مقایسه اثربخشی زوج‌درمانی گروهی راه‌حل محور و زوج‌درمانی گلاسری بر کیفیت جو عاطفی در همسران آسیب‌دیده از روابط فرازناشویی
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه تعالی مشاوره و روان درمانی
سپیده رحیمی نژاد
1
,
محمد قمری
2
,
علیرضا جعفری
3
,
وحیده باباخانی
4
1 - دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مشاوره، واحد ابهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، زنجان، ایران.
2 - دانشیار، گروه مشاوره، واحد ابهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، زنجان، ایران.
3 - استادیار، گروه مشاوره، واحد ابهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، زنجان، ایران.
4 - استادیار، گروه مشاوره، واحد ابهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، زنجان، ایران.
کلید واژه: روابط فرازناشویی, کیفیت جو عاطفی, زوج‌درمانی گروهی راه‌حل‌محور, زوج‌درمانی گلاسری, همسران آسیب‌دیده,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف: هدف از پژوهش حاضر مقایسه اثربخشی زوج‌درمانی گروهی راه‌حل‌محور و زوج‌درمانی گلاسری بر کیفیت جو عاطفی در همسران آسیب‌دیده از روابط فرازناشویی بود. روش: پژوهش حاضر از نوع نیمه‌آزمایشی با طرح پیش‌آزمون- پس‌آزمون با گروه کنترل بود. جامعه پژوهش حاضر شامل کلیه زوجین دارای روابط فرازناشویی مراجعه‌کننده به مراکز مشاوره شهر تهران در محدوده زمانی اسفند 98 تا اردیبهشت 99 بوده‌اند. نمونه پژوهش شامل 45 زوج مراجعه‌کننده بود که به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب و به‌صورت تصادفی در گروه‌های آزمایشی و گواه گمارده شدند. شرکت‌کنندگان قبل از اجرای مداخلات پرسشنامه کیفیت جو عاطفی را تکمیل کردند. گروه‌های آزمایش مداخلات زوج‌درمانی گروهی راه‌حل‌محور و زوج‌درمانی گلاسری را دریافت کردند. در نهایت از هر سه گروه پس‌آزمون گرفته شد. داده‌ها با آزمون تحلیل کوواریانس چندمتغیری به کمک نرم‌افزار SPSSV19 تحلیل شدند. یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد در همه مؤلفه‌های کیفیت جو عاطفی بین دو گروه زوج‌درمانی و گروه گواه تفاوت معنیداری مشاهده شد (01/0>P). همچنین نتایج نشان داد در متغیر کیفیت جو عاطفی، زوج‌درمانی راه‌حل‌محور نسبت به زوج‌درمانی گلاسری اثربخش‌تر است. نتیجه‌گیری: بر اساس نتایج این پژوهش می‌توان گفت، استفاده از روش‌های زوج‌درمانی راه‌حل‌محور و زوج‌درمانی گلاسری در جو عاطفی همسران آسیب‌دیده از روابط فرازناشویی اثربخش بوده و آگاهی متخصصان حوزه‌های مشاوره، روان‌شناسی و سلامت از این درمان‌ها می‌تواند کمک‌کننده باشد.
Purpose: The Purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of group-centered group therapy and Glaser's couple therapy on the quality of emotional climate in spouses affected by extramarital affairs. Methodology: The present study was a quasi-experimental study with a pretest-posttest design with a control group. The present study population included all couples with extramarital affairs who referred to counseling centers in Tehran in the period of March 2020 to May 2020. The study sample consisted of 45 couples who were selected by convenience sampling method and randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. Participants completed questionnaires of quality of emotional climate before performing the interventions. The experimental group received couple-centered group therapy interventions and Glaser's couple therapy. Finally, post-test was taken from all three groups. Data were analyzed by multivariate analysis of covariance using SPSSV19 software. Findings: The results showed that there was a significant difference between the two groups of couple therapy and the control group in all components of quality emotional climate (P<0.01). The results also showed that in the emotional quality climate variable, solution-oriented couple therapy is more effective than Glaser's couple therapy. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, it can be said that the use of solution-oriented couple therapy and Glaser's couple therapy in the emotional atmosphere of spouses affected by extramarital affairs is effective and the knowledge of counseling, psychology and health experts about these treatments can be helpful.
Abbasi H, Ahmadi SA, Fatehi zadeh M, Bahrami F. (2016). The Effect of Glaser's Reality Therapy on Personal Commitment of Couples. Family Pathology, Counseling and Enrichment Journal; 2(1): 39-53. [Link]
Cannon C, Hamel J, Buttell F, Ferreira RJ. (2016). A survey of domestic violence perpetrator programs in the United States and Canada: Findings and implications for policy and intervention. Partner abuse; 7(3): 226-276. [Link]
Delavar A. (2019). Research Methods in Psychology and Educational Sciences. Tehran: Virayesh Publication. [Link]
Dinkelmann I, Buff A. (2016). Children's and parents' perceptions of parental support and their effects on children's achievement motivation and achievement in mathematics. A longitudinal predictive mediation model. Learning and Individual Differences; 50(3): 122-132. [Link]
Duman Temel E. (2013). Mediating role of marital satisfaction in the types of infidelity-forgiveness, trait positive affect-forgiveness and coping-forgiveness relationships in married men and women (Master's thesis, Middle East Technical University). [Link]
Edwards A, Eisenberg N, Spinrad TL, Reiser M, Eggum‐Wilkens ND, Liew J. (2015). Predicting sympathy and prosocial behavior from young children's dispositional sadness. Social Development; 24(1): 76-94. [Link]
Franklin C, Hai AH. (2021). Solution-Focused Brief Therapy for Substance Use: A Review of the Literature. Health & Social Work; 46(2): 103-114. [Link]
Frasier SD, Hilburn JM, Smith Jr FG. (1970). Effect of adolescence on the serum growth hormone response to hypoglycemia. The Journal of pediatrics; 77(3): 465-467. [Link]
Froerer AS, Connie EE. (2016). Solution-building, the foundation of solution-focused brief therapy: A qualitative Delphi study. Journal of Family Psychotherapy; 27(1): 20-34. [Link]
Gingerich WJ, Peterson LT. (2013). Effectiveness of solution-focused brief therapy: A systematic qualitative review of controlled outcome studies. Research on Social Work Practice; 23(3): 266-283. [Link]
Girard A, Connor JJ, Woolley SR. (2020). An exploratory study of the role of infidelity typologies in predicting attachment anxiety and avoidance. Journal of marital and family therapy; 46(1): 124-134. [Link]
Gonzalez Suitt K, Franklin C, Kim J. (2016). Solution-focused brief therapy with Latinos: A systematic review. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work; 25(1): 50-67. [Link]
Haghighi J, Shokrkon H, Mousavi Shoshtari M. (2002). A Study of the Parent-Child Relationships and the Individual and Social Adjustment of the Nineth Grade Girl Students at Ahvaz Schools. Journal of Psychological Achievement; 9(2): 79-108. [Link]
Houltberg BJ, Henry CS, Morris AS. (2012). Family interactions, exposure to violence, and emotion regulation: Perceptions of children and early adolescents at risk. Family Relations; 61(2): 283-296. [Link]
Iwaibara A, Fukuda M, Tsumura H, Kanda H. (2019). At-risk Internet addiction and related factors among junior high school teachers-based on a nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan. Environmental health and preventive medicine; 24(1): 1-8. [Link]
Khalili G, Zahrakar K, Kasaee Esfahani A. (2020). Comparison of the effectiveness of training based on solution-focused brief therapy and rational emotive behavioral therapy on meaning of work among employees of Oil Company. Journal of psychological science; 19(90): 699-713. [Link]
Khorramabadi R, Sepehri Z, Bigdeli I. (2018). Structural model of executive function and extramarital relationship with mediating role of self-control. Journal of Cognitive Psychology; 6(1): 46-57. [Link]
Marín RA, Christensen A, Atkins DC. (2014). Infidelity and behavioral couple therapy: Relationship outcomes over 5 years following therapy. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice; 3(1): 1-15. [Link]
Morris CA, Denham SA, Bassett HH, Curby TW. (2013). Relations among teachers’ emotion socialization beliefs and practices and preschoolers’ emotional competence. Early Education & Development; 24(7): 979-999. [Link]
Mousavi FS, Eskandari H, Bagheri F. (2020). Comparing the Effects of Glaser's Reality Therapy and Emotion-Focused Therapy on Relationship Quality and Marital Satisfaction in Betrayed Women. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies; 6(6): 155-155. [Link]
Negash S, Veldorale-Brogan A, Kimber SB, Fincham FD. (2019). Predictors of extra dyadic sex among young adults in heterosexual dating relationships: A multivariate approach. Sexual and Relationship Therapy; 34(2): 153-172. [Link]
Rodrigues D, Lopes D, Pereira M. (2017). Sociosexuality, commitment, sexual infidelity, and perceptions of infidelity: Data from the second love web site. The Journal of Sex Research; 54(2): 241-253. [Link]
Sharifinia R, Bahrami H, Farrokhi NA. (2020). Compare and Contrast the Maladaptive Schemas of Fashion and Beauty of the Younger and Older Generations and their Role in Family Conflicts. Journal of Excellence in Counseling and Psychotherapy; 9(33): 34-46. [Link]
Souri G, Goodarzi K, Roozbahani M. (2021). The Effectiveness of Intervention based on the Exploration of Remarriage Families’ Problems on Child's Relationship with Stepparents. Journal of Excellence in Counseling and Psychotherapy; 10(37): 45-55. [Link]
Tabachnik BG, Fidel LS. (2013). Using Multivariate. Statistics. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. [Link]
Thorson AR. (2019). Investigating the relationships between unfaithful parent’s apologies, adult children’s third-party forgiveness, and communication of forgiveness following parental infidelity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships; 36(9): 2759-2780. [Link]
Wehr T. (2010). The phenomenology of exception times: Qualitative differences between problem‐focused and solution‐focused interventions. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition; 24(4): 467-480. [Link]
Woods SB, Roberson PN, Priest JB. (2020). Family emotional climate and health: Testing conveyance of effects via psychobiological mediators. Personal Relationships; 27(3): 674-707. [Link]
_||_