اعتبار سازه ای و قابلیت پاسخگویی نسخه فارسی مقیاس تجدید نظر شده دانش راهبردهای والدگری
محورهای موضوعی : روانشناسی
محمدجواد زحمتکش
1
(
دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران. mj.zahmatkesh1994@gmail.com
)
سجاد رضائی
2
(
University of Guilan
)
اشکان ناصح
3
(
گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران
)
کلید واژه: اعتبار سازه¬ای, دانش راهبردهای والدگری, قابلیت پاسخگویی,
چکیده مقاله :
مقدمه: والدگری مجموعه‌ای پیچیده از فعالیت‌هایی است که به طور مجزا یا در تعامل با یکدیگر بر روی رشد کودک اثر میگذارند.این پژوهش نسخه فارسی مقیاس تجدید نظر شده دانش راهبردهای والدگری، ابزاری با پایایی و روایی مناسب است که در سال 1400 ترجمه و اعتباریابی شده است. روش پژوهش: پژوهش حاضر روی نمونهای به حجم 330 والد (207 مادر و 123 پدر) و با هدف تعیین اعتبارسازه‌ای این مقیاس، اجرا گردید. همچنین به منظور تعیین قابلیت پاسخگویی نمرات نسخه فارسی KOPSS نسبت به آموزش دوره والدگری مثبت در یک مدرسه ابتدایی از 15 والد (9 مادر و 6 پدر) نمونه‌گیری هدفمند به عمل آمد. در قالب طرح پیشآزمون و پس آزمون تگ گروهی از این والدین، ابتدا پیشآزمون گرفته شد و سپس دوره آموزشی در قالب پنج جلسه دو ساعته آنلاین برگزار شد. پس از گذشت سه هفته از اتمام دوره، پسآزمون به اجرا درآمد. یافته‌ها: ضریب همبستگی بین نمرات پیشآزمون و پسآزمون شرکت‌کنندگان، برابر با 892/0= و در سطح 001/0> به دست آمد. ضریب آلفای کرونباخ استانداردشده برای نسخه فارسی KOPSS پس از حذف دو گویه به مقدار 717/0 محاسبه شد. در تحلیل عاملی تأییدی 11 گویه دیگر به دلیل بارعاملی ضعیف حذف شدند. در مدل نهایی KOPSS-20، شاخصهای برازش محاسبه شده، همگی قابل قبول بودند. تحلیل کوواریانس تک متغیری آشکار ساخت KOPSS-20 قابلیت پاسخگویی نسبت به اثرات آموزش دوره والدگری مثبت Triple-P دارد و اندازه اثر این تفاوت در سطح بالایی قرار دارد. نتیجه‌گیری: پژوهش حاضر نشان داد، KOPSS-20، ابزاری با اعتبار سازهای رضایت‌بخش است و نسبت به اثرات مداخله و آموزش والدگری حساسیت و پاسخگویی دارد
Abstract Introduction: The Persian version of Extended Version of the Knowledge of Parenting Strategies Scale is a tool with appropriate reliability and validity that has been translated and validated in 2022. Research Methods: The present study was performed on a sample of 330 parents (207 mothers and 123 fathers) with the aim of determining the structural validity of this scale. Also, in order to determine the responsiveness of Persian version of KOPSS scores to positive parenting program, a purposive sampling was performed from 15 parents (9 mothers and 6 fathers) in an elementary school. In the form of pre-test and post-test design, a group of these parents was first pre-tested and then the training course was held in the form of five two-hours online sessions. Three weeks after the end of the course, the post-test was performed. Results: The correlation coefficient between the pre-test and post-test scores of the participants was r = 0.892 (P<0.001). After removing two items, the standardized Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the Persian version of KOPSS was calculated to be 0.717. In confirmatory factor analysis, another 11 items were deleted due to poor factor loading. In the final model of KOPSS-20, the indexes of fit were all acceptable. Univariate analysis of covariance revealed that KOPSS-20 is able to respond to the Positive parenting program and the effect size of this difference is at a high level. Conclusions: The present study showed that KOPSS-20 is a tool with the adequate structural validity and is sensitive and responsive to the effects of intervention and parenting education.
Rayan A, Ahmad M. The psychometric properties of the mindful attention awareness scale among Arab parents of children with autism spectrum disorder. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 2018 Jun 1; 32(3): 444-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2018.01.001
VandenBos GR. APA dictionary of psychology. American Psychological Association; 2007.
Kang H. A guide on the use of factor analysis in the assessment of construct validity. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2013 Oct 1; 43(5): 587-94. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.5.587
King M, Dobson A. Estimating the responsiveness of an instrument using more than two repeated measures. Biometrics. 2000 Dec; 56(4): 1197-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.01197.x
Kirkman J. Beyond the Clinic: Access Early Intervention-An e-Health treatment for childhood behaviour disorders (Doctoral dissertation, UNSW Sydney).
Kirkman JJ, Dadds MR, Hawes DJ. Development and validation of the knowledge of parenting strategies scale: Measuring effective parenting strategies. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2018 Oct; 27: 3200-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1165-6
Zahmatkesh MJ, Rezaei S, Naseh A. Psychometrics and Standardization of Extended Version of Knowledge of Parenting Strategies Scale. Journal of Child and Family Studies, under review. 2023
Sanders MR, Markie-Dadds C, Turner KM. Theoretical, scientific and Clinical Foundations of Tripe P-Positive Parenting Program: A population approach to the promotion of parenting competence. Parenting Research and Practice Monograph, 2003; 1: 16
Sanders MR. Triple p- positive parenting program: Professional Training the University of Queensland; 2003: 115
Turner KMT, Sanders MR. Dissemination of psychological innovation to primary care professionals: Effectiveness and program uptake. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Brisbane, Australia; 2002: 421
Sanders MR, Woolley ML. The relationship between maternal self‐efficacy and parenting practices: Implications for parent training. Child: care, health and development. 2005 Jan; 31(1): 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2005.00487.x
Sanders MR. Triple P-Positive Parenting Program as a public health approach to strengthening parenting. Journal of family psychology. 2008 Aug; 22(4): 506. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.22.3.506
Abedei S. Positive parenting program (triple-P). Exceptional education. 2013; (114): 30-37. [Persian]
Turner KM, Sanders MR. Help when it’s needed first: A controlled evaluation of brief, preventive behavioral family intervention in a primary care setting. Behavior therapy. 2006 Jun 1; 37(2): 131-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2005.05.004
Turner KM, Sanders MR. Dissemination of evidence-based parenting and family support strategies: Learning from the Triple P—Positive Parenting Program system approach. Aggression and Violent behavior. 2006 Mar 1; 11(2): 176-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2005.07.005
Sanders MR, Pidgeon AM, Gravestock F, Connors MD, Brown S, Young RW. Does parental attributional retraining and anger management enhance the effects of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program with parents at risk of child maltreatment?. Behavior Therapy. 2004 Jun 1; 35(3): 513-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80030-3
Sanders MR, Dadds MR. Behavioural family intervention. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 1993
Bentler PM, Chou CP. Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological methods & research. 1987 Aug; 16(1): 78-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124187016001004
Meyers LS, Gamst GC, Guarino AJ. Performing data analysis using IBM SPSS. John Wiley & Sons; 2013 Aug 12.
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. SAS for Windows workbook for Tabachnick and Fidell: using multivariate statistics. (No Title). 2001.
Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203807644
Hair Jr J, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, G. Kuppelwieser V. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research. European business review; 2014 Mar 4; 26(2): 106-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavior science: Lawrance Eribaum association; 1988