ارزیابی تحمل به تنش خشکی در لاین‌های پیشرفته گندم دوروم با استفاده از شاخص انتخاب ژنوتیپ ایده آل (SIIG)
محورهای موضوعی : اکوفیزیولوژی گیاهان زراعیسحر تعدیلی 1 , علی اصغری 2 , رحمت‌الله کریمی‌زاده 3 , امید سفالیان 4 , حمید‌رضا محمددوست چمن‌آباد 5
1 - دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد اصلاح نباتات، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران
2 - دانشیار گروه زراعت واصلاح نباتات، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران
3 - استادیار پژوهشی، موسسه تحقیقات کشاورزی دیم کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، گچساران، ایران
4 - استاد گروه زراعت واصلاح نباتات، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران
5 - استاد گروه زراعت واصلاح نباتات، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران
کلید واژه: تنش خشکی, گندم دوروم, شاخص SIIG, شاخص Ti,
چکیده مقاله :
به منظور ارزیابی تحمل به تنش خشکی در 18 لاین پیشرفته گندم دوروم در قالب طرح پایه بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی در 4 تکرار تحت دو شرایط دیم و آبیاری تکمیلی طی سال زراعی 97-1396 در ایستگاه گچساران بررسی شد. در این مطالعه صفات روز تا سنبله‌دهی، روز تا رسیدگی فیزیولوژیک، ارتفاع بوته، طول پدانکل، طول سنبله، وزن هزار دانه، عملکرد دانه، نمره زراعی، تعداد دانه در سنبله، تعداد سنبله در مترمربع، کاهش دمای کانوپی در دو مرحله سنبله‌دهی و پرشدن دانه، مقدار سبزینگی در دو مرحله سنبله‌دهی و پرشدن دانه اندازه‌گیری شدند. نتایج تجزیه واریانس نشان داد که بین لاین‌های مورد مطالعه در شرایط دیم و آبیاری تکمیلی از نظر صفات روز تا سنبله‌دهی، ارتفاع بوته، طول پدانکل، طول سنبله، وزن هزار دانه، عملکرد دانه، نمره زراعی، تعداد دانه در سنبله، کاهش دمای کانوپی و مقدار سبزینگی در دو مرحله سنبله‌دهی و پرشدن دانه اختلاف معنی دار وجود داشت. نتایج مقایسه میانگین ها نشان داد که لاین‌های 4، 9، 13، 15 ،16 و 17 در اکثر صفات از بقیه لاین ها بهتر بودند. ارزیابی لاین‌های حساس و متحمل با محاسبه شاخص تحمل (Ti) برای صفات اندازه گیری شد. لاین‌های 1، 2، 4، 6، 9، 15 و 17 که در اکثر صفات شاخص Ti بالایی داشتند، لاین‌های متحمل‌تری بودند. انتخاب لاین‌های برتر براساس شاخص انتخاب ژنوتیپ برتر (SIIG) انجام شد. لاین‌های 4، 5، 9 و 15 با داشتن بالاترین مقدار این شاخص، جزو متحمل‌ترین لاین‌ها و مناسب برای کشت در شرایط دیم بودند. لاین‌های 7، 8، 10 و 14 با داشتن پایین‌ترین مقدار این شاخص جزو حساس‌ترین لاین‌ها بودند. نتایج حاصل از این رتبه‌بندی با نتایج حاصل از تجزیه خوشه‌ای برمبنای شاخص های Ti مطابقت زیادی داشت.
Drought tolerance of 18 advanced lines durum wheat were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with four replications under dryland and complementary irrigation conditions in GachsaranAgriculturalResearchCenter at 2016-2017. In this study, traits like days to spike formation, days to maturity, plant height, peduncle length, spike length, 1000 seed weight, seed yield, spike number, spike number per m2, canopy temperature reduction of two stages of spike and seed filling, rate of greenness at two stages of spike and grain filling, were measured. Analysis of variance showed that there were significant differences among lines under study for days to spike formation, plant height, peduncle length, spike length, 1000 seed weight, seed yield, crop score, number of seeds per spike, temperature reductions of canopy at two spike stages seed and greenery content in two stages of spike and grain filling were significantly different. Mean comparisons showed that lines 4, 9, 13, 15, 16 and 17 were better than other lines in most traits. Evaluation of sensitive and tolerant lines according to tolerance index (Ti) showed that lines 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 15 and 17, had high Ti index in most traits, were tolerant. Selection for superior lines, based on SIIG and selection of ideal genotype (SIIG) index, were performed. The results of variance analysis of traits based on Ti index showed that difference among lines in terms of 1000 seed weight, reduction of canopy temperature at grain filling stage, seed yield, grain filling period, chlorophyll content at both clustering and grain filling stage, days to reach and number of days to clustering were significant at 1% probability level. Lines 4, 5, 9 and 15 were the highest values of this index and were suitable for growing under dryland conditions. Lines 7, 8, 10 and 14 having lowest value of the SIIG index were sensitive to rainfed condition. The results of this ranking are similar to the results of cluster decomposition based on Ti index.
· Anonymous. 2017. World grain statistics. International Grains Council. [on-line] Available at https:// www.igc.int/en/subscriptions/subscription.aspx.
· Anonymous. 2018. Grain market report. International Grains Council. GMR483-23. November 2017. [on-lin] Available at https://www.igc.int/downloads/gmrsummary /gmrsumme.
· Balota, M., W.A. Payne, S.R. Evett, and M.D. Lazar. 2007. Canopy temperature depression sampling to assess grain yield and genotypic differentiation in winter wheat. Crop Science. 47: 1518–1529.
· Biglouie, M.H., M.H. Assimi, and A. Akbarzadeh. 2010. Effect of water stress at different stages on quantity and quality traits of Virginia (flue cured) tobacco type. Plant Soil Environment. 2: 67-75.
· Bihamta, M.R., M. Shirkavand, J. Hasanpour, and A. Afzalifar. 2018. Evaluation of durum wheat genotypes under normal irrigation and drought stress condition. Jornal of Crop Breeding. 9: 119-136. (In Persian).
· Bonwell, E.S. 2008. Determination of endosperm protein secondary structure in hard wheat breeding lines using synchrotron infrared microspectroscopy and revelation of secondary structure changes in protein films with thermal processing. MS.c. Thesis, Dpartment of Grain Science and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas Stat University. USA.
· Dastfal, M., V. Barati, Y. Emam, H. Haghighatnia, and M. RamezanPour. 2012. Evaluation of grain yield and yield component in wheat genotypes under late drought stress in Darab zone. Seed and Plant Production Journal. 27: 195-217. (In Persian).
· Gharbi, A., V. Rashidi, A.R. Tarinejad, and S. Chalabi Yani. 2014. Evaluation of durum wheat lines tolerance to salinity and drought stress under greenhouse conditions. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 7(4): 393-410.
· Hwang, C.L., and K.P. Yoon. 1981. Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Springer, New York, 350 pp.
· Lesk, C., P. Rowhani, and N. Ramankutty. 2016. Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production. Nature. 529: 84–87.
· Mitra, J. 2001. Genetics and genetic improvement of drought resistance in crop plants. Current Science. 80: 758-763.
· Moghadasi, L., V. Rashidi, and A. Razban. 2009. Effect of drought stress on grain yield and some morphological traits in durum wheat inbred lines. Journal of Science and Technology in Agricultural Sciences. 12: 41-53. (In Persian).
· Munns, R., and R.A. James. 2003. Screening methods for salinity tolerance: A case study with tetraploid wheat. Plant and Soil. 253: 201-218.
· Munns, R., R.A. James, and A. Lauchli. 2006. Approaches increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. Journal of Experimental Botany. 57: 1025-1043.
· Najafi, T., M. Dastfal, B. Andarzian, H. Farzadi, M. Bahari, and H. Zali. 2017. Stability analysis of grain yield of durum heat romising lines in warm and dry areas using parametric and non-parametric methods. Journal of Crop Production and Processing. 8: 79-96.
· Olivares-Villegas, J.J., M.P. Reynolds, and G.K. McDonald. 2007. Drought-adaptive attributes in the Seri/Babax hexaploid wheat population. Functional Plant Biology. 34: 189–203.
· Oweis, T. 1997. Supplemental irrigation. A highly efficient water-use practice. InternationalCenter for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Aleppo, Syria. 16pp.
· Raman, A., S. Verulkar, N. Mandal, M. Variar, V. Shukla, J. Dwivedi, B. Singh, O. Singh, P. Swain, A. Mall, S. Robin, R. Chandrababu, A. Jain, T. Ram, S. Hittalmani, S. Haefele, H. Piepho, and A. Kumar. 2012. Drought yield index to select high yielding rice lines under different drought stress severities. Rice. 5: 1-12.
· Ramzi, E., A. Asghari, S. Khomari, and H. Mohammad doust Chamanabad. 2018. Investigation of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum Desf) lines for tolerance to aluminum stress condition. Journal of Crop Breeding. 10: 63-72. (In Persian).
· Reynolds, M., F. Dreccer, and R. Trethowan. 2007. Drought-adaptive traits derived from wheat wild relatives and landraces. Journal of Experimental Botany. 58: 177–186.
· Romesburg, C. 2004. Cluster analysis for researchers. Lulu.com, USA. 340 pp.
· Sharifi Al-Husseini, M., and M. Azat Ahmadi. 2012. Evaluation of the end drought tolerance of the season of durum wheat genotypes using drought index. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Research. 10: 361-367. (In Persian).
· Shewry, P. 2009. Inceasing the health benefits of wheat. FEBS Journal. 276: 71-71.
· Soleimani fard, A., and N. Naseri. 2013. Genetic diversity of durum wheat Lines from agronomic traits under dryland conditions. Jornal of Crop Ecophysiology. 28: 469-478. (In Persian).
· Stone, L.R., and A.J. Schlegel. 2006. Yield water supply relationships of grain sorghum and winter wheat. Agronomy Journal. 98: 1359-1366.
· Yaghooti Poor, A., E. Farshadfar, and M. Saeedi. 2017. Evaluation of bread wheat papillomavirus genotypes for drought tolerance using suitable combination method. Jornal Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 10: 247-256. (In Persian).
· Zali, H., O. Sofalian, T. Hasanloo, A. Asghari, and M. Zeinalabedini. 2016. Appropriate strategies for selection of drought tolerant genotypes in canola. Journal of Crop Breeding. 20: 77- 90. (In Persian).
Zali, H., O. Sofalian, T. Hasanloo, A. Asghari, and S.M. Hoseini. 2015. Appraising of drought tolerance relying on stability analysis indices in canola genotypes simultaneously, using selection index of ideal genotype (SIIG) technique, Introduction of new method. Biological Forum. 7: 703-711. (In Persian).
_||_· Anonymous. 2017. World grain statistics. International Grains Council. [on-line] Available at https:// www.igc.int/en/subscriptions/subscription.aspx.
· Anonymous. 2018. Grain market report. International Grains Council. GMR483-23. November 2017. [on-lin] Available at https://www.igc.int/downloads/gmrsummary /gmrsumme.
· Balota, M., W.A. Payne, S.R. Evett, and M.D. Lazar. 2007. Canopy temperature depression sampling to assess grain yield and genotypic differentiation in winter wheat. Crop Science. 47: 1518–1529.
· Biglouie, M.H., M.H. Assimi, and A. Akbarzadeh. 2010. Effect of water stress at different stages on quantity and quality traits of Virginia (flue cured) tobacco type. Plant Soil Environment. 2: 67-75.
· Bihamta, M.R., M. Shirkavand, J. Hasanpour, and A. Afzalifar. 2018. Evaluation of durum wheat genotypes under normal irrigation and drought stress condition. Jornal of Crop Breeding. 9: 119-136. (In Persian).
· Bonwell, E.S. 2008. Determination of endosperm protein secondary structure in hard wheat breeding lines using synchrotron infrared microspectroscopy and revelation of secondary structure changes in protein films with thermal processing. MS.c. Thesis, Dpartment of Grain Science and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas Stat University. USA.
· Dastfal, M., V. Barati, Y. Emam, H. Haghighatnia, and M. RamezanPour. 2012. Evaluation of grain yield and yield component in wheat genotypes under late drought stress in Darab zone. Seed and Plant Production Journal. 27: 195-217. (In Persian).
· Gharbi, A., V. Rashidi, A.R. Tarinejad, and S. Chalabi Yani. 2014. Evaluation of durum wheat lines tolerance to salinity and drought stress under greenhouse conditions. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 7(4): 393-410.
· Hwang, C.L., and K.P. Yoon. 1981. Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Springer, New York, 350 pp.
· Lesk, C., P. Rowhani, and N. Ramankutty. 2016. Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production. Nature. 529: 84–87.
· Mitra, J. 2001. Genetics and genetic improvement of drought resistance in crop plants. Current Science. 80: 758-763.
· Moghadasi, L., V. Rashidi, and A. Razban. 2009. Effect of drought stress on grain yield and some morphological traits in durum wheat inbred lines. Journal of Science and Technology in Agricultural Sciences. 12: 41-53. (In Persian).
· Munns, R., and R.A. James. 2003. Screening methods for salinity tolerance: A case study with tetraploid wheat. Plant and Soil. 253: 201-218.
· Munns, R., R.A. James, and A. Lauchli. 2006. Approaches increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. Journal of Experimental Botany. 57: 1025-1043.
· Najafi, T., M. Dastfal, B. Andarzian, H. Farzadi, M. Bahari, and H. Zali. 2017. Stability analysis of grain yield of durum heat romising lines in warm and dry areas using parametric and non-parametric methods. Journal of Crop Production and Processing. 8: 79-96.
· Olivares-Villegas, J.J., M.P. Reynolds, and G.K. McDonald. 2007. Drought-adaptive attributes in the Seri/Babax hexaploid wheat population. Functional Plant Biology. 34: 189–203.
· Oweis, T. 1997. Supplemental irrigation. A highly efficient water-use practice. InternationalCenter for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Aleppo, Syria. 16pp.
· Raman, A., S. Verulkar, N. Mandal, M. Variar, V. Shukla, J. Dwivedi, B. Singh, O. Singh, P. Swain, A. Mall, S. Robin, R. Chandrababu, A. Jain, T. Ram, S. Hittalmani, S. Haefele, H. Piepho, and A. Kumar. 2012. Drought yield index to select high yielding rice lines under different drought stress severities. Rice. 5: 1-12.
· Ramzi, E., A. Asghari, S. Khomari, and H. Mohammad doust Chamanabad. 2018. Investigation of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum Desf) lines for tolerance to aluminum stress condition. Journal of Crop Breeding. 10: 63-72. (In Persian).
· Reynolds, M., F. Dreccer, and R. Trethowan. 2007. Drought-adaptive traits derived from wheat wild relatives and landraces. Journal of Experimental Botany. 58: 177–186.
· Romesburg, C. 2004. Cluster analysis for researchers. Lulu.com, USA. 340 pp.
· Sharifi Al-Husseini, M., and M. Azat Ahmadi. 2012. Evaluation of the end drought tolerance of the season of durum wheat genotypes using drought index. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Research. 10: 361-367. (In Persian).
· Shewry, P. 2009. Inceasing the health benefits of wheat. FEBS Journal. 276: 71-71.
· Soleimani fard, A., and N. Naseri. 2013. Genetic diversity of durum wheat Lines from agronomic traits under dryland conditions. Jornal of Crop Ecophysiology. 28: 469-478. (In Persian).
· Stone, L.R., and A.J. Schlegel. 2006. Yield water supply relationships of grain sorghum and winter wheat. Agronomy Journal. 98: 1359-1366.
· Yaghooti Poor, A., E. Farshadfar, and M. Saeedi. 2017. Evaluation of bread wheat papillomavirus genotypes for drought tolerance using suitable combination method. Jornal Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 10: 247-256. (In Persian).
· Zali, H., O. Sofalian, T. Hasanloo, A. Asghari, and M. Zeinalabedini. 2016. Appropriate strategies for selection of drought tolerant genotypes in canola. Journal of Crop Breeding. 20: 77- 90. (In Persian).
Zali, H., O. Sofalian, T. Hasanloo, A. Asghari, and S.M. Hoseini. 2015. Appraising of drought tolerance relying on stability analysis indices in canola genotypes simultaneously, using selection index of ideal genotype (SIIG) technique, Introduction of new method. Biological Forum. 7: 703-711. (In Persian).
