Numerical Investigation of Subgrade Reaction Coefficient in Sand Soils of Bandar Abbas City
محورهای موضوعی : Structural Engineering
Adel Asakereh
1
(Civil engineering department, Faculty of engineering, University of Hormozgan)
Masood Mossafa
2
(Graduate Student, Civil Engineering Department, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran)
کلید واژه: Elasticity coefficient, Mat foundation, Subgrade reaction coefficient, Bandar Abbas City,
چکیده مقاله :
The soil-foundation interaction is one of the most important issues in geotechnical engineering that deals with studying the soil behavior subjected to the side loading. Winkler’s model is the first and simplest method for consideration of the soil-foundation interaction. It is vitally important to determine the coefficient of subgrade reaction of the soil. Since several methods have been provided to estimate the coefficient of subgrade reaction up to now, this research is conducted to choose a ground characteristic in Bandar Abbas (IRAN). To do so, the obtained results from the proposed experimental formulas are compared with corresponding values of the behavioral models to determine the coefficient of subgrade reaction. In addition finite element analysis is performed using Plaxis software. The result of this paper shows that the finite element method is more compatible than Biot's method. Results also showed an increasing footing diameter which leads to the decrease of the Ks. This fact is because of an increasing load area which concluded to the increasing of the settlement. It is found that with increasing each of the strength parameters of the soil ( ) can be expected an effect on increasing the subgrade reaction; although this increase depends on footing diameter. Also, in sand soils, the cohesion of the soil is more effective on the increase of the subgrade reaction coefficient than the internal friction angle.
[1] Terzaghi, K., "Evalution of conefficients of subgrade reaction". Geotechnique. 5(4): p. 297-326, 1955.
[2] Bond, D., "The influence of foundation size on settlement". Geotechnique. 11 (2): p. 121-143, 1961.
[3] Teng, W.C.-Y., "FOUNDATION DESIGN", 1962.
[4] Bjerrum, L. and A. Eggestad." Interpretation of loading test on sand", in Proceedings of European Conference in Soil Mechanics. 1963.
[5] Broms, B.B., "Lateral resistance of piles in cohesive soils", Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division. 90 (2): p. 27-64., 1964
[6] Bowles, J., "Foundation analysis and design", McGraw-Hill Book Company., NY. 1982.
[7] Parry, R., "Estimating foundation settlements in sand from plate bearing tests", Geotechnique. 28 (1): p. 107-118, 1978.
[8] Arnold, M., "Prediction of footing settlements on sand", Ground Engineering. 13 (2) , 1980.
[9] Vesic, A., "Bending of beams resting on isotropic elastic solid", Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division. 87 (2): p. 35-54, 1961.
[10] Winkler, E., "Theory of elasticity and strength", Dominicus Prague, Czechoslovakia, 1867.
[11] Suoqing, Z., Z. Xiping, and P. Haili, "Study on foundation soil coefficient of subgrade reaction", Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering. 1 (7): p. 1109-1112, 2005.
[12] Larkela, A., M. Mengelt, and T. Stapelfeldt. "Determination of distribution of modulus of subgrade reaction", in Proc., 18th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, French Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (CFMS), Paris, France. 2013.
[13] Dinçer, İ., "Models to predict the deformation modulus and the coefficient of subgrade reaction for earth filling structures", Advances in Engineering Software. 42 (4): p. 160-171, 2011.
[14] Ding, D.Y. "Discussion on Determination Methods for Coefficient of Subgrade Reaction in Response Displacement Method in Applied Mechanics and Materials", Trans Tech Publ. 2014.
[15] Barmenkova, E.V. and A.V. Matveeva, "Calculation of Plates of Variable Rigidity on Elastic Foundation with Variable Coefficient of Subgrade Reaction", Procedia Engineering. 111: p. 97-102. , 2015
[16] Kobayashi, N., et al., "Estimation of horizontal subgrade reaction coefficient by inverse analysis", Computers and Geotechnics. 35 (4): p. 616-626. , 2008
[17] Liao, S. "Estimating the coefficient of subgrade reaction for plane strain conditions", in Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Geotechnical Engineering. 1995.
[18] Plaxis, B., "User’s manual of PLAXIS", AA Balkema Publishers. 2002.
[19] Lin, P.-S., L.-W. Yang, and C.H. Juang, "Subgrade reaction and load-settlement characteristics of gravelly cobble deposits by plate-load tests", Canadian geotechnical journal. 35 (5): p. 801-810, 1998.
[20] Vesic, A. "Beams on elastic subgrade and the Winkler's hypothesis", in Proceedings, 5th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. 1961.
[21] Biot, M., "Bending of an infinite beam on an elastic foundation", Zeitschrift fiir Angewandte Maihematik und Mechanik. 2 (3): p. 165-184, 1922.
[22] Horvath, J.S., "Modulus of subgrade reaction: new perspective", Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 109 (12): p. 1591-1596, 1983.
[23] Anderson, J.B., F. Townsend, and L. Rahelison, "Load testing and settlement prediction of shallow foundation", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 133 (12): p. 1494-1502, 2007.
[24] Mosallanezhad, M., N. Hataf, and A. Ghahramani, "Three dimensional bearing capacity analysis of granular soils, reinforced with innovative grid-anchor system", Iranian Journal of Science and Technology. 34 (B4): p. 419, 2010.
[25] Sadrekarimi, J. and M. Akbarzad, "Comparative study of methods of determination of coefficient of subgrade reaction", Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 14: p. 1-14, 2009.
[26] Ismael, N.F., "Allowable pressure from loading tests on Kuwaiti soils", Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 22 (2): p. 151-157, 1985.
[27] Marto, A., et al., "Foundation Size Effect on Modulus of Subgrade Reaction on Sandy Soils", Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 17, 2012.
[28] Ismael, N. and H. Al-Sanad, "Plate loading tests on weakly cemented surface desert sands", Geotechnical Engineering. 24 (2) , 1993.
