بررسی سیاست‌های حقوقی تغییر کاربری اراضی کشاورزی با تأکید بر حفظ حریم شهرها و توسعه کشاورزی (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان شمیرانات)
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی برنامه ریزی منطقه ایمحمد پارسا 1 , امیر وطنی 2 , عباس کریمی 3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری رشته فقه و حقوق جزا، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.
2 - استادیار دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.
3 - استاد دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
کلید واژه: اراضی کشاورزی, حریم شهر, تصمیمهای حقوقی و قضایی, قلع‌وقمع, شمیرانات,
چکیده مقاله :
گستردگی ابعاد تغییر کاربری اراضی کشاورزی یکی از چالشهای جدی پیش روی کشاورزی پایدار بوده و شناسایی عوامل اثرگذار بر آن یکی از مباحث مهم است. در همین راستا، در سال 1374 و با اصلاحاتی در سال 1385 تغییر کاربری اراضی زراعی و باغها را در خارج از بافت قانونی روستاها و در حریم شهرها که باعث از بین رفتن زمین‌های کشاورزی می‌شود، جرم تلقی کرده است. هدف اصلی این پژوهش شناساندن آثار و تبعات تصمیمهای حقوقی و قضایی منجر به قلع‌وقمع بنای احداثی بر حفظ و توسعه کشاورزی است. پژوهش حاضر با روش کتابخانهای و مروری بر منابع مرتبط با موضوع و همچنین به صورت میدانی و با ابزارهای مشاهده و مصاحبه انجام شده است. روش کار این پژوهش با رویکرد توصیفی- تحلیلی و از لحاظ هدف کاربردی می‌باشد. در این پژوهش ابعاد مختلف کالبدی، اقتصادی- اجتماعی، زیست‌محیطی و مدیریتی- حقوقی بررسی شده است و یافته‌های تحقیق نشان می‌دهد که در بخش کالبدی؛ رها شدن زمین با کسب امتیاز (878/0)، در بخش اقتصادی- اجتماعی؛ کاهش بازدهی محصولات کشاورزی با امتیاز (555/0)، در بخش زیست‌محیطی؛ تغییر چشم‌انداز طبیعی اراضی با امتیاز (681/0) و در نهایت در بخش مدیریتی- حقوقی؛ ضعف قوانین با کسب امتیاز (572/0) در جایگاه‌های اول واقع شده‌اند و جز مهم‌ترین و اثرگذارترین شاخص‌ها شناخته شده‌اند و نقش مهمی بر روی زمین‌های کشاورزی به خاطر تخریب ساختمان و نخاله‌های حاصل از آن دارند.
The extent of land use change dimensions is one of the major challenges facing sustainable agriculture and identifying the factors affecting it is one of the important issues. In this regard, in 1995 and with amendments in 2006, it was considered a crime to change land use and gardens outside the legal context of the villages and in the cities privacy, which would destroy agricultural land. The main purpose of this research is to identify the effects and consequences of legal and judicial decisions leading to the destruction of the construction building on agricultural conservation and development. The present study was conducted through a library method and a review of relevant resources with subject as well as field survey and observation and interview tools. The method of this study is descriptive-analytical and it is applied in terms of purpose. This study investigates various dimensions of physical, socio-economic, environmental and managerial-legal and the research findings show that in the physical sector؛ land abandonment, in the socio- economic sector؛ reducing the productivity of agricultural crops, in the environmental sector؛ natural Landscape change of lands and ultimately, in the management-legal sector, the weaknesses of the laws are among the most important and effective indicators and play an important role on agricultural lands due to the destruction of buildings and wastes of it.
Introduction
Land is a natural resource, and the efficiency of any ecosystem depends on the type and quality of land use. Also, the future of nation can be predicted based on how it is used. Dramatic changes in agricultural land use have taken place with the growth of population and the industrialization of human societies. This issue is more important in developing countries because of the weak management and the disruption of the political and economic structure. Rapid economic growth and accelerated growth of urban centers, inadequate government policies, and lack of adequate oversight are factors that are driving from the process of land use change. This change have impressive results on environment. Increasing environmental awareness and the effort for sustainable management of natural resources require the study and monitoring of land use, land cover, variations for time scales at different locations. This article first explores the legal and judicial decisions, and then the impacts of it and the expression of the relationship between agricultural land use conservation and agricultural development, as well as ways to prevent the negative effects of legal and judicial decisions, are discussed. Therefore, this research seeks to answer the question of what impacts buildings and waste products have on agricultural land?
Methodology
This research is a descriptive-analytical research and based on its purpose is applied. The method of gathering information according to the nature of the topic was first examined by using the library method based on the topic-related resources. In this way, a number of indicators related to the factors were identified and then field observation and interview tools were used to organize the data. The statistical population includes experts of ministry of agricultural-Jahad, experts of natural resources organization, experts of environmental Protection organization, experts of Housing Foundation of Islamic Revolution organization and Convicts who refuse to collect materials left over.In the first stage, interviews were conducted with experts and managers for a comprehensive and integrated view of the situation, and in a second stage, questionnaire was designed. The questionnaire was used to assess the effectiveness of each of the dimensions and components in the Likert range of five options, from very high to very low impact options. Finally, the number of experts was 30 and the number of convicts was 24.Also, Topsis was used for their analysis.
Results and discussion
The demolition of buildings by judicial decisions and the resulting rubbish will have a great impact on the agricultural land which cause problems in the agricultural sector, So that if these rubbish is not collected, it could have an adverse impact on agricultural land in the not too distant future. In this regard, the results of the TOPSIS model show that the land release indicator is in the first place and indicates the extent of its effect among the physical indicator. The second indicator in the physical sector is the decline in agricultural land use change, which is in a second place and shows its importance. Finally, the access problem is in third place.
Waste from the demolition of buildings is also important in the socio-economic sector and can affect different sectors of agriculture, because a pile of construction debris on agricultural land can affect different economic and social sectors as well as providing undesirable results. In this regard, the results show that the component of decreasing the productivity of agricultural products with a score of 0.555 is in the first place which indicates its importance and influence over other components. The second component is the devaluation of the land's economic value, which is caused by the accumulation of waste in agricultural land. Component of infrastructure implementation costs for land use change was in third place, showing its importance over other components. The consequences of the demolition of buildings by judicial decisions and the rubbish that results on arable land could have implications for the environment of the area. Ignoring the environmental issue at the regional level can be critical and cause many problems, especially in the area of environmental health. Protecting of this space, preventing of them from being converted into residential spaces and conserve ecological potential are important. However, this issue needs to be addressed in the context of environmental criteria that consider the sustainability of ecological structures, processes and functions. Therefore, the results of the TOPSIS model show that the debris of the construction changes the natural landscape, pollutes the land and destroys the green space that they show the importance of each of them in the agricultural lands. Results of the legal and management sectors show that the weakness of the rules with the highest score is in the first place and this indicator has played an important role among the indicators studied. The weakness of the state apparatus supervision is second stage. Finally, the weakness of the punishment for change of user is in third place.
Conclusion
Land use change for more urban builders is an important example of human impact on the environment that causes structural changes in the social, economic and physical dimensions of the towns in the area. It can be concluded from the research findings that the indicator of land use change in Iran especially in Shemiranat city in Tehran province is increasing. Given the crime of unauthorized alteration of agricultural land and gardens, this crime is being investigated in two criminal courts in the land. In cases of committing a crime, Offender is punished with a fine of cash and tin and the demolition of buildings.Based on note 10, article 10 of the Law on ministry of agricultural-Jahad laws may demolish a construction site in cases where land use change operations are in progress and have been suspended. Observations at sites that have resulted from both legal and destroyed building decisions indicate that construction materials and debris from the demolition remain in place and are not being collected. In practice, this causes the use of agricultural land to remain unprotected and in the privacy of cities to lose the necessary capabilities and efficiency. In this regard, the results of the multi-criteria decisions indicated that in the legal-managerial sector, indicators such as weakness of laws and control of state institutions and weakness of penalties for change of use are the most important ones. In economic and social sector, components such as reducing in efficiency of agricultural productions, and also decreasing in economic value of land show that their most important impact is the destruction of buildings on agricultural land. In the environmental sector, the presence of indicators such as changes in the natural landscape of lands and land pollution had the greatest impact after the demolition of buildings on agricultural lands. In the physical aspect, indicators such as land abandonment and reduction of land use change indicate their impact on other indicators.
1- Agricultural Land Conservation Plan. (2016): Parliament Research Center, Vol. 10, Registration No 162.
2- Amanpour, S, Kamelifar, M. J, and Bahmani, H. (2017): An Analysis of landuse changes in metropolises using satellite imagery analysis in the ENVI environment Case study: Ahvaz metropolis, Scientific - Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR), Vol. 26, No 102, pp 139-150.
3- Amirnajad, h. (2014): Factors Affecting Farmers' Willingness to Changing Land Use in Mazandaran Province, Journal of agricultural economics research, Vol. 5, pp 87-106.
4- Azizi, M.M and Dehghani, M. (2015): Assessment of Influencing Factors on Land Use Changes in UrbanExpansion of Metropolis, Case Study: District 22 of Municipality of Tehran, Arman Shahr Architecture & Urban Development, Vol.7 , No. 13, pp 343-359.
5- Bakhtar, M. R. (2015): Lands and estates in judicial procedure, Publications javehdaneh.
6- Barati, A, Asadi, A, kalantari, K, Azadi, H and Mamoorian, M. (2015): Analyzing the impacts of agricultural land use change according to the experts opinion of agricultural land organization in Iran, Iranian journal of agricultural economics and development research, Vol. 45, No. 4, 639-650.
7- Bashiri, A, Chavoshi, M. S, Daneshvari, H, Bashiri, A , Heydari, A, Keshtkar, M, Tigh, M.J, Shabani, E. (2015): Land Regulations Outside the Cities , Publications javedaneh.
8- Blöser, C and Titus S. (2017) : Hope (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), Publisher, Stanford Metaphysics Research Lab
9- Boroumand, M, Qajar Sepanloo, M and Bahmaniar, M. A. (2014): The Effect of Land Use Change on Some Physical and Chemical Properties of Soils (Case Study: Samskandeh Sari), Journal of Watershed Management 5, No. 9, pp. 94-94.
10- Dadashpoor H and Salarian ,F. (2015): Analysis of the Impacts of Urban Sprawl on Land Use Changes in Sari City, Geographical urban planning research, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp 145-163.
11- Dehghan, H and Azadeh, F. (2018): Identifying Factors Affecting the Preserve of Agricultural Land Use to Achieve Sustainable Agriculture, Journal of agriculyural science and sustainable production, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp 151-168.
12- Dempsey, Judith A., Andrew J. Plantinga, Jeffrey D. Kline, Joshua J. Lawler, Sebastian Martinuzzi, Volker C. Radeloff, and Daniel P. Bigelow. (2017) : Effects of local land –use planning on development and disturbance in riparian areas. Land Use Policy. No 60. pp 16-25.
13- Ghadimi, A, Papzen, A.h and Amini, A. (2018): The Investigation of Agricultural Land Use Change Trend and their Effects on Sustainable Development Components (Zayandehrood Basin of Isfahan Province), Architectural extension education research, Vol. 11, No. 3, 41-58.
14- Ghanbari, Y and Barqhi, H. (2008): Essential Challenges in Sustainable Development of Iranian Agriculture, rahbor deyas, No. 16, pp 218-234.
15- Hosseini Alamdani, H and Jamshidi Kouhsari, A. (2016): Change of Non-Use of Agricultural Land Law and State Ownership of Land Law, Publications Yar hoghogh.
16- Hosseini al-Madani, H and Jamshidi Kohsari, A (2016): Unauthorized use of agricultural land and government ownership of land, Yar Law Publications.
17- Jamalipour, M, Shahpouri, A. R and Ghorbani, m. (2015): Factors Affecting the Formation of Change in Land Use in the Mazandaran Province: A Case Study of Tonekabon, Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development.
18- Kalali Moghaddam, Zh. (2015): An Investigation of the Factors Affecting Land Use Changing of Agricultural Lands (Case Study: Rural Areas of Rasht Town- Iran), Journal of Research and Rural Planning, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp 113-132.
19- Khakpour, B, Velayati, S and Kianjad, Q. (2007): Land Use Change Pattern of Babol City during the years 1972-78, Geography and Regional Development, Volume 5, Number 9, pp. 45-64.
20- Loffe, G, & Nefedova T. (2001). Land Use Changes in the Environs of Moscow-Area. vol. 33, Issue 3.
21- Long, X., Xi Ji, and S. Ulgiati. (2017): Is urbanization eco-friendly? An energy and land use cross-country analysis”. Energy Policy 100,
22- Manshizadeh, R and Khoshal, F. (2005): The Impact of Tourism on Land Use Change in Lahijan City (with Emphasis on Rural Lands), Journal of Geographical Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 5, pp 106-89.
23- Menconi, Maria Elena, David Grohmann, and Claudia Mancinelli. (2017). European farmers and participatory rural appraisal: A systematic literature review on experiences to optimize rural development. Land Use Policy. No 60, pp 1-11.
24- Mohammad esmail, Z. (2010): Monitoring Karaj Land Use Changes Using Remote Sensing Technique, Iranian Journal of Soil Research, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp 81-88.
25- Motavaselie, B, GHorbaniyan, A, Naderian Zadeh, A and Zaresahhie, H. (2016): The Alteration in Land Allocation against Rural Guide Plans in Taft County (2010-2013), housing and rural environment, Vol. 35, No. 155, pp 77-92.
26- Motiee langroudi, h, Rezvani, M.R and kateb azgomi, Z. (2012): Economic effects of agricultural land use change on rural area (Dehestan of Licharaki Hasan-rood, Bandar Anzali), Journal of Research and Rural Planning, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp1-23.
27- Mousavi moghaddam, m. (2015):Land Use Change Analysis and Critique of Judicial Procedure and Law on Conservation of Land and Gardens, Publications hoghogh amroz.
28- Parsa, M. (2014): The Role of Judicial Interpretation of Criminal Laws in Criminal Statistics", Proceedings of the Conference on Identification of the Laws and Regulations that Provide and Facilitate Crimes and Legal Disputes, Kharazmi University, pp.103-104.
29- PourAhmad, A, Seifolddini, F and Prenon, Z. (2011):Migration and Land Use Change in Islamshahr City, Journal of Arid Regions Geographics Studies, Vol. 2, No. 5, pp 131-152.
30- Rattykone, S, Akiyuki K, Sangam S, and Masatsugu T. (2016). Assessment of potential impacts of climate and land use changes on stream flow: a case study of the Nam Xong watershed in Lao PDR. Journal of Water and Climate Change 7. No. 1, pp 184-.791
31- Saadi, H and Fereshteh Avatefi, A. (2018): Factors Affecting Agricultural Land Use Change in Hamadan Rural Areas, Journal space economy and rural development, Vol. 7, No 2, pp211-226.
32- Sadeghi, M. (1992), Sustainable Agricultural Systems and Its Role in Conservation and Exploitation of Natural Resources, Proceedings of the 6th Iranian Agricultural Extension Seminar, Ministry of Agriculture.
33- Schumacher, ernest F. (2018):Small is beautiful. Economics as if people mattered, Translated by Ali Ramin, Soroush Publications, Tehran.
34- Tavakolinia, J, Azizpour, F and Ansari, T. (2015): Physical -space consequences of agricultural land - use change in the zone 18 of metropolis Tehran, studies of urban structurs and function, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp 127-146.
35- Valbuena D, Verburg PH, Bregt AK and Ligtenberg A. (2010). An agent based approach to model landuse change.
36- Vos, W, & Meekes.(1999). Trends in European Cultural Landscape Development : Perspective for a Sustainable Future. Landscape and Urban Planning Journal, Vol. 17, No. 46, Netherlands.
37- Yin, H. (2014): Understanding land use and land cover change in Inner Mongolia using remote sensing time series.
38- Zandi, M. (2017):Unauthorized change of land use (Judicial Appeals Court of Tehran Province), Jungle Publications.
_||_