Comparison of ZAMAK 2 and ZAMAK 3 Alloys Produced by Powder Metallurgy Process
محورهای موضوعی : Metal Forming
Abdolhamid Azizi
1
(Mechanical Engineering Department, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran)
Gholamali Gheiratmand Haghighi
2
(Direct Manager, Acidsazan Zanjan, Iranian Sulfuric Acid Association, Iran construction engineering organization (IRCEO), Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran)
Pooya Bahrami
3
(Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kermanshah Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran)
Sahebali Manafi
4
(Department of Materials Engineering, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran)
کلید واژه: Density, Tensile strength, Powder Metallurgy, ZAMAK 2, ZAMAK 3,
چکیده مقاله :
The predominant method to produce ZAMAK alloys is casting. But this process is not without flaws. Factors such as low melting temperature, creep stresses, aging, and dimension change over time are the main problems in ZAMAK’s casting process. We embarked on this research to investigate the new production routes. In this regard, the powder metallurgy can be highlighted because of the non-occurrence of melting and non-solid-liquid phase changes. ZAMAK 2 and 3 are the most commonly used ZAMAK alloys. In this way, we study the comparison of ZAMAK 2 and 3 produced by powder metallurgy. The powder was prepared by the mechanical method. As we proceed, the effect of particle size, pressure, and sintering temperature will be investigated. The comparison was done in consideration of mechanical properties such as density, tensile strength, and hardness. The density of ZAMAK 2 obtained by the powder metallurgy method increases with increasing working pressure up to 400 MPa, but after this pressure, little change in density is observed. While in ZAMAK 3 the density increases with increasing pressure. The maximum ultimate stress obtained in ZAMAK 2 is approximately equal to 300 MPa, while, it is equal to 230 MPa for ZAMAK 3. In ZAMAK 2, we will see a 16.7% increase in density by selecting fine grains, but in Zamak 3, this enhancement is only equal to 7%, which indicates the intensive effect of particle size on the density obtained in ZAMAK 2.
[1] Campbell, J. 2001. Casting alloys Complete Casting Handbook. Butterworth-Heinemann: Elsevier.
[2] Lynch, R. F. 2001. Zinc: alloying, thermomechanical processing, properties, and applications encyclopedia of materials, 2nd edition. Sci Technol.
[3] Jareno, E. D., Castro, M. J., Maldonado,S. I. And Alvarado, H. 2010. The effects of Cu and cooling rate on the fraction and distribution of epsilon phase in Zn–4Al–(3–5.6) Cu alloys. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 490:524–530.
[4] Jeremy, M. G. 2010. Creep Properties of a Zinc-Aluminum Die-casting Alloy as a Function of Grain Size. PhD thesis. North Carolina State University.
[5] Alex, B. 2011. Aging behaviour of zinc die casting alloy ZP0810. MSc. thesis. University of Padua.
[6] Robertia, R., Polaa, A., Gillesb, M. and Rollezc, D. 2008. Primary and steady state creep deformation in ZAMAK5 die-casting alloy at 80°C. Material Characterization. 59: 1747-1752.
[7] Hanna, M. D., Carter, J. T. and Kashid, M. S. 1997. Sliding wear and friction characteristics of six Zn-based die-casting alloys. Wear. 204: 11-21.
[8] Gobiena, J. M., Scattergooda, R. O., Goodwinb, F. E. and Kocha, C. C. 2009. Mechanical behavior of bulk ultra-fine-grained Zn–Al die-casting alloys. Materials Science and Engineering. 518: 84–88.
[9] Ahmet, T., Mehmet, D. and Sabri, K. 2007. The effect of manganese on the microstructure and mechanical properties of zinc–aluminium based ZA-8 alloy. Journal of Material Science. 42: 8298–8305.
[10] Jadgish, P. P. and Braj, K. P. 1998. Sliding Wear Response of a Zinc-Based Alloy Compared to a Copper-Based Alloy. Metalurgical and Materials Transactions: A. 29A: 1245-1253.
[11] Boddes, J. and Bibby, M. J. 1999. Powder metallurgy Principles of Metal Manufacturing Processes. Elsevier Butterworh-Heinemann.
[12] Azizi, A. and Haghighi, G. G. 2015. Fabrication of ZAMAK 2 alloys by powder metallurgy process. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 77: 2059–2065.
[13] Okamoto, H. 1995. Supplemental Literature Review. Journal of Phase Equillibrium. 16(3): 281-282.
[14] da Silva, F. C., Kazmierczak, K., da Costa, C. E., Milan, J. C. G. and Torralba, J. M. 2017. Zamak 2 Alloy Produced by Mechanical Alloying and Consolidated by Sintering and Hot Pressing. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 139 (9): 091011-1 – 091011-7.
[15] Liu, W., Pang, X., Ma, Y., Cai, Q. and Zhu, W. 2018. C. Liang, Development of fully dense and high performance powder metallurgy HSLA steel using HIP method. Material Research Express. 5: 056523.
[16] Shaikh, M. B. N., Arif, S. and Arif Siddiqui, M. 2018. Fabrication and characterization of aluminium hybrid composites reinforced with fly ash and silicon carbide through powder metallurgy. Material Research Express. 5: 046506.
