Collaborative and Team Teaching in ESP Contexts
محورهای موضوعی : Journal of Teaching English Language StudiesSimindokht Vakilidousta 1 , Ramin Rahmani 2
1 - Department of English Language and Literature, Takestan University, Takestan, Tehran, Iran.
2 - Department of English Language and Literature, College of Humanities, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran
کلید واژه: ESP, Collaborative and team teaching, General English (GE), Subject teacher, Language teacher,
چکیده مقاله :
English for specific purposes is a crucial matter in English teaching that needs a lot of attention in our education systems. For this purpose, the present study was an attempt to investigate the ways of teaching ESP. Among eighty men in mechanical engineering from foreign brand vehicle manufacturing factory employees, 45 learners were chosen by placement test and they were put randomly in three groups. In first class, subject teacher taught, in second one, language teacher taught and in third classroom, both of them taught in cooperation with each other. The book that was taught was the same for all three groups and that was ESP for automotive mechanics for SAMT publication. At the end of the courses, an achievement test was held at the same time for all three classes. I used MANOVA tests for statistical analysis of variables which are final scores. The results supported the hypothesis which states that team teaching and cooperation between subject teacher and language teacher at the same time in one ESP class can be a good way of ESP teaching and the final result will be better.
Adeli Jam, Z. (2014). The Effect of Cooperative Learning of Technical words and Expressions among Students of Pharmacy. Global Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, Issue (15) 2014, pp. 45-55.
Ahmadi, M. Who should teach ESP? English teacher at the school of paramedical Shaheed Beheshti Medical University
Almagro Esteban, A. & Vallejo Marios, M. (2002). A Case Study of Collaboration Among the ESP Practitioner, the Content Teacher, and the Students. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 15 (2002): 7-21.
Anthony, L. English for Specific Purposes: What does it mean? Why is it different? Dept. of Information and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering
Bekir, S. (2009). Role of Functional Academic Literacy in ESP Teaching: ESP Teacher Training in Turkey for Sustainable Development. Uluslararası Sosyal Aratırmalar Dergisi The Journal of International Social Research Volume 2 / 9.
British Council (1980). Team Teaching in ESP. Produced in England by The British Council, Printing and Publishing Department, London.
Brown Faith, A., Collaborative Learning in the EAP Classroom: Students’ Perceptions.
Chang Ping, N. A discussion of team teaching in English for specific purposes (ESP) courses.
Cianflone, E. & Coppolino, R. (2009).English for Specific Purposes and Content Teacher Collaboration: Report on a pilot Project. English for Specific Purposes Issue 3 (24), Volume 8, 2009.
Davison, CM. (2006). Collaboration Between ESL and Content Teachers: How Do We Know When We Are Doing It Right? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, v. 9 n. 4, p. 454-475.
Dove Mariaand Honigsfeld, A., from Molloy College (2010). ESL Co-teaching and Collaboration: Opportunities to Develop Teacher Leadership and Enhance Student Learning.
Dudley Evans, T & Jo St John, M (1998). Development in English for specific purposes, Cambridge University Press.
Honigsfeld , A. & Dove, M. (2008).Co-teaching in the ESL Classroom. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin.
Hutchinson, T. and Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes, a learning centered approach, Cambridge University press, Rahnama publication.
Khales Haghighi, J., & Abdollahi, Kh (2014). On the Efficacy of Team Teaching and Station Teaching in the Enhancement of Students’ Reading Comprehension in an EAP Situation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98 (2014)882–890.
Maleki, A. ESP Teaching: A Matter of Controversy. Zanjan Medical Sciences University
Nagano, R., & Koyama, Y. (2000). Is There a Role for Engineering Teachers in the Language Classroom?
Nunan, D. Syllabus Design. Oxford university press. Published by Jangal publication.
Pouyan, P. (2012). A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Teaching ESP by the EFL Teacher and the Subject-matter Teacher: Students’ Point of View.
Riahipour, P. & Nejad Ansari, D. & Saba, Z. (2014). The Effects of a Collaborative Teaching Program on Iranian EFL Learners’ Language Proficiency. International Journal of Basic Sciences & Applied Research. Vol., 3 (12), 868-873, 2014.
Soltani, R & Shafaei, N. (2013). Implementation of Team Teaching in an ESP Program and the Investigation of its Effectiveness on Students of Computer science ESP Vocabulary Achievement.
Spasić, D., Janković, A. & Stojković, M. (2015).ESP Course design for the 21stcentury: Team teaching and hybrid learning. Language for specific purposes (LSP) SYNTHESIS.
Zohrabi, M. & Sabouri, H. (2014).Investigating the effectiveness of the Co- Teaching VS. Traditional teaching Iranian EFL context. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, Volume 6(4), August 2014; 202 – 219.
