The Effect of Pictorial Flashcards on the Sight Word Recognition in Kindergartens
محورهای موضوعی : Journal of Teaching English Language Studies
Haniyeh Hasani
1
(Department of English,Faculty of Literature and Foreign language, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch, Tabriz,)
Nesa Nabifar
2
(Department of English, Faculty of Literature and Foreign language, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch, Tabriz, Iran)
کلید واژه: Sight Word Recognition, Pictorial Flashcards, Kindergartens,
چکیده مقاله :
It was a quasi-experimental study because the study involved in training participants in twoclasses each containing about 5 to 6 years old pre-primary students. To this end, fifty studentsparticipated in the study who were studying at Misagh School in Tabriz. In order to makesure of their homogeneity, the researcher administered a pre-test. Based on the results, 40students were selected as the participants of the study. The two intact classes (twenty studentsin each class) were then randomly assigned into two experimental groups, each receiving onetype of sight word learning strategy. So, 30 words were given to the students as a pre-test. Tosee the effect of pictorial flashcard on sight word recognition, the necessary instruction wasgiven. At the end of the last session of the treatment, a post-test was given to each group andthen their mean scores were compared through Independent Sample T-test. The analysis ofthe results revealed significant difference in the efficiency of picture + text flashcard strategycompared to the text only strategy in the post-test. Findings of the present study are useful forEFL teachers, learners, language institutes, schools, and universities.
Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge,
MA: MIT. Press. Allington, R. L., & Walmsley, S. R. (1995).
Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., & Bryant, P. (2000). Phonological skills and comprehension
failure: A test of the phonological processing deficit hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An
Interdisciplinary Journal, 13, 31–56.
Carrell, P. L. & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema theory in ESL readers. TESOL
Quarterly, 17, 553-573.
Casey, S. D. (2008). A Comparison of within- and across-session progressive time
delay procedures for teaching sight words to individuals with cognitive delays. Behavior
Analyst Today, 9(3-4), 162-171.
JOURNAL OF TEACHING ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES, Vol. 6, NO. 3, Wintetr 2018
20
Dolch, E. W. (1936). A basic sight vocabulary. The Elementary School Journal, 36,
456-460. Dolch, E.W. (1939). A manual for remedial reading. Champaign, IL: Garrard.
Ehri, L. C. (2008). Development of Sight Word Reading: Phases and Findings. The
Science of Reading: A Handbook, 8, 135 – 154. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/9780470757642.
Falk, M., Band, M., & McLaughlin, T. F. (2003). The effects of reading racetracks and
flash cards on sight word vocabulary of three third grade students with specific learning
disability: A further replication and analysis. International Journal of Special Education,
18(2), 57-61.
Good, C. E. (2002). A grammar book for you and I…Oops, me! Herndon, VA: Capital
Books, Inc.
Gough, P. B., &. Tumner, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial
and Special Education, 7, 6 –10.
Harris, A. J., & Sipay, E. R. (1990). How to increase reading ability (9th ed.). White
Plains, NY: Longman.
Hood, J. (1977). Sight words are not going out of style. The Reading Teacher, 30(4),
379-382.
Jseph, L. M., & Nist, L. M. (2006). Comparing the effects of unkown-known ratios on
word-reading learning versus learning rates. Journal of Behavioral Educational, 15(2), 69-79.
Kamhi, A. G., & Catts, H. W. (1991). Language and reading: Convergences,
divergences, and development. In A. G. Kamhi & H. W. Catts (Eds.), Reading disabilities: A
developmental language perspective (1–34). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Allyn & Bacon.
Kaufman, L., McLaughlin, T. F., Derby, K., & Waco, T. (2011). Employing Reading
Racetracks and DI Flashcards with and without Cover, Copy, and Compare and Rewards to
Teach of Sight Words to Three Students with Learning Disabilities in Reading. Educational
Research Quarterly, 34(4), 27-50.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information
processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293-323.
Mangieri, J. N., & Kahn, M. S. (1977). Is the Dolch list of 220 basic sight words
irrelevant? The Reading Teacher, 30(6), 649-651.
JOURNAL OF TEACHING ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES, Vol. 6, NO. 3, Wintetr 2018
21
Meadan, H., Stoner, J. B., & Parette, H. P. (2008). Sight Word Recognition among
Young Children At-Risk: Picture-Supported vs. Word-Only. Assistive Technology Outcomes
and Benefits, 5(1), 45-58.
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of
word-recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties.
Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 85–101.
Rasinski, T. V., & Padak, N. (2008). From phonics to fluency: Effective teaching of
decoding and reading fluency in the elementary school. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Allyn &
Bacon.
Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001).
How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the
Public Interest, 2, 31–74.
Scott, J. A., & Ehri, L. C. (1990). Sight word reading in prereaders: Use of logographic
vs. alphabetic access routes. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 149-166.
Sheehy, K. (2005). Morphing Images: A Potential Tool for Teaching Word
Recognition to Children with Severe Learning Difficulties. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 36(2), 293-301.
Silbert, J., Carnine, D. W., & Stein, M. (1981). Direct instruction mathematics.
Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.) (1998). Preventing reading difficulties
in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Snowling, M. J. (2005). Literacy outcomes for children with oral language
impairments: Developmental interactions between language skills and learning to read. In H.
W. Catts & A. G. Kamhi (Eds.), The connections between language and reading disabilities
(pp. 55–75). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual
differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
JOURNAL OF TEACHING ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES, Vol. 6, NO. 3, Wintetr 2018
22
Storch, S. A., & Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to
reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 934
–947.
Stothard, S. E., & Hulme, C. (1995). A comparison of reading comprehension and
decoding difficulties in children. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension
difficulties (pp. 93–112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stuart, M., Masterson, J., & Dixon, M. (2000). Spongelike acquisition of sight
vocabulary in beginning readers? Journal of Research in Reading, 23(1), 12-27.
