ارزیابی الگوی معماری مساکن محله راه آهن تبریز از منظر آسایش صوتی
محورهای موضوعی : آلودگی صدانازنین قلی پور صغایش 1 , حسن ابراهیمی اصل 2 * , سولماز بابازاده اسکوئی 3 , حسن ستاری ساربانقلی 4
1 - دانشجوی دکترای معماری، واحد بین المللی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، جلفا، ایران.
2 - استادیار گروه معماری، واحد بین المللی جلفا، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، جلفا، ایران. * (مسوول مکاتبات)
3 - استادیار گروه معماری، واحد اسکو، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اسکو، ایران.
4 - دانشیار گروه شهرسازی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران.
کلید واژه: الگوی معماری, آسایش صوتی, آلودگی صوتی, شهر تبریز.,
چکیده مقاله :
زمینه و هدف: راحتی صوتی یکی از الزامات مهم در طراحی خانهها است. اثرات ناشی از آلودگی صوتی یا محیط ناخوشایند خود را به ویژه بر سلامت (اختلال سلامت روانی در منازل یا منازل خانگی) نشان میدهد. هدف تحقیق حاضر ارزیابی الگوی معماری مساکن محلۀ راهآهن تبریز از منظر آسایش صوتی میباشد.
روش بررسی: روش تحقیق حاضر توصیفی - تحلیلی می باشد. جامعه آماری تحقیق ساکنان محله راه آهن تبریز که برابر 32936 نفر میباشد. حجم نمونه با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 380 نفر بدست آمد. برای روایی سوالات از روایی صوری استفاده و برای پایایی از آلفای کرونباخ استفاده شد. برای تحلیل دادهها با بکارگیری نرم افزار SPSS و تکنیک تاپسیس فازی عددی استفاده گردید.یافتهها: نتایج نشان داد از نظر رتبه بندی کوی ها از نظر عدم آسایش صوتی کوی اتحاد رتبه اول با وزن 822/0 بدست آورد و پس از آن کوی بابک با وزن 751/0 و استادشهریار با وزن 627/0 بترتیب رتبه دوم و سوم بدست آوردند. همچنین نتایج نشان داد با استفاده از پنجرههای دوجداره و همچنین دیواره دوجداره و چنجره دوجداره میزان آلودگی صوتی در محله راهآهن تبریز را کاهش داد.بحث و نتیجهگیری: در نتیجه میتوان با طراحی مناسب و استفاده از فرم، نما و مصالح از نظر آکوستیک معماری در محله راهآهن تبریز تا حد زیادی از آلودگی صوتی کاسته و به ارتقا کیفیت آسایش صوتی ساکنان کمک کرد.
Background and Objective: Sound comfort is one of the important requirements in the design of houses. It shows the effects of sounds pollution or unpleasant environment, especially on health (mental health disorders in houses or domestic houses). The purpose of the present research is to evaluate the architectural pattern of the houses in Rah-Ahan district of Tabriz from the perspective of acoustic comfort.
Material and Methodology: The current research method is descriptive-analytical. The statistical population of the research is 32,936 residents of the Tabriz railway neighborhood. The sample size was 380 people using Cochran's formula. For the validity of the questions, face validity was used and Cronbach's alpha was used for reliability. For data analysis, SPSS software and numerical fuzzy TOPSIS technique were used.
Findings: The results showed that in terms of the ranking of the kois in terms of acoustic discomfort, ithad koi got the first place with a weight of 0.822, followed by Babak koi with a weight of 0.751 and Ostadshahriar with a weight of 0.627. And they got the third. Also, the results showed that by using double-glazed windows, as well as double-glazed walls and double-glazed shutters, the amount of noise pollution in Tabriz's railway neighborhood was reduced.
Discussion and Conclusion: As a result, it is possible to reduce the noise pollution to a great extent by using proper design and use of form, facade and materials in terms of architectural acoustics in Tabriz Railway neighborhood and help to improve the quality of sound comfort of the residents.
1. Rasmussen, B, 2019, Sound insulation between dwellings - Comparison of national requirements in Europe and interaction with acoustic classification schemes, PROCEEDINGS of the 23rd International Congress on Acoustics 9 to 13 September 2019 in Aachen, Germany.
2. Qiyabaklou, Z., 2013, Acoustic design of multi-purpose conference hall inspired by sea shell shell. Fine Arts - Architecture and Urbanism 18(3), 17-24. (In Persian)
3. Braat-Eggen E, Keus VD, Poll M, Hornikx M, Kohlrausch A. 2019, Auditory distraction in open-plan study environments: Effects of background speech and reverberation time on a collaboration task. Applied Acoustics, 154 :148-160 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.04.038.
4. Aletta F, Oberman T and Kang J. 2018, Associations between positive health-related effects and soundscapes perceptual constructs: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health; 15(11): 1-15. 2392. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fijerph15112392.
5. Jabłonska J. 2018, Architectural acoustics in Vineyard configuration concert hall Journal of Architectural. Eng Technol; 7(2):1-6. art. 1000220. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2168-9717.1000224.
6. Postma, BN, Jouan S and Katz BF. 2018, Pre-Sabine room acoustic design guidelines based on human voice directivity. J Acoust Soc Am, 143(4): 2428-2437. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5032201.
7. Jabłon´ska J, Trocka-Leszczyn´ ska E. 2020, Ergonomics of sound in a hotel environment. In: Charytonowicz J, Falcão Ch, editors. Advances in Human Factors in Architecture, Sustainable Urban Planning and Infrastructure. Proceedings of the AHFE 2019 International Conference on Human Factors in Architecture, Sustainable Urban Planning and Infrastructure. Springer.57-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20151-7_6.
8. Alves S, Scheuren J and Altreuther B. 2016, Review of recent EU funded research projects from the perspective of urban sound planning: do the results cope with the needs of Europe’s noise policy? Noise Map, 3(1).86-106. https://doi.org/10.1515/noise-2016-0007.
9. Ghaffari, A., & Gholizadeh, F. 2021. Analysis of impact of volume changes on acoustic behavior in mosques (Case study: Historic masques of Tabriz). Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism (JIAU), 14(35), 95-110. [In Persian].
10. Afshinmehr V, Ghafary A, Zamani R. 2021. Acoustic quality assessment at Nezamol molk dome of Jamemosque of Isfahan. Journal title; 9 (2) :123-140. (In Persian)
11. Tajmir, A; Sana'i, A., Qadri, N.; 2021, Investigation of acoustic principles in providing acoustic comfort in residential buildings, New Researches in Geographical Sciences, Architecture and Urban Planning, 4(32), 53-66. (In Persian)
12. Ahmadi, A. 2019, Calculation and analysis of acoustic data of multi-purpose hall, case example: Gorgan Music House, Sound and Vibration, 9(18), 129-143. (In Persian)
13. Dessi-Olive, J., Hsu, T. 2022, A Simulation-Validated Shape Grammar for Architectural Acoustics. Nexus Netw J 24, 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-021-00583-8.
14. Jablonska, J.; Czajka, R, 2021, CAD Tools and Computing in Architectural and Urban Acoustics. Buildings, 11(6), 1-16, 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11060235.
15. Ocholi M, Ibe K. E. Iheonu E. E& Ameh E. E, 2021, Assessing Wind Impact on Noise Level Measurements for Application in Architectural Acoustics: A Preliminary Study, Nigerian Journal of Environmental Sciences and Technology (NIJEST), 5(2), 413-419, https://doi.org/10.36263/nijest.2021.02.0290. www.nijest.com.
16. Ciaburro, G; Iannace, G.; Lombardi, I.; Trematerra, A. 2020, Acoustic Design of Ancient Buildings: The Odea of Pompeii and Posillipo. Buildings, 10(12), 1-16 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10120224.
17. Vorlaender, M, 2021, Diffraction problems in an architectural acoustics benchmark, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 150, 1-16. A93, https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0007735.
18. Jia, M.; Srinivasan, R.; Ries, R.J.; Bharathy, G.; Weyer, N. 2019, Investigating the Impact of Actual and Modeled Occupant Behavior Information Input to Building Performance Simulation. Buildings 11, 1-17, 32.
19. van Kempen E, Casas M, Pershagen G, et al. 2018. Who environmental noise guidelines for the European region: a systematic review on environmental noise and cardiovascular and metabolic effects: a summary. Int J Environ Res Public Health; 15(2): 1-18, 379, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020379.
20. Anoop, C. K., Noor, N., James, M., Paul, P. N., & Harikrishnan, R. 2018. Technological and green solutions for rural house construction. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 5(4), 2291-2293.
21. Zalejska-Jonsson, A, 2019, Perceived Acoustic Quality and Effect on Occupants’ Satisfaction in Green and Conventional Residential Buildings, Buildings, 9(1), 1-11, 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9010024.
22. Vardaxis, N.-G., Bard, D., & Persson Waye, K. 2017. On the definition of acoustic comfort in residential buildings. In The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(5):3540-3540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4987481.
23. Łowicki, D.; Piotrowska, S. 2015, Monetary valuation of road noise. Residential property prices as an indicator of the acoustic climate quality. Ecol. Indic. 52, 472-479.
24. Bard, D, Vorlaender N, G, Sondergard, E, 2019, Acoustic Comfort Investigation in Residential Timber Buildings in Sweden Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering, 1(24), .78-89, https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.24.1.22068.
25. Hongisto V., Mäkilä M., Suokas M., 2015, Satisfaction with sound insulation in residential dwellings - The effect of wall construction, Building Environment 86, 309-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.12.010.
26. Vardaxis N.-G., Bard D., Persson Waye K., 2018, Review of acoustic comfort evaluation in dwellings - Part I: Associations of acoustic field data to subjective responses from building surveys, Building Acoustics, 25(2), 151-170.
27. Abbaszadeh M, Madani R, Ghaffari A. 2022. Acoustic Comfort Level in Contemporary Housing Apartments According to Urban Spaces in Tabriz City. IUESA; 10 (40) :119-132. (In Persian)
28. Ghafari Jabari, S., Ghafari Jabari, S., & Saleh, E. 2015. Effects of Acoustical Design on Providing Acoustic Comfort forResidential Apartments in Tehran. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 7(13), 59-66. (In Persian)
29. Taghipour A, Sievers T, Eggenschwiler K. 2019, Acoustic Comfort in Virtual Inner Yards with Various Building Facades. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16;16(2): 249. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fijerph16020249.
30. Davis, M. J. M., Tenpierik, M. J., Ramírez, F. R., & Pérez, M. E. 2017. More than just a Green Facade: The sound absorption properties of a vertical garden with and without plants. Building and Environment, 116, 64-72.
31. Ghafari, A., Qolizadeh, F. 2020, Explanation of the theory of preference of form over materials in the acoustic behavior of the architect's space. The title of the publication. 8 (2):145-161. (In Persian)
32. Park, S.H.; Lee, P.J.; Lee, B.K. 2020. Levels and sources of neighbor noise in heavyweight residential buildings in Korea. Appl. Acoust., 120, 148-157.
33. Abbaszadeh M, Madani R, Ghafari A. 2022. Analysis of the effect of spatial arrangement on the level of acoustic comfort in contemporary apartment housing units (Case study: Apartment housing in Tabriz). Haft Hesar J Environ Stud; 11 (39) :73-86. (In Persian)
34. Lee, S. C., Hong, J. Y., & Jeon, J. Y. 2015. Effects of acoustic characteristics of combined construction noise on annoyance. Building and Environment, 92, 657-667.
35. Hao, Y.; Qi, H.; Liu, S.; Nian, V.; Zhang, Z. 2022, Study of Noise and Vibration Impacts to Buildings Due to Urban Rail Transit and Mitigation Measures. Sustainability, 14, 1-18. 3119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053119.
36. He, W.; He, K.; Zou, C.; Yu, Y. 2021, Experimental noise and vibration characteristics of elevated urban rail transit considering the effect of track structures and noise barriers. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28, 45903-45919.