ارزیابی مصوبات ابطال شده شورایعالی شهرسازی و معماری ایران در دیوان عدالت اداری «از ابتدا تاکنون»
محورهای موضوعی : معماریفریده کول آبادی 1 , اعظم افشارنیا 2
1 - کارشناس ارشد شهرسازی، معاون مدیر کل دبیرخانه شورای عالی شهرسازی و معماری.
2 - کارشناس ارشد شهرسازی، کارشناس دبرخانه شورای عالی شهرسازی و معماری.
کلید واژه: مصوبه شورای عالی, دیوان عدالت اداری, رای هیاًت عمومیدیوان, کمیسیون ماده 5 شورایعالی,
چکیده مقاله :
دیوان عدالت اداری کشور به عنوان یکی از مراجع قضاوت کشور طی سه دهه اخیر 24 مصوبه شورایعالی شهرسازی و معماری ایران (شورایعالی به عنوان بالاترین مرجع قانون گذار شهری) را لغو کرده است (از مجموع60 تقاضای ابطال). در این بحث رویکرد مصوبات ابطال شده شورایعالی از نظر موضوعی مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفته و دلایل ابطال مصوبات شورای عالی شهرسازی و معماری و آسیب شناسی آن بررسی و راهکارهای پیشنهادی ارائه گردیده است. روش تحقیق توصیفی-تحلیلی و نوع تحقیق کاربردی می‌باشد. نتایج این تحقق نشان می‌دهد که بیشترین درصد ابطال مصوبات مربوط به آرای کمیسیون ماده 5 شورایعالی در خصوص صدور پروانه، تفکیک و افزایش طبقات و تغییر کاربری می باشد. ارزیابی مصوبات ابطال شده و اثرات آن در طرحهای توسعه مانند عدم تحقق کاربری‌های خدماتی عمومی، تأسیسات زیربنایی و شبکه ارتباطی می‌تواند راهنمای مهمی در جهت فراهم آوردن بسترهای لازم برای تهیه طرح‌ها و متن مصوبات شورایعالی باشد.
Administrative Justice Court due to address complaints and objections of the people pleading with state agents or unitsor regulations officially started its work in 1981. Also urban development higher council of Iran established as the highestlegislative authority of city in the year 1964 with the aim of coordinating programs with urban development duties suchas consideration of approval and regulation city planning. From the beginning of establishment of The AdministrativeJustice Court so far, 60 demands of cancellation of legislation registered and 24 votes has been accepted (40 percent)and led to invalidate ratification. Assessment cancellation legislation and its effects on development of projects and lackof construction like the realization of the public -services-facilities infrastructure, and communication network can be animportant guide to provide essentials of codification of projects and policies.A method that used in this research is practical. The research method is descriptive-analytic. In this article evaluate thereasons for the annulment of decisions of urban development and architecture higher council of Iran and discussed thematter of revocation of approvals approach was evaluated and then proposed solution is presented. In the following, theways to reduce revocation of approvals due to non-compliance legal issues, with the consideration of proprietary rightsof the people were suggested. The study of non-compliance with legislation revocation confusion on the proprietaryrights of individuals and the rights of the people over the years has been gained and revocation of approvals has ledto the attainment of the owners complained.The absence of representatives of economic sectors (Ministry of Economy and Finance) and services (ministries ofeducation, health), and registration of ownership and legal documents, cause some problems. The lack of stable income,in charge of public services (such as lack of funding and credit for land administration, education, health)caused landacquisition and implementation services in the legal deadline and created many problems for the owners and custodians.In this discussion contradicts spectrum of dimensions and influential activities in the arena and city assessment andchallenges caused by the optimistic development plans and construction and solution of the proposal has beenpresented. The results show that the realization of the highest percentage cancellation legislation related to the votesof the commission Article five about license, the separation of classes and increase the effectiveness and change.Reasons for revocation of approvals of urban development and architecture higher council of Iran are:Lack of a central process in the spirit prevailing attitude in planning and urban development plans.Lower incidence rates of maintenance plans and urban development plans approved by the lack of useful informationand at the micro and macro scales.Lack of proper analysis over time due to deficiencies in project management and lack of integrated programs in urbanmanagement system.And finally weakness in determining the amount of the contribution and participation of socioeconomic (sustainablerevenues) in each part of the management of urban spaces that adapt to the real needs of people in urban development.... Keywords: The Ratification of Urban Development and Hrchitecture Higher Council of Iran, Administrative
_||_