Group-Work Dynamics: Its effects on EFL IELTS Candidates’ Structural Accuracy and Self-Regulation
محورهای موضوعی : Journal of Teaching English Language Studies
Zahra Zohoorian
1
(English Department, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran)
Khalil Motallebzadeh
2
(English Department, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran)
Mahshid Khazaee
3
(English department, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran)
کلید واژه:
چکیده مقاله :
Group-work dynamics has been assumed to explain a great part of impact in language learningand teaching in specific contexts or for particular skills. In the same vein, structural accuracy hasbeen significant in foreign language learning. Today, foreign language learning is not limited tothe classroom environment. In addition, it encompasses the learner’s lives, so that selfregulation’srole seems to be prominent. Accordingly, this study explored the effect of groupworkdynamics on EFL IELTS candidates’ structural accuracy and self-regulation. The findingsof this quasi-experimental mixed-method study revealed that group-work dynamics did not havea significant effect on the structural accuracy and self-regulation of the participants. Overall, asthe analysis of the open-ended questions confirmed, the employment of Group-work Dynamicswas not appealing to the students as they emphasized that learning grammatical points andstructural notes requires more control of the teacher rather than peers. Moreover, theyhighlighted that they believed that group work and other tasks need to be practiced in aconversation class to enhance the speaking skill.
Beebe, S. A., & Masterson, J. T. (2003). Communicating in small groups: principles and
practices. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Beck, C., & Kosnik, C. (2006). Innovations in teacher education: A social constructivist
approach. Albany: SUNY Press.
Becker, K. L. (2003). Just Tell Me What to Do: Group Dynamics in a Virtual Environment.
Paper presented at the Women in Research Conference, 13-14 November, Rockhampton,
Australia.
Bernier, A., Carlson, S. M., & Whipple, N. (2010). From external regulation to self-regulation:
Early parenting precursors of young children’s executive functioning. Child
Development, 81(1), 326-339.
Boekaerts, M. & Corno, L. (2005). Self-Regulation in the Classroom: A Perspective on
Assessment and Intervention. Applied psychology, 54(2), 199–231.
Brown, J. M., Miller, W. R., & Lawendowski, L. A. (1999). The Self-Regulation Questionnaire.
In L. VandeCreek & T. L. Jackson (Eds.), Innovations in clinical practice: A source book
(Vol. 17, pp. 281-289). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and
qualitative research. Boston: Pearson.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research method in education. London:
Routledge.
Dörnyei, Z., & Malderez, A. (1999). The role of group dynamics in foreign language learning
and teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duru, E., Duru, S. & Murat, B. (2014). Analysis of Relationships among Burnout, Academic
Achievement, and Self-Regulation. Educational sciences: theory and practice, 14(4),
1274-1284.
Ehrman, M. & Dornyei, Z. (1998). Interpersonal dynamics in second language education.
California: Sage Publications.
Ellis, N, C. (1998). Emergenism, connectionism and language learning. Language Learning, 48,
631-64.
Ellis, R. (2008). Investigating grammatical difficulty in second language learning: Implications
for second language acquisition research and language testing. International Journal of
Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 4-22.
Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.),
Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (pp. 8-33). New York: Teachers
College Press.
Freeman, K. & Gahungu, A. (2013). Small Group Dynamics in Cross-Cultural Collaborative
field research: Voices from the field. International Journal of Educational Leadership,
8(2), 77-94.
Freeman, L., & Greenacre, L. (2011). An Examination of Socially Destructive Behaviors in
Group Work. Journal of marketing education, 33 (1), 5-17.
Garcia T., Pintrich P.R. (1996) Assessing Students’ Motivation and Learning Strategies in the
Classroom Context: The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. In: Birenbaum
M., Dochy F.J.R.C. (Eds) Alternatives in Assessment of Achievements, Learning
Processes and Prior Knowledge. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, 42. 319-
339.
Gorse, C. A., & Sanderson, A. M. (2007). Exploring group work dynamics. In D. Boyd. (Ed.),
Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ARCOM Conference (pp.295-296). United Kingdom:
Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (2003). Joining together: Group theory and group skills.
Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Kivunja, C. (2014). Do you want your students to be job-ready with 21st century skills? Change
pedagogies: a paradigm shift from Vygotskyian social constructivism to critical thinking,
problem solving and siemens' digital connectivism. International Journal of Higher
Education, 3(3), 81 – 91.
Lantolf, J. & Throne, S. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language
development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mart, C. (2013). Teaching Grammar in Context: Why and How? Theory and Practice in
Language Studies, 3(1), 124-129.
Miedijensky, S. & Lichtinger, E. (2016). Seminar for Master’s Thesis Projects: Promoting
Students' Self-Regulation. International journal of higher education, 5(4), 13-26.
Poupore, G. (2015). Measuring group work dynamics and its relation with L2 learners’ task
motivation and language production. Language Teaching Research, 20(6), 1–22.
Qureshi, M. A. & Stormyhr, E. (2012). Group dynamics and peer-tutoring a pedagogical tool for
learning in higher education. Education studies, 5(2), 118-124.
Rimmer, W. (2006). Measuring grammatical complexity: The Gordian knot. Language Testing,
23, 497-519.
Rogers, A. (2002). Teaching adults. Canada: Open University Press.
Rossin, D. & Hyland, T. (2010). Group Work-based Learning within Higher Education: An
integral ingredient for the personal and social development of students. Mentoring and
tutoring: partnership in learning, 11(2), 153-162.
Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-Regulation and Academic Learning: Self-Efficacy
Enhancing Interventions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.),
Handbook of Self-Regulation (Pp. 631-649). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B.J. (2007). Influencing Children’s Self-Efficacy and Self-
Regulation of Reading and Writing through Modeling. Reading and Writing Quarterly,
23, 7-25.
Siti Rohani, Z. (2007). Teaching of grammar: Teachers’ beliefs, instructional context, and
practices (Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis). Malaysia: Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Toseland, R., J., Jones, L. V., & Gellis, Z. D. (2004). Group dynamics. In C. D. Garvin, L. M.
Gutierrez, & M. J. Galinsky (Eds.), Handbook of social work with groups (pp. 13-31).
New York: Guilford Publications.
Zimmerman, B. (2008). Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background,
Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects. American Educational Research
Journal, 45, 166-183.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Cleary, T. J. (2009). Motives to self-regulate learning: A Social cognitive
account. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp.
247-264). New York, NY: Routledge.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic
achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
