بررسی عوامل موثر بر مدیریت خشکسالی کشاورزان شهرستان اردکان
محورهای موضوعی : آب و محیط زیست
هما پورحسینی
1
,
مریم امیدی نجف آبادی
2
,
سید جمال فرج الله حسینی
3
1 - ارشد ترویج و اموزش کشاورزی گروه اقتصاد، ترویج و آموزش کشاورزي، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران
2 - دانشیار گروه اقتصاد، ترویج و آموزش کشاورزي دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران. *(مسوول مکاتبات)
3 - دانشیار گروه اقتصاد، ترویج و آموزش کشاورزي دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران.
کلید واژه: شاخص‌های اجتماعی- فرهنگی, شاخص‌های اقتصادی, عامل فنی, رگرسیون گام به گام.,
چکیده مقاله :
زمینه و هدف: خشکسالی پدیده‌ایست اجتناب‌ناپذیر که به عنوان یکی از بلایای طبیعی شناخته می‌شود. کشور ایران هم در طول تاریخ از این آسیب در امان نبوده است. در تحقیق حاضر هدف شناخت مدیریت خشکسالی و ارائه راهکارهایی برای مقابله با خشکسالی می‌باشد. روش بررسی: این پژوهش به لحاظ هدف کاربردی، به لحاظ نحوه گرداوری داده ها توصیفی غیرازمایشی و همبستگی می¬باشد. ابتدا شاخص‌های فردی، اجتماعی، اقتصادی، آموزشی، فنی و سیاستگذاری در روستاهای شهرستان اردکان که بیشترین مقدار خشکسالی را داشته‌اند بررسی شد. جامعه آماری این تحقیق کشاورزان شهرستان اردکان هستند (3130¬=N) که از این میزان 418 نمونه طبق روش نمونه‌گیری کوکران برای جمع‌آوری اطلاعات مورد سنجش از طریق پرسشنامه قرار گرفته¬اند. یافته ها: نتایج به دست آمده از تحلیل رگرسیون گام به گام نشان داد که در مجموع چهار متغیر وارد شده در معادله (اجتماعی¬ و فرهنگی، اقتصادی، آموزشی ترویجی، سیاست¬گذاری) توانسته¬اند که 3/65 درصد از تغییرات واریانس متغیر وابسته (مدیریت خشکسالی) را تبیین نمایند که در این میان شاخص اجتماعی و فرهنگی 1/46 درصد از تغییرات متغیر وابسته را به خود اختصاص داد و به عنوان تاثیرگذارترین شاخص در این پژوهش مطرح شده است. بحث و نتیجه گیری: در زمینه شاخص اجتماعی و فرهنگی در جهت مدیریت خشکسالی پیشنهادت می شود که با ترویج فرهنگ استفاده از آب و استفاده از ابزار فرهنگی و تبلیغی در زمان بروز خشکسالی در بین کشاورزان و همچنین فراهم آوردن شرایط برای در اختیار قرار دادن بهتر اطلاعات مدیریت خشکسالی به روستاییان توسط راه‌های ارتباطی به مدیریت هرچه بهتر خشکسالی کمک کنند.
Background and Objective: Drought is an inevitable phenomenon known as a natural disaster. Iran has not been immune to this damage in history. Material and Methodology: The purpose of this study is to identify drought management and thus provide solutions to drought management. At first, individual, social, economic, educational, technical and policy indicators were surveyed in villages of Ardakan city with the highest drought. The statistical population of this research is Ardakan farmers (N=3130), of which 418 samples were collected by Cochran sampling method for collecting information through a questionnaire. A questionnaire was used to collect the data and for its reliability, the preliminary test was confirmed by completing 30 questionnaires and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for its different parts was calculated to be between 0.702 and 0.805. Findings: The results of stepwise regression analysis indicate that social and cultural indicators explain 46.1 percent of variance dependent changes (drought management) and have been considered as the most influential indicator in this research. Disscusion and Conclusion: In the field of social and cultural indicators in the direction of drought management, it is suggested that by promoting the culture of using water and using cultural and promotional tools during drought among farmers and also providing conditions for providing better drought management information to the villagers Help manage the drought as best as possible through communication channels.
1. Alijani, A., and Rahimi, Y. Comparison and prediction of annual temperature changes with global temperature anomalies using linear regression and neural network methods, Geography and Development, 2005, Volume 18, Number 2, Pages 17-23 (In Persian)
2. Asadi Zarch, MA. Investigating the effect of climate change on the occurrence of drought in Yazd province. Desert Management scientific-research journal, 2016, number 9, pages 42-49. (In Persian)
3. Mohammadi, p. Investigating temporal changes and the effect of meteorological drought on the underground water resources of Kerman Plain using SPI standard precipitation indices and GRI Ecohydrology groundwater resources, 2018, year 5, number 1, pages 123-128. (In Persian)
4. Tompkin Emma, L., & Lemos, M. A Less disastrous disaster: Managing response to climate-driven hazards in the Cayman Islands and NE Brazil, Global Environmental Change, 2008, 18)4): 736-745.
5. Wilhite, D., & Wood, D. Revisiting drought relief and management efforts in the west: Have we learned from the Past? The West, 2001, 40)3:( 18-25.
6. Namdar, R. Analysis of economic, social and environmental aspects of drought crisis, Village and Development Quarterly,2015, Year 3, Number 1, Pages 161-183. (In Persian)
7. Ahmadian, A., and Hagitian, M. Sociological analysis of the role of cultural factors and urban environmental behavior studied by Kermanshah citizens, Urban Sociological Studies, 2015 Year 6, Number 18, Pages 51-76. (In Persian).
8. Riahi, V., and Pashazadeh, A. The economic and social effects of drought on the rural areas of Garmi city (A case study of Azadlo village). Human settlement planning studies, 2013, year 2, number 3, pages 17-37. (In Persian).
9. Bagheri, M., and Niknami, M. Individual and professional ability of farmers of Tafarsh city in applying drought management operations (case study of Tafarsh city). Quarterly Journal of Economic Research and Agricultural Development of Iran, 2013, Volume 5, Number 2, Pages 234-227. (In Persian)
10. Yazdian, F., and Ahmadpour, M. Methods of dealing with drought and optimization of water consumption in agriculture, Agricultural Promotion Coordination Management Journal of Qom Province Agricultural Jihad Organization, 2014, Volume 12, Number 4, Pages 12-23. (In Persian).
11. Shabanali Fami, h. Mohammadzadeh Nasirabadi, m. Sawari, M. Application of water management strategies by small-scale farmers in drought conditions in rural areas of Isfahan province, Rural Development Strategies Quarterly, 2018, Volume 6, Number 3, p. 265-278, (In Persian)
12. Yacoubi C. Investigating farmers' managerial behaviors during drought as preventive responses studied: Dehlran city. Journal of Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards, Year 4, Number 4, winter 2016. Pages 79-92. (In Persian)
13. Ghanbari, S. Analysis of socio-economic consequences of drought in 2006 and farmers in rural areas of Jiroft city. Geographical studies of arid regions, 2014, volume 23, number 6, pages 64-81. (In Persian)
14. Etemadi M., Karmi A., and Zamani, Gham. Social vulnerability resulting from self-improvement and the structures affecting it, studied by fig growers, Estehban Fars, Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Sciences, 2014, year 10, number 1, pages 63-73. (In Persian)
15. Savari M, Eskandari Damaneh H, Damaneh HE. Factors influencing farmers’ management behaviors toward coping with drought: evidence from Iran. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2021 Jul 19; 64(11):2021-46.
16. Bahta YT. Perception of agricultural drought resilience in South Africa: A case of smallholder livestock farmers. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies. 2021; 13(1):1-1.
17. Zobeidi T, Yazdanpanah M, Komendantova N, Sieber S, Löhr K. Factors affecting smallholder farmers' technical and non-technical adaptation responses to drought in Iran. Journal of Environmental Management. 2021 Nov 15; 298:113552.
18. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988.
19. Hosseini, M., Sharifzadeh, A. Explaining the components of drought crisis management in the rural and nomadic areas of the southeast of the country. Economic research and agricultural development of Iran, 2010, year 2, number 2, pages 185-197. (In Persian)
20. Adeli, b. Drought and its economic repercussions in the rural areas of Dodangeh district in Behbahan city, Space Economy and Rural Development Quarterly, 2014, Year 3, Number 3, Pages 131-148. (In Persian)