E-learning in EFL classes: a facilitator for the learner or the teacher?
محورهای موضوعی : Journal of Teaching English Language Studies
Fatemeh Bagheri
1
(Islamic Azad University, Takestan Branch)
Shahla Roshani
2
(Payam Noor University)
Ghale Sheikhi
3
(Payam Noor University)
کلید واژه: Technology, Perception, e-learning, facilitator,
چکیده مقاله :
This study aimed at bringing into light the various aspects of the impact of e-learning on the EFLlearners and Teachers and the level of their satisfaction with the outcome of their implementationof e-learning in their classes. The participants consisted of EFL students and teachers that theyselected randomly from ELT teachers and learners of Shokoh institute in Zanjan. 100 studentsand 20 teachers were selected randomly. 60 students were female and 40 male and 12 teacherswere female and 8 of them were male. The range of the students’ age was 19-21 years old andteachers’ was 27-45 years old. In order to meet the criteria of the present research according tothe research question, two instruments were used, questionnaire and written protocol. Havingdone the administration of the questionnaire and written protocol in form of semi-structuredinterview, the researcher gathered the questionnaires and transcribed the interviews and then thedata was analyzed. The results show that the teachers have a more positive perception towarde-learning. So, e-learning is more facilitator for EFL teachers than students. According to theresults of this study and previous studies reported in literature, it can be said that e-learning isaccepted by students and the teachers in online learning environment.
Adrian, C.M.(2002). Developing E-Learning environment: applying technology & TQM
to distance learning. In Khosrow-Pour, M.(Eds.),Web-Based Instructional
Learning(PP.43-58).Hershey: IRM Press;
Bates, A.W.(2005). Technology, E-Learning and Distance Education. London & New York:
Routledge.
Bennett, C., F., & Monds, K., E. (2008). Online Courses The Real Challenge Is “Motivation”.
College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal, 6 (4), 1-6.
Dilts, R.B. (1999). Sleight of Mouth: The Magic of Conversational Belief Change. Capitola,
C.A: Meta Publication
Ellis, Rod (2004). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kenning, M.M.(2007). ICT & Language Learning From Print to the Mobile Phone, Palgrave:
Macmillan.
Leh, A.S.(1995). The Information in foreign language instruction. Paper submitted at the
annual national convention of the Association for Educational Reproduction
Liu, I., F., Chen, M., C., Sun, Y., Wible, D., & Kuo, C., H. (2008). Assessment of an online
learning community from Technology Acceptance Model in Education. Eighth IEEE
International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 8, 222- 224.
MacDonald & al.(2009). Adressing the e-learning contradiction. In P.Rogers, G.Berg,
J.Boettcher, C.Howard, L.Justice, K.Schenk(Eds.), Encyclopedia of Distance
Learning(PP.33-39). Hershey & New York: IGI Global
Negash, S., & Wilcox, M.(2005). E-Learning classifications: differences & similarities. In
S.Negasg, M.E.Whitman, A.B.Wos-zczynski, K.Hoganson, & H.Mattord(Eds.),
Handbook of Distance Learning for Real Time & Asynchronous Information
Technology Education(PP.1-23).Hershey: Information Science Reference.
Pearson, J., & Trinidad, S. (2005). OLES: An instrument for refining the design of e-learning
environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 396-404.
Rayburn, W.E., & Ramceprasad, A.(2002). Three generations for the use of distance learning
technology in higher education. In M.Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Web-Based Instructional
Learning (PP.27-42). IRM Press
Selim, M. H. (2003). An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites.
Computers and Education, 40(4), 343–360
Walker, S. L. (2005). Development of the Distance Education Learning Environments Survey
(DELES) for higher education. The Texas Journal of Distance Learning, 2 (1), 1-16.
JOURNAL OF TEACHING ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES, Vol. 3, NO. 4, Spring 2015
53
Wu, D., & Hiltz, S. R. (2004). Predicting learning from asynchronous online discussions. Journal
of Asynchronous Learning Network, 8(2), 139–152.
