برخی از روش‌های افزایش کارآیی گیاه‌پالایی فلزات سنگین
محورهای موضوعی : آب و محیط زیستمحمدرضا نادری 1 , عبدالرزاق دانش‌شهرکی 2 , رضوان نادری 3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری اکولوژی گیاهان زراعی، گروه زراعت، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد *(مسئول مکاتبات)
2 - استادیار گروه زراعت، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهرکرد.
3 - دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد علوم و تکنولوژی بذر، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بیرجند.
کلید واژه: گیاه‌پالایی, فلز سنگین, ریزوباکتری‌های محرک رشد گیاه,
چکیده مقاله :
شکی نیست که در نتیجه‌ی افزایش روزافزون جمعیت کره‌ی زمین بایستی در آینده شاهد بغرنج‌تر شدن معضل آلودگی خاک، آب و هوا توسط انواع مختلف آلاینده‌های محیط زیستی باشیم. از این رو، توجه به فناوری‌های نوینِ مورد استفاده جهت پالایش مکان‌های آلوده، ضروری به نظر می‌رسد. گیاه‌پالایی یکی از این فناوری‌ها است که دارای سرعت تأثیر نسبتاً پایین و کارآیی اندک می‌باشد. در مقاله‌ی حاضر به بررسی برخی از روش‌های زیستی، شیمیایی، فیزیکی، فیزیکوشیمیایی و ژنتیکی مورد استفاده جهت افزایش کارآیی فرآیند گیاه‌پالایی خاک‌های آلوده به فلزات سنگین خواهیم پرداخت. این روش‌ها شامل کاهش pH، افزایش پتانسیل اکسایش-کاهش (Eh)، استفاده از عوامل کلات‌کننده و ریزجاندارانی نظیر قارچ‌های آربسکولار مایکوریزا (AMF) و ریزوباکتری‌های محرک رشد گیاه (PGPR) می‌باشند. شناسایی این روش‌های نوین سبب اجرای تکنیک‌های چندرهیافتی به منظور سرعت بخشیدن به فرآیند زدایش آلاینده‌های فلزی و در نتیجه، افزایش کارآیی گیاه‌پالایی خاک‌های آلوده به فلزات سنگین شده است. در این میان، کاربرد ریزوباکتری‌های محرک رشد گیاه یکی از سودمندترین و در عین حال، کم‌خطرترین تکنیک‌ها برای محیط زیست می‌باشد، که به تازگی جهت بهبود کارآیی فرآیند پالایش فلزات سنگین توسط گیاهان مد نظر قرار گرفته است.
Certainly, we have to observe the more complicated problem about pollution of soil, water and air by various environmental pollutants as a result of increase in the world population. Hence, it is necessary to consider the new technologies which are used for remediation of polluted sites. Phytoremediation is one of these new methods which posses relatively slow procedure and low efficiency. In current paper we review some of the biological, chemical, physical, physico-chemical and genetic methods, which are applied in order to increase the phytoremediation efficiency of heavy metal polluted soils. These methods include lowering the pH, increasing the electrode potential (Eh), using chelating agents and microorganisms such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Discovering of these new methods have been resulted in execute the multi-approaches techniques for a faster removal process of the metal contaminants, and consequently increase in the phytoremediation efficiency of heavy metal polluted soils. Among the introduced methods, application of the PGPRs is one of the most useful and environmentally friendly techniques, which is currently considered as a useful process for enhancement the efficiency of heavy metals remediation process by plants.
1- Shaw, B.P., Sahu, S.K., Mishra, R.K., 2004. Heavy metal induced oxidative damage in terrestrial plants. In: Prasad, M.N.V. (Ed), Heavy Metal Stress in Plants: From Biomolecules to Ecosystems, pp. 84-126.
2- Karami, A., Shamsuddin, Z.H., 2010. Phytoremediation of heavy metals with several efficiency enhancer methods. African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 9, pp. 3689-3698.
3- Ward, O.P., Singh, A., 2004. Soil bioremediation and phytoremediation-An overview. In: Singh, A., Ward, O.P. (Eds), Applied bioremediation and phytoremediation. Springer, Berlin, vol. 1, pp. 1-11.
4- Prasad, M.N.V., Freitas, H., 2003. Metal hyperaccumulation in plants – Biodiversity prospecting for phytoremediation technology. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 6, pp. 275–321.
5- Khan, A.G., 2005. Role of soil microbes in the rhizospheres of plants growing on trace metal contaminated soils in phytoremediation. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology. vol. 18, pp. 355-364.
6- Kirkham, M.B., 2006. Cadmium in plants on polluted soils: Effects of soil factors, hyperaccumulation, and amendments. Geoderma. Vol. 137, pp. 19-32.
7- Neugschwandtner, R.W., Tlustos, P., Komárek, M., Száková, J., 2008. Phytoextraction of Pb and Cd from a contaminated agricultural soil using different EDTA application regimes: Laboratory versus field scale measures of efficiency. Geoderma, vol. 144, pp. 446-454.
8- Wei, S.H., Teixeira Da Silva, J.A., Zhou, Q.X., 2008. Agro-improving method of phytoextracting heavy metal contaminated soil. Journal of Hazard Materials, vol. 150, pp. 662-668.
9- Peer, W., Baxter, I., Richards, E., Freeman, J., Murphy, A., 2005. Phytoremediation and hyperaccumulator plants. In: Tamas, M., Martinoia, E. (Eds), Molecular Biology of Metal Homeostasis and Detoxification. Springer, Berlin, Topics in Current Genetics, vol. 14, pp. 299-340.
10- Do Nascimento, C.W.A., Xing, B., 2006. Phytoextraction: A review on enhanced metal availability and plant accumulation. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Science. Vol. 63, pp. 299-311.
11- Garbisu, C., Alkorta, I., 2001. Phytoextraction: a cost-effective plantbased technology for the removal of metals from the environment. Bioresource Technology, vol. 77, pp. 229–236.
12- Belimov, A.A., Safronova, V.I., Mimura, T., 2002. Response of spring rape to inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase depends on nutrient status of the plant. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 48, pp. 189–199.
13- Li, Y.M., Chaney, R.L., Angle, J.S., Baker, A.J.M., 2000. Phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soils. In: Wise, D.L., et al. (Eds.), Bioremediation of contaminated soils. Marcel Dekker, New York.
14- Lasat, M.M., 2002. Phytoextraction of toxic metals – A review of biological mechanisms. Journal of Environmental Quality, vol. 31, pp. 109–120.
15- Van der Lelie, D., Schwitzgue, J.P., Glass, D.J., Vangronsveld, J., Baker, A., 2001. Assessing phytoremediation’s progress in the United States and Europe. Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 35, pp. 447–452.
16- Tandy, S., Schulin, R., Nowack, B., 2006. The influence of EDDS on the uptake of heavy metals in hydroponically grown sunflowers. Chemosphere, vol. 62, pp. 1454–1463.
17- Di Gregorio, S., Barbafieri, M., Lampis, S., Sanangelantoni, A.M., Tassi, E., Vallini, G., 2006. Combined application of Triton X-100 and Sinorhizobium sp. P002 inoculum for the improvement of lead phytoextraction by Brassica juncea in EDTA amended soil. Chemosphere, vol. 63, pp. 293–299.
18- Kos, B., Lestan, D., 2003. Induced phytoextraction/soil washing of lead using biodegradable chelate and permeable barries. Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 37, pp. 624–629.
19- McGrath, S.P., Zhao, F.J., 2003. Phytoextraction of metals and metalloids from contaminated soils. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol. 14, pp. 277–282.
20- Kayser, A., Wenger, K., Keller, A., Attinger, W., Felix, H.R., Gupta, S.K., Schulin, R., 2000. Enhancement of phytoextraction of Zn, Cd, and Cu from calcareous soil: the use of NTA and sulfur amendments. Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 34, pp. 1778–1783.
21- Robinson, B.H., Green, S.R., Chancerel, B., Mills, T.M., Clothier, B.E., 2007. Poplar for the phytomanagement of boron contaminated sites. Environmental Pollution, vol. 150, pp. 225–233.
22- Roy, S., Singh, S.B., 2006. Effect of soil type, soil pH, and microbial activity on persistence of clodinafop herbicide. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 77, pp. 260-266.
23- Luo, Q., Wang, H., Zhang, X., Qian, Y., 2004. Movement and transformation of nitrate in soil by non-uniform electrokinetics. Environmental Science, vol. 25, pp. 98–103.
24- Delgado, A., Gonzalez-Caballero, F., Hunter, R., Koopal, L., Lyklema, J., 2007. Measurement and interpretation of electrokinetic phenomena. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 309, pp. 194–224.
25- Bi, R., Aboughalma, H., Schlaak, M., 2007. In: 6th. Proceeding in Symposium on Electrokinetic Remediation. 12th–15th June 2007, Vigo, Spain.
26- Lobo Bedmar, M.C., Perez-Sanz, A., Martinez-Inigo, M.J., Plaza Benito, A., 2009. Influence of coupled electrokinetic–phytoremediation on soil remediation. In: Reddy, K., Cameselle, C. (Eds), Electrochemical Remediation Technologies for Polluted Soils, Sediments and Groundwater. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
27- O’Conner, S., Lepp, W., Edwards, R., Sunderland, G., 2003. The combined use of electrokinetic remediation and phytoremediation to decontaminate metalpolluted soils: a laboratory-scale feasibility study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 84, pp. 141–158.
28- Ouzounidou, G., Ilias, I., 2005. Hormone-induced protection of sunflower photosynthetic apparatus against copper toxicity. Biologia plantarum, vol. 49, pp. 223–228.
29- Dodd, I.C., 2003. Hormonal interactions and stomatal responses. Journal of Plant Growth Regulators, vol. 22, pp. 32–46.
30- Vose, J.M., Harvey, G.J., Elliott, K.J., Clinton, B.D., 2003. Measuring and modelling tree and stand level transpiration. In: McCutcheon, S.C., Schnoor, J.L. (Eds), Phytoremediation –Transformation and Control of Contaminants. Willey-Interscience Inc, New Jersey.
31- Rock, S.A., 2003. Vegetative covers for waste containment. In: Scheper, T. (Ed), Biotechnology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, vol. 78, pp. 157–170.
32- Pospisilova, J., 2003. Participation of phytohormones in the stomatal regulation of gas exchange during water stress. Biologia plantarum, vol. 46, pp. 491–506.
33- Fuentes, H.D., Khoo, C.S., Pe, T., Muir, S., Khan, A.G., 2000. Phytoremediation of a contaminated mine site using plant growth regulators to increase heavy metal uptake. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Clean Technologies for the Mining Industry, Santiago, Chile, pp. 427–435.
34- Liphadzi, M.S., Kirkham, M.B., Paulsen, G.M., 2006. Auxin-enhanced root growth for phytoremediation of sewage-sludge amended soil. Environmental Technology, vol. 27, pp. 695–704.
35- Barrutia, O., Epelde, L., Garcia-Plazaola, J.I., Garbisu, C., Becerril, J.M., 2009. Phytoextraction potential of two Rumex acetosa L. accessions collected from metalliferous and non-metalliferous sites: Effect of fertilization. Chemosphere, vol. 74, pp. 259-264.
36- Wu, H., Tang, S., Zhang, X., Guo, J., Song, Z., Tian, S., Smith, D.L., 2009. Using elevated CO2 to increase the biomass of a Sorghum vulgare x Sorghum vulgare var. sudanense hybrid and Trifolium pratense L. and to trigger hyperaccumulation of cesium. Journal of Hazard Materials, vol. 170, pp. 861-70.
37- Zhou, Q.X., Song, Y.F., 2004. Remediation of contaminated soils principles and methods. Beijing: Sciences Press, China.
38- Yang, B., Lan, C.Y., Shu, W.S., 2005. Growth and heavy metal accumulation of Vetiveria zizanioides grown on lead/zinc mine tailings. Acta Ecologica Sinica, vol. 25, pp. 45–50.
39- Zheljazkov, V.D., Warman, P.R., 2004. Application of high – Cu compost to Dill and Peppermint, Journal of Agricaltural Food Chemistry, vol. 52, pp. 2615-2622.
40- Tang, S., Xi, L., Zheng, J., Li, H., 2003. Response to elevated CO2 of Indian Mustard and Sunflower growing on copper contaminated soil, Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 71, pp. 988-997.
41- Belimov, A.A., Hontzeas, N., Safronova, V.I., Demchinskaya, S.V., Piluzza, G., Bullitta, S., Glick, B.R., 2005. Cadmium-tolerant plant growth-promoting bacteria associated with the roots of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern.). Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 37, pp. 241–250.
42- Jeffries, P., Gianinazzi, S., Perotto, S., Turnau, K., Barea, J.M., 2003. The contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in sustainable maintenance of plant health and soil fertility. Biology and Fertility of Soils, vol. 37, pp. 1–16.
43- Chen, B.D., Zhu, Y.G., Smith, F.A., 2006. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation on uranium and arsenic accumulation by Chinese brake fern (Pteris vittata L.) from a uranium mining-impacted soil. Chemosphere, vol. 62, pp. 1464-73.
44- Sylvia, D.M., 2005. Mycorrhizal symbioses In: Sylvia, D.M., Fuhrmann, J.J., Hartel, P.G., Zuberer, D.A. (Eds), Principles and Applications of Soil Microbiology. Pearson, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, pp. 263-282.
45- Glick, B.R., 2003. Phytoremediation: synergistic use of plants and bacteria to clean up the environment. Biotechnology Advances, vol. 21, pp. 383–393.
46- Gray, E.J., Smith, D.L., 2005. Intracellular and extracellular PGPR: commonalities and distinctions in the plant-bacterium signaling processes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 37, pp. 395-412.
47- Guo, J., Qi, H., Guo, Y., Ge, H., Gong, L., Zhang, L., 2004. Biocontrol of tomato wilt by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Biol. Control, vol. 29, pp. 66-72.
48- Abou-Shanab, R.A., Angle, J.S., Delorme, T.A., Chaney, R.L., van Berkum, P., Moawad, H., Ghanem, K., Ghozlan, H.A., 2003. Rhizobacterial effects on nickel extraction from soil and uptake by Alyssum murale. New Phytologist, vol. 158, pp. 219–224.
49- Idris, R., Trifonova, R., Puschenreiter, M., Wenzel, W.W., Sessitsch, A., 2004. Bacterial communities associated with flowering plants of the Ni hyperaccumulator Thaspi goesingense, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 70, pp. 2667–2677.
50- Karenlampi, S., Schat, H., Vangronsveld, J., Verkleij, J.A.C., Van Der Lelie, D., Mergeay, M., 2000. Genetic engineering in the improvement of plants for phytoremediation of metal polluted soils. Environmental Pollution, vol. 107, pp. 225–31.
51- Whiting, S.N., De Souza, M.P., Terry, N., 2001. Rhizosphere bacteria mobilize Zn for hyperaccumulation by Thlaspi caerulescens. Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 15, pp. 3144–3150.
52- Clemens, S., Palmgren, M.G., Kramer, U., 2002. A long way ahead: understanding and engineering plant metal accumulation. Trends in Plant Science, vol. 7, pp. 309-314.