Politeness Strategies and Politeness Markers in Email Request Sent by Iranian EFL Learners to Professors
محورهای موضوعی : Journal of Teaching English Language StudiesElahe Rahmani 1 , Ramin Rahmany 2
1 - MA candidate, Islamic Azad University, Takestan Branch
2 - Islamic Azad University, Takestan Branch
کلید واژه: Politeness strategies, Syntactic Politeness Modifiers, Lexical Politeness Modifiers, Politeness Theory,
چکیده مقاله :
This study attempts to investigate politeness strategies and politeness markers in email-request sent byIranian male and female EFL learners to professors. The comparison between strategies used by malesand females in email-request were also analyzed. 52 actual emails of M.A students of TEFL studying atAzad University consisted the data in this research. To analyze the corpus, politeness strategies in eachemail were examined according to the four strategies adapted by Brown and Levinson's (1978) PolitenessTheory. Finally, the frequency of syntactic and lexical politeness modifiers in each email-request of maleand female were found and compared. The results showed that negative politeness strategy was the mostfrequent strategy used by males and females in email-requests. Also, embedding was the most frequentsyntactic politeness modifier and subjectivizers were the most frequent lexical politeness modifiers usedby both males and females in email-requests.
Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2007). Students writing e-mails to faculty: An examination of e-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 59-81.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Bunz, U., & Campbell, S. (2002). Accommodating politeness indicators in personal electronic mail s. Paper presented at the Association of Internet Research’s 3rd Annual Conference Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Retrieved December 24, 2009 from http://bunz.comm.fsu.edu/AoIR2002 politeness.pdf
Chen, C.-F. E. (2001). Making E-mail requests to professors: Taiwanese vs. American students. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics (St. Louis, MO Febuary 2001).
Chen, C.-F. E. (2006). The development of e-mail literacy: from writing to Peers to writing to authority figures. Language Learning & Technology, 10(2), 33-55
Duthler, K. W. (2006). The politeness of requests made via e-mail and voicemail: Support for the hyperpersonal model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 (2), article 6. Retrieved December 24, 2009 http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/duthler.html
Hayati, A. M., & Shokouhi, H. (2011). A Genre analysis of Reprint Request E-mail Written by EFL and Physics Professionals. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 3(3), 21-42
Izadi, A., & Zilaie, F. (2012). Politeness strategies in email exchanges in Persian. Journal of Comparative Literature and Culture (JCLC), 2(1), 86-90
Najeeb, Z., Maros, M., & Nor, N. (2012). Politeness In E-mails Of Arab Students In Malaysia. GEMA Online™ Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 125-144
Parvis, M. (2012). Politeness Accommodation in E-Mail Requests among Iranian Postgraduate Students of EFL. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature. 1(7), 127-136
Quraishi, S. (2009). The acquisition of politeness strategies by Afghan learners of English as a foreign language. Unpublishe master thesis Kansas state university.
Rafieyan, M. (2012). Evaluation of English Language Teaching Departments of Turkish and Iranian Universities in Terms of Politeness Strategies with Reference to Request. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 1(2), 226-241.
Reiter, R. (1997). Politeness phenomena in British English and Uruguayan Spanish: the case of requests. A journal of English and American studies ,159-168
