Proposing a Conceptual Model of Critical Success Factors in Lean Production Using Interpretive Structural Modeling and Fuzzy MICMAC Analysis
محورهای موضوعی : Transactions on Fuzzy Sets and Systems
Mazdak Khodadadi Karimvand
1
,
Hadi Shirouyehzad
2
,
Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi
3
1 - Department of Industrial Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.
2 - Department of Industrial Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.
3 - Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
کلید واژه: Critical success factors, Lean production, Interpretive structural modeling, Fuzzy MICMAC analysis.,
چکیده مقاله :
Since companies are inclined to implement lean production, researchers have proposed a number of fundamental success factors to facilitate the implementation of this production approach. This study analyzes the critical success factors (CSFs) in lean production extracted from 14 review studies. The interpretive structural modeling approach is utilized to analyze the impact of these critical success factors on one another. The aim is to enhance insights into lean production and facilitate informed decision-making. In this article, a seven-tiered model is presented. According to the conceptual model of success factors in lean production, leadership is positioned at the base of the model and serves as the origin for other factors. It should be regarded as the foremost critical success factor in lean production. When establishing lean production systems, organizations and senior managers should focus on higher levels and critical success factors that underlie the model. Subsequently, nonfuzzy and fuzzy driving and dependence power analyses were conducted that the fuzzy matrix cross-reference multiplication applied to a classification (MICMAC) analysis provides deeper insights into the analysis of driving and dependence power. The fuzzy matrix cross-reference multiplication applied to a classification analysis helped identify some key factors that are highly effective for successfully implementing lean manufacturing.
Since companies are inclined to implement lean production, researchers have proposed a number of fundamental success factors to facilitate the implementation of this production approach. This study analyzes the critical success factors (CSFs) in lean production extracted from 14 review studies. The interpretive structural modeling approach is utilized to analyze the impact of these critical success factors on one another. The aim is to enhance insights into lean production and facilitate informed decision-making. In this article, a seven-tiered model is presented. According to the conceptual model of success factors in lean production, leadership is positioned at the base of the model and serves as the origin for other factors. It should be regarded as the foremost critical success factor in lean production. When establishing lean production systems, organizations and senior managers should focus on higher levels and critical success factors that underlie the model. Subsequently, nonfuzzy and fuzzy driving and dependence power analyses were conducted that the fuzzy matrix cross-reference multiplication applied to a classification (MICMAC) analysis provides deeper insights into the analysis of driving and dependence power. The fuzzy matrix cross-reference multiplication applied to a classification analysis helped identify some key factors that are highly effective for successfully implementing lean manufacturing.
[1] Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D. The Machine that Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production– Toyota’s Secret Weapon in the Global Car Wars that Is Now Revolutionizing World Industry. 1990.
[2] Womack JP, Jones DT. Lean thinkingbanish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 1997; 48(11): 1148–1148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jors.2600967
[3] Chen FF. Measuring Leanness of Manufacturing Systems and Identifying Leanness Target by Considering Agility. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 2006.
[4] Marodin GA, Saurin TA. Implementing lean production systems: Research areas and opportunities for future studies. International Journal of Production Research. 2013; 51(22): 666–6680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.826831
[5] Jasti NVK, Kodali R. Lean production: Literature review and trends. International Journal of Production Research. 2015; 53(3): 867–885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.937508
[6] Holweg M. The genealogy of lean production. Journal of operations management. 2007; 25(2): 420–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.04.001
[7] Lucey J, Bateman N, Hines P. Why major lean transitions have not been sustained. Management Services. 2005; 49(2): 9–13.
[8] Schonberger RJ. Best practices in lean six sigma process improvement: A deeper look. John Wiley & Sons; 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770910972469
[9] Boynton AC, Zmud RW, et al. An assessment of critical success factors. Sloan management review. 1984; 25(4): 17–27.
[10] Ben´ıtez RR, Fierro JC. Reverse logistics practices in the spanish smes context. Journal of Operations and Supply Chain Management (JOSCM). 2011; 4(1): 84–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12660/joscmv4n1p84- 93
[11] Asmaningrum V, Prassetiyo H. Application of interpretive structural modelling (ism) and analytical network process (anp) methods in the selection of component easy wheel suppliers in the bicycle manufacturing industry. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0119723
[12] Huang JJ, Tzeng GH, Ong CS. Multidimensional data in multidimensional scaling using the analytic network process. Pattern Recognition Letters. 2005; 26(6): 755–767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2004.09.027
[13] Netland TH. Critical success factors for implementing lean production: The effect of contingencies. International Journal of Production Research. 2016; 54(8): 2433–2448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1096976
[14] Korpela J,Tuominen M. Benchmarking logistics performance with an application of the analytic hierarchy process. IEEE Transactions on Engineering management. 1996; 43(3): 323–333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/17.511842
[15] Rungasamy S, Antony J, Ghosh S. Critical success factors for spc implementation in uk small and medium enterprises: Some key findings from a survey. The TQM Magazine. 2002; 14(4): 217–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780210429825
[16] Achanga P, Shehab E, Roy R, Nelder G. Critical success factors for lean implementation within smes. Journal of manufacturing technology management. 2006; 17(4): 460–471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380610662889
[17] Cotte P, Farber A, Merchant A, Paranikas P, Sirkin H. Getting More from Lean. BCG publication; 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1096976
[18] Losonci D, Demeter K, Jenei I. Factors influencing employee perceptions in lean transformations. International Journal of Production Economics. 2011; 131(1): 30–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.12.022
[19] Vinodh S,Joy D. Structural equation modelling of lean manufacturing practices. International Journal of Production Research. 2012; 50(6): 1598–1607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.560203
[20] Sila I, Ebrahimpour M. Examination and comparison of the critical factors of total quality management (tqm) across countries. International journal of production research. 2003; 41(2): 235–268. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/0020754021000022212
[21] Nitin S, Dinesh K, Paul ST. TQM for manufacturing excellence: Factors critical to success. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research. 2011; 2(1): 219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29252/jha.23.2.40
[22] Brady JE, Allen TT. Six sigma literature: A review and agenda for future research. Quality and reliability engineering International. 2006; 22(3): 335–367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.769
[23] Warfield JN. Developing interconnection matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 1974; 4(1): 81–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1974.5408524
[24] Jharkharia S, Shankar R. IT-enablement of supply chains: Understanding the barriers. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 2005; 18(1): 11–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17410390510571466
[25] Agarwal A, Shankar R, Tiwari M. Modeling agility of supply chain. Industrial marketing management. 2007; 36(4): 443–457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.12.004
[26] Ravi V, Shankar R. Analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2005; 72(8): 1011–1029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-07-2022-0417
[27] Faisal MN, Banwet DK, Shankar R. Supply chain risk mitigation: Modeling the enablers. Business Process Management Journal. 2006; 12(4): 535–552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150610678113
[28] Attri R, Dev N, Sharma V. Interpretive structural modelling (ism) approach: An overview. Research journal of management sciences. 2013; 2319(2): 1171.
[29] Gorane S, Kant R. Modelling the scm enablers: An integrated ism-fuzzy micmac approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 2013; 25(2): 263–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13555851311314059
[30] Abbas H, Asim Z, Ahmed Z, Moosa S. Exploring and establishing the barriers to sustainable humanitarian supply chains using fuzzy interpretive structural modeling and fuzzy micmac analysis. Social Responsibility Journal. 2022; 18(8): 1463–1484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2020-0485
[31] Sushil S. Interpreting the interpretive structural model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management. 2012; 13: 87–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-012-0008-3
[32] Aikhuele DO, Souleman FS, Azizi A. Application of fuzzy ahp for ranking critical success factors for the successful implementation of lean production technique. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2014; 8(18): 399–407.
[33] Saxena J, Sushil, Vrat P. Policy and Strategy Formulation: An Application of Flexible Systems Methodology. GIFT Pub; 2006.
[34] Tyagi M, Panchal D, Kumar D, Walia R. Modeling and analysis of lean manufacturing strategies using ism-fuzzy micmac approach. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications. 2021; 4(1): 38–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta2040123t
