مطالعه تطبیقی رویکردهای فضایی به عدالت در نظریه‌های سیاسی
محورهای موضوعی : جغرافیای سیاسیمراد کاویانی راد 1 , مصطفی قادری حاجت 2 , افشین متقی 3 , بهمن نعمت زاده 4 *
1 - دانشگاه خوارزمی
2 - دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
3 - دانشیار جغرافیای سیاسی دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
4 - دانشگاه خوارزمی
کلید واژه: عدالت, عدالت فضایی, مارکسیسم, نوفایده‌گرایی و جان راولز,
چکیده مقاله :
عدالت فضایی، نقش مهمی در توزیع متوازن امکانات در مقیاس‌های مختلف جغرافیایی دارد. این مفهوم، از چنان اهمیتی برخوردار است که نادیده‌انگاشتن آن، باعث گسترش تبعیض و نابه‌سامانی در سطوح مختلف ناحیه‌ای و ملی می‌شود. با توجه به اهمیت نظری و کاربردی عدالت فضایی، پژوهش حاضر که ماهیت بنیادی دارد با روش‌شناسی توصیفی-تحلیلی، مصادیق و رویکردهای فضایی به عدالت در نظریه‌های مارکسیسم، نوفایده‌گرایی و نیز نظریه‌های جان راولز را بررسی کرده است. نتایج نشان داد که مارکس، مفهوم عدالت فردی را در تقابل با هدف غایی طبقه پرولتاریا می‌داند. هدف‌ها و مبانی سرمایه‌داری با عدالت فضایی-اجتماعی سازگار نیست و عناصری چون محرومیت و استثمار از بایسته‌های بازار هستند و اساساً امکان تحقق عدالت فضایی را منتفی می‌سازند. نوفایده‌گرایی، با اتکا بر مفاهیم حس و تعلق مکانی، مفهوم عدالت را به رویکردهای فضایی نزدیک‌تر کرده است. نوفایده‌گرایان با تاکید بر اینکه مردمی که در یک مکان زندگی می‌کنند و از نظر تاریخی و فرهنگی، رابطه طبیعی با مکان زندگی خود برقرار کرده‌اند، فضا را به عنوان مفهومی راهبردی برای مصادیق عدالت به رسمیت می‌شناسند. همچنین، جان راولز با پیوند مفهوم عدالت به انصاف، نوعی رویکرد فضایی به عدالت دارد. این دیدگاه، نشان داد که هدف غایی عدالت، بسترسازی برای نهادهای سرزمینی در اداره واحدهای فضایی-سیاسی به شیوه دموکراتیک است.
Spatial justice is one of the fundamental concepts in political theory and philosophy. Extensive studies have been conducted to identify and determine the objectives of the concept of justice, of which spatial justice in geography can be considered as one of the important objective examples in this field. Given the importance of spatial justice, the present study uses a descriptive-analytical approach to spatial examples and approaches to justice in the theories of Marxism, utilitarianism, and John Rawls's theories. results has showed that Marx saw the concept of individual justice as opposed to the ultimate goal of the proletarian class and believed that individual justice was an obstacle to revolution. The goals and foundations of capitalism are incompatible with social spatial justice, and elements such as deprivation and exploitation are essential to the market and essentially eliminate the possibility of the realization of spatial justice. Rationalism, relying on the concepts of sense and spatial belonging, has brought the concept of justice closer to spatial approaches. Emphasizing that people who live in a place and have historically and culturally established a natural connection with their place of residence, neo-utilitarianism recognize space as a strategic concept for examples of justice. Also, John Rawls, by linking the concept of justice to justice, a kind of spatial approach to justice. John Rawls's book "Justice as Fairness" aims to provide a practical philosophical and ethical basis for acceptable causal and managerial matters. This view suggests that, in Rawls' view, the ultimate goal of justice is to provide the appropriate ground for democratic institutions in the administration of space-political units (states) in a democratic manner.
Abel Olsen, J. (2017). Theories of justice and their implications for priority setting in health care, Monash University.
Chen, X. (2017). The human voice of justice, Journal of Chinese Philosophy Department of English, University of Texas at San Antonio.
Craig, A., Werdorf, S., Alexander, I. and Firestone, P. (2018). Social Justice and Moral Reasoning: An Empirical Integration of Two Paradigms in Psychological Research, Social Justice Research, 15(1): 18-28.
Dufaux, F. (2018). Birth announcement, justice spatial/spatial justice, Bolivia Social Science & Medicine, 3(5), 663–678.
Farpour, R., Bakhshayesh Ardestani, A., & Abtahi, S. M. (2022). International justice from the perspective of John Rawls' political thought. International Relations Researches, 11(4), 215-237
Fiske, L. and Gilbert, P. (2017). Perceptions of social dangers, moral foundations and political orientation, Personality and individual different.
Fleurbaey, M., Salles, M.A. and Weymark, J. (2018). Justice political liberalism and utilitarism, Cambridge University.
Ghaderi Hajat, Mostafa, Aftabi, Zakia, Ferdowsi, Abbas (2017). The Relationship between Spatial Justice and Political Participation, Case Study: South Coastal Coast, Quarterly Journal of Human Geographical Studies, Volume 2, Number 1, pp. 119-101 [in Persian].
Ghani Nejad, Musa (2018). Historical and macro: Justice, Social Justice and Economy, Journal of Economics, Volume 3, Number 5, pp. 10-24 [in Persian].
Greb, Edward (2013). Social inequality: The views of classical and contemporary theorists, translated by Mohammad Siahpoosh and Ahmad Reza Gharvizad, Tehran: Abrar Publishing [in Persian].
Heidary Khoei, A., Seyed Bagheri, S.K., & Rezapour, H. (2023). The principles of political justice in the thought of Imam Khomeini and John Rawls. Islamic Politics Research, 10(22), 257-281.
Henslin, J. (2019). Spatiaology (Core concepts), Their Edition, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, pearson international.
Hosseini Beheshti, Seyyed Ali Reza (2017). Epistemological Foundations of Social Justice Theory, Tehran: Gohar Publications [in Persian].
Houshmand, H. (2020). Human Rights, Religion, and Decent Hierarchical Societies: A Rawlsian Analysis. The Journal of Human Rights, 15(1), 69-90.
Jahanshahi, Alieh (2014). The Role of Justice in Community Development, Tehran: Sami Publications [in Persian].
Hafiznia, Mohammad Reza (2016), Geopolitics: Concepts and Foundations, Mashhad: Papli Publications [in Persian].
Jamalzadeh, Nasser (2017). Political and Social Justice in Three Approaches of Jurisprudence, Philosophy and Sociology, Quarterly Journal of Political Knowledge, Volume 4, Number 3, pp. 20-5 [in Persian].
Kamkar, Behnam and Mahdavi Damghani, Abdolmajid (2008). Fundamentals of Sustainable Agriculture, Mashhad: Jihad University Press, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad [in Persian].
Kashi, Mohammad Javad (2010). Analysis of Space as a Discourse of Field Mining, Iranian Social Studies Quarterly, Volume 5, Number 2, pp. 1-19 [in Persian].
Kavianirad Morad, Gharabeyghi, Mosayeb (2015). Explaining the Relationship between Ecology and Democracy in Poststructuralist Theory, Quarterly Journal of Planning and Spatial Planning, Volume 20, Number 2, pp. 273-292 [in Persian].
Kavianirad, Morad (2012). Geography of Elections with Emphasis on Presidential Elections in Iran, Tehran: Kharazmi University Press [in Persian].
Kavianirad, Morad, Gharehbeygi, Mosayeb (2017). Geography of Elections: Concepts and Functions, Tehran: Institute for Strategic Studies Publications [in Persian].
Keykha, Najmeh (2017), Social Justice, Tehran: Young Thought Center Publications [in Persian].
Lam, T. (2016) Reference group influences among Chinese travelers, Journal of travel research, 12(1), 474-484.
Lipsit, Simor Martin (2013), Encyclopedia of Democracy, translated by Kamran Fani and Noorullah Moradi, Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Publications [in Persian].
Lotfi, Rozita (2012). The Sense of Justice and its Relationship with Political Trends (Case Study: Tehran), PhD Thesis in Sociology, Allameh Tabatabai University [in Persian].
Moradkhani, F. (2020). The Concept of constitution in john Rawl's thought. Journal of Legal Studies, 12(1), 247-273.
Mottaqi, Afshin, Abbaspour Gomari, Marzieh (2017). Organizing Space Based on Discourse Analysis of Heterogeneous Areas of Iran, Volume 7, Number 25, pp. 157-178 [in Persian].
Nikpey, A., & Madani, Z. (2020). Civil Disobedience in Open and Closed Societies and Legal-Political Systems (Review of John Rawls and Hannah Arendt's Theories). Legal Research Quarterly, 23(91), 277-302.
Pavot, W. and Diener, E. (2013) Review of the satisfaction with life scale, American Psychological Association, 5(2): 164-172.
Rawls, John (2014), Justice as Justice, Translated by Erfan Sabeti, Tehran: Ghoghnous Publishing [in Persian].
Rezvani, Mohammad Reza, Ahmadi, Ali (2009), The place and role of culture in the formation of spatial identity, Letter of Cultural Research, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 2-15 [in Persian].
Sanders, J. (2019). Handbook of Justice Research of law, Kluwer Academic, New York.
Slembrouck, S. (2015). Explanation, Interpretation and Critique in the Analysis of Discourse. Critique of Anthropology, 21(3): 33–57.
Soja, E. (2010), Seeking Spatial Justice, Publisher: University of Minnesota Press.
Tavassoli, Hossein (2017). The Basis of Justice in John Rawls Theory, Quarterly Journal of Criticism and Opinion, No. 10, No. 2, pp. 25-44 [in Persian].
Toolan, M. (2015). What Is Critical Discourse Analysis and Why Are People Saying Such Terrible Things About It? Language & Literature 6(2): 83–103.
Vaezi, Ahmad (2017). Critique and Study of Theories of Justice, Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute Publications [in Persian].
Widdowson, H. (2016). The Theory and Practice of Critical Discourse Analysis, Applied Linguistics 19(1): 136–151.
Wodak, R. (2011). What CDA is about, In: Wodak, Ruth & Meyer, Michael (eds.) (2001) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
Yaghoubi, Dariush (2017). Iranians' understanding of justice, Tehran: Jamshenasan Publications [in Persian].