Analysis of Masonry Infill Panels Retrofitted with FRP Sheets in R/C Frames
محورهای موضوعی : Structural EngineeringHosein Parastesh 1 , Murat Saatcioglu 2
1 - Associate Professor of Civil Engineering Department of Civil Engineering, University of Science and Culture, Tehran, Iran
2 - Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. E-mail: Murat.Saatcioglu@uOttawa.ca
کلید واژه: Finite element model, Retrofit, nonlinear analysis, seismic loading, Reinforced Concrete, Masonry infill, FRP sheet,
چکیده مقاله :
Masonry infill walls are often used as non-structural elements. According to the past structural failure, ignorance of interaction between infill walls and enclosed frame may lead to the different seismic response for non-ductile building frames. The main contribution of this paper is to analytically investigate the behavior of reinforced concrete with masonry infill panels as participating structural. In doing so, a finite element model based on an equivalent strut method is conducted to represent the behavior of masonry panels. The strut model is calibrated using the results of the companion experimental program, which examined the cyclic behavior of infill panels with and without FRP sheets. Accordingly, a nonlinear spring element and a shell element are used to simulate the behavior of masonry strut elements and FRP sheets, respectively. The nonlinear static analysis (Push over analysis) is accomplished using SAP2000 [1] structural analysis software for a 10-story building with FRP sheets subjec
[1] SAP2000 Integrated Finite Elements Analysis and Design of Structures.” Referenced an Tutorial Manual Ver. 6.2 Beta, June 1998.
[3] Binici, B., Ozcebe, G., and Ozcelik, R. “Analysis and design of FRP composites for seismic retrofit of infill walls in reinforced concrete frames”, Infrastructure Composites under Extreme Loadings, Volume 38, Issues 5–6, pp. 575–583, 2006.
[4] Almusallam, T. and Al-Salloum, Y. "Behavior of FRP Strengthened Infill Walls under In-Plane Seismic Loading." J. Compos. Constr., 11:3(308), 308-318, 2007.
[5] Atkinson, R.H., & Kingsley, R.G., “Comparison of the Behavior of Clay and Concrete Masonry Prisms in Compression.” Technical Report, Atkinson-Noland & Assoc., Boulder, CO, 1975.
[6] Lunn, D. and Rizkalla, S. "Strengthening of Infill Masonry Walls with FRP Materials." J. Compos. Constr., 206-214, 2011.
[7] Ozbakkaloglu, T. and Saatcioglu, M. "Tensile Behavior of FRP Anchors in Concrete." J. Compos. Constr., 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2009)13:2(82), 82-92, 2009.
[8] El-Sokkary, H. and Galal, K. "Seismic Behavior of RC Shear Walls Strengthened with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer." J. Compos. Constr., 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000364, 603-613, 2013.
[15] Serrato, F., “Seismic Retrofitted of URM Infill Panels in Reinforced Concrete Frame Using FRP Sheets.” M.A.Sc. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, Canada, 2002.
[16] Stafford Smith, B., “Lateral stiffness of infilled frames.” Journal of the Structural Division (ASCE): 88(6): 183–199, 1962.
[17] Stafford Smith, B., “Methods for predicting the lateral stiffness and strength of multi-storey infilled frames.” Building Science: 2: 247–257, 1967.
[18] Mainstone, R. J., & Weeks G. A., “The influence of bounding frame on the racking stiffness and strength of brick walls.” Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Brick Masonry, Stoke-on-Trent, UK,: 165–171, 1970.
[19] Holmes, M., “Steel frames with brickwork and concrete filling.” Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers: 19(6501): 473–478, 1961.
[20] Stafford Smith, B., “Behavior of square infilled frames.” Journal of the Structural Division (ASCE): 92(1): 381–403, 1966.
[21] Hendry, A., “Structural Brickwork.” Macmillan, London, 1981.
[22]Paulay, T., & Priestley, M. J. N., “Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings.” John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Toronto, 1992.