The Impact of Posing (Lead in) Pre-reading Questions on Reading Engagement of Iranian EFL Learners: Focusing on Extensive Reading
محورهای موضوعی : Journal of Teaching English Language Studiesکلید واژه: L2 reading, reading engagement, extensive reading, pre-reading activities,
چکیده مقاله :
The significance and effectiveness of pre-reading activities in the contexts of both ESL and EFL has been acknowledged by many researchers. If students lack the required background knowledge, a teacher must activate students’ background knowledge or offer background information prior to reading a text. The present study aimed at investigating the role of pre-reading questions plus extensive reading in affecting the reading engagement of Iranian EFL learners. Participants of the study included two groups of 30 EFL learners with similar language proficiency. Reading engagement was measured using Reading Engagement Index developed by Wigfield and Guthrie (2004). Language learners were pretested on reading engagement and it was found that the two groups of the study were not significantly different in terms of reading engagement. Afterwards, one group received extensive reading plus pre-reading questions and another group received just extensive reading. The two groups’ reading engagement was measured after treatment to explore the effect of treatment on reading engagement of language learners. The results of paired samples and independent samples t-test indicated that pre-reading plus extensive reading was more successful in enhancing reading engagement of language learners compared to extensive reading.
Bell, T. (2001). Extensive Reading: Speed and Comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 1(1). 28-42.
Brophy, J. (1999). Perspectives of classroom management. In H. J. Freiberg (Ed.), Beyond
behaviorism: Changing the classroom management paradigm ( pp. 43–56). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Brown, J.D. (Eds.). (2007). Understanding research in second language learning: A teacher’s
guide to statistics and research design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carrell , P. L., & Eisterhold, J.C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL
Quarterly, 17(4), 553-573.
Celce – Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston: Heile & Heinle.
Cho, S., Xu, Y., & Rhodes, J.A. (2010). Examining English Language Learners’ motivation of and engagement in reading: A qualitative study. The Reading Matrix, 10(2), 205-221.
Conrad, R., & Donaldson, J.A. (2004). Engaging the Online Learner: Activities and Resources for Creative Instruction. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Dreyer, C.& Nel, C. (2003). Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment. System, 31(3), 349-365.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). Motivational beliefs, Values, and Goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132.
Fujita, K., & Noro, T. (2009). The effects of 10-minute extensive reading on the reading speed, comprehension and motivation of Japanese high school EFL learners. Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan, 20(1), 21–30.
Grabe, W. (1998). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(4), 375–406.
Guthrie, J. T. (1996). Educational contexts for engagement in literacy. The Reading Teacher, 49(4), 432-445.org/articles/handbook/guthrie.
Guthrie, J. & Cox, Kathleen. (2001).Classroom Conditions for Motivation and Engagement in
Reading. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 283-302.
Guthrie, J.T., & Knowles, K.T. (2001). Promoting Reading Motivation. In J. Verhoeven & C.E.
Snow (Eds.), Literacy and Motivation: Reading engagement in individuals and groups (159-176). New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Ivey, G. & Broaddus, K. (2001). “Just Plain Reading”: A survey of what makes a student want to
read in middle school classrooms. 36(3), 350-377.
Jacobs, G. M., DuFon, P., & Hong, F. C. (1994). L1 and L2 vocabulary glosses in L2 reading passages: Their effectiveness for increasing comprehension and vocabulary knowledge. Journal of Research in Reading, 17(1), 19-28.
Lao, C. Y. & Krashen, S. (2000). The impact of popular literature study on literacy development in EFL: More evidence for the power of reading. System, 28(3), 261–270.
Nishino, T. (2007). Beginning to read extensively: A case study with Mako and Fumi. Reading in Foreign Language, 19(2). 151-162.
Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers. London: Prentice.
Pazhakh, A. & Soltani, R. (2010). the effect of extensive reading on vocabulary development in EFL learners in Dehdasht language institute, practice and theory in systems of education, volume 5 number 4.
Rueda, R., MacGillivray, L. & Monzo, L. (2001). Engaged Reading: A Multilevel Approach to
Considering Sociocultural Factors with Diverse Learners. CIERA report #1-012. Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schraw, G., Flowerday, T. & Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing Situational Interest in the Classroom.
Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 211-224.
Turner, J. C., & Paris, S. G. (1995). How literacy tasks influence children’s motivation for literacy.
The Reading Teacher, 48(6), 662-673.
Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J., Tonks, S. (2004). Children’s motivation for reading: domain specificity and instructional influences. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(6).
Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Perencevich, C. P, Taboada, A. Klauda, S. L., Mcrae, A., & Barbosa,
P. (2008). Role of reading engagement in mediating effects of reading comprehension instruction on reading outcomes. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 431- 445.
