در جست‌وجوی مفاهیم و مولفه‌های سکونت در معماری (از منظر اندیشه‌های مارتین هایدگر، کریستیان نوربرگ شولتز و معماران معاصر غرب)
محورهای موضوعی : دو فصل‌نامه فضای زیست
سعید قاسمی
1
,
سید نادر ضیائی
2
,
نوید جلائیان قانع
3
1 - دانشکده هنر و معماری دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد مشهد، ایران
2 - گروه معماری، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه شهید منتظری، مشهد، ایران
3 - گروه آموزشی هنر و معماری، دانشکده هنر و معماری دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد مشهد، مشهد، ایران
کلید واژه: انسان, محیط, مکان, مفهوم سکونت, مولفه‌های سکونت,
چکیده مقاله :
انسان امروزی با بحران‌های فرهنگی، اجتماعی و محیط‌زیستی بسیاری روبه‌رو است. یکی از مهم‌ترین عوامل ایجاد این بحران‌ها در حوزه معماری و شهرسازی، بنابر سکونت نامطلوب انسان بر روی کره زمین بروز یافته است که ذیل مفهومی کلی با عنوان بحران سکونت بدان پرداخته‌اند. آغاز سکونت انسان را می‌توان به سکنی‌گزیدن انسان‌های بدوی در غارها و تلاش آن‌ها برای رسیدن به مولفه‌هایی همچون امنیت و آسایش محیطی دانست اما مادامی که از زمان حضور آدمی بر روی کره خاکی در اعصار مختلف می‌گذرد سکونت به امری پیچیده و گسترده‌تری تبدیل شده است از این رو شناخت و فهم دقیق نسبت به مفهوم سکونت و مولفه‌های تاثیرگذار آن اعم از عوامل فیزیکی، ذهنی و روانی، در مسیر ارتقاء کیفیت زندگی انسان حائز اهمیت است به این منظور هدف این پژوهش ارائه چارچوب مفهومی برای فهم بهتر مولفه‌های سکونت در معماری از منظر صاحب‌نظران حوزه سکونت است. پژوهش حاضر با روش تحقیق کیفی و با تکیه بر راهبرد استدلال منطقی انجام پذیرفته است. نخست، به گردآوری اطلاعات از طریق مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای و اسنادی در آراء صاحب‌نظران منتخب (مارتین هایدگر، کریستیان نوربرگ شولتز، آموس راپوپورت، ریچارد راجرز، کریستوفر الکساندر، چارلز جنکس، رابرت ونتوری) پرداخته شده است سپس با روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی، مولفه‌های سکونت از منظر صاحب‌نظران استخراج شده و با استدلال منطقی و مقایسه آراء صاحب نظران با یکدیگر به ارائه مدل مفهومی در باب سکونت پرداخته شده است. در این پژوهش پنجاه‌و‌چهار مولفه حائز اهمیت برای سکونت از منظر صاحب‌نظران استخراج گردید که با تطبیق این مولفه‌ها و دسته‌بندی آن‌ها، در شش گروه کلی ساماندهی شدند این آراء و نظرات در طیفی از مباحث مفهومی/نظری تا کالبدی/ عملی قرار می‌گیرند و هرچه از جنبه‌های عینی و کمی به سمت جنبه‌های ذهنی و کیفی به صورت توامان با هم حرکت کنیم سبب اعتلای کیفیت طراحی معماری و سکونت انسان در آن خواهد شد.
Today's human is facing many cultural, social, and environmental crises. Each of these crises can be investigated from different perspectives and opinions. One of the essential factors in creating these crises in architecture and urban planning has emerged due to the undesirable human dwelling on the planet, which has been discussed under the general concept of "dwelling crisis". The beginning of human dwelling can be seen as primitive people settling in caves and trying to meet several needs, such as security and environmental comfort. However, as long as the human presence on the earth has passed in different ages, the dwelling has become more complex and extensive. In different civilizations, the dwelling has undergone many changes in terms of concept and has become more complicated. The unbreakable, strong relationship between the dwelling and concepts such as place, space, and environment has made architecture one of the essential fields in defining the concept of dwelling. The concept of dwelling consists of different aspects, such as physical dwelling, mental dwelling, and imaginary dwelling. Considering the philosophical aspects of dwelling to achieve a deep understanding of the dwelling is crucial given the correspondent relationship of these levels with humans and the environment. Looking through Western philosophy, many philosophers and experts have expressed their opinions and thoughts about dwelling directly and indirectly. Therefore, accurate knowledge and understanding of the concept of dwelling and its influential components, including physical, mental, and psychological factors, is crucial in improving the quality of human life. To this end, this research aims to compare and categorize the perspectives of a selected number of experts in terms of the dwelling concept; it then provides a conceptual framework for a better understanding of the components of dwelling in architecture from the perspective of experts in this field. Looking through Western philosophy, one can find few philosophers equal to Martin Heidegger, who directly expressed his thoughts about dwelling. Also, Christian Norberg Schultz has generally reflected Heidegger's insights in architecture, emphasizing his thoughts' importance in understanding the concept of dwelling. Thus, based on the thoughts of the mentioned philosopher and those of several prominent contemporary architects, this study will seek to understand the components of the dwelling. The current research was conducted using a qualitative method and logical reasoning strategy. First, information has been collected through library and document studies based on selected experts' perspectives (Martin Heidegger, Christian Norberg Schultz, Amos Rapoport, Richard Rogers, Christopher Alexander, Charles Jenks, Robert Venturi). By focusing on the native dwelling, Amos Rapoport has written explicitly about the dwelling and proposed solutions to achieve the ideal settlement in the contemporary period. Richard Rogers has explained sustainable dwelling on the planet by proposing architecture and urban planning compatible with nature through clean energies. While criticizing modern architecture and urbanism, Christopher Alexander has found the timeless way of building in a non-linear and non-tree dwelling. Charles Jenks has been the representative of Postmodernism in architecture and compared the architecture influenced by the role of people and their characteristics with elitist architecture in achieving an ideal settlement. Along with Charles Jenks, Robert Venturi has also explained the ideal settlement in the context of Postmodernist Architecture with features such as contrast and complexity and bringing back the decorations to Postmodernist Architecture. Through a qualitative content analysis, the components of the dwelling were then extracted from the perspective of the experts; based on logical reasoning, perspective comparisons, and categorizing the extracted components, a conceptual model of the dwelling was also presented. In this research, fifty-four essential dwelling components were extracted based on the perspective of experts; these components were then compared and categorized into six main groups. These perspectives are placed in a range of topics from "conceptual/ theoretical" to "physical/ practical," They show that the levels of dwelling begin with quantitative and objective needs and finally end with reflecting the most transcendental needs representing the qualitative themes. All these components have a complex and unbreakable relationship and are steps that, without each other, cannot become the basis for the transcendence of human settlement; therefore, the more aspects of these components are considered together in the design process, the higher the quality of architectural design and human dwelling.
_||_
