سنجش توانمندی تکنولوژی صنایع استان آذربایجان شرقی و ارائه الگوی مناسب جهت بهبود و ارتقای تکنولوژی
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت بازرگانی
یعقوب علوی متین
1
(دانش آموخته دکتری گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات ،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ،تهران،ایران)
عباس طلوعی اشلقی
2
(استاد گروه مدیریت واحدعلوم و تحقیقات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران،ایران)
کلید واژه: توانایی تکنولوژی, ضریب کمک تکنولوژی, مقایسه زوجی(روش سلسله مراتبی), مدل بهبود,
چکیده مقاله :
مقاله حاضر در نظر دارد ابتدا با به کار گیری مدل اطلس تکنولوژی ((ESCAP)) اقدام به ارزیابی سطح (امتیاز و نمره) اجزای تکنولوژی در صنایع سه گانه نفت- ساخت و تولید و صنایع معدنی نماید. برای تعیین و محاسبه ضریب کمک تکنولوژی (TCC) و ضریب توانی آن (iβ) از مقایسه زوجی به روش AHP با مؤلفه های تأثیر گذار بر تکنولوژی استفاده شده است و نهایتاً برای تعیین و بررسی معنا داری در میانگین نمرات و امتیاز به دست آمده درصنایع مورد مطالعه، از آزمون t و آنالیز واریانس (ANOVA) برای بررسی تفاوت معناداری در مقادیر میانگین مشاهده شده امتیازات در صنایع سه گانه استفاده شده است. در مرحله آخرالگوی پیشنهادی در دو مرحله الف) ارزیابی وتعیین و محاسبه امتیاز ب) ارائه راهکارهای بهبود توسعه تکنولوژی؛ تدوین وطراحی گردیده است ، درپاسخ به این سؤال که درصورت اجرا وبه کارگیری این مدل درعمل، منجربه بهبود تکنولوژی خواهد انجامید یا نه؟ اقدام به بررسی وصحه گذاری واعتبار مدل با روش شبیه سازی وبا استفاده از سیستمهای دینامیکی پرداخته شده است و روایی و پایایی مدل تست گردیده است .
The present research aims to assess the level (score and grade) of the components of technology in three industries-i.e., petroleum, manufacturing, and mining – by applying the ESCAP Technology Atlas model. In order to determine and calculate technology contribution coefficient (TCC) and its power factor (Bi), the researchers have used AHP pairwise comparison method with the components that affect technology. Finally, t-test has been used to determine the significance in the scores obtained from the studied industries, and analysis of variance has been applied to examine the significant difference in the scores observed in the three industries. In the final stage, the proposed model has been compiled and designed in two phases: a) assessing, determining, and calculating the score; b ) presenting strategies to improve the development of technology. To answer the question whether the implementation and application of this model will result in the improvement of technology, the model has been evaluated through the use of simulation method and dynamic systems, and its validity and reliability has been confirmed.
- Arastegi, M. (2004). Technology Strategic Management. (In Persian).
- Arasti M. R. (2004). Direct Assessment of Technolog Ility. Working Paper.
- Asadikram, A. R. (2002). The Evaluation the Implementation of the Technology of the National Company of Iranian Copper Industries to Provide the Appropriate Technology Development Program. Master's Thesis, Tehran: Tehran Univercity, (In Persian).
- Bravan, E. (2000). The Evaluation of Technology for Using by Managers. Tehran: Industrial Management Organization, (In Persian).
- Bravan, E. (2003). Assessment and Forecasting Technology. Tehran: Rahbordiye Ayandeh, (In Persian).
- Chen, C., & Haung, C. (2004). A Multiple Criteria Evaluation of High-Tech Industries for Science Based Industrial Park in Taiwan. Information & Management, 40(7). 839-851,.
- Fallh, A. (1999). Technology Basics and Technology Transfer from the Perspective of Policy Making for Technology Development. Tehran: Summer Defense Publications, (In Persian).
- Gaynlor, H. (2001). Handbook if Technology Management, Strategic Policy Intelligence: Current Trends, the State of Play and Prospective.
- Ghazi noori, S. S. (2004). Technology Assessment Tools for Policy Making. Tehran: Industries Center Publications, (In Persian).
- Ghazi Noori, S. S. (2004). The Evaluation of Technoloy Toolkit for Policy Making, Tehran: New Industries Center Publications, (In Persian).
- Hajfathali, A. (1993). Technology Development (Conceptual Review and Decision Process. Tehran: Allameh Tabataba,i Univercity, (In Persian).
Hill , S. (1988). Tragedy of Technology. London: Pluto Press.
- Megantez, R. (2002). Compilation and Implementation of Technology Infrastructure Agreements. Tehran: New Industries Center Publications, (In Persian).
- Nezhad, R., & Sofian, S. (2010). The Influence of (beta) Technology Intensity and Evaluating TCC Using AHP Model in Iran Tractir Manufacturing Cimpany (ITMCO). International Review of Business Research Paper, 6, 286-298.
- Nurhayat, A. M. (2012). The Analysis of Technological Contribution and Competitveness at Agroindustry Cokro Tela Cake Yogyakarta. Master Thesis, Yogyakarta: University of Pembangunan Nasional Veteran.
- Porter, A. L., & S. W. (2007). Cunning Harn, Tech Mining. New York: Wiley.
- Purnomo, S. (2012). Process Management Improvement Suggestion for PT.IGLAS (PERSERO) based on Technometric Approach. Master Thesis.
- Unido, V. (1989). Industry and Development. Global Report. 40-42.
- Sharif, N. (1993). Technology Transfer Management. Translation by: R., Aslani, Terran: Management and Planning Organization, (In Persian).
- Wiratmadja, I. I., & Govindaraju, R. (2010). Analysis of the Influence of Technology on the Business Performance of Rattan Processing SMEs in South Kalimantan, The l l th Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering and Management Systems Conference.
_||_
- Arastegi, M. (2004). Technology Strategic Management. (In Persian).
- Arasti M. R. (2004). Direct Assessment of Technolog Ility. Working Paper.
- Asadikram, A. R. (2002). The Evaluation the Implementation of the Technology of the National Company of Iranian Copper Industries to Provide the Appropriate Technology Development Program. Master's Thesis, Tehran: Tehran Univercity, (In Persian).
- Bravan, E. (2000). The Evaluation of Technology for Using by Managers. Tehran: Industrial Management Organization, (In Persian).
- Bravan, E. (2003). Assessment and Forecasting Technology. Tehran: Rahbordiye Ayandeh, (In Persian).
- Chen, C., & Haung, C. (2004). A Multiple Criteria Evaluation of High-Tech Industries for Science Based Industrial Park in Taiwan. Information & Management, 40(7). 839-851,.
- Fallh, A. (1999). Technology Basics and Technology Transfer from the Perspective of Policy Making for Technology Development. Tehran: Summer Defense Publications, (In Persian).
- Gaynlor, H. (2001). Handbook if Technology Management, Strategic Policy Intelligence: Current Trends, the State of Play and Prospective.
- Ghazi noori, S. S. (2004). Technology Assessment Tools for Policy Making. Tehran: Industries Center Publications, (In Persian).
- Ghazi Noori, S. S. (2004). The Evaluation of Technoloy Toolkit for Policy Making, Tehran: New Industries Center Publications, (In Persian).
- Hajfathali, A. (1993). Technology Development (Conceptual Review and Decision Process. Tehran: Allameh Tabataba,i Univercity, (In Persian).
Hill , S. (1988). Tragedy of Technology. London: Pluto Press.
- Megantez, R. (2002). Compilation and Implementation of Technology Infrastructure Agreements. Tehran: New Industries Center Publications, (In Persian).
- Nezhad, R., & Sofian, S. (2010). The Influence of (beta) Technology Intensity and Evaluating TCC Using AHP Model in Iran Tractir Manufacturing Cimpany (ITMCO). International Review of Business Research Paper, 6, 286-298.
- Nurhayat, A. M. (2012). The Analysis of Technological Contribution and Competitveness at Agroindustry Cokro Tela Cake Yogyakarta. Master Thesis, Yogyakarta: University of Pembangunan Nasional Veteran.
- Porter, A. L., & S. W. (2007). Cunning Harn, Tech Mining. New York: Wiley.
- Purnomo, S. (2012). Process Management Improvement Suggestion for PT.IGLAS (PERSERO) based on Technometric Approach. Master Thesis.
- Unido, V. (1989). Industry and Development. Global Report. 40-42.
- Sharif, N. (1993). Technology Transfer Management. Translation by: R., Aslani, Terran: Management and Planning Organization, (In Persian).
- Wiratmadja, I. I., & Govindaraju, R. (2010). Analysis of the Influence of Technology on the Business Performance of Rattan Processing SMEs in South Kalimantan, The l l th Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering and Management Systems Conference.
