرمان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمان، ایران.
کلید واژه: خط‌مشی, سلامت نظام اداری, قوانین بالادستی, ارزیابی خط‌مشی,
چکیده مقاله :
این تحقیق با هدف ارائه مدل اثربخش ارزیابی خط‌مشی‌های سلامت نظام اداری با توجه به اسناد بالادستی در وزارت امور اقتصادی و دارایی انجام شده است. این پژوهش ترکیبی از روش‌های کیفی و کمی بوده بدین ترتیب که در ابتدا با انجام مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای 108 عنوان خط‌مشی به‌عنوان کدهای اولیه (پاره‌گفتارها) احصا گردید که با استفاده از روش تحلیل مضمون در 23 مضمون پایه (مؤلفه) و سپس در 6 مضمون سازمان‌دهنده (بعد) شامل ابعاد اداری، اجتماعی، اقتصادی، سیاسی، قضایی، و مالی دسته‌بندی گردید. مدل اولیه توسط خبرگان مورد تأیید قرار گرفت. جامعه آماری این تحقیق شامل کارکنان ستاد و ادارات کل استانی وزارت امور اقتصادی و دارایی به تعداد 4062 نفر بوده و با توجه به روش نمونه‌گیری کوهن تعداد 205 نمونه با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری طبقاتی انتخاب شده‌اند. مدل اولیه در این نمونه مورد آزمون قرار گرفت. روایی پرسش‌نامه برابر با (1/86 درصد) محاسبه گردیده، پایایی درونی پرسش‌نامه نیز با استفاده از آلفای کرونباخ محاسبه شده و با توجه به اینکه مقادیر آلفای کرونباخ بالاتر از (7/0) قرار گرفته، پایایی درونی تمامی بُعد‌ها مورد تأیید قرار گرفت. تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزارهای SPSS و Smart-PLS انجام‌شده است. برای بررسی سؤال‌های پژوهش از روش‌های آماری تحلیل عاملی تأییدی، معادلات ساختاری و آزمون t تک نمونه‌ای استفاده شده است. درنتیجه با توجه به کسب نمره شاخص‌های آلفای کرونباخ و پایایی ترکیبی بیشتر از 6/0، بار عاملی بالاتر از 5/0 سؤالات، نمره شاخص ریشه میانگین مربعات باقی‌مانده استاندارد شده معادل 039/0، اعتبار مدل مورد تأیید قرار گرفت.
This research has been done with the aim of providing an effective model for evaluating the health policies of the administrative system according to the upstream documents in the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance. This research is a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, so that at first, by conducting library studies, 108 policy titles were counted as primary codes (parts of speech), which were divided into 23 basic themes (components) and then into 6 organizing themes (dimension) included administrative, social, economic, political, judicial, and financial dimensions. The initial model was verified by experts. The statistical population of this research includes 4062 employees of the headquarters and provincial general offices of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance, and according to Cohen's sampling method, 205 samples were selected using the stratified sampling method. The initial model was tested in this sample. The validity of the questionnaire was calculated as (86.1 percent), the internal reliability of the questionnaire was also calculated using Cronbach's alpha, and considering that the values of Cronbach's alpha were higher than (0.7), the internal reliability of all dimensions was confirmed. Data analysis was done using SPSS and Smart-PLS software. Statistical methods of confirmatory factor analysis, structural equations and single-sample t-test have been used to investigate the research questions. As a result, according to Cronbach's alpha indices score and composite reliability higher than 0.6, factor loading higher than 0.5 of the questions, root-mean-square index score of the standardized residual equal to 0.039, the validity of the model was confirmed.
Alkin, M. C., & Christi, C. A. (2012). An Evaluation Theory Tree. In M. Alkin (Ed), Evaluation roots, A wider oerspective of Theorists views and influence. SAGE, Thousand Oaks.
Amiri, M., Nargesian, A., & Bahri Roudposhti, A. (2014). Measuring corruption and administrative integrity in Tehran Municipality. Organizational Behavior Studies Quarterly, 4, 65-96. (In Persian)
Bostan Zar, J., Rahman Sorsht, H., Sharifzadeh, F., & Taqavi Fard, M. T. (2018). A Dynamic Model for Public Policy Evaluation (As evidence: Development Plans). Economic Strategy, 7(25).
Choi, H., Hong, S., & Lee, J. W. (2018). Does increasing gender representativeness and diversity improve organizational integrity? Public Personnel Management, 47(1), 73-92.
Danaei Fard, H., Abdali, R., & Mahmoudi Kochsaraei, A. A. (2019). Researches on corruption and administrative health in Iran: a domain review. Audit knowledge, 20(79), 201-218. (In Persian)
Gorjipour, H., Khashei, V., Eslambolchi, A., & Asghari Sarem, A. (2019). Developing the Evaluative Model for Cultural Policy Making Process based on Qualitative Study of Cultural Documents of Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Public Administration, 11(1), 47-72. https://doi.org/10.22059/jipa.2019.268859.2409 (In Persian)
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. Jossey-Bass.
Habibi Tabar, H. (2017). Administrative health in the light of Islamic supervision and control and its comparison with Iran's administrative system. Ethical Research Quarterly, 8(4), 97-116. (In Persian)
Hajatpour, S., Danesh Fard, K., Taban, M., & Amirnejad, Q. (2018). Providing a model of successful evaluation of social security organization's general policies based on professional ethics. Ethical researches, 37(10), 111-128.
Hamidi, K., Ahmadi, A., Daneshfard, K., & Seyf, A. (2019). A model for evaluation of human resource development policies of government employees. Modiriat-e- farda(57), 67-82.
Hosainpoor, D., Sharifzadeh, F., Noori, R., & Karimian, O. (2019). Application of Grounded Theory in Assessing the Economic Policies of the Islamic Parliament. Public Organizations Management, 7(2), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.30473/ipom.2019.42898.3367
Hu, J., Li, X., Duncan, K., & Xu, J. (2020). Corporate relationship spending and stock price crash risk:Evidence from China's anti-corruption campaign. Journal of Banking & Finance, 113, 105758.
Iran Islamic Council Research Center. (2023). Economic and social parameters affecting administrative corruption in Iran (economics of crime and administrative corruption). https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/729421 (In Persian)
jabaripur, M., Abedi jafari, H., & Abooie Ardekani, M. (2015). Anti-Corruption Policies in Islamic Republic of Iran’s Quad Development Program. Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 1(2), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.22059/ppolicy.2015.57159
Jabeen, S. (2018). Unintended outcomes evaluation approach: A plausible way to evaluate unintended outcomes of social development programmes. Evaluation and program planning, 68, 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.09.005
Javanbakht, S., Mohammadi, M., & Rezaeifar, H. (2022). Management competencies of organizational health based on administrative system transformation policies. Strategic and Macro Policy Quarterly, in Press. https://doi.org/10.30507/JMSP.2023.363123.2488 (In Persian)
Kargar Shouroki, H., Rezayi Sadrabadi, A., & Rahmani shamsi, J. (2021). Requirements of Executive Policies to Implement General Policies of Administrative Integrity. Quarterly Journal of The Macro and Strategic Policies, 9(35), 586-608. https://doi.org/10.30507/jmsp.2021.277104.2217
Kargar Shuraki, H., Rezaei Sadrabadi, A., & Rahmani Shamsi, J. (2021). Executive policies for the implementation of the general policies of the administrative system in the field of administrative health Quarterly. Strategic and macro policies, 587-608. (In Persian)
Kia, F., Hashemi, A., & Fazel Anwari Yazdi, A. (2016). Investigating the relationship between organizational culture and administrative health inefficiency in the employees of Lamard Health Center. Journal of Iran University of Medical Sciences, 65-73. (In Persian)
Mark, M., Henry, G., & Julnes, G. (2000). An Integrated Framework for Understanding, Guiding, and Improving Policies and Programs (1 ed.). Jossey – bass, San Francisco.
Morell, J. A. (2018). Systematic iteration between model and methodology: A proposed approach to evaluating unintended consequences. Evaluation and program planning(68), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.09.006
Nouri, K., Foraty, H., Hemtian, H., & Faezy Razi, F. (2020). . , 63(5), -. doi: . (2020). Presenting a Conceptual Model for Evaluating the Implementation of Administrative System Policy: A Case Study of Executive Bodies and Medical Universities of Semnan Province. Medical journal of mashhad university of medical sciences, 63(5). https://doi.org/10.22038/mjms.2020.19119
Quchani Khorasani, M., Hosseinpour, D., Mahmoudzadeh, A., & Alwani, S. M. (2017). Identifying the development factors of open innovation processes in cyber security research institutions with a data base approach. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Smart Business Management Studies, 7(26), 37-70. (In Persian)
Rafizadeh, A., Mirsepasi, N., & Azar, A. (2016). Design Model of Performance Management at the State Level. . Public Organizations Management, 4(4), 81-100.
Rossi, P., Lipsey, M., & Freeman, H. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7 ed.). SAGE, Thousand Oaks.
Sarukhani, B. (2006). Research methods in social sciences (2 ed., Vol. 1). Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran.
Shokri, Z., & Kheyrgu, M. (2018). How to evaluate the quality of public policies in Iran: Exploration’s Mixed Methodology Research. Public Organizations Management, 6(2), 79-94.
Soltani, A. M. (2020). National Evaluation System; a Missing Link in the Legislation and Planning System of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 6(4), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.22059/jppolicy.2020.75197
Transparency International. (2021). Corruption Perceptions Index. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2021
Vaezi, R., & Mohammadi, M. (2018). A model for evaluating public policies in Iran (value added tax policy study). Public Management Perspectives, 8(29), 47-72.
Vaezi, R., Sharifzadeh, F., & Mohammadi, M. (2016). A model for evaluating public policies in Iran (a case study of value-added tax policy). Public Administration Perspective, 29. (In Persian)
Yagoubi, N., & Yousefi Tabas, H. (2014). The administrative system health with the aim of executing general administrative policies: the case of developing E-government to improve the administrative system health from the perspective of staffs in Birjand university. Administrative Law Quarterly, 7, 113-142. (In Persian)
Zarandi, S. (2006). Designing a framework for administrative health [Master's thesis, University of Tehran]. (In Persian)
_||_Alkin, M. C., & Christi, C. A. (2012). An Evaluation Theory Tree. In M. Alkin (Ed), Evaluation roots, A wider oerspective of Theorists views and influence. SAGE, Thousand Oaks.
Amiri, M., Nargesian, A., & Bahri Roudposhti, A. (2014). Measuring corruption and administrative integrity in Tehran Municipality. Organizational Behavior Studies Quarterly, 4, 65-96. (In Persian)
Bostan Zar, J., Rahman Sorsht, H., Sharifzadeh, F., & Taqavi Fard, M. T. (2018). A Dynamic Model for Public Policy Evaluation (As evidence: Development Plans). Economic Strategy, 7(25).
Choi, H., Hong, S., & Lee, J. W. (2018). Does increasing gender representativeness and diversity improve organizational integrity? Public Personnel Management, 47(1), 73-92.
Danaei Fard, H., Abdali, R., & Mahmoudi Kochsaraei, A. A. (2019). Researches on corruption and administrative health in Iran: a domain review. Audit knowledge, 20(79), 201-218. (In Persian)
Gorjipour, H., Khashei, V., Eslambolchi, A., & Asghari Sarem, A. (2019). Developing the Evaluative Model for Cultural Policy Making Process based on Qualitative Study of Cultural Documents of Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Public Administration, 11(1), 47-72. https://doi.org/10.22059/jipa.2019.268859.2409 (In Persian)
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. Jossey-Bass.
Habibi Tabar, H. (2017). Administrative health in the light of Islamic supervision and control and its comparison with Iran's administrative system. Ethical Research Quarterly, 8(4), 97-116. (In Persian)
Hajatpour, S., Danesh Fard, K., Taban, M., & Amirnejad, Q. (2018). Providing a model of successful evaluation of social security organization's general policies based on professional ethics. Ethical researches, 37(10), 111-128.
Hamidi, K., Ahmadi, A., Daneshfard, K., & Seyf, A. (2019). A model for evaluation of human resource development policies of government employees. Modiriat-e- farda(57), 67-82.
Hosainpoor, D., Sharifzadeh, F., Noori, R., & Karimian, O. (2019). Application of Grounded Theory in Assessing the Economic Policies of the Islamic Parliament. Public Organizations Management, 7(2), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.30473/ipom.2019.42898.3367
Hu, J., Li, X., Duncan, K., & Xu, J. (2020). Corporate relationship spending and stock price crash risk:Evidence from China's anti-corruption campaign. Journal of Banking & Finance, 113, 105758.
Iran Islamic Council Research Center. (2023). Economic and social parameters affecting administrative corruption in Iran (economics of crime and administrative corruption). https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/729421 (In Persian)
jabaripur, M., Abedi jafari, H., & Abooie Ardekani, M. (2015). Anti-Corruption Policies in Islamic Republic of Iran’s Quad Development Program. Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 1(2), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.22059/ppolicy.2015.57159
Jabeen, S. (2018). Unintended outcomes evaluation approach: A plausible way to evaluate unintended outcomes of social development programmes. Evaluation and program planning, 68, 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.09.005
Javanbakht, S., Mohammadi, M., & Rezaeifar, H. (2022). Management competencies of organizational health based on administrative system transformation policies. Strategic and Macro Policy Quarterly, in Press. https://doi.org/10.30507/JMSP.2023.363123.2488 (In Persian)
Kargar Shouroki, H., Rezayi Sadrabadi, A., & Rahmani shamsi, J. (2021). Requirements of Executive Policies to Implement General Policies of Administrative Integrity. Quarterly Journal of The Macro and Strategic Policies, 9(35), 586-608. https://doi.org/10.30507/jmsp.2021.277104.2217
Kargar Shuraki, H., Rezaei Sadrabadi, A., & Rahmani Shamsi, J. (2021). Executive policies for the implementation of the general policies of the administrative system in the field of administrative health Quarterly. Strategic and macro policies, 587-608. (In Persian)
Kia, F., Hashemi, A., & Fazel Anwari Yazdi, A. (2016). Investigating the relationship between organizational culture and administrative health inefficiency in the employees of Lamard Health Center. Journal of Iran University of Medical Sciences, 65-73. (In Persian)
Mark, M., Henry, G., & Julnes, G. (2000). An Integrated Framework for Understanding, Guiding, and Improving Policies and Programs (1 ed.). Jossey – bass, San Francisco.
Morell, J. A. (2018). Systematic iteration between model and methodology: A proposed approach to evaluating unintended consequences. Evaluation and program planning(68), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.09.006
Nouri, K., Foraty, H., Hemtian, H., & Faezy Razi, F. (2020). . , 63(5), -. doi: . (2020). Presenting a Conceptual Model for Evaluating the Implementation of Administrative System Policy: A Case Study of Executive Bodies and Medical Universities of Semnan Province. Medical journal of mashhad university of medical sciences, 63(5). https://doi.org/10.22038/mjms.2020.19119
Quchani Khorasani, M., Hosseinpour, D., Mahmoudzadeh, A., & Alwani, S. M. (2017). Identifying the development factors of open innovation processes in cyber security research institutions with a data base approach. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Smart Business Management Studies, 7(26), 37-70. (In Persian)
Rafizadeh, A., Mirsepasi, N., & Azar, A. (2016). Design Model of Performance Management at the State Level. . Public Organizations Management, 4(4), 81-100.
Rossi, P., Lipsey, M., & Freeman, H. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7 ed.). SAGE, Thousand Oaks.
Sarukhani, B. (2006). Research methods in social sciences (2 ed., Vol. 1). Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran.
Shokri, Z., & Kheyrgu, M. (2018). How to evaluate the quality of public policies in Iran: Exploration’s Mixed Methodology Research. Public Organizations Management, 6(2), 79-94.
Soltani, A. M. (2020). National Evaluation System; a Missing Link in the Legislation and Planning System of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 6(4), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.22059/jppolicy.2020.75197
Transparency International. (2021). Corruption Perceptions Index. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2021
Vaezi, R., & Mohammadi, M. (2018). A model for evaluating public policies in Iran (value added tax policy study). Public Management Perspectives, 8(29), 47-72.
Vaezi, R., Sharifzadeh, F., & Mohammadi, M. (2016). A model for evaluating public policies in Iran (a case study of value-added tax policy). Public Administration Perspective, 29. (In Persian)
Yagoubi, N., & Yousefi Tabas, H. (2014). The administrative system health with the aim of executing general administrative policies: the case of developing E-government to improve the administrative system health from the perspective of staffs in Birjand university. Administrative Law Quarterly, 7, 113-142. (In Persian)
Zarandi, S. (2006). Designing a framework for administrative health [Master's thesis, University of Tehran]. (In Persian)