بررسي عوامل تاثيرگذار برمشارکت اجتماعي در بازآفريني شهري با بکارگيري مدل Amos (مطالعه موردي: بافت تاريخي سورو بندرعباس)
محورهای موضوعی : محیط زیست شهریمهدی جعفری 1 , کوروش افضلی 2 , مصطفی ظهیری نیا 3
1 - دانشجوي دکتري، گروه شهرسازي، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي واحد کرمان، کرمان، ایران.
2 - استادیار، گروه شهرسازی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد کرمان، کرمان، ایران. *(مسوول مکاتبات)
3 - دانشيار، گروه علوم اجتماعي، دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ایران.
کلید واژه: بازآفريني شهري, مشارکت اجتماعي, تحليل عاملي, بافت تاريخي سورو.,
چکیده مقاله :
زمينه و هدف : بازآفريني شهري يک رويکرد جامع، يکپارچه و کل نگر است و مشارکت- اجتماعي دلالت برگسترش روابط بين گروهي در قالب انجمن‌هاي داوطلبانه، باشگاه ها، اتحاديه‌ها و گروه هايي دارد که معمولا خصلتي محلي و غير دولتي دارند. اين پژوهش بر اساس هدف، از نوع کاربردي است که با هدف ارزيابي مشارکت اجتماعي در بازآفريني محله تاريخي سورو انجام شده است.
روش تحقيق: روش پژوهش از نوع توصيفي و تحليلي مي باشدکه ابزارگردآوري اطلاعات از طريق مطالعات اسنادي وکتابخانه اي، مراجعه به سازمان هاي مربوطه و بازديد هاي ميداني درمحدوده منطقه مورد مطالعه مي باشد. ابتدا شاخص هاي مشارکت و بازآفريني شهري استخراج گرديد و سپس با بکارگيري مدل Amos اثرگذاري هريک از عوامل پنهان روي يکديگر سنجيده شد و بر اساس آن بيشترين تاثير به همراه وزن حاصله مورد سنجش قرار گرفت و در ادامه داده هاي استخراج شده از پرسشنامه که درنرم افزارSpss وارد شده تحليل گرديد.
يافته ها: يافته هاي تحقيق نمايانگر اين است نتايج پژوهش نشان دهنده اين است که تاثيرپذير ترين عامل، اجتماعي با اندازه 33/18 مي باشد و عوامل اثرگذار عبارتند از اصالت با ميزان 05/10، بزرگ محوري با اندازه 68/9 و اقتصادي با اندازه 09/8، به عبارتي چنانچه در اين منطقه مقرر باشد مشارکت اجتماعي جهت بازآفريني شهري تحقق يابد.
بحث و نتيجه گيري: با توجه به يافته هاي بدست آمده بايستي از ظرفيت عوامل اصالت، بزرگ محوري و اقتصادي براي تاثير گذاري روي ساير عوامل استفاده نمود و تاثير پذيرترين عامل اجتماعي مي باشد، بدين معني که ساختارهاي اجتماعي اين منطقه همراهي مناسب تري جهت تحقق اين امر دارند.
Background and Objective: Urban regeneration is a comprehensive, integrated, and holistic approach, and social participation implies the expansion of intergroup relations into voluntary associations, clubs, unions, and groups that are usually local and non-governmental in nature. This purpose-based research is of an applied type with the aim of evaluating social participation in the reconstruction of the historic neighborhood of Soro.
Material and Methodology: The research method is descriptive and analytical that the data collection tool is through documentary and library studies, referring to relevant organizations and field visits in the study area. First, the indicators of participation and urban regeneration were extracted and then, using the Amos model, the effect of each of the hidden factors on each other was measured. Entered was analyzed.
Findings: Findings show that the results show that the most influential factor is social with a size of 18.33 and the effective factors are originality with a size of 10.05, large axis with a size of 9.68 and economic with a size of 08.09. In other words, if social participation is to be realized in this region for urban regeneration.
Discussion and Conclusion: According to the findings, the capacity of originality, greatness and economic factors should be used to influence other factors and is the most influential social factor, meaning that the social structures of this region have a more appropriate accompaniment to achieve this.
1. Pour Ahmad, A.; Keshavarz, M.; Ali Akbari, A.; Hadavi, F.2017. Reconstruction of studied urban dysfunctional tissues (District 10 of Tehran), Quarterly Journal of Environmental Planning, No. 37, Page 13. In Persian.
2. Rafieiyan, M, Mohammadi Aydaghmish, F. 2016. Proposing a Conceptual Framework of Urban Regeneration Interaction and Entrepreneur City in Achieving Place Marketing, Journal of Urban Economics and Management, Vol. 5, No2(18), 1-20.
3. Alaei Bosjin, M. 1399. Study of the effect of urban regeneration on the development of social capital (Case study: Qapo Ardabil Highway), Iranian Journal of Social Development Studies, No. 4, page 23.In Persian.
4. United Nations. The Millennium Development Goals Report .2012. Available online: https://www.unilibrary. org/economic-and-social-development/the-millennium-development-goals-report-2012_32f1e244-en(accessed on 30 July 2019).
5. ISTAT. Rapporto SDGS. 2019. Informazioni Statistiche per L’agenda 2030 inItalia. Available online: https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/229565 (accessed on 30 July 2019).
6. Mohammed, A. J.; Ghebreyesus, T.A.2018. Healthy living, well-being and the sustainable development goals. Bull. World Health Organ. 96, 590. [CrossRef] [PubMed].
7. United Nations. 2017. HLPF Thematic Review of SDG3: Ensure Healthy Lives and Promote Well-Being for All at All Ages; United Nations: New York, NY, USA; pp. 10 –12.
8. Kruize, H.; Droomers, M.; van Kamp, I.; Ruijsbroek, A.2014. What causes environmental inequalities and related health effects? An analysis of evolving concepts. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health , 11, 5807–5827.
9. Battisti,A, Barnocchi,A, Iorio,S .2019. Urban Regeneration Process: The Case of a Residential Complex in a Suburb of Rome, Italy,Journal of Sustainability, 30 October 2019; Published: 3.
10. Alpopi, C. & Manole, C. (2013). Integrated Urban Regeneration - Solution for Cities Revitalize. Procedia Economics and Finance, 6, 178-185.
11. Christelle, B., & Damidavičiūtė, A. (2016). Urban Regeneration in Rio de Janeiro Favelas during the Olympic games of 2016”. Master Thesis in Development & International Relations, Supervisor: Malayna Raftopoulos.
12. Aeini, M, Ardestani, Z (2009), Pyramid Recognition and People's Participation, Criteria for Evaluation of Urban Development Programs, City Identity Journal, Science and Research Branch.
13. Rafiyan, M, Khomeini, Shi, Ismaili, AM (2010), Urban Recognition and Creation and Development and Development of Traditional Urban Late (TND), Internet Journal of Renovation Organization.
14. Sabaj, affection .2013. developed a mechanism for use of urban recreation in the face of urban worn tissues. Case study: Hamedan neighborhood in Hamedan, Journal of Seven Fences Research.
15. Lotfi, S and Zargari, I. 2012. urban recreation and redefining burnout criteria: Beginning on sustainable city restoration, Shahramar's two-time.
16. Safaee Pour, M and Madanloyjo, M .2016. Urban Earth Policies in Urban Reflection, Karaj: Nibeg Publishing.
17. Roberts, P.2000. The evolution, definition and purpose of urban regeneration, in p. Roberts and H,Syke. Urban Regeneration, AHandbook, British Urban Regeneration Association, SAGE Publications, London.
18. Noorian, F; Ariana, A. 2012. Analyzing how the law protects public participation in urban regeneration Case study: Imam Ali (Atiq) Square, Isfahan, Journal of Fine Arts, No. 2, page 16. In Persian.
19. Gibson M and Kocabas¸ A .2001. London: Sustainable regeneration Challenge and response. In: 1st international urban design meeting, Mimar Sinan University, Istanbul, Turkey, May
20. Assefa,G,Frostell B .2007. Social Sustainability and Social Acceptannce in technology Assessment: ACase study of Energy Technologies, Technologies in Society(29)63-78.
21. Pourjafar, M. 2009. Fundamentals of improvement and renovation of the old texture of cities, Tehran: Payam Publications. First Edition. In Persian.
22. Chris Couch, Olivier Sykes, Wolfgang Börstinghaus January .2011.Thirty years of urban regeneration in Britain, Germany and France: The importance of context and path dependency, Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages 1–52.
23. Tavana, M; Abedini. 2015. Reconstruction of the dilapidated texture of the city with the approach of sustainable development and public participation (Case study: Sirus neighborhood), the second national conference on sustainable architecture and urban landscape, page 18. (In Persian)
24. Population and Housing Census.2016. Statistical Center of Iran. In Persian.