نقش سبک‌های تفکر و تصمیم‌گیری در رغبت به ازدواج دانشجویان
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه تعالی مشاوره و روان درمانی
محسن جدیدی
1
(
دانشیار، گروه روان شناسی،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، واحد شهرقدس، تهران ، ایران.
)
رقیه حسینی
2
(
کارشناسی ارشد روان شناسی عمومی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد شهرقدس، تهران، ایران.
)
جاوید پیمانی
3
(
استادیار، گروه روانشناسی ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، واحد شهرقدس، تهران،ایران.
)
کلید واژه: رغبت به ازدواج , سبک های تفکر, سبک های تصمیم گیری,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف: تحلیل واقعیت‌های جامعه نشان می‌دهد که در دانشجویان، رغبت به ازدواج کاهش یافته است. این کاهش ممکن است به دلیل تغییراتی در سبک‌های تفکر و تصمیم‌گیری باشد که تأثیر چشم‌گیری بر تمامی جوانان و جوامع دارد و می‌تواند در زمینه‌های مختلف جامعه به ویژه در ازدواج و روابط جوانان تاثیرگذار باشد. پژوهش حاضر به منظور بررسی سبک‌های تفکر و تصمیم‌گیری در رغبت به ازدواج دانشجویان صورت گرفت.
روش: مطالعه حاضر توصیفی از نوع همبستگی _پیش‌بینی بوده و جامعه آماری پژوهش را دانشجویان کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شهر قدس در سال تحصیلی ۱۴۰۱-۱۴۰۲ تشکیل دادند که نمونهای به حجم ۲۲۹ نفر با نرم‌افزار G*power به صورت غیرتصادفی، در دسترس انتخاب گردید.
یافته‌ها: یافته‌ها نشان داد که از بین مؤلفههای سبک‌های تفکر، سبک تفکر محافظه‌کارانه (β=0.123, df=2.226 P<0.05) و سبک تفکر الیگارشی (β=0.185, df=2.226 P<0.01) می‌تواند رغبت به ازدواج را پیش‌بینی کند. همچنین از بین مولفه‌های سبک تصمیم‌گیری، مولفه سبک وابستگی (β=0.232, df=2.226 P<0.01) می‌تواند رغبت به ازدواج را پیش‌بینی کند.
نتیجه‌گیری: با توجه به یافته‌ها، جوانان نسبت به ازدواج و مسولیتهای ازدواج محتاطانهتر و ترجیح میدهند برحسب تفکر محافظهکار با آداب و هنجارهای فعلی پیش روند؛ همچنین براساس سبک تفکری الیگارشی در اولویتبندی کارهای مهم زندگی دچار چالش هستند و ظاهراً این بدان دلیل است که بیشتر در صدد تثبیت شرایط شغلی هستند تا ازدواج و جفتگزینی.
Purpose: Societal realities indicate a decrease in the desire for marriage among students. This decline may be attributed to changes in thinking styles and decision-making processes, which significantly influence youth and communities, particularly in areas such as marriage and youth relationships. This study aims to investigate thinking styles and decision-making in the desire for marriage among students.
Methodology: The present study is descriptive correlational research. The research population consisted of master's degree students at Islamic Azad University, Shahre Qods Branch, in the academic year 2022-23. A sample of 229 individuals was selected non-randomly, using G*power software, based on availability and purposive sampling.
Findings: Statistical results indicate that among the components of thinking styles, the conservative thinking style (β = 0.044, df = 2.226, P < 0.001) and the elitist thinking style (β = 0.009, df = 2.226, P < 0.001) can predict the desire for marriage. Additionally, among the components of decision-making style, the dependency component (β = 0.001, df = 2.226, P < 0.001) can predict the desire for marriage.
Conclusion: According to the results, young people are more cautious about marriage and the responsibilities of marriage and prefer to proceed according to conservative thinking with current customs and norms; Also, based on the oligarchy's thinking style, they have a challenge in prioritizing the important tasks of life, and apparently this is the reason that they are more interested in stabilizing their job conditions than marriage and partner selection.
Aghaasi, M., & Falahminbashi, F. (2015). Iranian youth's attitude towards marriage, choosing a spouse and starting a family. Women's Journal, 6(1), 1-21 (Persian) [Link]
Allwood, C. M., & Salo, I. (2012). Decision-making styles and stress. International Journal of Stress Management, 19(1), 34. [Link]
Armstrong, S. J., Cools, E., Zhang, L., & Sternberg, R. (2009). Cognitive styles and their relevance for business and management: A review of development over the past two decades. Perspectives on the nature of intellectual styles, 253-290. [Link]
Azar, E. C. (2009). Investigating the factors affecting the delay of marriage age in Iran, the sample studied in Golestan province. Sociology Quarterly, 4(4), 21-25. [Link]
Bailo, L., Vergani, L., & Pravettoni, G. (2019). Patient preferences as guidance for information framing in a medical shared decision-making approach: the bridge between nudging and patient preferences. Patient preference and adherence, 2225-2231. [Link]
Beach, L. R., & Connolly, T. (2005). The psychology of decision making: People in organizations: Sage publications. [Link]
Brown, K. S., Schmidt, B., Morrow, C., & Rougeaux-Burnes, G. (2023). Pre-cohabitation conversations for relationships: Recommended questions for discussion. Contemporary family therapy, 45(2), 131-145. [Link]
Cantor, N., Acker, M., & Cook-Flannagan, C. (1992). Conflict and preoccupation in the intimacy life task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 644. [Link]
Carver, K., Joyner, K., & Udry, J. R. (2003). National estimates of adolescent romantic relationships. In Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior (pp. 37-70): Psychology Press. [Link]
Chen, S. (2022). Predictive Roles of Thinking Styles in Coping Strategies Among Mainland Postgraduate Students in Hong Kong. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 693637. [Link]
Cohen, P., Kasen, S., Chen, H., Hartmark, C., & Gordon, K. (2003). Variations in patterns of developmental transmissions in the emerging adulthood period. Developmental psychology, 39(4), 657. [Link]
Cohen, T. F., Strong, B., & DeVault, C. (2008). The marriage and family experience: Intimate relationships in a changing society: Thomson/Wadsworth. [Link]
Donalds, C., & Osei-Bryson, K.-M. (2020). Cybersecurity compliance behavior: Exploring the influences of individual decision style and other antecedents. International Journal of Information Management, 51, 102056. [Link]
Duncan, S., Barlow, A., & James, G. (2005). Why Don't They Marry-Cohabitation, Commitment and DIY Marriage. Child & Fam. LQ, 17, 383. [Link]
Duvander, A.-Z., & Kridahl, L. (2020). Decisions on marriage? Couples’ decisions on union transition in Sweden. Genus, 76(1), 22. [Link]
Eickmeyer, K. J., & Manning, W. D. (2018). Serial cohabitation in young adulthood: Baby boomers to millennials. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(4), 826-840. [Link]
Eisenfuhr, F. (2011). Decision making. In: New York, NY: Springer.
Furman, W., Brown, B. B., & Feiring, C. (1999). The development of romantic relationships in adolescence: Cambridge university press. [Link]
Hiekel, N., & Keizer, R. (2015). Risk-avoidance or utmost commitment? Dutch focus group research on cohabitation and marriage. Demographic Research, 32, 311-340. [Link]
Jordan, L. S. (2018). “My mind kept creeping back… this relationship can’t last”: Developing self-awareness of monogamous bias. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 30(2), 109-127. [Link]
Lee, J., Kim, H., Woo, J., Chang, S. M., Hong, J. P., Lee, D.-W., . . . Jeon, H. J. (2020). Impacts of remaining single above the mean marriage age on mental disorders and suicidality: a nationwide study in Korea. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 35(37). [Link]
Liptak, A. (2015). Supreme Court ruling makes same-sex marriage a right nationwide. The New York Times, 26, A1. [Link]
Mal, S. (2013). Knowledge and attitude towards marriage of currently married women in Paschim Medinipur district of West Bengal, India. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(8), 46-57. [Link]
Martines, L. Humanist marriages: A study of five families. The social world of the Florentine humanists, 1390-1460. [Link]
Mosalman, M., Atadokht, A., & Mahdavi, A. (2020). Evaluation of neuroscientific knowledge, thinking styles and teaching style preference of elementary school teachers in Amol city. Pouyesh in Humanities Education, 6(19), 101-118. [Link]
Ohlsson Wijk, S., Brandén, M., & Duvander, A.-Z. (2018). Committing to marriage? The role of marriage attitudes and gender equality among young cohabiters in Sweden. [Link]
Organization, C. R. https://www.sabteahval.ir/. [Link]
Piroozfar, S., & Hoseinee, S. (2016). The role of the family in the development of children's individual identity with an emphasis on religious teachings. Islamic social research, 22(111), 71-94 (Persian). [Link]
Porzoor, P., Narimani, M., Shojaei, A., & Ebrahimi, M. (2015). The role of hope (basis of Islamic attitude), life meaning and irrational beliefs in predicting tendency to marriage in university students. [Link]
Prager, K. J. (1986). Intimacy status: Its relationship to locus of control, self-disclosure, and anxiety in adults. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12(1), 91-109. [Link]
Rad, K. M., Zabihi, A., & Makarani, K. F. (2023). Relationship Between Attribution Styles and Inability to Make Decisions of Auditors Working in Institutions and Auditing Organizations. MEJDS, 13, 35-38. [Link]
Rani, P., & Agarwal, N. (2015). Thinking Styles: An Overview. Cosmos An International Journal of Art & Higher Education, 4(2), 1-3. [Link]
Rauer, A. J., Pettit, G. S., Lansford, J. E., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (2013). Romantic relationship patterns in young adulthood and their developmental antecedents. Developmental psychology, 49(11), 2159. [Link]
Riahi, M., & Khayatan, F. (2018). The relationship between attitudes toward parents, trust in interpersonal relationship and attitudes to premarital relationship with a desire to marry the young single in Isfahan city. Journal of Woman and Family Studies, 6(1), 469-492. [Link]
Sanders, P. R. (2008). The decision-making styles, ways of knowing, and learning strategy preferences of clients at a one-stop career center: Oklahoma State University. [Link]
Saqqezi, A., YazdaniEsfidvajani, H., & Nasr, S. (2020). The Role of Marriage Expectations in Predicting Desire for Marriage in Girl Students Experiencing Relationship with the Opposite Sex. Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi Journal (RRJ), 9(9), 131-138. [Link]
Savioni, L., Triberti, S., Durosini, I., & Pravettoni, G. (2023). How to make big decisions: A cross-sectional study on the decision making process in life choices. Current Psychology, 42(18), 15223-15236. [Link]
Schulenberg, J. E., Bryant, A. L., & O'MALLEY, P. M. (2004). Taking hold of some kind of life: How developmental tasks relate to trajectories of well-being during the transition to adulthood. Development and psychopathology, 16(4), 1119-1140. [Link]
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1995). Decision-making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and psychological measurement, 55(5), 818-831. [Link]
Seif, M. M., & Aref, M. (2015). Pathology of delay in marriage age of young Iranians. Cultural Engineering, 10(86), 74-89. [Link]
Shafir, E., Tversky, A., Smith, E., & Osherson, E. (2002). Decision making. Foundations of Cognitive Psychology, 601. [Link]
Shariatmadaree, M., & Navdan, S. F. S. (2014). Investigating the relationship between the functions of thinking styles and the academic achievement motivation of Payam Noor University students. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Psychology and Behavioral Sciences. [Link]
Sobhani, P. (2016). Investigating the reasons for increasing the age of marriage among young people. Tebian monthly, 105, 45-50 (Persian). [Link]
Soote, R. N., & Gadidi, M. (2019). Investigating the predictive role of family functioning and thinking style with the mediation of personal values and difficulty in deciding on the willingness of young people to marry. Psychology and behavioral sciences of Iran, 22(5), 91-102. [Link]
Stine, R., & Foster, D. (2011). Statistics for Business: Decision Making and: Addison-Wesley. [Link]
Stolyarov, N. O., Petrenko, E. S., Serova, O. A., & Umuralieva, A. S. (2020). The digital reality of the modern economy: new actors and new decision-making logic. Paper presented at the Digital Economy: Complexity and Variety vs. Rationality 9. [Link]
Zarean, M. (2018). Investigation of the reasons for delayed marriage from the viewpoint of female students in Tehran. Journal of Woman and Family Studies, 6(2), 86-110. [Link]
Zhang, L.F. (2017). The value of intellectual styles: Cambridge University Press. [Link]
Zhang, L.-f., & Sternberg, R. J. (2005). A threefold model of intellectual styles. Educational psychology review, 17, 1-53. [Link]
