شناسایی مهمترین موانع جلب مشارکت شهروندان در فرایند تصمیم سازی‌های شوراهای اسلامی شهر ایلام
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی پژوهش و برنامه ریزی شهریداود جمینی 1 , علیرضا جمشیدی 2 *
1 - استادیار گروه ژئومورفولوژی، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران
پژوهشگر پاره وقت پژوهشکده کردستان شناسی، دانشگاه
2 - استادیار گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران.
کلید واژه: مدیریت شهری, توسعه پایدار شهری, ایلام, مشارکت شهروندی, شورا,
چکیده مقاله :
برخورداری از سطح قابل قبولی از مشارکت شهروندان در امور مختلف شهری به ویژه مدیریت شهری، یکی از ارکان اصلی رعایت حقوق شهروندی و دستیابی به توسعه پایدار است. یکی از مهمترین ابعاد مشارکت شهرندان در امور مختلف شهرها، مشارکت آن‌ها در فرایند تصمیم‌سازی شوارهای اسلامی شهر است که مستقیماً توسط آراء شهروندان انتخاب می‌شوند. هدف پژوهش کابردی حاضر، پیش‌بینی سطح مشارکت شهروندان در فرایند تصمیم-سازی‌های شوراهای اسلامی شهر و شناسایی مهمترین موانع جلب مشارکت شهروندان در فرایند مذکور است که به صورت مطالعه موردی در شهر ایلام انجام گرفته است. جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر 194030 نفر از شهروندان شهر ایلام بوده که 384 نفر جهت مطالعه از طریق فرمول کوکران انتخاب شدند، سپس با استفاده از پرسشنامه محقق-ساخته و به صورت تصادفی ساده اطلاعات لازمه از محلات رزمندگان، شادآباد، زمین شهری، بان‌بور، رسالت، شهرک کشاورزی در شهر ایلام جمع‌آوری شد. لازم به توضیح بوده روایی ابزار تحقیق به صورت صوری و پایایی با استفاده از آزمون آلفای کرونباخ (758/0 = α) مورد تأیید قرار گرفت. همچنین، روش‌های آماری مورد استفاده برای تحلیل داده‌ها آزمون t تک نمونه‌ای و تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی بود. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد علی‌رغم اینکه سطح مشارکت شهروندان در فرایند تصمیم‌سازی شوراها با میانگین 2/2، در وضعیت نامناسبی قرار دارد، تمایل به مشارکت شهروندان در فرایند تصمیم‌سازی‌های شوراها با میانگین 17/3، در سطح بالایی قرار دارد. نتایج تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی نشان داد پنج مانع اصلی جلب مشارکت شهروندان در فرایند تصمیم‌سازی‌های شوراهای اسلامی شهر ایلام، که توانسته‌اند 662/79 درصد واریانس متغیر وابسته را تبیین نمایند، به ترتیب اهمیت عبات‌اند از: شهروندمحور نبودن شوراها، ضعف بنیان علمی ـ تخصصی شوراها، محدودیت‌های قوانین و مقررات و نظارتی، ضعف سرمایه اجتماعی و کم‌اعتنایی شهروندان.به ترتیب اهمیت عبات‌اند از: شهروندمحور نبودن شوراها، ضعف بنیان علمی ـ تخصصی شوراها، محدودیت‌های قوانین و مقررات و نظارتی، ضعف سرمایه اجتماعی و کم‌اعتنایی شهروندان.
Having an acceptable level of participation of citizens in various urban affairs, especially urban management, is one of the main pillars of respecting citizenship rights and achieving sustainable development. One of the most important aspects of citizens' participation in various city affairs is their participation in the decision-making process of the city's Islamic councils, which are directly elected by citizens' votes. The aim of the present applied research is to predict the level of citizens' participation in the decision-making process of the city's Islamic councils and to identify the most important obstacles to attracting citizens' participation in the said process, which has been conducted as a case study in the city of Ilam. The statistical population of the current research is 194030 citizens of Ilam city, of which 384 people were selected for the study through Cochran's formula, then using a researcher's questionnaire, the necessary information was obtained from the neighborhoods of Rozmendagh, Shadabad, Zamin Shahri, Ban Bor, Rislat in a simple random manner. , agricultural settlement was collected in Ilam city. It is necessary to explain that the face validity and reliability of the research tool was confirmed using Cronbach's alpha test (α = 0.758). Also, the statistical methods used for data analysis were one-sample t-test and exploratory factor analysis. The results of the research showed that despite the fact that the level of citizens' participation in the decision-making process of the councils is in an unfavorable situation with an average of 2.2, the willingness of citizens to participate in the decision-making process of the councils is at a high level with an average of 3.17. The results of the exploratory factor analysis showed that the five main obstacles to the participation of citizens in the decision-making process of the Islamic councils of Ilam city, which were able to explain 79.662% of the variance of the dependent variable, are, in order of importance, the lack of citizen-oriented councils, the weakness of the scientific foundation. The specialization of councils, the limitations of laws and regulations and supervision, the weakness of social capital and the lack of attention of citizens.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
During the past decades, despite the increasing academic attention to citizens' participation in urban affairs, evidence shows a significant decrease in various levels of civic, political and institutional participation of citizens. On the one hand, people are interested in participating in local issues that affect their lives, and on the other hand, members of the city administration do not want to involve people in the decision-making process (Mohammadi et al, 2018: 1762). The reduction of public trust and skepticism towards the policies and decision-making of institutions in charge of urban development is one of the main reasons for reducing the level of citizen participation in various urban affairs (Ekman and Amna, 2012: 283). Considering the importance of citizens' participation in the process of urban development, most experts consider the experience of centralized urban management to be a failure and consider it impossible without the participation of citizens in the administration of city affairs and the transformation of city dwellers into citizens. Therefore, citizens' participation is considered one of the main concerns of modern urban managements, which is not possible to achieve except through scientific and planned efforts based on sufficient understanding of the problem (Yaghfouri and Rafiyan, 2014: 82; Bozarjamehri et al., 2018: 37).
The city of Ilam with a population of 194,030 (Iran Statistics Center, 2015), as the fifth most populous city in Iran, plays a key and pivotal role in the growth and development of Fars province. The location of numerous historical, cultural, religious, industrial, service, educational and tourism centers in the city of Ilam is only a part of this city's capabilities in the field of urban and regional development. These things have caused the population of this city to grow rapidly in recent decades. On the one hand, considering the importance of citizens' participation in the decision-making process of city managers (especially the city's Islamic councils, which are directly elected by citizens), and on the other hand, considering the challenges caused by the lack of participation of citizens in the decision-making process of managers. The main questions of the current research are: What is the level of participation and the degree of willingness of citizens to participate in the decision-making of the Islamic Council of Ilam? And what are the most important obstacles to attract citizens' participation in the decision-making process of the Islamic councils of Ilam city?
Methodology
The present quantitative and applied research is a descriptive-analytical type of research, which was completed using documentary data (articles, books, Iran Statistics Center, etc.) and field data (completion of a questionnaire). The statistical population of the research includes 194,030 citizens of Ilam city who are over 18 years old. Considering the large size of the statistical population and the difficulty of conducting the census, 384 people were estimated as a statistical sample using Cochran's formula. The main research tool for collecting field data is a researcher-made questionnaire, which has been used to check its validity (face validity) from the opinions of urban planning experts and university professors. To check the reliability of the questionnaires, a pre-test method was used and 30 questionnaires were completed, and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient obtained for the main parts of the questionnaire was more than 0.7.
The said questionnaire is designed in five main sections. The first part of the questionnaire includes the respondents' demographic information such as their age, occupation, monthly income, household dimensions and their education. The second and third sections are respectively devoted to the degree of participation and willingness of citizens to participate in the decision-making of the Islamic City Council, and the fourth section is devoted to the issues related to the obstacles to citizens' participation in the decision-making of city councils. It is necessary to explain, in order to investigate the level of participation or the willingness of citizens to participate in the decision-making of the Islamic Council, four approval or planning sections (social, economic, health and cultural planning), monitoring (oversight of affairs) have been used. various, including health affairs, financial affairs and assets, and supervising the implementation of the council's approvals, implementing development plans and supervising the affairs of the cemetery), executive (in the field of elections, formation of organizations and associations, Forming various issues, encouraging activity and public participation) and cooperation and consultation (with executive officials, in the field of approving and implementing approvals, recognizing shortcomings and inadequacies, in the field of forming associations, collecting proposals and presenting them to executive organizations).
Results and discussion
The results showed that the indicators of citizens' participation in the decision-making of the city's Islamic Council are not in a suitable state. In other words, it can be said that the level of participation of the studied people in the field of the desired indicators is lower than the average, which can be seen based on the negative and significant t coefficient obtained. On the other hand, the results of examining the status of the indicators of citizens' willingness to participate in the decision-making process of the Islamic councils in Ilam city showed that the approval indicators are in a good state (mean = 3.49 and standard deviation = 0.838). Cooperation (mean = 3.44 and standard deviation = 0.905), implementation (mean = 3.36 and standard deviation = 1.05) and supervision (mean = 3.14 and standard deviation = 0.906). Also, the t obtained for the desired indicators is positive and significant, and based on this, it can be said that the degree of willingness of the desired people to participate in the decision-making indicators of the Islamic Council of Ilam city is higher than the theoretical mean or average.
The results of the factor analysis showed that five factors have been identified as the most important obstacles to attracting citizens' participation in the council's decision-making process. In total, five identified factors have been able to explain 79.662% of the variance of the dependent variable. The specific value of identified factors in order of importance are: first factor 20.417%, second factor 19.577%, third factor 16.793%, fourth factor 11.738% and fifth factor 11.137%. According to the obtained results, the most important obstacles to the participation of citizens in the decision-making process of the Islamic councils of Ilam city are 1- the non-citizen-oriented nature of the councils, 2- the weakness of the scientific-specialized foundation of the councils, 3- the limitations of laws and regulations and supervision, 4 - Weakness of social capital and 5- Indifference of citizens.
Conclusion
Considering the low participation of citizens in the decision-making process of Islamic councils, despite the significant desire of citizens to participate in the said process and also identifying the obstacles to attract citizens' participation, operational solutions to improve the level of citizen participation in the decision-making process of Islamic councils, the scope of study are: 1. - Revision of the rules and regulations for the candidates of the city Islamic Council and considering the specialized filtering of urban management for the candidates, 2- Requiring the city Islamic councils to pay attention to the opinions of the citizens, 3- Providing incentive and even punishment policies for the members of the city Islamic council. 4- Justifying the Islamic City Councils regarding the importance of citizens' participation in the decision-making process, 5- Closer supervision of the supervisory bodies on the performance of the councils, 6- Clarification of adopted plans and policies, 7- Informing citizens about the duties and rights of citizens.
1- Alizadeh, K., Razavinejad, M., & Radfar, M. (2013). Investigating the role and participation of people in administrating urban affairs (A case study of zone 10 Mashhad). Urban Structure and Function Studies, 1(1), 61-87. [in Persian]
2- Amini, Y., & Amini, M. (2017). Investigation on Influential Social and Economic Factors on Citizen's Participation in Urban Affairs Related to Municipality. Quarterly Journal of Social Development (Previously Human Development), 11(2), 179-198. doi: 10.22055/qjsd.2017.12688 [in Persian]
3- Aristeidou, M., Scanlon, E and Sharples, M (2017). Profiles of engagement in online communities of citizen science participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, pp: 246-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.044
4- Arvin, M., Farhadikhah, H., & Pourahmad A. (2017). Investigation predisposing indictor’s citizen participation in urban affairs (Case study: Region 9 of Tehran). Arid Regions Geographic Studies, 8 (29) :33-51. [in Persian]
5- Boudjelida, A., Mellouli, S and Lee, J (2016), Electronic Citizens Participation: Systematic Review, Conference: 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, March 2016.
6- Bozarjemehri, K., hossini Kahnoji, S. R., & Hosseini, N. (2020). Analysis of factors affecting the participation of citizens in the government of cities (case study: eight areas of Ahvaz). Geographical Planning of Space, 9(34), 37-52. doi: 10.30488/gps.2020.91917 [in Persian]
7- Duzi, B., Osman, R., Lehejcek., J., Novakova, E., Taraba., P and Trojan, J (2019). Exploring citizen science in post-socialist space: Uncovering its hidden character in the Czech Republic. Moravian Geographical Reports 27(4):241-253. DOI:10.2478/mgr-2019-0019
8- Ekman, J and Amna, E (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human Affairs 22(3), 283-300. DOI:10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1
9- Fox, O., & Stoett, P. (2016). Citizen participation in the UN Sustainable Development Goals consultation process: Toward global democratic governance? Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 22(4), 555-574. DOI:10.1163/19426720-02204007
10- Galani-Moutafi, V. (2013). Rural space (re)produced e Practices, performances and visions, A case study from an Aegean island. Journal of Rural Studies, 32, 103-113. DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.04.007
11- Ghadermarzi, H., Jamini, D., Jamshidi, A., & Cheraghi, R. (2013). Analysis of spatial inequality in rural areas based on the housing indicators of rural of Kermanshah Province. Economy of space and Rural Development, 2(3), 93-113. http://serd.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1579-en.html [in Persian]
12- Habibnezhad, A., & Ameri, Z. (2019). The Role of Public Participation in Enacting Municipal Regulation: A Comparative Study of Western and Iranian Laws. Comparative Study on Islamic & Western Law, 6(3), 1-28. doi: 10.22091/csiw.2019.4478.1586 [in Persian]
13- Hosseini, S A., Aflaki, A. (2023). Investigation of Effective Factors on Citizen participations in reviving the Urban Worn-out Textures (Case study: Maliki neighborhood of Noorabad Mamasani city). Journal of Research and Urban Planning, 14(53),169-186 DOI: 10.30495/JUPM.2021.28386.3925. [in Persian]
14- Hosseinzadeh, A. H., Eider, N., & Abbasi, E. (2013). Investigating factors affecting citizenship participation among the citizens of Khorramabad city. Urban Sociological Studies, 2(2), 59-82. [in Persian]
15- Huerta-Vergara, A. R., & Escolero, O. (2024). The role of citizen participation in advancing sustainable water solutions: The Mexico City case study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 101, 105104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.105104
16- Jahanbani, M., Ahmadi, M., & Behzadfar, M. (2021). Identifying and prioritizing factors influencing the strengthening of collective participation in the implementation of urban development plans (case study: Tehran metropolis). Scientific and Research Quarterly of New Approaches in Human Geography, 13(3), 477-504. 20.1001.1.66972251.1400.13.3.1.4 [in Persian]
17- Jamali Haji Hassan Sofla, E. and Nematollahi Bonab, S.D. (2021) Investigating and evaluating the role of citizens and their social participation in achieving sustainable urban development goals. (case study: Tabriz city), Journal Urban Environmental Policy, 1(1), PP 95-112. DOR: 20.1001.1.27833496.1400.1.1.16.4 [in Persian]
18- Jamini, D., shamsoddini, A., & Jamshidi, A. (2023). Citizen participation in urban management and identifying its economic and social determinants, Ilam. Motaleate Shahri, 12(45), 19-30. doi: 10.34785/J011.2022.007. [in Persian]
19- Kummitha, R.K.R. (2019). Smart cities and entrepreneurship: An agenda for future research. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 149, 1-10. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119763.
20- Mirhosseini, H., Heidarabadi, A., & farzaneh, S. (2022). Investigating the role of social capital on citizen participation in the reconstruction of dilapidated urban fabric (Case study of Gorgan and Gonbad cities). Journal of Research and Urban Planning, 12(44), 1-18. doi: 10.30495/jupm.2022.25094.4039
21- Mohammadi, S.H., Sharifah Norazizan, S and Nikkhah, H.A (2018). Conflicting perceptions on participation between citizens and members of local government. Qual Quant, 52, 1761–1778. doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0565-9.
22- Moradi, G. (2014). The Construction and Validation of the construct “Urban participation”: Case of Study: City of Kermanshah. Urban Sociological Studies, 4(11), 149-180. [in Persian]
23- Musai M, Razavi Alhashem B. (2011). SWOT Analysis of Citizens’ Participation in Civic Affairs in Tehran. Social Welfare Quarterly,11(41), 123-152. [in Persian]
24- Naranjo-Zolotov, M., Oliveira, T., Cruz-Jesus, F., Martins, J., Gonçalves, R., Branco, F and Xavier, N (2019). Examining social capital and individual motivators to explain the adoption of online citizen participation. Future Generation Computer Systems, 92, 302–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.09.044.
25- Qadrjani, R and Qaitrani, N (2012). investigation of ways to promote public participation in the improvement and renovation of dilapidated houses (case study: Golan neighborhood in Hamedan city). Haft Hesar Journal of Environmental Studies, 1(2), 83-75. [in Persian]
26- Rezaei, R., Asiyabani, Z. (2019). Assessment of quality of life and its impact on citizen participation in urban affairs case study of Neyriz city. Geography, 16(58), 141-156. [in Persian]
27- Salahi Amiri & Mohammad, S. (2010). Study and pathology of inconvenience of the Islamic city council and municipality’s relations: the case study of the Islamic city council and municipality of Tehran. Urban Management Studies, 2(2), 21-42. [in Persian]
28- Sarvarzadeh, S.K., Sza, I and Foroozan, A (2014). Evaluating Citizens’ Participation in the Urban Heritage Conservation of Historic Area of Shiraz. Asian Conference on Environment-Behaviour Studies Chung-Ang University, Seoul, S. Korea, 25-27 August 2014.
29- Seydaei, E., Ghanbari, Y., Jamini, D., & Boshagh, M. (2013). Measuring the Agricultural Sustainability in Rural Areas-A Case Study: Rural Areas of Central District of Ravansar Township. Geography and Environmental Sustainability, 3(1), 87-106. https://ges.razi.ac.ir/article_208.html?lang=en [in Persian]
30- Shakiba Moghadam, M. (2009). Administration of local and municipal organizations, second edition, Tehran, Mir Publications. [in Persian]
31- Sharepour, M., & Hojjati, H. (2018). Analysis of social factors affecting citizenship participation: empirical evaluation of social capital theory. Urban Sociological Studies, 8(28), 1-32. Doi: 10.22059/JURBANGEO.2021.315699.1425 [in Persian]
32- Shiani, M; Razavi Al-Hashem, B and Delpasand, K (2012). investigation of social factors affecting citizens' participation in the management of Tehran's urban affairs. Urban sociological studies, 2(4), 215-240. [in Persian]
33- Stevenson, C., Dixon, J., Hopkins, N and Luyt, R (2015). The Social Psychology of Citizenship, Participation and Social Exclusion: Introduction to the Special Thematic Section. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v3i2.579.
34- Sydaii, S.E., Jamini, D., & Jamshidi, A. (2014). An analysis on the status of health-therapeutic indexes in the provinces of Kermanshah using TOPSIS, AHP and cluster analysis models. Spatial Planning, 4(1), 43-64. https://sppl.ui.ac.ir/article_15984.html?lang=en [in Persian]
35- Taghvaei, M., Babanasab, R., & Moosavi, Ch. (2010). An Analysis of Assessment of Effective Factors on Citizen's Participation in Civic Management: Case Study of District 4 of Tabriz. Journal Urban - Regional Studies and Research, 1(2), 19-36. [in Persian]
36- Turrini, T., Dörler, D., Richter, R., Heigl, F and Bonn, A. (2018). The threefold potential of environmental citizen science - Generating knowledge, creating learning opportunities and enabling civic participation. Biological Conservation, 225, 176–186. DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.024.
37- United Nations. (2009). The Millennium Development Goals Report 2009. New York: United Nations.
38- Yaghfoori, H., & Rafieyan, S. (2015). A Study of the Function of Urban Management Regarding the Participation of Citizens in Urban Affairs: The Case of Fasa. Journal of Urban - Regional Studies and Research, 7(27), 81-100. [in Persian]
39- Yaghfoori, H., Aghaei, V., Moazzeni, M., & Badali, A. (2017). The role of management indicators and social capital in promoting citizen’s participation in urban affairs (Case Study: Parsabad City). Regional Planning, 7(27), 133-146. 20.1001.1.22516735.1396.7.27.10.7 [in Persian]
40- Yaghfoori, H., Hadiyani, Z., & Rafieyan, S. (2014). Review the Potential and Capabilities of Citizens’ Participation in Urban Affairs Case study: Fasa township. Geography and Development, 12(34), 83-98. 10.22111/GDIJ.2014.1434 [in Persian]
41- Yang, F., Yao, S., & Li, Y. (2023). Solidarity mobilization and citizen participation effectiveness in urban area: The case of community recycling program. Cities, 143, 104623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104623.